User talk:KojiDude/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about User:KojiDude. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

SSJ5 is covered in the article Dragon Ball AF. I don't think it is specifically stated that SSJ5 doesn't exist, but since a picture is shown of Goku as one, and it is said in the article that the picture is just fanart, that would imply that SSJ5 is non-existant by association. However, I will try to edit the article when I have the chance to make it more clear that SSJ5 doesn't exist.

Daishokaioshin 21:45, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Thankyou. I like you a lot because of that removal - but be damned careful he doesn't complain about you to the admins, because what we did is probably quite naughty. In future, let's keep everyone else quiet, but let the troll talk himself to death, that way, he ignores the article. HawkerTyphoon 02:56, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Get in. I think we win. I'll check back on this tomorrow. Manga is worth precious little in my eyes, and it hurts me to see people arguin over it. To each his own. Goodnight, fair prince. HawkerTyphoon 03:05, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Since the information on the article is based on the series and manga itself, then you can conclude that all of the information there is conon. This means that there would be no place to add the events that occurred in a movie to a specific timeline in the article. Always remember that DBZ movies are Non-Canon, no matter how close to the events of the series or manga the movie may seem. You can speculate, but you can never be 100% sure about the actual time in which the movie could have taken place, and speculation is not "allowed" (by Wikipedia policy) on Wikipedia. The movies won't fall into Timeline 4 because that timeline is based on a completely different Future Trunks universe. Multiple sections would have to be created for the movies' timelines since not all of the movies follow the events of the previous ones. I really wouldn't want to get into doing that since it would just be too complicated to comprehend, but if you think you are up for a challenge then by all means go for it. Something that should be mentioned to a certain extent, however, is basically what I stated above. That DBZ movies are Non-Canon, no matter how close to the events of the series or manga they may seem to be, their events would have to fall into their own timeline.-3bulletproof16 04:15, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

No problem, glad to help.-3bulletproof16 04:29, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

I've reported him on the 3RR board, here: Feel free to leave comments.

Daishokaioshin 03:50, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Ok. Cool. I would've reported him but...The reporting thing is confusng. @.@ KojiDude 04:01, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

You also broke 3rr on Majin Buu so I blocked you for 3 hours, I blocked Wiki-star for a week. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 04:22, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Ok. I had a feeling this'd happen. Sorry for breaking the rule man it won't happen again. KojiDude 04:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

The SSJ4 Gogeta image you uploaded (Image:GogetaSuperSaiyan4.jpg) has a copyright violation as the image is copyrighted by Toei Animation. The tag on your image claims that you are the creator of the work, which is obviously not true. Thus, it has a copyright violation. For more information on using correct copyright/license tags, please see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags. Hope that clears it up a bit. --3bulletproof16 02:14, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bojack.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:04, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Took care of it for you KojiDude. --3bulletproof16 22:11, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks dude. KojiDude 22:17, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

I removed them. You have clearly used some copyrighted material in creating them. Therefore they are derivative works, and thusly copyrighted by the original copyright holder. I will be nominating them for deletion shortly. --Lord Deskana (talk) 23:00, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Oh...I thought if I made it on my computer with my paint program it would be considered my creation. The image uploading always confuses me here...Anyways sorry for breaking the copyright rule. KojiDude 23:17, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Ahem... read my comment above...--3bulletproof16 23:21, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

You said you wanted an admin for something? Anything I can help you with? --Lord Deskana (talk) 23:00, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

You're never gonna get sleep again? How in the blue hell do you think I feel!?!? And It's only the fourth time the IP has added the link! I wonder if he's into that sort of thing... eww... Now hold on a sec. You actually clicked on the link? lmao Dude...--3bulletproof16 00:38, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Are you a "fan devoted to Cell" lmao. Was the screen jiggling all around? lol.--3bulletproof16 00:45, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

I bet Daishokaioshin clicked on the link as well! lmao, Imagine what she must have felt...--3bulletproof16 00:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Same here, sort of caught me off guard.--3bulletproof16 01:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Rejoice my son... Rejoice! For the end to a pain in the arse has come. --3bulletproof16 00:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Hallelujah, hallelujah, hallelujah, HA-LLE-LU-JAH!!!! --3bulletproof16 00:49, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Not to worry my son... I know of a lord... (whom I think you are familiar with)... The lord that vanished the Dragon Emperor infestation. See his miracles. It is Lord Deskana, and yes... ^{HE VALUES OUR OPINIONS} --3bulletproof16 01:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

You can't always get what you want. But if you try sometimes, well you just might find... you get what you need. Papacha 05:41, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Well isn't that always true, my good friend... You know, kinda makes you wonder if he'd really clean up his act this time around... ... ... NAH... --3bulletproof16 06:03, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

The second anyone un-blocked him he'd revert the Majin Buu back to his version, no doubt about it. KojiDude (talk) 06:09, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

However... I am going to miss his dramatic way of writing... that Final Atonement speech almost (ahem... ALMOST) brought a tear to my eye. Well not really, but still pretty dramatic. --3bulletproof16 06:19, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

It made me feel a little sorry for the dude, but not alot. And it was kinda corny how he used the Final Atonment title from the episode of DBZ where Vegeta kills himself...Almost takes away the coolness of the title. KojiDude (talk) 06:22, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Yeah that kind of killed it for me too... Oh well, whatever gives him a sense a drama... Keep up the good work Wiki-star! --3bulletproof16 06:33, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

If you can expand Dende's article with notable info the second pic can stay, otherwise it needs to go or the text must be rearranged per image use policy. Voice of Treason 05:13, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

I improved the article best I could, I'm not really worried about the picture anymore. That article was lacking way too much important information. KojiDude (talk) 05:46, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Waz up man I was wondering if you may want to sing a duet of "I believe I can fly" by R.Kelly on your talk page I'll star it off

I used to think that I could not go on

And life was nothing but an awful song

But now I know the meaning of true love

I'm leaning on the everlasting arms

...Uh, no thanks. Sorry. KojiDude (talk) 06:18, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

You should probably upload the picture under a different name; trying to overwrite information is troublesome sometimes. Then put the original up for deletion. I'll help out if there's any problems. Voice of Treason 07:04, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I'll get right on it. Sorry for the little copyright mishap thing by the way. I'll try not to let it happen again. KojiDude (talk) 07:08, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Don't worry about it. I didn't want you to think you were being "targeted" for not knowing Wikipedia's copyright policy. Voice of Treason 07:10, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

I did what you said, see if it works now. I didn't nominate the other one for deletion though, I uh...Kinda don't know how. KojiDude (talk) 07:12, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Good, the template is now correct. But you still need to add copyright info. See this picture for an example from Excel Saga, a featured article. Name all the studios and the source, and the reason you uploaded it and feel it's covered by fair use. Again, I'll help you wherever I can. Voice of Treason 07:21, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Went ahead and did it. Just put {{db-author}} at the top of the other to have it speedily deleted. Voice of Treason 07:48, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Well for once I'm somewhat flattered that he actually addressed me this time. Though I'm not too fond of him saying that he was going to kill me, I do, however, manage to find some comedic relief in all this at the thought of him attempting to kill me. Here's my analysis: He can't write at all so my guess is another Dragon Emperor "Sockpuppet". However, the IPs responsible for the recent vandalism are AOL trolls so there is a slim possibility that Wiki-star could indeed be making himself look like an ass again... --3bulletproof16 21:44, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Dude, either Wiki-star's finally snapped or some IP adress saw his bad reputation and wants to make it worse. That doesn't sound like Wiki-star, though...If he was back he'd be all "Hello, fellow contributors! It is I, Wiki-star!" ect. KojiDude (talk) 22:41, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Hah, so true... You make a very good impersonation of Wiki-star, BTW --3bulletproof16 03:46, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi,well i think we need to take a decision about the power levels by consensus,thank you by your atention.Victtorio 20:32, 16 July 2006 (UTC)Victtorio

Why don't we take a straw poll? KojiDude (talk) 20:35, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

"atention", it is Dragon Emperor --3bulletproof16 20:40, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Oh, that explains alot. You got a good eye for catching his sock puppets don't you? Welcome back by the way. KojiDude (talk) 20:42, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Still haven't left yet but thanks anyways... Stupid plane got delayed. Good thing I brought my laptop, though! --3bulletproof16 20:48, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Well looks like its time for me to board... Yes after 8 hours of waiting... finally! I'm off to Seattle! I'll try to go on Wikipedia if I have time during the week. Be back in 7 Days. --3bulletproof16 00:16, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

I did another revert of Talk:Dragon_Ball_Z:_Budokai_Tenkaichi_2 due to the vandalism, the removal of content, and the puppet shows he is running using other names (see my talk page, last entry if you want more info.). Since you gave him a warning earlier, it would be good to report him. Thanks Seicer (talk) 22:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

I didn't notice the message you left for me until just now (Onikage725 left a message the same day). If you still need help and information on creating articles, Help:Starting a new page is an easy way to get started. You should have little trouble making one from there. Help:Editing is available for the rest. Voice of Treason 10:01, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

There appears to be a content dispute element in your dealings with 81.36.29.122, and it isn't clear to me that actual vandalism is going on. I therefore suggest you take the matter to WP:ANI where they can deal with more complicated cased like this one. WP:AVI is only for very blatant vandalism (addition of profanity, article blanking, etc.) Thanks. JoshuaZ 20:11, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Please accept this invite to join the new WikiProject Bodybuilding, a WikiProject dedicated to improving bodybuilding related articles. Simply click here to accept! Addbot (talk) 02:30, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Could you help me with trimming down the Synopsis part of the Buu article? I'm having a hard time figuring out what should be cut. I would like to see it become a good article. Thanks. Nemu 00:24, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

What is going on? Those IPs come from several diferent ISPS is there some significance of (~)?Geni 19:34, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

The significance is in the edits. All the IPs added the exact same characters each time they vandalised the page, so either its the same person or a conspiracy. Also, most of them are definitly the same person, due to personallity traits. If you check the talk page's history you'll see. KojiDude (talk) 19:44, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Dude... what is it with trolls these days? --3bulletproof16 20:09, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Hummm zombie machines perhaps. But that would be a lot of effort. The IP patturn is odd though. Something strange going on here.Geni 20:12, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

When isn't something strange going on? --Lord Deskana (talk) 10:29, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Per the fair use policy, I have removed fair use images from your userpage. Please do not use fair use images outside of article space. They should be linked (like this... [[:Image:Example.jpg]]) rather than being included on the page. Thank you. --Lord Deskana (talk) 10:29, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Nobody has concrete proof that she is Saiyan, thus, putting her on the Saiyans page is not correct, she should go into aliens.

There is no proof that she is a different alien. Just leave her at Saiyans, that's the most logical place to put her.--KojiDude (talk) 00:20, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

When editing AIV, pleaes remember to include "LIST EMPTY", "LIST NOT EMPTY", or some variant thereof in your edit summary. Isopropyl 05:56, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

I know, it kind of slipped my mind. Sorry about that.--Koji Dude 05:59, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

I should have checked the users block and contribution log before reporting to AIV and I tried to remove the report after realizing my mistake but Woohookitty reviewed it before I could revert it. Sorry --1568 08:38, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

You don't have to be sorry. I didn't mean to come off in that kind of tone, I was just advising you for future reference. As long as your intetnions are good, apologies aren't needed. =) --Koji Dude 08:42, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the reminder (I sort of needed it) seems like my mind got stuck in anti-vandal mode just reverting and reporting without thinking!--1568 07:00, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

I didn't mean to make the page look "sloppy". In fact I only edited it the two times prior to your recent edit. On my Mozilla Firefox browser the text was smudged between the two pictures in the 'Golden Oozaru' section. I also like the pic of Oozaru Bebi Vegeta grabbing SSJ4 Goku and thought of putting it back to where it was in the 'Abilities' section. I appreciate your concern for this article since Im also a Dragonball fan! :D Maphisto86 12:20, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Ooh... I have the power to vanquish someone now. Hehehe... I'm flattered. --3bulletproof16 16:24, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

I wonder how he came up with this name? Hmm... -- 3:16 16:34, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, it's official, Dragon Emperor has no life whatsoever.--Koji Dude 16:40, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

What you just witnessed is what I deal with every friggin' day... I think its time for another Wiki-break. What do you think? -- 3:16 05:08, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

So soon?--Koji Dude 05:21, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Tell you what... We'll see how today goes. -- 3:16 15:57, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Stop reverting that, it's not "fact", it's the opinion of some fans. It would only be fact if Toriyama or Toei said that was true. TJ Spyke 22:50, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

It is a fact. Toriyama had very little to do with the series. Opinion doesn't over-rule facts. If it did, 2+2 could equal chicken. The sky could be cows running on water. Morgan Freeman could be white. It is a fact that he had very little to do with it, thus it is lower in canon than the other two (which he CREATED).--Koji Dude 22:54, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

No it is NOT fact and I can't understand why you can't realize that. He has NEVER said it was below DB and DBZ, and neither has Toei. The only ones saying that are fans like you. GT is just as canon as DB and DBZ(the same way that all Star Trek shows created after Roddenberry died are just as canon as ones he created. TJ Spyke 22:58, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Toriyama has stated that he had very little involvment with it. If the CREATOR has very little to do with it, it isn't as canon as something he created.--Koji Dude 23:14, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm wondering if TJ really understands english... Toriyama has nothing to do with GT except a few designs. That is a fact. You're saying Toriyama wrote GT from the beginning to the end ? prove it.

What is canon is what was created by the original author. It is a fact. You want to say otherwise ? prove it.

Were did Tôei and Toriyama said that GT was 100% canon and more canon than the manga ? The only ones saying that are fans like you.

Basically, we don't care about what Star Treck fans can say. Have you already forgotten ? Folken de Fanel 23:45, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Smashing, Folken. Very well said.--Koji Dude 23:57, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey, that was a cheap shot... -- bulletproof ^3:16 02:53, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Last time I checked, GT was non-canon. GT was never part of the written manga so most of it is void of canonical facts. The movies are proven to be non-canon (not only not written by Toriyama, but doesn't even fit into the rest of the story), how does that make the 64 episode long flop series called Dragonball Grand Tour any different? If you say the movies are non-canon (which they are), then GT has to be non-canon as well. -- Majin Vegeta 12:31, August 30 2006 (UTC)

Hey. I tried to add my Esperanza page into my signature, but when I use the ~, it comes up like this: [[User:Sasuke-kun27|'''Sasuk'''[[User:Sasuke-kun27/Esperanza|'''e''']][[User:Sasuke-kun27|'''-kun''']][[User talk:Sasuke-kun27|'''27''']]]] 02:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC). I tried typing it the way I wanted it (Sasuke-kun 27) and then copying/pasting it into my preferences, but it didn't work. You helped me before and I was hoping you could help me again.

P.S. You can delete this after you read it and post your comment on my talk page. - Sasuke-kun 27

Please do not put false warnings on my page. The policy is to use the official ENGLISH name, and since there is no English manga of GT, that would mean the FUNimation dub. TJ Spyke 03:28, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

This has already been disputed before. Talk to User:Daishokaioshin about it. She's the expert on thsi subject. And it wasn't a "false" warning, you added nonsense to Wikipedia (the line in the first paragraph), which is considered vandalism.--Koji Dude 03:30, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm the one vandalizing the page? Haha, I put a neutral statement, that some fans don't consider him canon. What YOU put is that he isn't canon, something that violated WP:V since you can't prove it. Others editos have agreed that it IS canon, and everytime I present evidence you just dismiss it even though mine is just as valid as yours. So YOU are the one vandalizing the page. Stop reverting my changes or you are the one who will be reported. TJ Spyke 21:50, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

TJ, basically you haven't done anything except say "I think GT is canon, so it's canon! Whatever I say is right!". If GT was canon, then the movies would be canon, which they aren't. You aren't trying to say that they are, which proves that you are doing this soley out of selfishness, which would be bad faith. You are now trolling due to this fact, which is a type of vandalism. Please stop.--Koji Dude 21:54, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

The movies have been announced as non-canon, they never said that about GT. If you revert once more I will report you for violating WP:3RR. TJ Spyke 21:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

If you report me, you will be blocked as well, and for a longer period of time because you are trolling. I am reverting vandalism, so I can't be blocked for 3RR due to WP:IAR.--Koji Dude 21:58, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

You might be blocked depending on the person. Some won't consider that vandalism. Nemu 21:59, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

How is it vandalism? I made some correct edits(saying that his canonicity is debateable), and all you do is keep reverting it. I have offered compromises but you continue to just revert. I have made a edit that should make both of us happy so neither of us get in trouble. TJ Spyke 22:01, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Because it can't be debated, GT is NON-CANON. It's a FACT, which can't be debated. If you debate against a fact, pushing your own opinion and ignoring everyone else, you are vandalizing Wikipedia.--Koji Dude 22:03, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

How is it "fact" when no official sources have said it's not canon? So yes it CAN be debated. TJ Spyke 22:06, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Canon comes from the original source. GT did not come from the original source. Nemu 22:08, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

The fact that TORIYAMA, THE CRATOR OF DRAGON BALL, didn't write it, and the plot holes, the fact that it doesn't fit with the continuity of the original manga (as Nemu said), and the Pilaf plot hole, make it NON-CANON. YOU haven't done anything yet but say "Your "facts" are wrong", and then you vandalize. Why don't you provide ONE thing that says otherwise?--Koji Dude 22:10, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Since you continue to assert your OPINION as "fact" and not accepted my compromise of it being debatable, I listed this at Wikipedia:Third Opinion. Your opinion of it being non-canon doesn't make that a fact. Even though Toriyama did do designs for the show, gave it his approval, encouraged people to watch it, said the writers more or less took it where he would have. Him not creating it does not automatically make it not canon. Has he ever come out and say somthing like he doesn't consider it canon? NO. TJ Spyke 02:18, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

TJ, you're not listening. That isn't my only fact. Your ONLY argument is that TOEI and Toriyama have said nothing abotu it, which doesn't fucking matter one little bit. GT is non-canon because of the plot holes, the fact that it wasn't created by Toriyama, the Pilaf plot hole (which means GT couldn't have taken place), and the wide fan base that considers it non-canon. We don't need a third opinion, we need you to stop ignoring the facts.--Koji Dude 02:22, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Every show has plot holes(even DB and DBZ), Pilaf could have been in space when Buu destroyed Earth, Toriyama basically gave GT his full support, i've seen many fans and websites(like Pojo, which is highly respected) consider it as canon, and your only "fact" is that Toriyama didn't create. So unless Toei or Toriyama say that it is or isn't canon, then it IS debatable. TJ Spyke 02:38, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

TJ, there is no way to prove Pilaf was in space, Toriyama not creating it automatically makes it non-canon (out ruling anything else), the plot holes make it not able to fit into the continuity of the original manga, fan sites don't count as reliable sources, and TOEI and Toriyama stating that the movies are non-canon is basically the same as them stating GT is non-canon, as GT is the same as the movies (not created by Toriyama, and they contain many plot holes). This all proves your ONE little point wrong by a longshot. If you continue to revert the page after this, then you will be vandalizing, and you will be reported on WP:AIV and blocked for disruption eventually.--Koji Dude 02:44, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Arguing with you is like arguing with a brick wall. There is no way to proove Pilaf wasn't in space, Toriyama not creating it does not automatically make it not canon(especially since he did have some involvement with it), Pojo is the largest unofficial Dragon Ball website(and not some random fan site), and the movies/GT thing is not the same. It's not vandalism either, it's a content dispute and you refuse to compromise because you believe you are right. TJ Spyke 02:59, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Canon is what is created by the original author. Is GT created by Toriyama? No. So that automatically makes it non-canon. His little involvment makes no difference. The Movies and GT are the same because they are both not created by Toriyama and have major plot holes. Pojo is still a fan site and doesn't matter at all. GT is non-canon, and it is painfully obvious. If you continue to say it isn't, then you are obviousley ignoring what I say and pushing your own opinion into an article because you want to be right, therefore disrupting Wikipedia and vandalizing.--Koji Dude 03:03, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

See Canon (Star Trek) to counter your first argument. I am not pushing my point, I offered a compromise by saying it's debatable. You are the one trying to push your opinion. You do realize that you are the one looking bull-headed by not willing to compromise? TJ Spyke 03:06, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Star Trek has NOTHING to do with DBZ. The creator of Star Trek is dead, the creator of DBZ is alive. It is not my opinion, as I am listing FACTS. You even said yourself you stated why it "could be canon" not why "it is canon". So you haven't given any REAL proof or facts to support you. Also, if you wanted my opinion, the Android Saga, Cell Saga, and Buu Saga are all non-canon. Am I going to articles and making them say that? No. Am I pressing my opinion into an article? No. Am I not listing any facts, and only giving my personal opinion? No. But you are.--Koji Dude 03:10, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

I only pointed out Star Trek because it kinda moots you point about something only being canon if created by the author. Yes it is my opinion that GT is canon just like it's your opinion that GT isn't canon. That's why I suggest putting that it's debatable in the Bebi article since there are supporters for each side and we have no official word from Toei or Toryiama to prove which side is right. Why not leave it like that? TJ Spyke 03:28, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Because it isn't debatable. There isn't a single thing in this god given earth that points to GT being canon, whereas there are many FACTS that it isn't. Toriyama did not make it, therefore it is NON-CANON no matter what you say, because canon is what is CREATED by the ORIGINAL AUTHOR. Why can't you simply accept that? Why is it so hard for you to stop trying to get your opinion into the article?--Koji Dude 03:33, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

You are freaking bull-headed. It is NOT a fact. It's only a fact if Akira Toriyama or Toei Animation(the studio that owns the rights to Dragon Ball) say it's not canon. Otherwise it's your OPINION. I'm starting to wonder if you actually went to school. TJ Spyke 04:17, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

It doesn't have to be announced for it to be a fact. Get that in your head. It is YOUR opinion that GT is canon. Why the hell would it have to be announced to be a fact? Was it announced that there was going to be a Trunks? No. That doesn't mean Trunks isn't canon.--Koji Dude 04:22, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

You don't want to consider GT canon, fine. That doesn't mean it's not canon. Go ahead and read about something called "Personal Canon". It's fine if you don't want to consider GT canon, but please stop vandalizing the Bebi article. TJ Spyke 04:28, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm not vandalizing, YOU are. I have given a reason for GT being non-canon that nobody in the entire world can argue against, and do you know what you said in reply? " That's your opinion! Not a fact! " Well, news flash, it IS a fact. Canon is what is created by the original author, and GT is not created by the original author, thus it is non-canon. How can you debate against that? It's impossible. You're not only adding your opinion, you're adding nonsense. Please stop, this argument has gone on for 12 hours and you're obviousley WRONG. I consider you a friend, that is why I have put myself in danger of being blocked to save you from being blocked. I don't want to have to report you at WP:AIV, so please, for your sake, stop the vandalism. Listen to what I'm saying: It's impossible to debate against the fact that GT is non-canon, because GT wasn't created by it's original author.--Koji Dude 04:33, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

I am just trying to put in something that will make everyone happy. Articles are Wikipedia are supposed to have verifiable sources, and since there has been no official word on whether or not it is canon and there are many people supporting both sides, I feel it's best not say he is canon or not canon. If you can find a way to put that in the article(which is what I am TRYING to do) then go ahead. I don't think it makes sense to just say he is not canon though when non-canon though. The creater of a franchise doesn't have to be involved for something to be canon(there are many movie, TV shows, and video game franchises that have entries considered canon despite their creaters not being involved). TJ Spyke 04:40, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

TJ, it isn't debatable. Wether there are equal members of each side, there is no way to overrule the fact that Toriyama didn't create GT, which means GT is non-canon which means Bebi is non canon. It isn't vandalism, and it isn't my opinion, it is a FACT. How many times do I have to say it to get it through your head? It is a god damn FACT, that can not be debated against. You can't debate against the fact that the movies are non-canon, so how can you debate against the fact that GT is non-canon? You haven't given one single thing to back up your point, and it is obvious you are only thinking of yourself.

You posted for a third opinion, but when I told you we already got one from Nemu (whom sided with me) you continued to add your opinion. If we had gotten a third opinion, and he sided with you, I bet you'd say " The third opinion sided with me, so the argument is over. ". But scince the third opinion didn't side with you, you ignored it. That's bad faith if I've ever seen it.--Koji Dude 04:50, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

I am beginning to wonder if you know how to compromise. Yes Toriyama didn't creat GT, that doesn't automatically make it non-canon. Does that mean anything in the Spider-Man or X-Men universes not created by Stan Lee are not canon? No, because Marvel decides what's canon since they own them, just like Toei owns DB so they decide what is canon. I also have editors who agree with me. It IS debatable and I don't appreciate you reverting my good(and neutal changes) and calling it vandalism. If you feel like reverting it AGAIN, stop and decide to ask for arbitration instead since it is obvious that we will never agree(and since you continue to insist that your opinion is fact). TJ Spyke 04:57, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

"Yes Toriyama didn't creat GT, that doesn't automatically make it non-canon." Yes, it does. "Does that mean anything in the Spider-Man or X-Men universes not created by Stan Lee are not canon?" No, because they aren't full of plot holes. "Toei owns DB so they decide what is canon" If you said that to Toriyama, he'd say " Tch, like hell they do. It's my god damn manga. ". "since it is obvious that we will never agree" Yes, we will never agree, because all you do is ignore the facts. You're so obsessed with not losing the argument, that you've not only broken 3RR (by a longshot), you've insulted a user that could have easily had you blocked hours ago but decided not to out of kindness. You've also ignored Wikipedia's policy of original research, scince you have nothing to prove GT is canon, and you have nothing to say it's debatable. I consider you a friend and a good contributor, which is why I didn't report you for 3RR when you broke it. I don't want to continue the argument with you, because it will only end in you getting blocked, and the longer the argument the longer the block.--Koji Dude 05:04, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

I am trying to reach a compromise here. EVERY show has plotholes, not just GT. The reason I say Toei decides what is canon is because they own Dragon Ball. It's not about losing the arguement, other editors on other GT related articles have agreed that GT is canon(just very low canon, but still canon). I don't know why this article is such a problem. Maybe we should ask other editors to say what they think and agree to stand by their consensus. We should have a vote at Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and Manga(since their is no WP for Dragon Ball specifically). If the majority of people there agree with me, will you stop changing it? Because officially neither of us are correct becuase Toei and Toriyama never said whether it's canon or not. TJ Spyke 05:24, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

TJ, it really isn't that important. You're obviousley wrong, as you haven't given a single source to back up your claims. Canon is what is created by the original author. Unless you can somehow change the meaning of canon, you're wrong.--Koji Dude 05:30, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

...Ahem... actually there is a Wikiproject for Dragon Ball... I was the only member for about two months, and then it all basically went straight to hell since nobody else bothered to join... Ahem... Wikipedia:WikiProject Dragon Ball... -- bulletproof ^3:16 05:32, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

I find that kinda funny for some reason.--Koji Dude 05:35, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks a lot guys... -- bulletproof ^3:16 05:37, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

I just put the issue up there, but since nobody posts there I will also put it up at it's parent project(Anime and Manga). TJ Spyke 05:50, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

KojiDude, I'm not going to lie to you. If Taracka ever finds the testicular fortitude to go and do something as stupid as that, it would be the absolute most hilarious thing I've ever seen on Wikipedia. Of course, most of the hilariousness would be from seeing his ass get banned again instantly for the 1000th time. -- bulletproof ^3:16 04:38, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Seems to me that Koji "First Timer" Dude and TJ "Clean Slate" Spyke are interested in joining "The Club" Yeah, I had to click on the "100 versions" for this one. -- bulletproof ^3:16 05:19, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Damn, you guys are really going at it... -- bulletproof ^3:16

I was reverting vandalism (a.k.a WP:IAR) on this one. If I were to get blocked, that would be extremley stupid, as I am exerting as much good faith as possible, and trying to keep false info out of Wikipedia (a.k.a following policy).--Koji Dude 05:26, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Not true, you were trying to assert your OPINION(that GT isn't canon) wheras I was trying to make it neutral by saying that it's debatable(which is true). TJ Spyke 05:29, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

TJ, read those definitions of fact and opinion I put on Bebi's talk page. =) --Koji Dude 05:31, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Where is your SOURCE saying that only what appears in the manga is canon?

TJ, everybody knows that only what is in the manga is canon. Every article on Wikipedia that involves Dragon Ball says that. Face the fact that you're wrong and stop vandalizing. It's getting old. Eeveryone knows you're wrong, and you know you're wrong. You just can't accept it.--Koji Dude 07:48, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

I know i'm not wrong, the DB articles I have seen (like Dragon Ball canon) also say it's canon. They may say it's below the manga and the other two TV series in how canon it is, but it's still canon. Also, it is your BELIEF that only what is in the manga is canon. TJ Spyke 07:51, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

No, it's a fact. You don't decide the definition of canon, and you don't decide what is canon. What is canon is only what is created by Toriyama. Only what is 100% created by Toriyama is canon. It isn't my beleif, it is a FACT.--Koji Dude 07:54, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Read the defition of canon again, it does NOT say that only what an author creates in canon. IF only the mange was canon like you claim, then a source stating that would be available. TJ Spyke

"A complete body of work considered to be authentic, particularly the books of the Scriptures (Bible) accepted as authentic, or by a particular author."--Koji Dude 07:58, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

The duration of the block is 24 hours. Please, never revert that much anymore over what appears to be non-vandalism, as this is way out of hand. Voice-of-All 08:48, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Please read WP:POINT. Wikipedia is not Nomic. -- The Anome 23:57, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy by disruption of the project by attempting to delete an established policy.. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bastique (talk • contribs)

Nominating official polices for deletion is unlikely to succeed. Please read WP:SNOW for more quidance. -- The Anome 00:07, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

I strongly believe this block is not justified and unreasonable. Only two offenses were made and none after being warned. -- bulletproof ^3:16 00:12, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

So do I, but complaining about it will probably just get it extended.--Koji Dude 00:16, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Please read WP:FUC coprighted images are used in articles under a leagal claim of 'fair use'. THat does not extend to userspace. I've removed the image. Thanks. --Doc 00:01, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

I can't remember if you were the one who added it or not, but the topic seems to have been deleted multiple times (2 or 3 times at the least). Should we post something on the talk page, just keep re-adding it...What do you think? Sasuke-kun 27 00:18, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Resorting to an edit war would be sort of rash, even if it is just a bunch of trolls. Let's post something on the talk page first, as the paragraph helps let readers know the rumors are false, and hopefully will cut back on the number of trolls.--Koji Dude 23:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. I just wanted to get your opinion before I did any editing to either of the pages. Sasuke-kun 27 00:30, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

No problem.--Koji Dude 01:17, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your reply. I have given up on trying to get credited for my work as that is beyond the point now. The issue now - as best as I can see it - is whether reversions of self-reverts constitute vandalism.

Hi. I appreciate the advice, but why should I accept bullet's slander of my Wikipedia integrity? Isn't it warranted for me to bring that up to the admins? Just trying to understand where you're coming from...thanks.JB196 03:47, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

I just can't get through to user JB196. He continues to revert the article, reducing its quality claiming that he is not credited as "The Author" in the article itself. The issue is being brought up here help would be greatly appreciated. Hey KojiDude! just like old times huh? remind you of two other colorful characters we've had to deal with? -- bulletproof ^3:16 03:50, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Yeah it's me... Im still new to Wikipedia and Im doing some thing's wrong. It has to do with pictures and copyright. I know how to attach a copyright tag but Wikipedia has sent me messages saying that I must tell what the source is. I understand all this I just want to do it right... If you could just tell me how to send private messages and give me a moment of your time (it's up to you as to when) I would appreciate if you can talk me through how to properly post screenshots and other pictures. --Maphisto86 08:36, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Because all the Wiki-stars, Dragon Emperors, and Tarackas of the world have nothing better to do than to annoy the hell out of you. I'm getting really tired to have to deal with this sort of thing time and time again... That's It! I'm taking a beerbreak... I mean Wikibreak-- bulletproof ^3:16 02:07, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, that would probably be for the best. I'll take your place and help TJ with reverting any new problems that come up for ya.--Koji Dude ^{(viva la} ^BAM!) 02:20, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Just FYI, whether you believe me or not, I assure you that the edit at was entirely, 110% unintentional on my part. I would never nor have I ever intentionally removed anybody’s comments from any page with the exception of my user page. That being said, I understand you’re thinking that it was unintentional, although it was not. I was simply knee deep in all of that text and was trying to cut and paste that one sentence but instead seem to have cut out the entire paragraph in the process.JB196 02:41, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

I beleive you, but still, this whole thing would be best left forgotten. The past is a bad thing to think about sometimes.--Koji Dude ^{(viva la} ^BAM!) 03:23, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for reverting the vandalism that was done to my talk page. TJ Spyke 22:30, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

No problem.--Koji Dude ^{(viva la} ^BAM!) 22:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Ahem... ... Ahem ... What is up with Bulish.cx anyways? Oh and I see JB196 has been blocked indef... Hmm, its literally the same ending to every story. They always end up getting what they asked for . -- bulletproof ^3:16 23:01, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, just like Wiki-star... Oh, and I was going to mention you to TJ, but for some reason I felt really awkward typing it up. Sorry about that ol' chap. (Sweatdrop and nervous smile)

And Bulish.cx is probably just another average troll. I seriousley doubt it'd be Taracka, though. His tiny little brain wouldn't be able to put together vandalism like that.--Koji Dude ^{(viva la} ^BAM!) 23:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

The most amusing thing Koji is that you warned him repeatedly that this was likely to escalate and result in blocks. Alas it fell on deaf ears because as we all know WP:OWN never applies. –– Lid^(Talk) 04:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

The day somone actually listens to me when I tell them that will be the day pigs fly...--Koji Dude ^{(viva la} ^BAM!) 04:07, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

He's made an edit war trying to remove the Vic Grimes entry from WP:LAME heh . Honestly there is no way that war doesn't fall under LAME as it violates a policy at every stage. It first violates WP:OWN, then it violates wikipedia integrity, then bad faith reports, then bad faith edits, then personal attacks. It's the ultimate in an edit war that had no chance of being won. –– Lid^(Talk) 04:10, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Problem with ignoring him is that he is an AOL IP, which means his IP constantly changes, which means blocking his socks does no good. Unless an Admin Semi-Protects the problem articles, there is no chance the vandalism can be prevented. -- bulletproof ^3:16 04:13, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Now the edit war at WP:LAME is just completley hilarious. He's almost as funny as Taracka. And about the AOL IP thing, that still doesn't stop you from not acknowledging him. Leaving edit summaries about him, discussing him on talk pages (like right now), and even the WP:LAME thing is just making him proud of himself. I think this would fall relate to WP:DENY.--Koji Dude ^{(viva la} ^BAM!) 04:18, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

HAHAHA! A lame edit war in Lamest Edit Wars. How much lower is this whole thing going to get? lol. -- bulletproof ^3:16 04:24, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

I don't think it's even possible for it to get any lower than that... But I'd like to see an edit war at Toilet or Flowers.--Koji Dude ^{(viva la} ^BAM!) 04:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Well overall, I think it's been a very productive day. -- bulletproof ^3:16 05:11, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Not to scare anybody but i have a seven friends that are going to start trolling BIGTIME SOON they are each going to name hemselves a deadly sin like lust or envy, i cant stop them they want me to go and help troll but i said no...i really am desprate to stop them they say that wikipedia sucks and they are mad at me cause i am using this and not myspace i dont know who to tell and i am scared they will totally vandlize my page until there is nothing left to revert it to. do not brush me off i am serious all that i know is that they are going to one by one vandalize everypage i helped or posted on.i am really paranoid and if you veterans could offer any protection it would be very appeaciated. this is not a joke and please listen to me please. i am at my breaking point. User:Big foot123456789

Hey, relax. It's nothing we can't handle. As soon as they vandalize a page Deskana or somone else will block them. 7 13 year olds aren't really that big of a problem.--Koji Dude ^{(viva la} ^BAM!) 03:49, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

thank you and also just to let you know they are upper classmen they are all 15 and have a lot of lan parties or something User:Big foot123456789

Every RfA contains a link to at least one set of statistics that is generated based upon your use or lack of use of edit summaries. It is my understanding that many voters take a dim view toward a low percentage of articles with edit summaries. Including them on every article is hardly the only thing one must do in order to wield the mop, but it is an important start. Erechtheus 01:45, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

What do you think of merging the following nonimportant characters into the list articles? They really don't seem like they need their own aricles and most of the information in them are just plot summaries. They are King Vegeta, Paragus, Bra, Son Goku Jr., Gyū-Maō, Uranai Baba, Marron, Cui, Dodoria, King Cold, Android 14, Android 15, Shenlong, and Porunga. Nemu 21:43, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

That sounds like a pretty good idea. King Vegeta, Gyū-Maō, Marron, and the 2 Dragons should be moved into a list. The rest should keep their own articles, except for 14 and 15. I'd like to try and merge them, but if that fails we can just add them to whatever list they belong to/we create. We should probably ask some other editors for opinions first, though. We don't wanna make huge changes out of nowhere and get everyone mad at us.--Koji Dude ^{(viva la} ^BAM!) 21:58, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Absolutely not. Some of those characters are tertiary. However, I disagree about Cui, Dodoria, and King Cold. They are major players in their sagas respectably. Those characters are the most important to me, and many others. It's that merging which was a bad idea to begin with. It's what caused controversy and one page to become exceptionally cluttered and infested with information. This is a much more clear and concise method and has been proven so most recently.

They have barley any info. Their own articles are pointless. Cui Zarbon and Dodoria can have their own articles. King Cold doesn't need one.--Koji Dude ^{(viva la} ^BAM!) 23:27, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Also, on another note, KojiDude, if you watch the cooler dvd and look in the end credits, you'll see that his name is not written as SALZA but as Salsa, am I getting anywhere. To you, it may sound like he's saying Salza...but he isn't. Also, in the game, Cooler says Saizaa Blade...doesn't make Salsa's name Saizaa either....based on the actual info, his name is Salsa. check it. - Zarbon

His name is Sauza. Check the subtitles. Sasuke-kun 27 23:25, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Zarbon, I'm not going to waste my money on a DVD to satisfy you. I'd rather just wait until you finished special ed.--Koji Dude ^{(viva la} ^BAM!) 23:27, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

See, this is very entertaining. -- bulletproof ^3:16 23:31, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

I rented Cooler's Revenge (what a waste of $5) and I checked the subtitles. It said "Sauza", not "Salsa", "Salza", etc. The game isn't a very reliable source of info (Trunks' being able to go Super Saiyan 2 in the Budokai series is a good example) and the only reason Cooler uses the move in the game is because it wouldn't make sense to have a character with only one move (not counting his transformation and super finishing move). In the movie, Sauza uses the attack and calls it "Sauza Blade". Sasuke-kun 27 23:35, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Alrighty then. Problem solved.--Koji Dude ^{(viva la} ^BAM!) 23:41, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

We have to protect the page again. That little, pain in the ass IP user won't quit. It's getting on my nerves (I'm trying not to show it), and I bet he's getting on yours. If he's not, he will unless we do something about him. We're they only ones who are reverting his edits (User:3bulletproof16 reverted one of his edits, too.) Do you have any objections whatsoever on protecting the page? Do you have another plan in mind or should we just revert his edits? Any ideas would be great.

P.S. - Your reply can be left on your talk page. I'll have it on my watchlist. Oh, and I changed Cui to Kiwi. Hope I didn't miss any! ^_^ Sasuke-kun 27 19:43, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

I'd say just to try and revert it, but if it really is out of hand (I haven't been making edits in the last half hour or so) I'll submit the protection request. You can second the request and add your own comments and hopefully it'll work. Oh, and thanks for the Cui to Kiwi thing. =) --Koji Dude ^{(viva la} ^BAM!) 20:02, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi KojiDude, sorry for the delay in replying. Let me take a look at your contribution record and see what advice I can give. Best, Gwernol 18:06, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi, I took a look at where you are. This is an informal and brief review only; I'd recommend you ask for a formal editor review if you want other and/or more in-depth comments. The first thing I looked at is your block log. This is enough to suggest you should not be thinking about an RfA now. Three blocks, the most recent only just over 2 weeks ago would be enough for most editors to oppose you, I'm afraid. You'll need to let these recede several months into the past before an RfA is likley to be supported. The fact that you have two blocks for the same behavior - WP:3RR - is worrying.

Now on to your contributions. You've been editing since late April, so you squeak past my personal minimum for time before an RfA. I'd prefer to see 6 months of active editing. Your editing stats are:

Username KojiDude

Total edits 2176

Distinct pages edited 385

Average edits/page 5.652

First edit 15:50, 29 March 2006

(main) 951

Talk 511

User 122

User talk 314

Image 109

Image talk 1

Template 9

Template talk 6

Wikipedia 130

Wikipedia talk 23

Again, these are definitely on the low side. Personally I look for at least 2500 edits overall, and I'd prefer more like 3000-4000. You've got a reasonable spread of edits across the various categories, though Wikiepdia talk is low. I'd like to see more evidence of you being engaged in this area of the project.

Now looking at some specific contributions. I'm glad to see you've been making good contibutions to WP:AIV recently. This is good. I'd like to see more reports from you. You've also contributed to some WP:AFD debates. Again, this is good, do more of this. I'd like to see you quote specific policies in your opinions, rather than just saying "blatantly not needed in an encyclopedia", for example. Learn the policies that effect deletions and show us you know when they apply. Try to get involved in the more complex deletion debates, as these teach you the finer points of polciy and its limits. Obviously its important to remain calm and civil during these discussions.

Almost all your editing is on Dragon Ball Z articles. Its great to have a specialization (I have a couple), but its good to take part in the wider Wikipedia world. Try hitting the Random article link a few times. Find an article that needs improving and go to work on it. Its a great way to broaden your experience with Wiki editors, plus you'll learn about something you never thought you would. Some of my most refreshing aexperiences here have come working on completely new subjects. Admins have to deal with a lot of different subjects and people, so get some exposure to that.

One other issue: your use of edit summaries is lower than I'd like to see. I'd suggest turning on the preference that reminds you if you try to make an edit without a summary. That will force you into the habit of leaving them. I have this option turned on.

Overall, I'd say that with more experience and if you can keep your slate clean (no more warnings and certainly no more blocks), then you are heading towards being a good RfA candidate. Good luck, Gwernol 18:20, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Alright, thanks for the help, I really apreciate it. I am already in the process of getting into the edit summary habit, and I have that preference option on. I'm having trouble thinking of what to put often, because saying "Comment" or "Reply" or "rv" kind of gets old and makes me sound like a drone. I noticed on WP:ANI that admins just copy and paste their whole paragraph so the edit summary cuts it off, like a fore-shadowing or something... That kinda bugs me. Also, I'm aware that my edit range is pretty much limited to Dragon Ball, but it's mostly because when I was growing up it was the coolest thing in the world to me, I'll try getting involved in other subjects, though. With this in mind, I think I'll have a good chance when I have about 3,000-5,000 edits. Thanks again.--Koji Dude ^{(viva la} ^BAM!) 21:01, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome, glad it is some help. I agree about edit summaries: sometimes they're a pain to write, but they're really useful to other editors. I too don't like the "first sentence" style summaries, I prefer a succinct summary that really does summarize the content of what I wrote (I'll try to do a good one for this comment :-) I do think you'll have a chance in a few months; demonstrating that you've learnt the lesson from the blocks is particularly important, but they're not insurmountable. Good luck, and I'd be happy to do another review like this when you feel you're ready to try another RfA. Best, Gwernol 21:04, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

You edited the Ginyu Force on the list of Frieza related characters and told me I had no reason to change it earlier. I just told you the whole reason before. Why don't you stop this childish behaviour. Oh and about reporting me you have to realise it was you who has screwed up. I told you that I had given them shorter descriptions but you still had to remove them just to get your own way. User:Recoome

No, just to follow policy. The characters do not need any summaries there. See Wikipedia:Manual of style. They do not each need their own summaries because they have their own articles and barley any info. Please do not deliberetly damage the integraty of pages and accuse me of violating WP:NPOV.--Koji Dude ^{(viva la} ^BAM!) 01:47, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

I moved it from ANI per your suggestion thanks. Vive le bam!—Preceding unsigned comment added by Pewlosels (talk • contribs)

There really isn't a need to thank me, but, your welcome, I guess.--Koji Dude ^{(viva la} ^BAM!) 02:55, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

I know it's minor, but, thanks for removing that personal attack. I'd have thought being blocked would clean up his act. Guess not.--Suit-n-tie 04:45, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Not a problem. I seriousley doubt his act will ever get "cleaned-up". I mean, seriousley, read his user page, and read Deskana's talk page. If I was that kid's Dad I'd smack 'em... Or laugh...No, laugh then smack. Yeah.--Koji Dude ^{(viva la} ^BAM!) 04:53, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

That would be something to hope for.--Suit-n-tie 04:59, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Yup, sure. I'll be sure to do that in the future.GI Judd 19:47, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

It seems he's using a sockpuppet now. His new page is nearly an exact reprint of his old one. That guy's gone out of line, or has he... Just want your opinion is all.--Suit-n-tie 00:39, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Well, if he's resorting to pointless sockpuppetry and wants us to "keep quiet about it" when Deskana will figure it out in a manner of minutes next time he logs on, yeah, I'd say he's crossed the line. And judging by his actions after his first block, he's pretty much gone for good. The sock puppet block will lead to him using more sock puppets to evade the block, the block will get reset or extended, and he'll end up like User:Ericsaindon2.--Koji Dude ^{(viva la} ^BAM!) 03:09, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

In total he has 3 sock puppets and 1 that might be his. Well, I reported him to Deskana. Now it's only a matter of time.--Suit-n-tie 04:01, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

The guy's got a screw loose. He's become a troll again. I'll try not to bother you anymore. See ya later.--Suit-n-tie 00:02, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Hey, Koji. I stumbled across the Grandpa Gohan page a few months ago and put a lot of hard work into it. But I'm not the only one. An IP user added this to the page not to long ago and I was thinking over whether it would be a good idea to have it or if it would be POV. I was wondering if you could take a look at it and delete if necessary. Thanks!

P.S. - Your reply (if you choose to reply) can be left here. Sasuke-kun 27 20:52, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I'd say that violates WP:NPOV. Perhaps it could be re-written in an un-biased manner, though, as it is partially true.--Koji Dude ^{(viva la} ^BAM!) 21:32, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for removing the vandalism from my talk page. I really appreciate that. Thanks a lot. -- bulletproof ^3:16 03:44, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks for reverting mine too.--Koji Dude ^{(viva la} ^BAM!) 03:59, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

No problem; happy to help. All in a night's work on Wikipedia. :) Thisthema n 05:53, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

There's no indication of vandalism on the article page anywhere. Please tell me why you removed it. User:Kabuto Yakushi

Because there are no referneces proving it is Dragon World. If you can cite a source stating that it is, then you can re-add it. =) --Koji Dude ^{(viva la} ^BAM!) 21:39, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Hey, KojiDude. I've made a suggestion on the Ultimate Battle 22 talk page to change the title from Ultimate Battle 22 to Dragon Ball Z: Ultimate Battle 22. Details can be seen on the talk page. I just wanted to know if you had any feedback on the suggestion or not. Happy editing! Sasuke-kun 27 20:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

...on the page protection request. I've been here for a while, but it's the first time I've ever filed a request on that page, so needless to say I made a few mistakes. I went back to reformat it and move it, and you'd beaten me to it! | Mr. Darcy talk 00:15, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

No problem, happy to help. I was confused the first time I wrote one too. I think filing a 3RR vio is the most confusing, though. >_< --Koji Dude ^{(viva la} ^BAM!) 00:23, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Indeed - that's my next stop, at some point tonight, since he's rv'd one article six times using three different IPs. It just takes so long to fill the report out. | Mr. Darcy talk 00:29, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Just passing through since I don't edit Wiki much anymore, thought I'd say hey (HEY!). Looking through your contributor history to see what you've been up to; are you an administrator now? If so, congratulations! The things that go down when I take time off. ^_^;

My recent edits aren't much I'm afraid, just a difference in opinion on the Coola page, which brought me here. Just think since official title translations of the films are given in FUNi's subtitles they should have prominence (and be listed regardless) in the movie listing; it's not even a sub or dub thing really. Probably all you'll hear from me on that, since I won't be around anyway. :(

Oh well. Whatever you're doing, have fun and stay safe. Take care now, and drop kick a few vandals for me! Voice of Treason 09:58, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Are you sure about that? Most of the page is about Broly and is mostly a summary of the movie. It can't be expanded at all. Minor characters that have a small role in one movie don't really need a page in the first place. Nemu 20:36, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Well, after reading your summary for him on the list of Saiyans page, I changed my mind. Good work. Just remember to let Bra, Goku Jr., and the 2 Dragons keep their own seperate articles. #'s 14&15 should keep their own articles too, but it wouldn't hurt to just merge them.--KojiDude 20:58, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I redirected it again. While I don't think Bra and Goku Jr. need pages, I woun't bother to pursue merging them. I'll probably merge 14 and 15 sometime later. I think I already merged the dragons a while ago. Nemu 21:05, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Shenlong really has no need for a page either. The couple of small, mostly unexpandable paragraphs are much better suited on the list than their own page. Nemu 21:17, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

He should keep his own page. He's a major character. All we need to do is expand the article a little. Add a personality section, a section listing the wishes he granted, and maybe a section about what wishes he can't grant and why he can't grant them.--Koji Dude ^{(Contributions)} 21:34, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

I really wouldn't classify him as major. He only had like a half hour of screen time in the entirety of the three anime. It's more the idea of the Dragon Balls that's major. The additions to the page would mostly be fluff and cruft. I just think it would be better to leave a nice, short summary on the list. Nemu 21:52, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Why did you revert Androids 14 and 15? They are very minor, and their articles are just small plot summaries. They have no personality, and really don't need pages. I can sort of see the main villians of movies needing pages, but minor characters that play very small roles really don't need any.

As for your edits to Shenlong, you seem to be mostly reiterating points that are already made. The big list of wishes is cruft and already found on Dragon Ball. I think it would be much better to just leave at as a redirect, and have the little blurb on that page do. Nemu 22:34, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

I reverted Android 14 and 15 because I don't think they should be redirects for 2 reasons.

1) If merged, they would do just fine. Somethig like Androids 14&15
2) The List of Androids in Dragon Ball article sucks. It has horrible grammar and a couple pathces of false information. It also has people who don't even belong there.

Shenlong is an important character because, were it not for him, the entire universe would probably be destroyed. The point about the list of wishes being taken from Dragon Ball doesn't make much sense to me. It's not a big deal that two articles have similar information. I'm also going to re-read the Dragon Ball manga during the week and add on to Shenlong as I do. Another point I want to bring up is that I don't have much knowledge of Shenron, so maybe somone who does know alot about him could help us out. We should probably have a Video Games section too.--Koji Dude ^{(Contributions)} 22:49, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

The android list can always be cleaned up(I'll start on it in a little bit). A combined article would be pretty pointless as they both only have a paragraph of information each. They should just be redirected.

A character being important in the series doesn't relly earn them an article. It's more about notablity and information. He's notable as far as Dragon Ball goes, but he really doesn't have enough information. The personality and un-Grantable wishes are mostly rehashes of information from the first paragraph(which also does a better job to just summarize it). The granted wishes section is not needed. It's very pointless, crufty, and much too large. It's not a big deal that two articles have similar information, but it seems pointless that over a quarter of the page is just a direct copy and paste from another page. A video game section will add a very small paragraph that's really not needed.

The page really just doesn't need to exist. It's already pretty much maxed out in terms of useful information, and way over the amount of fluff an aricle should have. Nemu 00:15, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

wasn't kiwi stronger at first 18,000 was vegeta's level??—Preceding unsigned comment added by Zadsat (talk • contribs)

Kiwi's power level was 18,000. He claimed to be stronger than Vegeta to intimidate him. That's when Vegeta powered up to 22,000 and killed Kiwi. (This is from the Manga)--Koji Dude ^{(Contributions)} 04:52, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

but in the anime it is said in a way that makes kiwi's advantage pretty clear do you mean in the magna? in the anime Zarbon says his powerlevels way higher than vegeta you wont be seein that monkey again or something like that?? - Zadsat 04:58, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm not entirley sure what you're trying to say. The Manga has the final say in things like Power Levels. TOEI Studios and FUNimation fucked up alot of the storyline and dialouge in some parts. Zarbon was indeed more powerful than Vegeta in his Monster form, but in his Base state he was not.--Koji Dude ^{(Contributions)} 05:02, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

no no no no no no no zarbon says that cui was much more powerfull than vegeta. - Zadsat 05:03, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

First, Zarbon said that before Vegeta powered up. Second, get a life Taracka.--Koji Dude ^{(Contributions)} 05:04, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

i understand you now zarbon did say that before dude. - Zadsat 05:06, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

With regards to your comments on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dragon Ball special abilities: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. "Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users." Please keep this in mind while editing. Thanks. In particular, your asking another user "Are you fcuking high?" Andrew Levine 05:01, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Examples of personal attacks

"Specific examples of personal attacks include but are not limited to:

Accusatory comments such as "George is a troll", or "Laura is a bad editor" can be considered personal attacks if said repeatedly, in bad faith, or with sufficient venom.
Negative personal comments and "I'm better than you" attacks, such as "You have no life."
Racial, sexual, homophobic, ageist, religious or ethnic epithets directed against another contributor. (Disagreement over what constitutes a religion, race, sexual preference, or ethnicity is not a legitimate excuse.)
Using someone's affiliations as a means of dismissing or discrediting their views — regardless of whether said affiliations are mainstream or extreme.
Profanity directed against another contributor.
Threats of legal action.
Threats of violence, including death threats.
Threats of vandalism to userpages or talk pages. May be direct or indirect.
Threats or actions which expose other Wikipedia editors to political, religious or other persecution by government, their employer or any others. Violations of this sort may result in a block for an extended period of time which may be applied immediately by any sysop upon discovery. Sysops applying such sanctions should confidentially notify the members of the Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee and Jimbo Wales of what they have done and why.
Posting a link to an external source that fits the commonly-accepted threshold for a personal attack, in a manner that incorporates the substance of that attack into Wikipedia discussion. Suggesting a link applies to another editor, or that another editor needs to visit a certain link, that contains the substance of an attack."

Nowhere does it say that questioning a user's reliablity and current status is a personal attack. Saying "Are you fucking high?" Is not a means of insulting somone. And there's no policy against saying the word fuck. Last time I checked, there was one promoting it.--Koji Dude ^{(Contributions)} 13:21, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Vegito23.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:51, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

I saved the OR version of Glitch City at User:The Hybrid/Glitch, and then I merged it. Cheers T H L 17:31, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Okay, nice work. =D I would've done it myself but I was at school, and the computer I was assigned to in the Tech Lab was blocked for 3 months (because of a different student).--Koji Dude ^{(Contributions)} 21:48, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

I was happy to do it. Feel free to edit the page as much as you like, thats why I gave you a link. Cheers. T H L 09:43, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Hello mate. I have looked through the pages and I am trying to correspond with the style. I know that you care equally about maintaining a proper amount for each page. I see that the Zarbon, Dodoria, Cui, Pikkon, Babidi, and some other pages are in good format, with a maximum of five pics on their pages. This is a good format. However, these characters are major players in their respective sagas whereas people like Janemba, Hildegarn, and Tapion are not. People have a tendency to put up a hooplah of images on the movie characters. Tapion was in 38 or so minutes. Hildegarn was in about 24 minutes. Janemba was in around 30 minutes of total airtime. These characters all appear in one movie and they aren't necessarily important nor influential. People are adding 6 images on their pages when they actually barely deserve one. This is why I am telling you to help me maintain control of pages like Janemba, Hildegarn, and Tapion. For example, Janemba can have 3 images on his page, such as his first form, his second form, and one of tank boy before his emergence. But to add three or four more images of him when he's smiling, angry, or lunging at an enemy is just plain overkill. I learned to maintain your method because of how you tried to bring control to my favorite pages. Thus, Zarbon has one image of his first form, one image from a game, one from his second form, one from his saga in mid battle, and one from when he returns in GT. This is a good method and it covers the character well. And I don't go and add 20 images on a page identifying every single move they make. I would also like to bring to your attention the very miserable Buu page. There's just too many images on the page, and many of them are just battle pics. Again, I hope you can help me and we can work together to maintain the 4-5 images per page for series characters and 3 images max for people like Janemba. Thank you very much and I hope to hear from you soon. - Zarbon

The size of the article merits the numder of images, not importance. The Dodoria, Zarbon, Pikkon and ect's article's are short. I think you kind of have it backwards.--Koji Dude ^{(Contributions)} 21:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Ok, why do you accuse me of vandalism? I haven't done anything wrong. I really believe you're mistaken and think I'm somebody else. Dragonball1986 23:24, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Simply because some of your edits were made in violation of WP:NPOV. Almost all of your edits are being reverted, and you seem to be doing the same thing over and over to different articles. I'm not saying you're doing it on purpose, I'm simply letting you know that your edits are questionable and you need to consider reading some of the policies concering images and behavior and ect.--Koji Dude ^{(Contributions)} 23:41, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

I know for a fact that those power levels are official because they are listed in the Japanese Dragonball of Wikipedia for combat power. Look it up and see that I'm not lying. (make sure you have a Japanese to English translator though) 69.167.112.220 03:16, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

I do have a translator, but not a very good one. If you've already translated it, maybe you could just cite whatever reference the Japanese Wikipedia does? It sounds like the simplest thing to do, imo.--Koji Dude ^{(Contributions)} 03:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

The only official power levels come either from Toriyama's manga or from the Daizenshû databook. Everything else is original research, even on the japanese Wikipedia. It's not because it's in japanese that Wikipedia becomes suddenly a primary source ! Folken de Fanel 10:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

I got it! The Japanese wikipedia has it from Akira Toriyama's staff called Mt. Toriyama Discernment. That proves they're official. Correct me if I'm wrong though, but at least have those characters whose power levels were revealed in the anime. Dragonball1986 13:57, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Like I said, Wikipedia, in japanese or in english language, will never be a primary source. Everything not coming from official sources is original research. If I contributed under the name "George W. Bush" it would never mean that I really am the president of the USA. Folken de Fanel 17:44, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for catching this problematic username. I have advised the user to request a name change, and we can play it by ear. --Ginkgo100 ^{talk · e@} 02:22, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

No prob.--Koji Dude ^{(Contributions)} 02:23, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Hey Koji, thanks a lot for supporting me in my recent RfA. It succeeded, and I am very grateful to all of you. If you ever need help with anything, please don't hesitate to ask. Also, feel free point out any mistakes I make! Thanks again, —Khoi khoi 04:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

No problem. =) If you ever find yourself in a position where you don't know what to do, just remember; 42...--Koji Dude ^{(Contributions)} 05:02, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

That's the smartest thing I've heard all day. ;-) —Khoi khoi 05:12, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

If you were to look at the summary for the edit in question and at what I removed, you would hopefully realize I was removing a redundant section. Gokule, the section I removed, already exists as Gotan. Unless you believe there is a need for the same character to have two sections on the same page, then my edit was just. I admit my edit summary may not have been incredibly clear, but looking at what I removed should have answered any questions you may have had. ~SnapperT o 05:20, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Please don't do it. You are not entitled to three reverts in every twenty-four hours, as your edit summary here seems to suggest. Tom Harrison ^Talk 23:10, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

I know, I've read WP:3RR; I only said that because he was accusing me of breaking 3RR.--Koji Dude ^{(Contributions)} 23:13, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

First off, what's with you calling it vandalism? I listed the reason right in the summary. Just say you disagree with it. Don't call it vandalism. Why does he need the page? It's just a basic plot summary of the movie. It's pointless as hell. A small section on the list with a link to the movie should do. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TTN (talk • contribs) .

Because you blanked an entire article without any consenseous from other people. You can't just go aroudn redirecting any page you want. It's disruptive and not fair to the people who've been working hard to make the article. How would you feel if you wrote a big long article, spent alot of time on it, and I came and redirected saying it was pointless (when it isn't)?--Koji Dude ^{(Contributions)} 23:48, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm never going to write anything that pointless. I don't see how anyone could work very hard on a basic plot summary that only should be on the movie's article. I have no clue how it would ever reach a consensus as the few pages I have left a message on haven't been replyed to. These pages are really pointless. I have no idea how people want them to exist. If the character can only have a plot summary, what's the point? Nemu 23:52, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

"Few pages"? You've redirected about 10-15. What you're doing is lazy; you're blanking articles instead of doing clean-up on them. All these pages need is a little extra information about the character. That's what Wikipedia is for. You create a small article, and then it gradually grows. Not you create a small article and TTN comes and redirects it callign your work pointless. And don't think this is a WP:OWN issue, because I've hardly worked on the Hirudegarn article.--Koji Dude ^{(Contributions)} 23:56, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

When did I say you thought you owned it? I'm saying that you're magnifying it's importance way beyond what it actually is. So far, I've only redirected pages that don't need to exist, and can't be "cleaned". All these movie characters articles are just plot summaries. They characters have no importance outside of them. If I was to clean them, there would be nothing left as I would reduce the summary to a paragraph(as it is on the list). The only movie characters that should have articles are Coola, Broly, and Garlic Jr. They at least build up more than just a "villain of the week" reputaion.

Saying the articles should stay just because people worked on them is pointless. I'll go around and add the plot summaries to the movie articles if they're good or better than what's there. The other good info can be placed on the list. See, no "important" info or work lost. Nemu 00:07, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia has no limit to the number of articles it can have or the amount of content in articles. If you disagree with the notability of an article, then discuss among your fellow Wikipedians. If the consensus agrees with you then it may be removed. However, if you continue this disruption, your edits will be considered as Vandalism. -- bulletproof ^3:16 00:04, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Really, it wouldn't. I could easily AfD these articles, and most people would agree to delete them as they are not notable at all and for the fact that they're plot summaries(which I believe the writing about fiction policy says not to do). How am I going to discuss it when nobody replies? Nemu 00:10, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Thats what this fool said about this. And look what happened. -- bulletproof ^3:16 00:13, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

So, if you just straight up deleted a page without AfDing it, nobody would care? At least having an AfD would allow discussion. Just redirecting it out of nowhere is disruptive.--Koji Dude ^{(Contributions)} 00:11, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Well, I assume nobody should disagree with it(which is why I didn't try to do it with characters that really aren't important, but can be seen as important like Cui and Dodoria). Do you disagree with the redirects because you find the characters notable, or that you don't like pages being removed? The later is what I'm sensing.

You know what? Screw trying to justify my actions. Let's just discuss it now. The articles for King Cold(which I tried to discuss after, but Bulletproof just seemed to ignore it) and Hirudegarn should be merged with their lists. Why do you disagree?

First, I disagree because King Cold has plenty of info, and Hirudegarn just needs to be expanded a bit. You shouldn't redirect articles without giving some sort of notice, so somone has time to clean them up (you should probably be doing it yourself, though). Second, why the hell do you wanna discuss wether or not a page should be removed on my talk page?--Koji Dude ^{(Contributions)} 00:22, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Because if I bother to put it on the talk page, it'll be ignored. How can either of them be expaned while having on the essential history on their pages? They have nothing besides that and a quick personality description which fits better on the list. Do you think either could look like Kuririn(which needs a general clean up)? He has a nice brief history, but the article actually has substance. Neither of those two could have anything close to that. Nemu 00:33, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

If all you need is an example of what I'm talking about, look at Janemba. Me, Jeinum, and Voice of Treason all worked together to clean it up. If you notice. we also comunicated on the talk page about our edits (and don't just go Redirect that one because I mentioned it).--Koji Dude ^{(Contributions)} 00:44, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Another day, Another WP:TROLL... -- bulletproof ^3:16 00:25, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Wow. That's just stupid. Because I feel that a couple of pointless pages need to be redirected, I'm a troll? You haven't even discussed it yet. I put it right on King Cold's talk page right after you reverted it again. Wait until I keep redirecting it(which I won't, just to clarify) before calling me a troll. Nemu 00:33, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Count up how many articles you've redirected so far, and then read what you just said.--Koji Dude ^{(Contributions)} 00:44, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

As far as fully redirected, six that I could find. That's not very many as they were all small articles like Android 14, 15, Porunga and others that can easily be summed up in a paragraph. I tried to redirect Hirudegarn, King Cold, Rou Dai Kaioshin and Shenlong, but they were reverted. Both Shenlong and Rou Dai Kaioshin are debatable, I guess, but Hirudegarn and King Cold are minor at best. I guess I could have discussed Shenlong and Rou Dai Kaioshin, but the rest shouldn't need one at all. Nemu 00:54, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I'm confused on everything now. Some articles use dub names, some use manga names, some use Japanese names, some use fan names, it doesn't make any sense. You said the ones where a diffrent name was used more they used that name, like Coola. Coola gets 1,810,000 results. Cooler gets 79,000,000 results. And people say to discuss changing artilce names but when I bring it up it will get one or two comments and then be forgoten. If I try to move it someone reverts it and gets on my case for not discussing it when I did. So what am I suposed to do? Takuthehedgehog 05:54, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Well, in my eyes there's 3 options. 1) Make the point about Google hits in your move summary or on the talk page 2) Find somone very active to debate with or 3) Forget about it, it's anime.--Koji Dude ^{(Contributions)} 05:59, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Please see Bebi's talk page to decifer who deleted him. --Dragon BallPower levels ^{(Contributions)} 19:36, 8 November

I honestly have no idea what happened here. I think it's just a Redirect gone bad. Maybe bring it up at WP:ANI?--Koji Dude ^{(Contributions)} 20:37, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Luigi30 did it during a history merge, but got caught up in something else. He's going to undelete it. Nemu 20:42, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

I suggested a move from Broly (Dragon Ball) to Broly. See his talk page for commenting. Power level (Dragon Ball) 21:45, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

About the Super Saiyan page, under super saiyan, there is a list of 'known users' that had achieved that level, Future Trunks was included, but I was wondering would Future Gohan be qualified to be included, since he did make an appearance in the DBZ movie "絶望への反抗!!　残された超戦士・悟飯とトランクス", but you probably have a point to disagree to this, somehow I see one coming..

A User:Zhahzha has been placing orphan tags on several Dragon Ball related images that are in current use. I'll revert this person's doings as soon as I'm done here, but I need you or any other Wikipedians to warn this person. Power level (Dragon Ball) 17:11, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

My mistake, I was badly misinformed and have already apologized to Zhahzha on Nemu's talk page. -- // Power level (Dragon Ball) // 15:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		You've done way more than enough to deserve such an award. So here you go.--SU IT⁴² 03:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Hey, Kojidude... its been a while huh? I was out for a couple of weeks cause my computer started acting up. So I went to go get it fixed, and it turns out the motherboard was completly fucked up. So I did what any other pissed off person with cash would do. I kicked my COM around a few minutes, then I spit on it another few minutes, and finally I went out to Best Buy and got a new one! See, it all worked out for BP. So now that im back...eh... what'd I miss? Any new trolls? -- bulletproof ^3:16 18:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

What?!?!? that Powerlevel guy is still around? I thought Deskana would have blocked him by now... -- bulletproof ^3:16 18:30, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

We're having an argument over at Talk:Rou Dai Kaioshin about the spelling of Majin Buu in the english manga. I said that they could either check volumes 24-26 of the DBZ manga or Majin Buu's page (under "manga name") to prove that I was right. TTN had changed "Boo" to "Majin Buu" on the article to avoid revert wars, but they still argue about the spelling on the talk page. Now they're demanding manga scans that prove that I'm right. Do you know how hard it is to find manga scans of a specific page on the internet? Hopefully, you and possibly someone other users, besides Suit and myself, can talk some sense into them. Thank you. // Sasuke-kun 27 20:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Hey there, KojiDude! Um, could you check out Talk:Bardock? I posted up a discussion but nobody has answered yet....maybe if you put up your opinion on the site, more will take a look at it and give their opinion. So, when you get the chance, visit the talk page. It's section is at the very bottom. There's a link to the site; see if it has good information. If not, can you find a link needed or something. Thanks! ----Power level(Dragon Ball)^{Stacy's Mom}16:25, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

It's me again, could you see Paragus' talk page also for comment?----Power level(Dragon Ball)^{Stacy's Mom} 21:26, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Well, to be completley honest, I really don't care about the Paragus page. If Nemu wants to go and redirect every stub because he's too lazy to fix them up, let him. It's just a meaningless Wikipedia article anyway =/ --Koji Dude ^{(Contributions)} 16:22, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

We're having a little problem we're trying to resolve. Another move request over at Talk:Hercule (Dragon Ball), since apparently winning the last one didn't "count." Care to weigh in? Onikage725 07:48, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

There's a troll that is reverting my redirects from a few articles that seem to be plain listcruft. (List of Dragon Ball DVDs List of Dragon Ball video games, List of Dragon Ball episodes) I believe it is unnecessary to have such lists because of the fact that there are templates that list most of the information there already. The third article in question is nothing more than a list of movies and links to other lists. A comment on this issue would be greatly appreciated. -- bulletproof ^3:16 03:19, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Please see Talk:Dragon World dispute for your vote on whether we should keep the Human (Dragon World) article or have it merged into Dragon World. Thanks! Power level (Dragon Ball) 15:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

It's happening again. Place your vote/comment on the respective talk page for which name Wikipedia should use; a censored name, or an orignal name. ^{Power level (Dragon Ball)} 15:21, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

It is hilarious :D —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.50.143.66 (talk) 12:20, 17 December 2006 (UTC).

Thanks. =D --Koji Dude ^{(Contributions)} 07:27, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:DMC4Dante.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:50, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Recently, I have noticed that you haven't been very friendly with me and swearing, as you did on my user talk page. Attacking other users only esculate the tension between you and the oposing user/s so please try to remain civil at all times, even though the opposing contributor has made a mistake or angered you in any way. Read Personal attacks and disruptive comments if you're unsure of what's civil and what's not. Try to always keep cool and pipe down a little before posting hurtful comments on people's user talk pages. You, yourself regard having no personal attacks has very important and you should keep to your word. This notice was not put there just to annoy you, it was put there because I believe your comments for me and other contributors, need improvement. Please read the guidelines carefully before further disrupting mine or any other user talk pages. Thank you! Shaggy9872004 05:59, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Another day, another troll... Wikipedia is not censored... -- bulletproof ^3:16 23:53, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

How is any of this a personal attack, uncivility, or disruption on KojiDude's part? He obviously didn't do any of that towards you Shaggy so what's up with the ridiculous warning? Power level (Dragon Ball) 01:02, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

If you both need refreshing please note that ethnic epithets and profanity is a personal attack. Please see this little statement written by Serpent's choice if you need verifying. Even if this is not a rule, it is strongly discouraged by wikipedia. Read Personal attacks if you need refreshing. Please respond on my talk page if you need further refreshing of Wikipedian rules and discouragement. I will gladly help you. Good day to you. By the way User:3bulletproof16, how was I being a troll. I was only suggesting that he has manners and speak politely. You look there has been another user, accusing KojiDude of being uncivil. Shaggy9872004 10:45, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

When you can, see Talk:Power level (Dragon Ball)#Okay, let's get these power levels right!, thanks! Power level (Dragon Ball) 19:08, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:DemonKingYouth.GIF. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MECU≈talk 01:54, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Hey Kojidude, would you be interested in joining our Wikiproject? Wikipedia:WikiProject Dragon Ball -- bulletproof ^3:16 02:33, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		For your fine contribs to Wikipedia. Keep 'em coming. -- bulletproof ^3:16 07:50, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

I was wondering why you had more than one {{User DBZfan}} on your userpage. Is it cause you like Dragon Ball that much? Just askin'! Power level (Dragon Ball) 19:45, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

I should let ya know too. Whenever you can, please see Talk:List of Dragon Ball special abilities#Garlic Gun. If you see that Garlic Gun there, that is just a sample of how the techniques should be classified and titled. I am going to change all of the techniques on the list (except Kamehameha, Dodonpa, Genki Dama, Kaio Ken and any others that were used as romaji names in the English manga/anime) into their literal English translation in about five days from now. This change will be similar as to how Bardock was changed to Burdock (name pun) and Hercule to Mr. Satan (which was his original Japanese/romaji name). Please comment on anything else if you have something you may want to add on to it. Thanks! Power level (Dragon Ball) 00:04, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Hilarious section. That made me have a big laugh :D. Good job!! --Taraborn 08:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Dude where you at? been a while since you've been on the Wiki. Hope you come back soon man. The DBZ Wikiproject could use some extra help. -- bulletproof ^3:16 04:47, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

I would like to apologize for the dispute we got into last summer over Baby. I still think I was right, but I shouldn't have let it elevate as far as it did. TJ Spyke 23:20, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Examples of personal attacks

Examples of personal attacks

SSJ5

Thanks

Dragon Ball timelines

Wiki-star

Unknown copyright?

Image Tagging for Image:Bojack.jpg

Images on your userpage

Admin?

The Cell Page

The Apocoslypse Is Comin'

With a song in my heart ~~

Dende

WAZ UP!!

Nameks

The Return of Wiki-Star

Powerlevels discussion

Talk:Dragon_Ball_Z:_Budokai_Tenkaichi_2

Sorry

81.36.29.122 and WP:AVI

You're invited&nbsp;:)

Buu

Your report on WP:AIV

Fair use images

Regarding Honey

AIV

Re: VandalBot

Oozaru page editing

Guess who's back...

Dragon Ball canon

My signature

Dragon Ball GT

Re: Hey

Bebi (Dragon Ball GT)

Regarding reversions made on August 31 2006 to Bebi (Dragon Ball GT)

Regarding your edit to WP:IAR

Copyrighted images

"Fake Characters" on Dragon Ball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi 2

Vic Grimes

Re: Vic Grimes

Vic Grimes

Newb Questions

Why does being calm, civil, and nice never work?

Just so you know...

Thank You

Edit summaries

Dragonball character articles

Re-protecting Tenkaichi 2

Adminship

The Ginyu Force

hi

Hey

Grandpa Gohan

Thanks

Re: Thanks

Why'd you remove the Dragon World map?

Ultimate Battle 22

Thanks for your help

What's up?

Paragus

kiwi

note about attacks

Image tagging for Image:Vegito23.jpg

Glitch City

DBZ Character Page Images

How can I find a source?

User:Wikistar3

Muchas gracias

Re: Edits

Edit warring

Hirudegarn

Dragon Ball Z article named

Someone deleted Bebi blatantly

Please see Broly's talk page

What do you think of this?

Notice: A fellow user

Barnstar

Hello!

I need a little help here...

You're invited :)