Loading AI tools
 |
Hi NewsagentEU! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:01, 18 June 2017 (UTC) |
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:41, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:26, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello NewsagentEU. According to the record chart guidelines about the suitability of of music charts for inclusion in Wikipedia articles, charts which rank material from a single vendor or network (such as iTunes) should never be placed in discography tables or tables of charts. So the iTunes Singapore chart should not be included in the chart table in the article Mall (song). Please, don't revert back, or discuss instead. Sar2de (talk) 12:54, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Hello again NewsagentEU. As the Singapore's Digital Songs Chart is solely compiled based on the iTunes music sales download figures, then it should never be placed in discography tables or tables of charts per WP:SINGLEVENDOR / WP:SINGLENETWORK. iTunes is listed as a deprecated chart at WP:BADCHARTS. Sar2de (talk) 16:53, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Hello NewsagentEU. Why do you leave me unwarranted warning messages in the article's revision history instead of discussing content and trying to reach consensus? From the beginning I'm trying to substantiate my concerns by providing content guidelines, while you don't assume good faith. Content guidelines at WP:SINGLEVENDOR, which you are choosing to ignore, clerly indicate that charts which rank material from a single vendor should never be placed in tables of charts, and if there is any doubt left, iTunes is listed as a deprecated chart at WP:BADCHARTS. I'm not reverting back for the sake of civility and to stop a edit war, but I'm opening a discussion using the talk page, and I'm asking for third opinions.Sar2de (talk) 10:01, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- NewsAgentEU, you need to stop with the WP:OWN comments and threats. As Sar2de has correctly pointed out, iTunes is listed on WP:BADCHARTS and is a WP:SINGLEVENDOR, so it has been removed again. I've reported you to an administrator because you seem to be unwilling to discuss content and would rather edit war and threaten Sar2de from editing the article again, when their edits were justified. Ss112 06:09, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- Ss112, I command you to lower the tone and tame your language when addressing ME. You have been reported to Wikipedia and this issue will be mediated by them. Additionally, I shall file a lawsuit against you should further mobbing and condescending messages of this nature will be received now or in the future. Hereby, I forbid you to contact me until Wikipedia's decision.
- It's not "the" Wikipedia, it's just Wikipedia. I don't see where you reported me or how you even did. You can't "forbid" another user to contact you; I don't think you're aware of how things work here. I'm not concerned about your silly threat, but threats of legal action against another user usually result in blocks per Wikipedia:No legal threats. Ss112 21:35, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- Ss112, Troll, you have been reported to the relevant authorities of which you seem to be clearly unaware, and to my lawyer as well, along with Sar2de and another person involved in this mobbing case. You chose Wikipedia for your personal devious double-dealings, but you will soon deal with Competent Authorities.
Hi NewsagentEU. Per the above messages please take care to adhere to our guidelines when editing articles. If you have an edit reverted or you find yourself in a content dispute with another editor the place to resolve the disagreement is usually on the article talk page. No one owns any of our articles so we have to work collaboratively on them. Thank you for all of your work on the project. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 13:06, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Eugent Bushpepa - Mall (Instrumental sample).ogg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:30, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Mall (song) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ss112 20:34, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- Tread carefully NewsagentEU. Your editing is becoming disruptive. If you have a disagreement with Ss112 take it to the article talk page. No more edit warring. I don't want to address this subject again. -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:58, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 21:51, 10 May 2018 (UTC)Note to reviewing admin CU-confirmed block evasion as User:JonathanAUS. Yunshui 雲水 10:36, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
NewsagentEU (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #21495 was submitted on May 11, 2018 12:23:19. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 12:23, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
NewsagentEU (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #21499 was submitted on May 11, 2018 15:01:30. This review is now closed.
Hi @NewsagentEU: You speak above of "Competent Authorities", but Wikipedia disputes are handled by the volunteer Wikipedia community and volunteer Wikipedia admins. The WP:UTRS system is intended for use when an unblock request here on your talk page would not be appropriate - typically if you do not have access to your talk page, or if your unblock request would require the revelation of private information that should not be exposed in public. As neither of those conditions appears to be applicable, your unblock appeal should be made here on your talk page by following the instructions in the block message. And for information, WP:UTRS requests are handled by the exact same volunteer admins who handle requests made here on your talk page, not by any other category of "Competent Authorities". Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:22, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
I am unsure as to what gave you even the slightest impression that by "Competent Authorities" I have implied Wikipedia (?!). That person known as "Ss112" has been reported to the Competent LEGAL Authorities in Australia. My intention has been stated clearly and remains effective until this case been solved through legal means. That person known as "Ss112" has violated the three-revert rule, stubbornly vandalized articles in which I gave ninety percent of contribution, then persistently left personal attacks on my talk page as well as edit summary, and yet, that person is still around due to some of their "privileges" in here, whilst my account remains blocked due to it being relatively new. "Bite the newcomers" case at its worst! <Personal attacks removed>.
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Ad Orientem (talk) 12:58, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Wikiwand in your browser!
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.
