Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello Less Unless:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
– — WILDSTARtalk 18:30, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
![]()
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive | ![]() |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
![]() |
Women in Red Women in Oceania contest |
Less Unless Thank you for your additions October 2021 WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:33, 1 November 2021 (UTC) |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2021).
Less Unless! Have you ever done a GA review? — WILDSTARtalk 13:46, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
![]()
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Thanks for uploading File:Ourense CF logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
For reviewing at least 25 articles during the drive. |
Thank you for reviewing or re-reviewing 49 articles, which helped contribute to an overall 1276-article reduction in the backlog during the drive. (t · c) buidhe 12:40, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2021).
(Coming here from WP:CLEANUP so as not to clutter that page.)
@Less Unless: I don't know if it's in the documentation or not that the citation parameter |access-date= needs a full date. I've encountered several error messages in my citation work over time and have just 'figured them out'. The |date= parameter will take a lot of abuse and numerous formats, but maybe not the |access-date= parameter. Most of the time when I've seen that error message, it means the date isn't complete.
Just yesterday I found another weird citation error message: the preview kept complaining that four citations were defined but not called. They had been defined in the references section and were called in the article body. Everything looked fine. I even tried to drag it from references section up to where it was called, and removed the name. Didn't stop the error message. Turns out the problem was the prior citation way up the page that was missing its </ref> tag. I sure don't know why preview told me the next four citations were defined but not called. Bizarre. Figured it out and went on my way. Platonk (talk) 17:34, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Sorry - I didn't spot that you were also working on this. I'll leave the taxobox for you. Ingratis (talk) 18:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
— WILDSTARTALK is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
![]()
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Less Unless,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 13:19, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).
|
![]()
|
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
![]()
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).
oversight
will be renamed suppress
in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections.![]()
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).
|
![]()
|
In continuation of the discussion at WP:RFPP. I am not disputing your decline. Just trying to understand how you assess significant disruption. It is subjective I believe. I believe the page has significant disruption. Almost all IP edits last six months are vandalism. So what do you look for when you agree to lock the page? Venkat TL (talk) 14:39, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
![]()
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).
deletelogentry
and deletedhistory
rights. This means that those in the Researcher user group and Checkusers who are not administrators can now access Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. (T301928)Hey there! I saw you just recently protected this page, but only for three days. As you can see in the logs for the article, it has been persistently vandalized in recent months and had multiple protections placed on it as a result. Is it possible you could make the protection last longer? Preferably several months at this point, since it already had a month long protection period, and as it is unlikely the disruption will stop given his high profile role in the Premier League where most of the high profile players have their Wikipedia articles persistently vandalized. I appreciate you protecting the article but just some food for thought given the recent history of it, cheers and thanks! --TylerBurden (talk) 22:01, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
![]()
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() |
Women in Red Translation Contest |
Less Unless Thank you for your additions April 2022 WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:41, 1 May 2022 (UTC) |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).
|
![]()
|
Hello Less Unless,
At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.
Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.
In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 799 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 856 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.
This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}}
on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Wishing Less Unless a very Unless happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 14:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC) |
The normal week has passed. 100% of the people who commented said keep. I think it has been demonstrated that she is notable. Why do we need more time when it seems WP:SNOWBALL? You asked for non-English sources, which is what I provided already. I cannot imagine us getting to this point if someone tried to delete an article about the deputy editor in chief of a top US or European newspaper. Typically unanimous agreement to keep would be closed as such, in my experience. I humbly ask you to consider if this could be closed as keep as it stands. CT55555 (talk) 14:42, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
![]()
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() |
Women in Red Translation Contest contest |
Less Unless Thank you for your additions May 2022 WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:33, 1 June 2022 (UTC) |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2022).
|
![]()
|
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.