Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thanks for your comments! No, I don't have any other location maps ready yet. I did start on Sumatra and Sulawesi, though, but I still need to regenerate them with better data. BTW, the resolution of the data I'm working with is 90 m - I had to downgrade it by a factor of 6 for Java maps. So I could make location maps for much smaller islands, too. I'm going to create few "real" topographic maps for some of the smaller islands (e.g. Flores, Sumba) and could do location maps for them as well. There probably would be little/no use for them, though. – Sadalmelik 11:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
I have restored the links section on the Suppressor article; you're right that there are questions about WP:SPAM and WP:EL, but I'd prefer that it be discussed some on the article talk page before it's completely removed like that. Thanks. Georgewilliamherbert 21:43, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Hey Man, would you give one reason why your knaife so sharp to cut every bit of what have I'm done in Bengkalis Regency....? Nice to know you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Me iwan (talk • contribs) 00:22, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
I don't understand... Forgive me, but I added a link on the "Dirty Dancing" page in good faith to very well regarded wiki style non-commerical site that contains lots of information and you removed it immediately --whilst leaving utter commerical dreck like this link intact(http://www.movieweb.com/movies/film/38/3638/summary.php/)???? Did you even check the link?
UPDATE: I only added it as you were mis-attributing an important quote on the movie's success to two sources that had taken it from another writer in 2001. I also notice that you removed the reference. This was a perfectly legitimate affort to contribute. No wonder good editors are leaving. I added several links because I am a frequent vistor to that site and very much appreciate their totally non-commercial stance with no ads, no agenda and everyone can contribute. I couldn't believe that they (as an important contributor to the genre) weren't listed anywhere whereas so much commercial dreck was... Thats all. Sorry, but this was my first effort at contributing and I feel that you were a little hasty in your judgement... Thanks again. Fanpot 16:17 4 September 2007 (GMT)
What is that supposed to mean? Can we please address the issue?
Yes, I posted 3 links to an important non-commercial resource from 3 relevant pages. 3, not 3 hundred for heavens sake. But No, I am not a link spammer. And no, you didn't *check* their validity.
I've spent a significant portion of my time this afternoon learning how to contribute before posting and I point you to the following wiki editor guidelines relevant in this situation: (from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith)
1) Unless there is strong evidence to the contrary, assume that people who work on the project are trying to help it, not hurt it.
2) If criticism is needed, discuss editors' actions, but it is not ever necessary nor productive to accuse others of harmful motives.
I'm not being funny, but, should I just cancel my account and accept that this is a closed community line DMOZ, where new members are far from welcome to try and help or correct issues? I don't want to waste your time or mine, so honest answers are appreciated. Thanks in anticipation.Fanpot 16:25, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your latest reply. :)
Obviously being accused of being a spammer was *very* annoying after I'd just spent *ages* trying to figure out how to contribute properly, --but, upon relection I realised that it must be very difficult in your position, so I hope we can chalk this up to my experience and that I may now be able to start fresh and contribute something positive? :)
That said, I have taken your advice and posted to two of the discussion pages of the pages where I tried to contribute. Any further advice you can give would very much be appreciated :)
Can I ask you to please consider reviewing your decisions to delete all my contributions? If I have to go through a proposal stage for every update, it will be a very long and frustrating process (it seems) or is this just the way it works?
Thanks again :) Fanpot 16:35, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Sorry - just realized :-) --Bencomplain 07:14, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
I have had a few experiences of so called "community" sites where the concept is very good, but the reality was a hidden agenda that excluded all but the priviliged few. Wiki seems different and it probably is down to the efforts of people like yourself so, as I said, I understand that it must be hard to seperate the "wheat from the chaff". Thanks again for your help and understanding :-) Fanpot 08:33, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Hey Man, Look at the article's history at 25 November 2006: . You did cut my own work from years ago, you know that. So what i'm done to that article is only make rollover it to my work from last year.
— Me_iwan (reply) — 10:07, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
My changes to my talk page about my mod were removed...Im just wonderng why... I added detailed information about my mod such as file type, download type, size, genre, etc...Apparently Vandalism?
I was under the impression that the creator of the mod, and the page would be correct about its contents...Im not likely to vandilise my own mods page --Sgt. D. Pilla 00:58, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- I just realized that you created that page, but please don't put your user name and signature on the article space. Please read WP:MOS on how to edit articles in Wikipedia. — Indon (reply) — 00:47, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes you may, and please do not use first person in the article. This is an encyclopaedia, not a report, and please be as neutral as possible. Cheers. — Indon (reply) — 01:00, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Why did you remove my comment from Postoaks talkpage? stop being an ignorant fool. --Smerit Blandereichen 00:54, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
You are only doing this because you hate me, If all else fails, I'll complain to Jimbo. That'll shut you up --Smerit Blandereichen 00:57, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Policies are only guidelines! Unless they support my position, in which case they are, of course, set in stone --Smerit Blandereichen 01:00, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Also, see Wikipedia:Ignore All Rules --Smerit Blandereichen 01:02, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
You, who's supporting my opponent (User:SatuSuro) is either a puppet or a friend called in to help. After all, could more than one person oppose my natural good sense? --Smerit Blandereichen 01:13, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
To SB, it was 3 am and I was going to sleep and I woke up this morning to see you blocked. Nice system. ;-) — Indon (reply) — 08:04, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Chaser%27s_War_on_Everything - kalau belum mengerti - tak apa apa - mungkin semua orang di luar australia kurang mengerti SatuSuro 10:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Negara aneh - oz - belum mengerti negara atau kebudayaan yang lain - tetapi ada hal aneh dengan kebudayaan oz - mungkin indon bisa mengerti editor oz sekarang dari itu! SatuSuro 01:39, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Can you please examine the page history. Carl Sabanski's mysundial.ca site is the principal site in the gnomonics community ex Wikipedia. It is the only site with the full mathematical treatment of every dial. He is a wikipedian but a ipeditor, but the type of qua;lity editor we cannot afford to lose. Over the last year this link has been persistently targetted in unexplained and possibly sophisticated way and removed. On several occasions I have bored into his site looking for commercial links , libel and anything else unwiki- the site is clean (though the raw HTML is sometimes unexciting.)
I don't understand why, or how you decided to do a delete, but you are obviously being drawn into this spat. What we need is a way to protect this link from deletion. I haven't the experience to initiate this process and I done know the tags to use. These deletions would break the 3 deletions rule 3 times over were it to be the same person who is doing the deletion.
Can you advise. ClemRutter 08:19, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for comment. Did as advised. The mastersite link is www.mysundial.ca/tsp/tsp.html this triggers a spam blocking. I have already requested that this gets a local whitelisting- but there has been no action, which is presumably why other user, used link. This is really a embarrasing tangle. ClemRutter 08:57, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello there Indon/Archive12, this fortnight's Indonesia project collaboration is > > > Jakarta < < <. Please contribute. The most important thing is to find reliable references for all existing information, and for any new info added.
Also, please help nominate an article for the next collaboration at the collab nomination page. An underdeveloped or stub article is preferred over a long and developed article. Please nominate up to two articles. any questions, please let me know. Kind regards and happy editing. --Merbabu 11:40, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
You deleted my views on Mughal article. I thought that was right so that people know about the effect of Mughal's ruling in India. I am new to Wiki, so might not be aware of many things which you might know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikideewana (talk • contribs) 07:51, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page! I did decide to keep it, though, just because...well, it's hilarious. :) How do you think I ought to go about responding to a legal threat? GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 17:51, 9 September 2007 (UTC) |
I logged on wikipedia at school, and when i went to the bathroom, my friend edited the page hoping to get me banned. Im real sorry about this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Chuckles V2 (talk • contribs) 22:46, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick revert on my user page! It is greatly appreciated. --TeaDrinker 23:29, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
I may protect your userpage for awhile if the troll whose vandalizing it keeps visiting you. If I do protect it and you wish for it to be unprotected, contact me at any time.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 00:54, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
this WAS discussed on the Suharto talk page. please read it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtl1969 (talk • contribs) 20:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Hey Indon, seems like you know how to handle Wikipedia spammers. So I thought you might be the right one to ask. What way is there to block a spam poster indefinitely or to report him? Seems like User:Angarali is a candidate, for example. Cheers, Trigaranus 22:18, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Hmmm - are the quote boxes the best way to present in-line quotes? Normally I save them solely for an article that can be read independently of the box - ie, like Mount Tambora or U2 where they are not "in-line". On the other hand, they are really part of the prose in Nagarakretagama and thus I'm thinking that block quote is better. Gimana? --Merbabu 08:42, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi Indon/Archive12, Communications in Indonesia currently has the most votes for the next collab but I think we should agree on a direction for the article before we make it the collab. In the meantime I will post Sutan Sjahrir as next fortnight's collab. Can you please put your thoughts on Talk:Communications in Indonesia? Many thanks. --Merbabu 09:38, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Err... I think I never heard of that page before and don't remember editing it. Why did you write me about it being tagged for speedy deletion? --Fritz S. (Talk) 13:51, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Pardis Maghami is awesome, hes a legend in Australia. U yanks wouldnt know that though...... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.79.19.162 (talk) 00:30, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
You reverted my edit to the page Nolan Stolz and cited WP:CSD. Can you please explain to me why the page doesn't meet the criteria for speedy deletion when criterion number 7 states:
Sabian220 14:52, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
I notice that you are not putting historical characters into this list. Any reason? Where should, say, Bung Tomo go? thanks! --Merbabu 04:19, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Howdy. Just fyi, I've left a uw-error3 warning template, and removed the welcome template that you left, from Calo2007's talkpage. The account seems to be being used for pure vandalism so far. If I notice any more vandalism from there tomorrow I'll notify an admin. Hope that is acceptable :) --Quiddity 05:47, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I notice you've previously contributed to the Murder article. It is sadly lacking content from domains outside of Europe and North America. Your participation would be most welcome in addressing this situation. LeadSongDog 22:03, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Lihat tentang sama di dalam EB - mungkin copyvio? SatuSuro 01:49, 26 September 2007 (UTC) gmail SatuSuro 08:43, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
anda bisa membantu membuat artikel baru tentang shawn wolley ini saya fjr_ab nyantai beh! 14:04, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
for fixing the vandalism to my user page. Vgranucci 02:55, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Indon. I've been asking around regarding 'member'. The word was used to describe members of terorrist organizations such as the IRA and the Red Brigade (and Kopassus!), but it's a strange word. You can say "member of the army", but "army member" sounds strange. Can we stick to "members of the G30S" until or unless somebody comes up with something better? Davidelit 09:13, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Such accusations are highly exorbitant. Assuming you're eminently adroit enough to apperceive this volume's protocol hence I make amends for this miscomprehension. Yours truly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tianasez (talk • contribs) 13:20, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
I've just read your messages about the external link I added on some of the Bridget Jones related pages of Wikipedia. I don't want to cause troubles and I apologize if I did something wrong, but I'm rather puzzled about why the site I tried to post (http://bridgetarchive.altervista.org/) should be considered spam. I read the external links guideline and this site - who isn't mine - doesn't break any of yours rules: it contains an extensive collection of material about the character of Bridget Jones, so it does not misleads the reader about its contents, it's completely free, it doesn't advertise absolutely anything, it's easily accesible by everyone and there is nothing offensive on it.
On the other hand it offers the possibility to read a lot of material unavaible everywhere else, like Helen Fieldin's original columns, interesting articles and reviews and other actually out of print writings that could be very helpful for students, like me, who are writing their thesis on Fielding. To deny the possibility to consult it wouldn't be a disservice antithetical to the very aims of Wikipedia?
Thank you very much, and again, I apologize for any problem I may have inadvertently caused and for my terrible English.
Carrie26 Carrie26 14:16, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi there. Apa kabar? Jakarta is taking a well-intentioned (?) battering today. Any thoughts about what to do? Davidelit 15:58, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your prompt reply. I'm sorry for my misapprehension: I thought that since there were many high quality pictures, articles and video-interviews of the actors themself on the site, it may have been of some interest for their fans. It will not happen again. But could you leave the link on Helen Fielding's page, please? The site is really mostly about her writing and hosts the most accurate biography I was able to find on the web...
I'd like and I hope to cooperate more substantially to Wikipedia in future, but since I'm not a native English speaker I'm rather terrified to not be able to do it adequately.
Thank you again and have a nice day.
Carrie26 16:13, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
I'am teribly sorry my friend he messed around while I was in the washroom. sorry Please forgive me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.87.63.191 (talk) 01:13, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
No problem! Happy editing! GlassCobra (Review) 01:52, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thankyou for your understanding on this matter. however, the fact no one wants to delete my articles isn't true. plus, i have cited reliable sources. anything from a company website is NOT misleading, since by nature, it not allowed to be.
ever thought of checking the phpBB article? they reference to their site...come on, equal opportunity here guys. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick Tompson (talk • contribs) 12:58, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
hello I was advised to get a new account by a wiki admin recently, this is my problm:
I was recently being bothered by another user Precious Roy who seemed to be following every single edit I did on wikipedia, and would make abusive remarks to me. Sometimes I would do edits without loging in ( I am forgetful) and he would say this made me a "sock puppet"..so weird!
On one public forum, he accused me of working for a Public Relations firm, (completly false) and he exposed that I do my edits from the London Public Library on one page, and where I work. I stupidly threated him with legal actions (whoops Wikipedia:no legal threats) but it was misinterpreted that it was against Wikipedia..which was not the case.
If I had know what the hell I was getting into I never would have bothered with this.
All I really want now, is to have my personal info deleted! ( there is exposure of my political, and relgious beliefs by this user) as it puts me at risk because of an ex-boyfriend being able to find me, and also exposes me to problems at my place of employment.
Please help me with any advice,...I hope this Precious Roy person is not a friend :O)
Prior to dealing with Precious I never had any problems for two years, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Julia1970 (talk • contribs) 15:55, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Is mentioned in this article - do you think we should create a stub for it? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreamland_Beach SatuSuro 01:18, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- kalau lihat itu, mungkin Indonesia needs one! maybe? SatuSuro 01:55, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Wow SatuSuro - that's an "extreme" idea, I'd say go for it, and I can chip in. and User:Caniago with his geography focus would be a good source too, no doubt. --Merbabu 02:33, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
OK - stub kosong - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_points_of_Indonesia - enjoy! SatuSuro 02:46, 6 October 2007 (UTC) gmail SatuSuro 01:06, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
--Merbabu 13:26, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
mas Indon tau artinya cascaded down dari kalimat The central vent emitted lava frequently, which cascaded down a steep slope. ga? thx before Mimihitam Bicara 13:53, 6 Oktober 2007 (UTC)
Kpd Indon: Tolong lihat User talk:Mimihitam#Pindah. Banyak terima kasih, Bessel Dekker 17:12, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
kok tau :p ... thx ya.. sementara pake istilah itu dulu... *nunggu kedatangan ahli geologi* <grin> Mimihitam Bicara 00:12, 7 Oktober 2007 (UTC)
I was updating the information on the Thanh Hoa Bridge. You stated these photos were not from the era - The photos I was uploading were from the Vietnam era as they show A-7C's flown by VA-82 near the end of the air war. This is heavily documented, as well as this squadron's involvement in dropping the bridge, especially in John Sherwood's book, Afterburner: Naval Aviators and the Vietnam War (2004) published by the NYU Press.
My father was award the Distinguished Flying Cross for his part in this raid. I have all his documentation, plus the discussion of this attack in Sherwood's book, where he interviews Admiral Leighton "Snuffy" Smith, who was in the flight of four from VA-82 that day.
Please let me know what I need to know to correct the description.
Thanks, Brian Baldwin —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbri4570 (talk • contribs) 23:39, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
I will work on documenting the pics and then update the information. Thanks for your help......first time updating Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbri4570 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Indon
I thought this was fairly impressive work - you don't think it should stay? Where could we put it? Although, it seems a little odd - so much in one edit from an anon. --Merbabu 02:01, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
(note to Hadi). Could you please register? It's free and you can choose any name if you want to hide your true identity. Now you're using multiple IPs, as seen in the West Java's history, which makes me difficult to talk to you. — Indon (reply) — 08:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Just FYI, I have reverted your changes relating to this body of water. If you do a Google search, you will find that "Bali Sea" is almost unknown, with Laut Bali qualifying as the common name in English. "Bali Sea" appears to be an anglicisation of the Dutch name. See also Talk:Battle of Makassar Strait. Grant | Talk 14:49, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Nope, sorry. I don't get 506 hits when I search for "laut bali", I get 3,160. When I search for laut + bali I get 318,000; bali + sea = 332,000; "bali sea" = 27,500
I don't know where you are located but Google results can vary depending on location (i.e. some parts of the web are not "visible" from particular locations at particular points in time. Likewise my original search may have been affected by this, so I will defer to the project on this, as Satu has suggested above. Grant | Talk 07:59, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Mas Indon,tolong ganti nama username saya dari FadhilRamadhan menjadi Fadhil2007.Tolong ya mas. Adil dan sejahtera 02:38, 8 Oktober 2007 (UTC)
Akhirnya, proyek Gunung Tambora selesai juga.. makasih loh, udah buat artikel tentang Gunung Tambora di EN, sehingga juga mempengmaruhi yg di id.. would you like to see the one in the indonesian? is it right or not? thanks :) Mimihitam 12:40, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
You may recall that around the New Year you vigorously objected to Template:IndonesianPresidents and Template:IndonesianVPs, but you seem to have had no problems with Template:Indonesia Presidents, created a mere three weeks later. Can we resolve this business by my redirecting the first to the third & using the second, or do you still have objections? Biruitorul 04:57, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Could we please re-establish and confirm that issues central to an issue such as sources - and the issues arising from them is in a centralised place - the Bali Sea talk page is an example where any sense of credibility this project has has had a bit of a bump? - It would be appreciated if we realise that projects do have leigitmacy problems - and when outsider editors and admins come in and find discussions like that - they might wonder whether kalau semua orang disini gila or worse :) - cheers
Do not tell me what I can do or what I can not do. I will do whatever the (explicit) I want. I do not want to to hear from you again because you are very annoying. Thank you and God Bless everybody except Indon, whoever that person is.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ps3ps3 (talk • contribs)
The Muralitharan article is full of controversial material - not least of which the claim that he is "generally regarded as one of the greatest bowlers in cricket history". I can tell you for a fact that no one I've talked to regards him as a "great" bowler, and I expect this sentiment is shared overseas. Except for in Sri Lanka, of course. Over there they think he's great. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sentient LifeGap (talk • contribs) 14:43, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
how can i know who is really the primary source on the topic biodiversity —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ynamorata (talk • contribs) 14:49, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
While I am new to Wikipedia (and may not understand all requirement) I have found the documentation and service links I added to various aritcles to be of great value. The external links that have been previously allowed by others (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos400d/ and http://www.slrtoday.com/articles/29/1/Review-The-Canon-EOS-Digital-Rebel-XTi-400D/Page1.html ) point to commercial sites. Therefore I don't understand why you deleted the External Links I placed. In terms of value to the Wikipedia community I feel the links I added provide users valuable content and utility. Please let me know what I need to do to meet your specific objections.
All the best,
Documentation —Preceding unsigned comment added by Documentation (talk • contribs) 12:59, October 10, 2007
(ZZAAAAAPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP !!!!!!!!!!!) - jangan qwatir - it can always get worse :( SatuSuro 14:50, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello!
Indon, I am your biggest fan because you crack down vandalisers every day. Keep up the great work! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldenstatewarroirs (talk • contribs) 16:41, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Came across Statistics Indonesia and Badan Pusat Statistik which seem to be the same topic. Seems like a merge is needed? Cheers. Caniago 19:32, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Indon! I have a quick question: Are you sure Eleanor Roosevelt is FDR's fifth cousin, once removed? Just want to make sure it has the correct info on that article. So long -Goldenstatewarroirs —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldenstatewarroirs (talk • contribs) 22:05, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
apaan sih WikiProject Indonesia (balas pake bahasa indonesia maklum baru sedikit bahasa inggris) Fajar adi buana 07:26, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
I am well aware of what vandalism is. Furthermore I don't recall insulting anyone, only reading the riot act so that they know to stop being disruptive. the UNOFFICIAL vandal policeBang Bang 10:17, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
You either nominated a WP:FLC or closed such a nomination this year. As such, you are the type of editor whose opinion I am soliciting. We now have over 400 featured lists and seem to be promoting in excess of 30 per month of late (41 in August and 42 in September). When Today's featured article (TFA) started (2004-02-22), they only had about 200 featured articles and were barely promoting 20 new ones per month. I think the quality of featured lists is at least as good as the quality of featured articles was when they started appearing on the main page. Thus, I am ready to open debate on a proposal to institute a List of the Day on the main page with nominations starting November 1 2007, voting starting December 1 2007 and main page appearances starting January 1 2008. For brevity, the proposal page does not discuss the details of eventual main page content, but since the work has already been done, you should consider this proposal assuming the eventual main page will resemble either an excerpted list format or an abbreviated text format. The proposal page does not debate whether starting with weekly list main page entries would be better than daily entries. However, I suspect persons in favor of weekly lists are really voicing opinions against lists on the main page since neither TFA nor Picture of the day started as weekly endeavors, to the best of my knowledge. Right now debate seems to be among support for the current selective democratic/consensus based proposal, a selective dictatorial approach like that used at WP:TFA or a non-selective first in line/calendar approach like that used at WP:POTD. See the List of the Day proposal and comment at WP:LOTDP and its talk page.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 19:17, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi,Indon
I think you did wrong by removing the template. I think it gives an important historic context. That's not excessive, it´s complet. And doesn't seems to me that anyone will think that the islands belong to Portugal. Did you really got that impression? Have you checked on how many articles of sovereign countries that template and category are? And sometimes with even more related categories and templates. For example, i don't think anyone will stay with the impression that Brazil is still part of Portugal. OK... Be cool.
--Bluedenim 22:17, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Indon,
Please see Talk:Harbrinderjit_Singh_Dillon#Should_be_H._S._Dillon - re naming conventions. Thanks. --Chriswaterguy talk 14:18, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Indon. Thanks very much for the Barnstar. The problem with Wikipedia is that the more you do, the more gaps you find. Next on the list: Sjam, Dipa Nusantara Aidit (expansion of) and possibly Untung, Latief and M. H. Lukman (expansion). The Communist Party of Indonesia article really needs work too, but it's a question of time. At least I've found a use for all those books I've been collecting. By the way, well done for spotting and linking the Pierre Tendean article. Regards Davidelit 09:11, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for cleaning up the vandalism at Iris flower data set. Daggerbox 17:28, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi FayssalF, I noticed you'd included Sukarno in the WP:MILHIST project. I'm not against the project, but do you think he is considered as a military personnel? Through his biography, he was an engineer turned into politicians and he never commanded military personnels in action, although as the head of a state he is officially the commander-in-chief of Indonesian army. But if the latter is the case then all Indonesian presidents must be included in the project. Just a thought. Cheers. — Indon (reply) — 07:44, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
I posted a link on the Cuba page to a documentary our production team did on Cuba. This was not spam as it was not an advertisment for us, but a legitimate link to useful information on Cuba. Perhapes before U dick with People u should actually see what U R doing.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Battmail (talk • contribs)
I have no idea what you've been trying to do to Talk:List of regencies and cities of Indonesia, but whatever it is, it isn't working. Redirecting the page to itself just creates an unusable link. And as long as the corresponding article exists at its current title, it makes no sense to redirect the talk page anywhere else. --Russ (talk) 21:42, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
>>> "Sejarah Melayu alleges that Parameswara was a descendant of Alexander the Great of Macedonia.[citation needed]" <<<
Hi Indon, I don't understand why the need of citation when the source mentioned is a book (written in 17th century) called Sejarah Melayu? Detonqutei 08:49, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Oh I see, thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Detonqutei (talk • contribs) 08:38, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Indon. The bit about him being persuaded not to run for governor came from one of the two Kompas articles. I'll add an inline reference when I get the time, but I'm a bit rushed this week. I added the info about being educated at Catholic schools as I believe it provides extra background, and is significant as he is one of Canisius College's most famous alumni and because he played the religious card during the election campaign. Regards Davidelit 09:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
The links leading to the videos were not added by me at first but I do agree to their addition. To me, it is a good way for users to see the martial arts in question. Don't you agree that this is a good way for them to get to know it better? Iijam 08:59, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
No, I haven't.. Am currently going through Wikipedia policies.. I guess I have a few mistakes in the past regarding editing articles, linking and all that. Will try to be more careful in the future. There is still more I can learn. I there is anything else, please advice. Thank you. Iijam 09:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello Indon, after looking at the article on Silat I would dearly love to help in the copy-editing of the article. Since it has been dead in the water for a while, I'd like to pitch in. However, it appears to be a rather thorny issue. My apologies, but please revert or alert me if I do anything stupid. Last thing this subject needs is another edit war. Thanks for your time. Sunshard (talk) 09:14, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello,
I work with the organization called MENTOR/The National Mentoring Partnership. We promote all kinds of mentoring activities all over the country.
I am currently updating three wikipedia articles: Mentor, Youth Mentoring, Mentorship, and I also added two more entries on MENTOR/The National Mentoring Partnership and Nationl Mentoring Month.
Please keep my edits and the two new entries - we are tring to spread the word and advocate for mentoring of high-risk youth. There is an article for the Big Brother, Big Sister organization, and we feel that it would help us increase the visibility of our efferts by having profiles on the wikipedia.
Please? It's a for a really good cause. We also have a public service announcement created by HBO that we'll be placing shortly on YouTube and such.
Thank you.
If you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter, please email me at MAgeeva@mentoring.org
Masha Ageeva —Preceding unsigned comment added by MashaAgeeva (talk • contribs) 14:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the update on the "colloborationist" category and the possible sock puppetry. News to me and I appreciate the news. I think there's room to discuss Indonesians who collaborated with the Dutch and/or the Japanese (and/or the Americans for that matter!), but I don't think a reductionist category is the place for it. Cheers, Smilo Don 16:48, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for pointing out that I didn't cite my source for announcing that Tina is having a baby. The thing is I have read the guidance page but still don't know how to do it. I'm her husband, so the source is reliable! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oliver Wheeler (talk • contribs) 15:33, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
The November 2007 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles newsletter has been published. Comments are welcome on this, as well as suggestions or offers of assistance for the December 2007 issue. Dr. Cash 01:13, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
I do need your help. Now that I have your attention, I need your help reverting or rather changing the Yahoo! Answers page so that is shows criticisms as should be done. I would also like you to ban novangelis who was pointed out as not being eligible to edit that article being that he is a known member of Yahoo! Answers who was pointed out on that very page as showing heavy bias towards Christians. Despite me pointing that out, loeth, that biased member, sided with him! Here is the link to the edit in mind, no it isn't perfect grammar as it runs on and so on, but IT DOES CITE SOURCES. Now how can anyone claim I need to cite sources and that I am biased when I AM CITING THE SOURCES? Please do explain that!:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yahoo%21_Answers&oldid=167631550
Mzarius and others say there is "weasel wording" and bias yet what is it? There mere say so? How is it novangelis, cited as an abusive user, who acknoweldged on Yahoo! Answers that he is the one who was tampering with the page, and gloating about the whole wikipedia siding with him, permitted to edit that page? That's fair? That's reasonable? Why does wikipedia itself on its entry have a criticism section, yet Yahoo! Answers have NONE at all? Why were my edits on the talk page reverted over and over and why after I reported this harassment to the page protection section was it not addressed promptly and the vandals banned? Instead I WAS BANNED. Disgusting! So, it's damned if I do cite sources, damned if I don't cite sources, right? Sickening!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Unbiaseduser (talk • contribs) 11:57, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi INdon. Yes I studied Indorayon as a case study for my uni degree although I no longer have the books. I felt it more appropriate for a seperate article. The condensing you;ve done now is excellent and is more suitable I think. Thanks anyway and keep up the good work. I'm astonished such a major company and businessman took so long to get onto wikiepdia -an excellent start. You'll be pleased to know I have done some work on List of Indonesian films ♦ King of Baldness ♦ "Talk"? 12:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Thannks yes I haven't got so far as adding most of the titles yet but it would be a great help if you have seen some of the movies and are able to give a decent plot section in the articles. I'm afraid the online info on the films content is not there. ♦ King of Baldness ♦ "Talk"? 14:02, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
wah... editan gue bener2 ditolak... padahal dulu nggak sesusah ini ngedit Wiki... oke deh gue ngaku nyerah ke Jimbo Wales... --kandar 16:48, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Dear Indon,
Hi, My name is Hito, I tried to edit the Indonesia page with the new facts, yet, you seem try to always delete it. I wonder why?
In fact the informations used in Indonesia page at Wikipedia is not valid anymore. A lot of the data is from 2003 to 2006. Moreover, the expositions used has failed represent the current condition of Indonesia. Indonesia has created a great progress recent years.
please explain to me How can I edit the information without put my statement on the cited statement? and how to make cited works on Wikipedia. Because my new edit is valid and I have the cited works for it. So, please don't delete my revision again. I will never give up and keep trying put my revision!!!! because I have a valid cited works. I want to give people correct informations about Indonesia.
Hito —Preceding unsigned comment added by Horohito (talk • contribs) 20:51, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Eteruel 10:43, 12 November 2007 (UTC) eteruel
Hi Indon! Thanks for the correction to my editing of H. Floresiensis, I apologize for the inconvenience, I'm a new user.
I'm not in the position to publish about it, I am just "surprised" that a serious attempt to explain how a H. Erecturs arrived at Flores about a million years ago dismisses the possibility of doing so by swiming, which would be in perfect accordance to the aquatic ape hypothesis. Swiming seems to be accepted as the means of locomotion elephants used for the same purpose, perhaps because no one dares to speculate they were so intelligent to have a navigation technology...
Once arrived at the island, those H. erectus would have evolved, and in particular would have "suffered" dwarfism, the same as the elephants.
Perhaps I should use the "Talk" section for expressing these ideas?
Thank you in advance!
There have been a series of proposals to initiate a Featured List of the Day on the main page. Numerous proposals have been put forth. After the third one failed, I audited all WP:FL's in order to begin an experiment in my own user space that will hopefully get it going. Today, it commences at WP:LOTD. Afterwards I created my experimental page, a new proposal was set forth to do a featured list that is strikingly similar to my own which is to do a user page experimental featured list, but no format has been confirmed and mechanism set in place. I continue to be willing to do the experiment myself and with this posting it commences. Please submit any list that you would like to have considered for list of the day in the month of January 2008 by the end of this month to WP:LOTD and its subpages. You may submit multiple lists for consideration.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 17:39, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
The December 2007 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles newsletter has been published. Comments are welcome on this, as well as suggestions or offers of assistance for the January 2008 issue. Dr. Cash 01:02, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
I have been checking the European countries' articles such as France, Germany, and Russia. I have found out that User:Blain123, has vandalized, or changed the content of the article on purpose, and should be banned. As an administrator, User:Indon, you should bann this person from editing any articles. It is for the good of Wikipedia.
As many users say: "LONG LIVE WIKIPEDIA!!"
Cheers and have a great day! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ps89 (talk • contribs) 00:10, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I just wondered if you would consider letting me nominate you for adminship, as you seem experienced enough. Thanks. Epbr123 (talk) 11:43, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Hahaha, thanks for your compliment, Merbabu. I second to Merbabu, but not because of his reason, of course. :-) First, I don't like wiki-drama, though I enjoy reading it ;P, and second, I can't commit myself to wiki. I've abandoned wiki for such a long time due to my real-life situation. As for Indonesia-related articles, we still have Merbabu, SatuSuro and Caniago to keep the project alive. Anyway, thanks a lot for your offer, Epbr123, but I've to refuse it. — Indon (reply) — 09:53, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi Indon, I remember the very helpful review you gave of Javan Rhinoceros. I wondered if you'd be interested in taking a look over Sumatran Rhinoceros which I just finished doing some heavy work on. In many ways they're similar to the Javan Rhino, but in many ways quite different. I've been working on it for so long that I need a fresh pair of eyes to point out spots where the article might still be weak. Thanks for your help! --JayHenry (talk) 06:36, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
dear wikipedia,
tahniah atas usaha anda dalam memartabatkan bangsa indonesia.Segala usaha anda saya letakkan sebagai cerita kelas pertama. Tapi terdapat beberapa permasaalahan yang timbul. Benarkan saya untuk bercerita mengenai permasalahan tersebut. Pertama mengenai sejarah terjadinya samarinda.
Assalamualaikum,
Nama saya Indra bin Abd. Wahab. saya berumur 42 tahun. Saya adalah anak yang tertua daripada Hj. Abd Wahab. Saya berbangsa bugis berketurunan wajo, Sulawesi. Sebenarnya bapa saya dan adik beradiknya berasal dari samarinda tapi kini telah menjadi rakyat malaysia dan menetap di sabah. Keluarga saya berasal dari keturunan Lakandu @ wakandu, pemilik tanah di samarinda seberang yang juga merupakan anak kepada Lauda/Dauda @ Lamaddu kelleng yang pernah menjadi puang ri magalatung @ Yang di pertuan Agung wajo yang juga merupakan pemerintah tertinggi bangsa wajo pada tahun 1725. Apa yang menjadi kemuskilan saya ialah tentang kewujudan samarinda. Apa yang saya lihat di kebanyakkan buku mahupun internet samada di malaysia mahupun di samarinda kebanykakannya menceritakan mengenai pembukaan samarinda yang di buka oleh orang yang bernama Lamohang Daeng Mangkona. Namun dari hasil penyelidikan saya dan sepupu saya mendapati bahawa samarinda telah di buka pada 1730-an oleh lamohang Daeng Mangkona namun pembukaan tersebut adalah atas arahan Pung Ri Magalatung pada masa itu iaitu Lamaddu Kelleng. Dan dari hasil penyelidikan berserta bukti yang di perolehi dari pemegang bertauliah lontara wajo, kami mendapati bahawa raja wajo yang bernama lamohang Daeng Mangkona ini tidak terdapat dalam lontara wajo,berkemungkinan nama ini adalah nama samaran atau nama yang ditambah sebab orang yang bernama Daeng Mangkona ini adalah wujud.Perkara kedua adalah mengenai Pua Ado 1 yang disalah tafsir oleh penulis kepada Lamohang Daeng Mangkona. Sebenarnya Pua Ado 1 dan Lamohang Daeng Mangkona atau Daeng Mangkona adalah orang yang berbeza.Malah tahun kehidupan mereka adalah berbeza. Pua Ado 1 mengikut bukti yang terdapat di wajo adalah bersal dari nama ssalah seorang raja wajo iaitu Latenri Pakado Tonampe yang mana ado di ambil dari pakado. Beliau yang mula memerintah dari tahun 1660 dan ketika membewa suku kaum wajo berhijrah ke samarinda selepas Perjanjian Bungaya manakala Lamohang Daeng Mangkona atau Daeng mangkona pula mula hidup ketika era lamaddu kelleng iaitu cucu kepada Latenri Pakado Tonampe. Perkara Ketiga ialah mengenai Tanah permakaman yang terdapat di Kg. Baka samarinda seberang,yang mana nama pemilik makam tersebut telah diubah kepada nama Lamohang Daeng Mnagkona atau Daeng Mangkona sedangkan pemilik sebenar makam tersebut adalah moyang saya dan makam Lamohang Daeng mangkona atau Daeng Mangkona berkubur di Johor semenanjung malaysia. Berikut adalah merupakan silsilah ringkas keturunan saya iaitu bermula : Latenri pakado tonampe - Lasangkuru Patau Mulajaji - Lamaddu Kelleng @ dauda - Lakandu dan Seterusnya arwah datuk/kayi saya iaitu Hj. Yusupu Daeng Ma Sengaj. Anak - anak beliau adalah seperti berikut :
1.Saipol Ahyar Bin Hj. Yusupu 2.Fatimahsyam Bte Hj. Yusupu 3.Saipol Anwar Bin Hj.Yusupu 4.Hj. Abd.Wahab Bin Hj.Yusupu (bapa saya). 5.Ahmad bin Hj. Yusupu 6.Halimatus Saadiah Bte. Hj. Yusupu 7.Yusam Bin Hj. yusupu 8.Abdullah Sani Bin Hj. Yusupu 9.Zamrud bte Hj.Yusupu. 10.Haniah Bte Hj. Yusupu.
Untuk pengetahuan penulis atau pemilik laman ini diharap dapat menghubungi saya seandainya ingin mendapatkan maklumat mengenai keturunan kami. H/P 0195839303 atau H/P 0135822431. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.82.34.32 (talk) 04:07, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Happy New Year! Here is the latest edition of the WikiProject GA Newsletter! Dr. Cash (talk) 03:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
On July 24, 2007, you made a request to the League of Copyeditors for a copyedit on Borobudur. Due to a heavy backlog and a shortage of copyeditors, we have been unable to act on your request in a timely manner, for which we aplogize. Since your request, this article has been subject to significant editing, and may no longer be a good candidate for copyediting by the League. If you still wish the League to copyedit this article, please review this article against our new criteria and follow the instructions on the Requests page. This will include your request in our new system, where it should receive more prompt attention. SlackerMom (talk) 18:06, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello, :p, apa kabar Sukanto Tanotonya? Mimihitam (talk) 10:16, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
The February 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash (talk) 05:28, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Selamat, do you have any idea of why is your userpage being vandalised so many times? You aren't an admin, are you? Btw sorry for insulting you, why not you stop using the name "Indon", it's insulting for Indonesians now, and this name is blocked in the Malay Wikipedia... --אדםוןד ואודס (talk) 16:28, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
The March 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash (talk) 06:00, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi Indon How are you?? apa ini anda?? soalnya orang ms lagi pada ngerencanain ngehapus halaman Indon. Bukan buat ganti nama :) Fajar adi buana (talk) 08:03, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
The April issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is now available. Dr. Cash (talk) 03:53, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
The May Newsletter for WikiProject Good Articles has now been published. Dr. Cash (talk) 22:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
List of volcanoes in Indonesia was selected as a WP:LOTD for one day in June and will be the LOTD during the month. Let me know before May 23rd if you have any date preferences.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 03:07, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Delivered by the automated Giggabot (stop!) 01:41, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
to join the Volcanoes Wiki! Questions can be directed to my main user page. MeldshalP (talk) 14:28, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Given your comments on the previous MIT FAC in January 2007, I would like to solicit your feedback on MIT's current article at the peer review for whatever changes you feel would be necessary to secure your support at a future WP:FAC. Madcoverboy (talk) 16:36, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Sorry about the delay. AWB has been having a few issues lately. Here is the august issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter! Dr. Cash (talk) 20:35, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Dear Indon, I would like to use your ground plan of Borobudur in a scientific publication (article in a serial, about 800 copies), but I don't want to print the whole GNU license text with it. It would be nice if you could give me permission to use it without having to print the whole license thing. Please get back to me via Email at georg.hauzenberger at phil.uni-augsburg.de Hauzi (talk) 16:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
I added a few good things about this guy, I hope perhaps you could see fit to letting him join the ranks of Chris Taylors out there...merci, Winnersblues(Winnersblues (talk) 07:06, 6 March 2009 (UTC))
You uploaded some portraits of Indonesian politicians, I appreciate your help on my question on Commons. --Martin H. (talk) 16:58, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Indon, is it possible to modify this map that you created such that each province is an object? sort of like this one Arkwatem (talk) 03:23, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.
We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:17, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Do you have time to come by here? It would be greatly appreciated. Greetings --hroest 12:08, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello. I stumbled across a discussion that you had with another gentleman regarding my research; specifically, that ceratopsian crests enhanced low frequency acoustics. You recommended that my work not be disseminated among Wiki readers until it was formally published. I agree with that conservative perspective. However, I am writing to inform you that the research was published in my text titled, "Dinosaurs Incognito," assuming that such a topic is still of interest to you.
Best regards, John Anton24.0.74.187 (talk) 04:30, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
We can still use your hard work. Remember - you are one of the most active Indonesian Wikipedians there before you lost faith, and now I want you back. If you do, please note that we have an awful lot of articles ready for collaboration. Leave a note to me if you are ready. Cheers! - Boeing7107isdelicious|SPRiCh miT meineN PiloteN 03:39, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.29.132.248 (talk) 16:54, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.