Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome! Hello, Jeff Dahl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Mak (talk) 18:37, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the great picture! Do you have any others of Old Cairo? I'm currently working on several articles about that area and am very interested in other images, whether they're of buildings, or of a view, or just of empty streets. What do you have available? :) --Elonka 22:23, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Hey there. I see you've been doing some excellent work on chemistry and pharmacology articles. Would you like to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Pharmacology? It's sort of a "task force" of editors dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of pharmacy and pharmacology articles, and all are more than welcome to help. Either way, thanks again, and keep up the good work! Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 16:39, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi! thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I'm interested in your comments at Talk:Ketorolac#Proposal to merge Acular into Ketorolac, if you don't mind. --Jdlh | Talk 07:19, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for creating the figure for 2,5-dimethylfuran! Unfortunately there is a small error in the first intermediate, which should have just one double bond, rather than two. As it is now it has two pentavalent carbon atoms! Cheers, Itub 15:46, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Aspirin has been selected as this week's Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week! Please help us bring this article up to featured standards during the week. The goal is to nominate this at WP:FAC on September 10, 2007.
Also, please visitWP:RxCOTW to support other articles for the next COTW. Articles that have been nominated thus far include Doxorubicin, Paracetamol (in the lead with 4 support votes so far), Muscle relaxant, Ethanol, and Bufotenin.
In other news:
Dr. Cash 00:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Daniel Case 15:13, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
WarthogDemon has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Here's a brief update in some of the recent developments of WikiProject Pharmacology!
You are receiving this message because you are listed as one of the participants of WikiProject Pharmacology.
Dr. Cash 04:59, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi Jeff - got your message over on commons, thanks for the invite... I am out and about quite a bit but will cast my eye over the page and see where I can help out... Regards 87.102.123.56 20:44, 24 September 2007 (UTC)and here on Wikipedia Merlin-UK 20:46, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
You're right, the terming was different. However, with the merger of the two projects, they look identical, and actually even feed into the same assessment system, making them functionally duplicates. John Carter 23:33, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
I hereby award you this Barnstar for your many contributions to the article on Ancient Egypt, not only in terms of plain edits but also for mobilizing other editors to help improve the said article to featured status. -Icewedge 06:30, 28 September 2007 (UTC) |
Hey! Thanks for your comments at peer review. I think I've addressed most of your concerns, and I was wondering if you would bother reading the article again and responding on the FAC page. Thanks, David Fuchs (talk) 11:44, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I have changed the template, to show the importance, can you see whether it "works" as expected, I've checked a few articles, and they look OK. Markh 20:10, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
The one you swopped to is a facsimile of 100 years later than the original, and should not be used in articles on art, nor any article without making this very clear. Johnbod 00:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Edwin Smith Papyrus v2.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 06:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC) |
Hi Jeff,
Just letting you know I've uploaded a new 'less cropped' version of the Hymenocallis speciosa flower nom on FPC if you want to take another look. --jjron 15:31, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
I am not sure if you have seen WP:FC. It contains a section where a few hundred of the WP:FLs have been excerpted. As I imagine it, the new section would use the work already done there to create the excerpts. Thus, we would just take the FL section from FC and put it at the bottom of the main page at first.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 20:07, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
... for all your helpful suggestions with Restoration of the Sistine Chapel frescoes, and in particular your generous comments about my literary style.... I mmade a few more of the changes that you recommended..... and a little gold star suddenly popped up in the corner!
Well, the big decision now is whether to put up Leonardo da Vinci which a lot of people have had a hand in, or something less challenging! All the best! Amandajm 07:32, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks you for the peer review. I can see we have our work cut out for us. Yes, this does badly need to be reoutlined; the edit wars have taken their toll. Captain Zyrain 21:09, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello Jeff Dalh, I've added a response to your message here. selfwormTalk) 21:51, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
That barnstar means a lot to me :-) Ta bu shi da yu 07:10, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
The author of the book contends that these pictures are reproductions of reconstructions of the original text. I'd quite believe him - these pictures were high quality, certainly not verbatim copies of 2000+ year old papyrus, there is clearly some work involved in reconstructing them. As for sending messages, we have hundreds and hundreds of emails in m:OTRS to process, no time to discuss every one of the issue. David.Monniaux 15:02, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the peer review on Matrikas. It's much appreciated.TheRingess (talk) 22:55, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Vinland Map HiRes.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 04:55, 20 October 2007 (UTC) |
Thank you for your suggestions in the peer review. Please elaborate on sections with the "coin" analogy.--Redtigerxyz 05:48, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
As I said in the reply, there are more changes pending. I'm a bit busy IRL, so it would take me time to improve the article. However, the film's been peer reviewed before: Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Peer review/Rob-B-Hood. Could you give some examples of problematic prose? Which sections need the most fixes?
As for the homosexual security van drivers part, it's based on this dialog in the film.
And after the car chase.
Those phrases were the homo jokes in the film, and I think I will just use the film itself as a source.--Alasdair 18:40, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your vote and comments to the featured article candidacy of Golden Film. I changed several things in the article and posted a response on the candidate page. Furtermore, I am willing to further expand the article, do you have any suggestions? – Ilse@ 18:58, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
I have a question. On the FA-candidate page of Golden Film, you wrote: "Keep at it, it needs expansion because there is more to the story than this". After I have used many of the suggestions and comments from the FA-candidate page to improve the article, do you still think there is information missing? Do you have any suggestions of what is "more to it"? – Ilse@ 23:10, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Jeff, I just got around to making the edits on the Alanya article which you recommended at the peer review, and I just wanted to say thank you for taking the time to look over the article, and that your suggestions did indeed improve the article. Thanks again!--Patrick Ѻ 19:58, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank for help at Image:Tiled roof in Dubrovnik-edit.jpg Featured picture candidates! I tried write more at the description and add a geocode. What can be good at the caption? Can you take a look on that? Thank you very much for help --Beyond silence 07:40, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey, Jeff, just wanted to say that it's awesome to finally find someone on Wikipedia that has an interest in Ancient Egypt! Just wondering, do you know what they did to the Ancient Egypt page? I added an extra paragraph, but they deleted it along with some other important info on Egypt. If you can find a way to reply to this, can you? Thanks!
Thanks for the advice, but now that I know what to do, I think I'll wait the four days.
Abluescarab 03:34, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.