Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archives |
|
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ItsTooEarly.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Marchjuly (talk) 02:53, 3 March 2016 (UTC) -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:53, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
User:Jwad/Don't Tell Me Promo Tour, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jwad/Don't Tell Me Promo Tour and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jwad/Don't Tell Me Promo Tour during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Chris Kyle shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I know it would be unorthodox, but is it possible to put a protection against IP editing on the Chris Kyle talk page? The same individual is continuing to IP hop and is now removing the RfC. I expect they won't stop. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 18:55, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
this is on facebook in a patriots group i just took the screen with ms snipping tool but i can't put it on the talk page there for some reason
— Preceding unsigned comment added by PatriotWolf359 (talk • contribs) 06:52, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Keri (talk) 13:43, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
I disagree that my comment wasn't constructive. I encourage you to patrol the Wikipedia pages claiming his music is "satanic", or calling him "evil" as diligently as you have my note.
I'm a lover of everything Prince ever did. And my observations of his genius, hidden or blatant, coincidence, or not, are constructive, and relevant to others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christeyena (talk • contribs) 19:34, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
What is the protocol for putting photos onto a bio page/ do they have to be public domain? Also what is the rule on adding external links? thanks,Cydorsm Cydorsm (talk) 16:47, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello,
Sorry for my english, first. I saw you have blocked User:Télécom ParisTech groupe 11, and that @Yamla: refused the username change. I'm a sysop on french wikipedia (fr:User:Jules78120) and I created this account on frwiki for this project: fr:Wikipédia:Projets pédagogiques/Télécom ParisTech. There are only two persons behind the account, and they are well identified. I saw Wikipedia:Username_policy#Usernames_implying_shared_use: there is no way to unblock the account and rename it? On frwiki shared accounts are not forbidden, especially for school and university projects (if there is no abuse).
Best regards, Jules78120 (talk) 14:59, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello There, please do not revert the changes, you can remove the links, as they might have accidentally added by me, intent is not promotional, its a genious thing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kunalrrv (talk • contribs) 21:11, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm new to Wikipedia and have been emailing with someone at the info desk to work through this. It seems we need to submit changes to the Talk page instead of editing which I now can't do because I'm blocked, and I don't want to change the username because we are making it clear that we are the organization who just wants to edit incorrect information. Can you please unblock me so I can submit the changes through the Talk page? Thank you. 47.19.215.5 (talk) 15:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
I wanted to change ajith kumars picture into his latest picture..can you please change it? I'm finding it difficult to change Sambhu12 (talk) 18:25, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
I have not visited WP for several months, and every time I do there seems to be another unpleasant surprise awaiting me!
You sent the deletion notification to me, and someone now has deleted her, without waiting for any comments. My email address is on file, so someone could at least have notified me - this is not rocket science! I agree I initially created a short article on her, which was definitely not lifted from any other source, as I am careful about this. I know that a number of people in different countries modified and expanded the article after that from newspaper sources, personal knowledge, etc. If someone lifted some text from an article, you should merely have deleted that section. In my view, she is/was interesting and notable, and definitely deserves a WP article. Of course, since the material has now been deleted, I can't check who contributed which section, but you or your colleagues should definitely have done that before taking this drastic step. She will be missed! Jpaulm (talk) 23:06, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on User talk:MicrosoftIntelS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- samtar talk or stalk 17:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Would it be possible to rev-del/suppress/whatever the content of the recent vandal-edits to Tangled: Before Ever After? Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 18:44, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. Jauerbackdude?/dude.
Pardon me, but I don't know about any edit war I was involved in. I've been reverting bad edits, fighting vandals, and making UAA reports for the past hour. Can you please explain what edit war I was involved in? Joel.Miles925 (talk) 19:33, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
And incidentally, the user i was reverting had created a promotional article now being considered for deletion. Joel.Miles925 (talk) 19:34, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Okay. I understand what you're saying, but I was simply removing promotional content (I do agree that could be seen as an edit war). What should I do in the future to avoid similar issues? Joel.Miles925 (talk) 19:45, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Cheers! Joel.Miles925 (talk) 20:30, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Please avoid archiving ANI threads before at least 24 hours after close. At least 24 hours are need to allow all interested parties to view the close, regardless of time zones, sleep patterns, work patterns, and log-in patterns. The easiest way to avoid premature archiving is to Google utc time, subtract one day from that, and then avoiding archiving any threads which were closed after that time. Thank you, Softlavender (talk) 23:27, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User talk:Indian Yoga Center, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:14, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback, how can I hire someone to write them about me and my profile? Can I hire you? Email me directly if possible bodyguards007@aol.com thank for your kind assistance and cooperation! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.27.95.194 (talk) 17:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Not_Dipper_Pines (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Time: Jul 19, 2016 15:25:45
Message: null
Notes:
Fuck you for deleting my shit CoolGuy3472 (talk) 19:23, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
How can I get the history of my father's business on wikipedia without it being taken down? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keatwrig001 (talk • contribs) 15:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
CRF has made many advances in marketing and has also been recognized around the country. It is no different than recognizing any other business. Why then would CVS have one of these. If I did not know what something was then i might look in an encyclopedia. If someone did not know what CRF was then they could look it up and see the history and importance of this. There is no promotional reason why this should be on wikipedia. I don't see many people going to wikipedia finding out out to fundraise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keatwrig001 (talk • contribs) 20:21, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
It seems prudent to provide a link to the rule violated by the wording in the image. Regardless, I have removed the speculative comments from the image and re-uploaded it. There should no longer be an issue with it as it is documenting known variations of the KFm family. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Btreecat (talk • contribs) 17:06, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Jauerback, I would like for you to be nicer to people in the talk pages. I understand how important Wikipedia rules are, but you do not seem to undertand that other users are people too. You do not understand that other users are new and instead of welcoming them, you tell them they are "ruining the page" and blocking them. Imagine if that happened to you. Would you be happy? Also your use of informal terms, such as "messing up", is not appreciated. Jauerback, you are a good user, but it would be appreciated if you would 'lighten up' and be nicer to users. Jauerback, I hope you take this into account --Domata789 (talk) 14:36, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I would be grateful if You would put Serbia (Srbija) as the country that Gotovusa is in.Because it is.Kosovo for now stil in Serbia.Thank You Jedinstvenadevojka (talk) 14:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Gotovusa is in Serbia, Kosovo is part of Serbia, I would be grateful if you put Serbia as the country Gotovusa is in.Can You fix that? Thank You Jedinstvenadevojka (talk) 14:51, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, Won't do it again. SupLetchup (talk) 15:36, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
I have started use of multiple windows in one pc Prince9819 (talk) 14:30, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for keeping an eye on this, but please hold off tagging them? They clearly enjoy amassing socks so we should deny recognition. BethNaught (talk) 18:20, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Legends & Lies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Civil War. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
I created the page which is being discussed at this AFD. I didn't know much about tennis notability. This user Rms125a@hotmail.com makes this comment boilerplate fancruft article created by banned user; does not fulfill athlete/sports notability threshold.. This user has big block log. Why he called me banned user? I was never banned from creating the page Kayla Day. I saw her Wimbledon page and assumed that she has notability. --Marvellous Spider-Man (talk) 02:48, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Jauerback, Could you possibly revdel this edit and this edit please?, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 01:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
1st Place To Remove Vandalism!
46396 Points! Bollins Cerrname (talk) 08:41, 9 August 2016 (UTC) |
What are good articles that I should edit? Fazerayray98 (talk) 16:10, 12 August 2016 (UTC) Fazerayray98 (talk) 16:10, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
I am turning to a life of vandalism. I am so sorry😓😓😓😓 Fazerayray98 (talk) 16:26, 12 August 2016 (UTC) Fazerayray98 (talk) 16:26, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Rogue Fitness at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 15:49, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Sorry. I am new to wikipedia, so I wanted to remove all things negative. Also, it appears to be rude for you to abruptly deny the user who tried to make a village from Kosovo to Serbia. Anyways, why do all wikipedia users say, "see above"? --Domata789 (talk) 20:22, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Hey man I don't think Kaleo is any where close to being indie pop Ejs20 (talk) 21:30, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Re the reversion of my inclusion of the Rich Froning example for the BMI entry: would it help if I'd mentioned that the weight/height measurements underpinning in the BMI figure in the example came from Froning's Wiki entry ? Robma (talk) 09:17, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Could you lower the protection on Sam Bradford to semi-protection or even ECP protection? See Talk:Sam_Bradford#Protected_edit_request_on_3_September_2016_2. Dat GuyTalkContribs 18:35, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi Jauerback,
You recently deleted an article I was in the process of writing on UniAdmissions. Would you be able to restore it so I can modify it tocomply with the Wiki guidelines. Being new there I am in the process of learning how to edit, etc...Any help and advice will be appreaciated. AVC12 (talk) 08:20, 5 September 2016 (UTC)AVC12
Thanks a lot! I'll do my best to improve it! AVC12 (talk) 12:56, 5 September 2016 (UTC)AVC12
Hi again, I have modified the page now. Would you be able to tell me if it's more acceptable? User:AVC12/UniAdmissions Many thanks for your help, AVC12 (talk) 11:35, 6 September 2016 (UTC)AVC12
Ok, anyrhing in particular because I cna't see much difference with this page?? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxbridge_Applications AVC12 (talk) 19:34, 7 September 2016 (UTC)AVC12
Hello! Your submission of Rogue Fitness at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 10:33, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Jauerback. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Hey there. Sorry to bug you but there are some unregistered IP users who are vandalizing the Bridgeport article with the addition of the word 'affluent', which is not only untrue, but also violates NPOV, given that affluency isn't technically a standardized measure, but is generally relative to one's own interpretation. Regardless of the semantics though, it is hardly classifiable as an 'affluent' area... and besides that I live hereand am well aware of it's middle-working class status, it is also clearly reflected by the relatively low median income listed in the infobox. Thank you for your assistance. Ryecatcher773 (talk) 18:12, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
see this link [1] that the home team is first, because they won. Jdavi333 (talk) 17:58, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello,
Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Jauerback/Archives,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Jauerback/Archives.
A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.
If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
This is Riz Story - you've managed to lock me out of my own page for now - but expect consequences. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meopa (talk • contribs) 23:24, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Meopa (talk • contribs) 06:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC) Delete Walls of text above do no — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:60DC:400:75BD:EEA5:DE50:B25C (talk) 16:11, 19 November 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meopa (talk • contribs)
User:2600:387:5:807:0:0:0:82 is abusing her talk page. CLCStudent (talk) 21:03, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Per this edit, is it possible to change the protection to simply block IP editors/Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access? The edit warring seems to come from one person using multiple IPs constantly ignoring other editors, failing to use even basic layout, and constantly 3 reverting and even four reverting . In the last round of edit warring a second anonymous IP seemed to show up to war with the first. Hard to even try to achieve consensus when it is impossible to tell who is saying what, maybe having to identify themselves with accounts would be a first step. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 00:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi there. I received a notification at the top of my page that I had been mentioned by another editor, so with excitement I went to see what it was, and it was User talk:BatteryIncluded, who you recently blocked for making personal attacks, telling me to f-off.
The sockpuppet this editor is referring to is in regard to a message I left today at User talk:EdJohnston#Concern.
I really do try to avoid this childish stuff. Thank you for your help. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:16, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Jauerback. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
You destroyed historical evidences regarding the deletionist vandals that destroyed the first nomic bank. Curse upon you. Bow bank4 (talk) 20:47, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
YOU DELETIONIST BASTARD. THE WAY YOU DELETE 11 YEARS OLD EVIDENCES OF THE DELETIONIST VANDALISM IN WIKIPEDIA., THE SAME WAY YOU WILL BE DELETED. THIS IS A CURSE UPON YOU, AND UPON ALL YOU DELETIONIST DECENDANTS. Bow bank 5 (talk) 20:56, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, could I request that the protection level to the Poland article is returned to Semi-protected — after the recent upgrade which expired, article protection was completely removed and not dropped back to Semi-protected status, since then anno IPs started to disrupt the page. --E-960 (talk) 11:00, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Here it is. There were attempts to continue the discussion, even though you yourself had explicitly stated that edit summaries are not compulsory. I do not wish to be bothered by a trivial issue any longer. May I request the discussion be ceased? --Sk8erPrince (talk) 02:35, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
I'm not sure if it's just a glitch or I'm being hacked but I received a message saying the contribution I made was undone when I don't even have an Wikipedia account. I apologize in advance if this question has been asked in advance but I really have no idea how to navigate through the Wipedia pages. Is this a common occurrence? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.183.47.109 (talk) 22:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
For 83.29.66.66? Thanks. Linguist If you reply to me here, please add {{ping|Linguist111}} to the start of your message 14:47, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Hey, someone who is not in anyway connected to the band Steppenwolf came on the Steppenwolf band wiki page under members and did some removal and adding of text that he had no right to edit. When looking into it more we found the name Larry Green and that's a person whos in a steppenwolf tribute band and has no connection to Steppenwolf. Hes under the name Steppenwolfman. If you can please bar him.... We are trying to edit out the damage he is causing ... thanks .... — Preceding unsigned comment added by FormerSteppenwolfmember (talk • contribs) 10:33, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
this new yiddish version of god bless america was historic and made news headlines all over the world see this article: http://www.timesofisrael.com/first-hasidic-woman-judge-sworn-in-with-yiddish-song/
http://forward.com/video/358190/lipa-schmeltzer-sings-god-bless-america-in-yiddish/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by VINnews (talk • contribs) 12:43, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.