Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Ixtal. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Your feedback is requested at Talk:William H. Davis (educator) on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Booth Theatre on a "Art and architecture" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Nutty Narrows Bridge on a "Art and architecture" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Jewellery of the Berber cultures on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Memorial to Victims of Violence in Mexico on a "Art and architecture" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Paramount Hotel on a "Art and architecture" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:QAnon on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Brahma Chellaney on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:31, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Walter Kerr Theatre on a "Art and architecture" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Bellesa on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Leon P. Miller on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi,
Can you support me? I have few edit proposals, which are stuck and I don't know what step need to be taken next?
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Anti-Armenian_sentiment_in_Azerbaijan#Elchibay's_speech
Thanks in advance!
--Abrvagl (talk) 11:00, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Can I also ask your opinion on the below statement from the Anti-Armenian sentiment in Azerbaijan article? Reading the Wikipedia rules other day, I found that below information does not fit into the Wikipedia requirements and need to be improved, but I am not sure if Im right or not.
"President Aliyev regularly makes remarks seeking to belittle Armenia and inciting inter-ethnic hatred. He in particular encouraged to wage war against Armenia,[125] made statements alleging that Armenia is "a country of no value" that is run from abroad and artificially created from "ancient Azeri lands",[126][127] that "it is not even a colony, it is not even worthy of being a servant",[128] further stating that it is, in contrast to Azerbaijan, in constant decline[129] and that Armenia's existence should be called into question.[130][131] Aliyev also claimed that the main enemy of Azerbaijan is the Armenian lobby in the United States,[132] and invoked imagery of the Battle of Aghdam to argue that the Armenians are vandals and barbarians.[133][134]"
As I understood above information is based on the WP:RSPRIMARY sources and not following WP:NOR requirement. Because it states that "President Aliyev regularly makes remarks seeking to belittle Armenia and inciting inter-ethnic hatred", however it is not supported by secondary source, neither it is supported by the provided primary sources. As I understood it is analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources, which is against rules..
Above means that statement also not inline with WP:BLP and WP:BLPPRIMARY requirements. Moreover, accuracy of the quoting not followed, as per WP:RS/QUOTE, words are taken out of the sentence and context.
So in my opinion above should be rephrased. Conclusion part of it should be removed, all other statements should be correctly cited inline. Am I right? I'm not sure, and don't want to start talk page while Im not sure, because I afraid to get accused in the intentions which I do not have.
Sorry for disturbance! Thanks in advance! --Abrvagl (talk) 15:36, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Neil Simon Theatre on a "Art and architecture" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
An arbitration case regarding Skepticism and coordinated editing has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 05:04, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:
These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:06, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:1922 Index of Great Trigonometrical Survey of India.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 16:51, 4 March 2022 (UTC) |
The Barnstar of Good Humor | ||
For Wikipedia:Embrace_Stop_Signs, funny but also sadly true at times. Rlink2 (talk) 18:25, 5 March 2022 (UTC) |
Rlink2 (talk) 18:25, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:August Wilson Theatre on a "Art and architecture" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Iveco on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:24, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
There are a few additional disputes on the Anti-Armenian sentiment in Azerbaijan talk page. Should they be included into the current DRN or it is better to wait for solution to the current one, and then start a new one? TBH all of them straight forward, but they become long-lasting disputes because some editors just pushing their POV. I personally believe that it is better to wait and start the new one. --Abrvagl (talk) 14:44, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
I am somewhat confused by your closure at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#RfC: Categorise male footballers in the same way that we categorise female footballers: you seem to have found a consensus for both the main proposal (to rename the generic footballer categories into male footballer categories) as well as for sub-proposal one (to merge female footballer categories with the male ones). Moreover, I am not convinced that the sub-proposal discussion received enough participation to override the consensus of the main proposal, and IMO, the sub-proposal isn't sufficiently broad because the precedent would apply to all biographical categories split by gender and overturn a major categorization pattern, which would require a much more broadly publicized and widely participated RfC. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 17:25, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi there! Hope my message finds you well and happy:)
I am not sure why Robert McClenon decided to close the DRN which was almost completed, but he clearly stated what he stated. There is the truth in his words...but, I am definitely not the one who pushes POV. I always strictly follow the Wikipedia rules even if they are against my POV.
REgarding the dispute. AS I understood it was about to be closed. My and Zani's dispute is about if there are sufficient reliable sources to support the statement of Elchibay or not, and I believe that we found out that at least at this point there is no such source available, and we were waiting for Zani's last reply, where if he did not provide the reliable source and we did not find any - dispute is closed.
Anyway, I followed your recommendation and UNDO the reliable source noticeboard request. --Abrvagl (talk) 23:23, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Icewhiz's law, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Icewhiz's law and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Icewhiz's law during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:05, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi,
I know, I already got you with my pings...but I need your advice.
In the Anti-Armenian sentiment in Azerbaijan, user Kevo327 added information about a living person and supported it with WP:NEWSBLOG source, which also seems to be partisan and biased. As per I reverted his edit and proposed to discuss it on the talk page, however, he refuses to do any discussion and reverts his edit back. 1. Should not he first reach a consensus before making an edit? 2. This user's attitude is clearly disruptive. As I do not want this to grow into edit wars, can you advise how I can follow up on this in a peaceful way?
Thanks in advance!
--Abrvagl (talk) 19:43, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi A. C. Santacruz. Just to thank you for re-assessing Financial economics (per Wikipedia:WikiProject Finance & Investment/Requests). Your comment is appreciated. Fintor (talk) 11:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
On 26 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Royal Expedition, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that supplies were so poor during the Royal Expedition of the First Carlist War that some soldiers wore cardboard-heeled shoes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Royal Expedition. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Royal Expedition), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
If you are waiting for a response from another editor, maybe the case should be closed for lack of response. If you aren't waiting for a response, either the editors need another statement or the case should be closed. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:53, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.