User talk:Mvcg66b3r/Archives/2022/March

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Mvcg66b3r. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Orphaned non-free image File:New WECP logo 2018.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New WECP logo 2018.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Lead paragraphs (KMEX-DT)

There were two reasons why we modified the lead paragraph of KMEX-DT.

• Feedback received during GAN: I received feedback from Lee Vilenski during GA review (Talk:KMEX-DT/GA1) that the lead had a WP:SEAOFBLUE issue. SEAOFBLUE occurs when there are two or three links back to back, e.g. "Spanish-language television station licensed to Los Angeles". It is discouraged by the Manual of Style.

• Reducing jargon: These leads can be tough reading for people unfamiliar with the topic. (He notes he further revised the lead after my tweaks.) At GAN, sometimes the nominators of pages are people not as intimately familiar with American TV. That's good! The whole point of my style of writing is to reduce the heavy, jargon-filled, dense prose long associated with TVS pages. One should not need to be an industry wonk to read our contributions to the encyclopedia.

The reason I didn't touch that part of the lead was, sadly, because I knew from past experience that you were going to come in and undo any changes I would make. I should not have to think like that. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 16:38, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Of course, you would have to do that to the lead paragraphs of every TV station article. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 17:51, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

WBSF is now broadcasting in ATSC 3.0

Yesterday, WBSF began broadcasting in ATSC 3.0. As a result, the channel 25.2 designation is now 46.1 and the Charge! channel is now on WSMH on channel 46.3. There is no more 25.2 designation for WEYI. Steelbeard1 (talk) 16:04, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

See here: "Denoting ATSC 1.0 simulcasts in infoboxes and subchannel tables" Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:09, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Perhaps you should talk to @Sammi Brie: about this. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:29, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

@Steelbeard1: Look at KJZZ-TV#Technical information as the model page for how to represent all this. It can get complicated, but once we have a nice and neat list of the services WBSF is broadcasting in 3.0, there should be two tables. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 16:40, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

The WBSF situation is simpler regarding moving its 1.0 channels as only the Charge! TV channel had to be moved. WBSF was already simulcasted by WEYI on channel 25.2. So that was simply changed to 46.1 at WEYI's end. Co-operated WSMH was the station that picked up the Charge! channel on physical channel 18.4 and the display channel of 46.3. Steelbeard1 (talk) 16:55, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

The WEYI table should have 25.1 / 25.3 / 25.4 / 46.1. I edited it to the standard for displaying this information. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 19:14, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

Your recent editing history at KWCH-DT shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I calculate five reverts in 13 hours. Please calm down. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:07, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:El Jannah logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:El Jannah logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 22 March 2022 (UTC)