Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
![]() | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
I am a user of the product and saw the article was deleted and your name was in it. Can you explain how to get it accepted? Search the name online return many products. There are concerns of technocracy against this handy product, not helping censorship, so it discontinued Intodefinitecubic (talk)
You might want to revoke talk page access. They're spamming empty unblock templates and large images. MaterialsPsych (talk) 07:46, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
"Kindly do needful"as it is increasingly unwelcome. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thank you from keeping Wikipedia clean from pesty vandals, you deserve this award!
Kind regards, Alon Alush. 😄 |
Thank you for keeping Wikipedia safe from harm. You are doing a very important public service and a very important person with a very fulfilling existence that I am sure everybody appreciates. Without you, I am not sure how the Internet would function.
Hello Materialscientist, this is regarding your revert and block of my IP. I'm sorry that you considered my edits to be vandalism. A user other than me converted the redirect to a short article without sources. I reworked the article with a couple of sources in good faith in the intention of creating a short stub; specifically adding Template:Sources exist that it might be saved, and it did feel like Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers on the receiving end. I have created Talk:Zammis Clark, I welcome your input. 2A00:23C4:41A:9601:D5E0:2228:EE57:4951 (talk) 07:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
(Personal attack removed) 176.20.16.239 (talk) 09:18, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi, this IP range is possibly a sock of banned User:Lokeshwaran V R. I opened a case here few months back and the IP range was blocked by @Black Kite: for a month. Known for disregarding WP:COMMONNAME. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
I revoked TPA on this user; I assumed you wouldn't mind. Joyous! Noise! 03:30, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
My apologies, I'm pretty new to editing on wikipedia. There are multiple sources I have found indicating Jenna Davis was born on May 5, 2004, including a post on her official facebook age on May 5th, 2023 of her holding a birthday cake with the number 19 on it. I'm just unsure what exactly to link to. Multrex (talk) 09:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi.
I have decided to retire from English Wikipedia with immediate effect. Is there any way to block me indefinitely?
The best regards, PaskaSemmen113 (talk) 10:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Just an FYI - an IP you recently blocked for disruption to Jonathan Roumie appears to be doing the same thing again now that their block expired. That edit has been reverted already, but wanted make sure you knew about it. ButlerBlog (talk) 16:07, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi User:Materialscientist I need help with explaining this user User:Bijzindia as he keeps rv every edit in Bigg Boss (Malayalam season 5). I made some edits as there was issues with the page.
Firstly as Bigg Boss comes under Big Brother franchise the format and structure of tables should be consistent right. The user insists on adding entering days of wild cards in the nominations of that particular housemate. But we don’t use that in any version of Bigg Boss and Big Brother. I even discussed this in a polite way on his talk page with proof of how tables wild cards should be CHECK HERE User talk:Bijzindia#Regarding bigg boss 5. Second in many big brother tables we don’t add Hosptilised if thr contestant as walked its normally Walked as you can see in Celebrity Big Brother (British series 22)#Housemates and Big Brother (British series 18)#Nominations table
I don’t know how more I can tolerate his appalling behaviour 2A02:6B68:10:4E00:E0BB:4277:2C88:5CA4 (talk) 16:53, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
I'm sure I'm missing some subtlety, but how is this vandalism? --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 17:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi @Materialscientist I noticed that Bahari Ibaadat article has been protected by you for repeatedly recreating since it was deleted. I am not sure who repeatedly created the article that violated the guidelines. I am kindly requesting your help to unprotect the title so that I can work on the article to make it as per Wikipedia guidelines. ahmadi.afg (talk) 04:50, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for blocking this User:Shame on PJ Santos IP vandal. Though they are active again, using their talk page to tag me and PJ Santos for another surge of posts. Kindly remove their user talk page access please. Thanks -WayKurat (talk) 06:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
An IP you blocked, 136.158.60.175 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), may need to have their talk page access revoked. They're currently rapid-fire spamming thousands of bytes onto it. AntiDionysius (talk) 10:11, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I wonder why you reverted my edit. 2601:1C1:8200:7720:F7D0:2403:7986:9075 (talk) 01:16, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Letting you know I'm considering carrying their unblock request to WP:AN. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:07, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- seems to be a bit of an edit war, that I am not going anywhere near, but might need more eyes... JarrahTree 07:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi Materialscientist :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 09:26, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello MaterialScientist! Can you please RevDel this edit? It contains a personal attack towards Hey man im josh and slurs. (Asking you because I saw you on recently active admins.) —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts! 01:00, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
Steel for you! |
For making hundreds of contributions a day over the past decade and a half and not getting worn down! 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 17:59, 28 February 2024 (UTC) |
Hi, Materialscientist. I just converted Titanium sulfide from a redirect to a set-index page. Looking through the page history, I see you did the same about 6 months ago, and then promptly reverted yourself. Do you recall why? Is there a reason this title shouldn't be a set-index? Thanks, Bernanke's Crossbow (talk) 06:16, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
@DMacks: see User talk:Prof Animal. Their every contribution is a citation to Jeppe Dyre et al.--Smokefoot (talk) 18:34, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Pls advise why my ip is being blocked ....even i cannot open id Alipur g (talk) 19:28, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
How is fixing typos not constructive? 184.176.200.227 (talk) 13:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:ET007-10.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
{{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:29, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately we have a problem. They have been at this for over 6 months doing number vandalism from many different IPs, some IP4 others IP6, all from Italy, usually changing the heights of things, buildings, mountains etc.. thousands of edits. Blocking does nothing, in fact might be a bad idea as at least we can track them. After a block they shift to a different unknown IP. I've been tracking and reverting 2.44.145.152 for a while. Sadly, I let about a dozen edits sit for a few weeks and nobody reverted them, they were overlooked by the community.
The range of IPs is in the millions, see here (click "Show more.." at bottom). The scale makes tracking impossible, much less blocking. I'm really at a loss what to do because they are causing a lot of hidden damage. -- GreenC 14:54, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Sir article Auwalu Abdullahi Rano it created for more than one month it review both the searching engine didn't appear what may I do. Bamalli01 (talk) 18:04, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
The article Ben Leatigaga has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NSPORTS and WP:GNG, only coverage I can find is generic "player is starting for team" news (nothing about him specifically).
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Primefac (talk) 10:01, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I would like to consult something about this editor's behavior towards others. This has been going on for several years and a lot of ANI discussions were raised against this user but he only gets "a slap on the wrist" for his aggressive behavior.
Just recently, I got a run-in again with Hotwiki at the Saksi article, restoring texts that he removed because in his opinion, it was "unreferenced". After restoring them, he removed it again and justifying that the information where Mike Enriquez and Vicky Morales were transferred was "trivial", while adding italics on program titles. I restored my edits since there was an agreement before in the last ANI I raised against him that any changes in this article should be discussed in the talk page. Well, you can read the rest of our heated argument at the Saksi talk page and at one point tried to provoke me to revert his edits and be blocked again.
I'm speaking on behalf of other Filipino Wikipedians who have good intentions in editing the articles Hotwiki is trying to gatekeep for several years. If you notice, most of the articles that he gatekeeps have very little or missing information about them. He cuts and removes most of other editor's contributions and dismiss them as "trivial". Checking the Saksi, 24 Oras or Unang Hirit articles alone shows that if you read those articles, you will sense that some information is missing. Not to mention the his behavior in the past when he replaced most of the GMA Network's image title cards and replacing it with the same image that he uploaded.
I have confronted this user several times, and it seems he's just being hard-headed and won't agree on any consensus. What's "right" in his opinion must be followed and the hell other editors' contributions.
What should I do with this? If another ANI will be raised against him, other administrators that have no background or knowledge on his past behavior will just dismiss these accusations and sometimes, the one that is reporting is being gaslit. -WayKurat (talk) 07:16, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
The IP is repeatedly blanking their talk page and replacing it with random things. Shadow311 (talk) 14:57, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
It is almost complete, waiting for a couple of images that I have been promised. There do not seem to be that many material scientists on Wikipedia. Ldm1954 (talk) 05:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
I'm curious if the draft article is similar to the one you delete. Sock territory? microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 15:33, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
A user you recently blocked may be back. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Integrity | |
For your work on Wiki and all of the amazing things you do! |
407and2-1976 (talk) 20:15, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
The article Baikin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The articles of both people previously listed here have been deleted. This is now a useless one-sentence stub about an unnotable name failing WP:NNAME. No sources found to indicate notability, no WP:SIGCOV.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 04:48, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
This article's only two sources are unverifiable print sources that may or may not contain the information they are said to contain. Creator and primary editor of this article attempted to create numerous hoax articles in the past and add false information to articles. I could find absolutely nothing about this movie when I did an Internet search. Based on all this, I am led to believe that this article is a hoax and that this film is nonexistent. If this is indeed the case, I recommend having the user blocked to prevent further disruption. I attempted to alert a user to this months ago, but nothing happened after all that time. ApplePieGuy95 (talk) 15:19, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
There are IPs who seem hell-bent on causing disruption on the Talk page of the above article. If you have time, could you take a look at it and consider giving it protection? Sweetpool50 (talk) 19:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
IP 198.62.68.0/24 barely did anything wrong, did not even edit. For some reason, even AT home, he is somehow blocked. He asked me to ask you if you can unblock him.
He agrees on one condition: Not to removes sources unless he discusses in the talk page, disruptive editing and threatning.That's three actually, but still.  174.135.36.220 (talk) 07:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
I love your butterfly photos. Thank you. Von 218.215.40.33 (talk) 10:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
You dropped some semi-protection there., but now there are some autoconfirmed socks. Can you bump it to ECP, please? I'm a touch more involved than I'd like to be to protect. Thanks. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello Materialscientist, a while ago you reverted someone who used Summit Racing, saying it was an unreliable source. From my knowledge, it can be considered a reliable source for automotive manufacturing and drag racing/other associated sports. I do not wish for you to take any action, just for you to be cognizant in the future about this. A related website, OnAllCylinders, is a blog published by Summit Racing, and I believe whilst not an official opinion of Summit Racing is still authoritative in the sphere of motor racing, hot rodding and aftermarket support for engines. Best, X750. Spin a yarn? Articles I've screwed over? 17:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
A couple months ago your famous and wonderful group banned me fellow peer unfairly. My peer states “ I would love to talk to materialist scientists about my band and how un professional I was.” As you can see my client is very upset about the decision and wants to talk about it calmly. Thank you for your time you guys are the best.:) 23.145.33.131 (talk) 14:34, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Over at User talk:Heygibi123!, I think they've made a good case for lifting the block. Any objections? This is actually one of the better unblock requests I've seen recently. --Yamla (talk) 12:53, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
The 50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal | |
For your work in getting 50 articles through the DYK process. --evrik (talk) 16:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC) |
Hi fellow scientist! @Materialscientist
I found your site and as a newbie to Wikipedia editing it's super impressive what you've already done here!
For my first article, I thought it would be easiest to take an existing article in my native language (German), translate it, and add additional information. I wrote about Nanoscribe which is part of the BICO group. As a materials scientist you might have heard of them, they make 3D laser microprinters. I made some mistakes at the beginning and didn't realize some problems with citations. But I think I have that pretty well fixed now. I submitted it for review and I've been waiting for several weeks for someone to review it. Could you help me with this? As a newbie, if there are still problems with the article, I would be happy to get your tips :)
Greetings from @3Dmicroprintexpert 3DmicroPrintExpert (talk) 08:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Hey Materialscientist, I see that you are on a wikibreak or something, I wanted to award you this barnstar for your fantastic and relentless efforts on reverting and blocking vandals, and answering AIV/RPP requests! — AP 499D25 (talk) 05:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC) |
Hey Materialscientist,
I wanted to ask your opinion of this, because it's more in your field of expertise. I ran across the article gas carbon some months ago. I was interested because I'd never heard of carbon in a gaseous form before. Upon reading it, however, I'm almost certain what it's describing is coke (fuel), using a very uncommon name. Only one of the three sources actually works, and it's questionable at best. I did some checking through google and google books going back to the 1800s, and found no uses of the name "gas carbon" except for a few websites that appear to have gotten their info from Wikipedia. I started a discussion on the talk page, but got no replies.
My first thought is that it should be merged with the coke article, but that article already covers everything in the gas-carbon article in far more detail. Since the term "gas carbon" doesn't seem to have ever been used historically, I'm thinking now that maybe it would be better to simply delete the article, since the title implies a gaseous form of carbon. This confusion seems to be reflected in these redirect discussions: here and here. But I'm not sure what would be the best solution, so I wanted to ask for your expert opinion on the matter.
If you have some time, could you please take a quick peek? Thanks. Zaereth (talk) 21:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi Materialscientist, I tried to edit a page on Hunted Australia (I think) on the ip 110.145.223.234 last year August, apparently I now have a two year block from editing Wikipedia (ends in August 2025). I didn't vandalise the page and I don't know why you blocked me. Please clarify Thanks Trainandbus123 (talk) 01:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Bui Quoc Huy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 29 § Bui Quoc Huy until a consensus is reached. Tollens (talk) 19:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
{"from_gameid":"12669177","channelCode":"870089"} 1.187.219.55 (talk) 17:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Could you tell me about this article which you deleted in 2021 as a G5? Is there anything in that article that is salvageable should I want to try and re-create it? Thank you so much! Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
They have pinged me to ask about the checkuser block on their account. You might want to respond to their query at their talk page. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 06:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
according to https://civilization.fandom.com/wiki/City-state_(Civ5) must be KIEV instead of «kvyv» 178.176.88.87 (talk) 11:19, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Just dropping by to tell you that I reverted your revert on Greco-Iberian alphabet because I don't think it was vandalism, the user just added a caption to a picture listing the letters depicted. Have a good day, — Alien333 (what I did & why I did it wrong) 13:29, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Your userpage says "As of 2014, most of my free time is taken by emergency matters like vandalism, though I still write short articles during calm hours."
Can you make that info up to date? 24.115.255.37 (talk) 19:59, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
1. Mike runs a news site that Wikipedia considers a reliable source. If Mike publishes an article to his site, and then cites said article in Wikipedia, does that violate WP:OR?
2. John is a person who is notable enough to have a Wikipedia article. Can John edit his own article to add information about himself with no sources to back it up? And would something written by John himself be a valid source for that article? 24.115.255.37 (talk) 21:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello Materialscientist. A user that you’ve blocked twice has been disrupting and POV pushing in several Armenia-Azerbaijan articles.
I’ve noticed user's edit in Second NK War , where they’ve added WP:REDFLAG claim in infobox that’s not supported by independent reliable sources and isn’t even mentioned in the article. I then noticed their edits in two other articles; here they change the numbers from reliable sources to ridiculous “45-135-145” soldiers killed by one from the opposing army, all the sources are partisan unknown websites, the claim is obviously WP:REDFLAG, and the reliable sources that are in the article (Radio Free Europe, Eurasianet) don’t support anything close to what Ao192 is claiming. Then Ao192 goes to that one soldier’s wiki article that allegedly killed “45-135-142” from the opposing army, and here he does the same WP:REDFLAG changes and removes the two reliable sources from the article , . Btw the WP:RS Eurasianet article that Ao192 removed says “Four Armenian soldiers also died in the firefight. The Azerbaijani government has attributed the deaths of four Armenian soldiers to Ibrahimov…", but Ao192 attributes the 4 killed to “Armenian government”, and his ridiculous WP:REDFLAG numbers he attributes to “numerous sources” . Awful POV pushing on so many levels.
I warned user of contentious topics, reverted the WP:REDFLAG poorly sourced claims, and restored the WP:RS. But that didn't stop Ao192 . I’ve looked at the articles' history as well and, not surprisingly, it’s not the first time of red flag POV push from Ao192 , . They even tried to remove the WP:RS similarly to how they did now and insert the WP:REDFLAG, .
Given the continued heavy POV pushing even after being blocked, I believe Ao192 is in the WP:NOTHERE territory. As the blocking admin, could you take a look? Thank you. Vanezi (talk) 07:55, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Why is 82.8.252.173 indeffed? From what I can see they only had 1 bad edit (and frankly also 1 good edit). Both were months before the block. They trigged an edit filter (only) twice (closely) before the block and was only given 1 warning. Anyways, for some reason you indeffed them? They have no previous blocks. What's going on? Another mistake like ? Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 11:23, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
See: User talk:HahaNormal#June 2024 from User:Remsense. Thank you, -- Ooligan (talk) 15:05, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
The Mistakes of Miss Grand International 2024, has got prevent vandalism. Removed ''Bolvia'' as well ''Poland'' ''Malaysia'' and ''Korea''. Would you please reaction this, thank you the user ItsFeL has swear this. Bina.biny99 (talk) 11:59, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi, the America Ferrera page was recently semi-protected indefinitely but the prior PC settings were not reset. Would you please take care of this? Thanks. Roesgo (talk) 01:27, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Hey Materialscientist, good to see you back after that two-week break! I like your low-tolerance approach when it comes to countering vandalism. Can't think of any other admins who regularly use Huggle to place blocks like you do.
So regarding that User:Paul is describing account you blocked for 31-hrs. You might want to do a checkuser run on it – see what I and another editor wrote at the SPI. Basically there seems to be a lot of coordinated and sequential editing going on between it and the (already blocked) 'User:Master of all cinemalovers' account.
Thanks!
I can't tell what's worse in the long run — actual vandalism (which can be resolved in human time) or narcissists with bots (which can't).
(ref. Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to The Blacklist season 1—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 13:32, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply])
2603:7000:8C00:43E2:CC1C:63A4:D1D8:8826 (talk) 19:19, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
You blocked this user in August 2023, apparently after a CU request. He has since requested for a username change, but his requests were denied because of this block. However, I cannot find any mention of his username everywhere on enwiki, and he has made no contribution here. Could you please add en explanation on his talk page? He has pinged you a few days ago, but I've just read you may not have seen this notification. Thank you! Litlok (talk) 11:43, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
im editing thayyur village article. I know about that village very well. I live at nearest village . So don't ban me 45.115.89.224 (talk) 13:30, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, someone has edited the Besiktas signing info in between the Lazio career info paragraphs on the Ciro Immobile page. I had just fixed that error. TheRookieRowlet (talk) 04:46, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have deleted Handwriting by mistake. The mistake has been corrected by Explicit. GTrang (talk) 18:43, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Litlok (talk) 14:11, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
It may be advisable to escalate to an independent administrator even with you blocking warnings rather than you blocking as I have identified that user has reverted your appropriate appearing to me undo on List of Philippine mythological figures. There has been a pattern of behaviour that has created much disruption with despite warning multiple unacknowledged cut and pasting today from others work in Wikipedia or possibly other sources. I understand similar activity may have happened in 2020 in the area of study that this user has showed much interest in today. ChaseKiwi (talk) 20:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
hello I opened a sockpuppet investigation for the user who vandalized the Hausa people wikipedia article. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 02:37, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia's attitude is clearly skeptical and hostile towards Nostradamus. Invented prophecies, wrong solutions or forcing by some interpreters are highlighted. The blame for all this is subtly placed on Nostradamus and it is stated that his prophecies can only be identified after the events have occurred. Which is completely normal. Never has a cryptic prophecy been correctly exposed before it occurred. Prophecy is the message that God entrusts to the prophet to make known to men. There are two types of prophecies: explicit and cryptic. The explicit one is for example when God entrusts the tables of the law to Moses. The cryptic one is John's prophecy of the apocalypse, full of symbols, codes and figures that can hardly be interpreted before the events stated happen and in fact almost two thousand years have passed since its enunciation. My contribution is based on scientific and mathematical evidence specifying the source for which it can be objectively assessed. There is no adequate justification for removing it. It means wanting to also deny the Pythagorean theorem without giving a rational justification. 151.50.94.171 (talk) 07:41, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for this edit. The IP in question is currently subject to a sockpuppet report for his constant tendentious editing behaviour. Needs sorting! 10mmsocket (talk) 12:00, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Dear MaterialScientist,
The article rollback of the Bondage Suit page performed appears to be vandalism of appropriate psychological, non-sexual, and sexual explanations of the practice with fewer references. The article should be returned to the revised state then line item discussed in the talk page for further revisions, edits, rollbacks, and changes. The short article is filled with multiple uncredited claims that do not tie into Psychology, but personal preferences without reason or critical thinking objectives fulfilled.
Sincerely, AccreditedGemologist (talk) 14:13, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Along with a whole bunch of other stuff; you might want to re-protect. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 14:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar | |
For dealing with the LTA garbage at Typhoon Gaemi. I appreciate your hard work. JeffSpaceman (talk) 11:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC) |
Hi Mat, could you consider actioning this request ? Thanx, - FlightTime (open channel) 01:52, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Thank you 65.93.101.75 (talk) 11:47, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
In case you havn't noticed, user:Viking Fox Queen has started a WP:AN thread about you here - as they don't seemed to have notified you, I thought someone had better do it.Nigel Ish (talk) 12:32, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
I think your reference to Pottsgove should be Pottstown. 2601:98A:980:B30:4D1:3198:E1C:FB37 (talk) 10:47, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
Oi material scientist sorry I deleted your talk page or whatever this is . Also I liked the bird photos, quite good looking. But I’m here because you reverted by helpful AND referenced edit to Bulimba state school. Not cool man/woman. I tried by best to help Wikipedia and you revert my edit :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bulimba12345 (talk • contribs) 12:16, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
You recently (dated October 2021 !) sent me a message with the above title. I did NOT make the edits that you accuse me of, and I already have an account which is used for editing. Gunzle (talk) 16:25, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I had edited the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tata_Memorial_Centre, which has a lot of old, incomplete and incorrect information, and added multiple factual updates, including the current logo of Tata Memorial (the logo on the page is an old one). I had removed incorrect or irrelevant information such as regarding the Konark Cancer Foundation or the Tata Clinic. However, all my edits have been undone and the page has been restored to the prior status. I can see some of these were done by you. Can you please help me in ensuring that the page remains accurate and uptodate? I am looking forward to working together on this. Ad baheti (talk) 16:30, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Regarding a certain user you've previously blocked... it seems as though they have not learned their lesson in the slightest and, despite several warnings on their talk page, they continue at the same pace of making unsourced, speculative and opinion-based edits. Please take a look and see if you could do anything, as I've been reverting edit after edit and at this point it's just tedious. Thanks, Vasil3fonov (talk) 13:08, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
I understand you don't receive pings. I pinged you on User talk:Maheswar Rana#Unblock me. I am inclined to unblock that user's other account based on that discussion (see also User talk:Perfectodefecto#Unblock request on the other account). I view it as an attempt at WP:CLEANSTART by a user who wasn't aware of the rules and has actually been a decent contributor for two years with the other account. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:54, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.