Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is IPhonehurricane95's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2 |
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
You have continued your pursuit in improving the Hurricane Gilbert article despite a setback (GAN failure), which many editors on here might not have done. It is an important storm article to improve. I therefore award you the Barnstar of Diligence, hoping the article can be improved/raised to GA status in the near future. Thegreatdr (talk) 23:33, 5 March 2012 (UTC) |
Per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Layout#See_also_section, the See Also section is mainly meant for incomplete articles which certain wikilinks are not included within the article body yet, but would be if it were a GA. It does mention that it is not a place for wikilinks already included within the article above. Someone clarified me on this a few years back. Now you know. Thegreatdr (talk) 01:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Before seding an article to GAN that you have not worked on, please notify the primary author. Thank you. YE Pacific Hurricane 23:35, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Jeffrey! I just finished reviewing Hurricane Gilbert and I have some suggestions for you. However, I was wondering if I could first do a thorough copyedit myself. If not, I can post all of my copyediting suggestions for you too along with the rest of the review. It's no trouble either way. Thanks for all your great work! Best, Keilana|Parlez ici 04:30, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Hey man, how have you been doing? I noticed you haven't been editing much. I just wanted to make sure everything is alright. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 13:07, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
While this article is not terrible, it is not at the right location and while is somewhat notable and an okay idea, it is a little on the short side not to mention the fact that they are tons of more important storms without articles. I suggest you work on more important storm like Pacific typhoons or storms in the Southern Hemisphere as they are many more storms with good info. as well as many key storms in those basins that do not have pages. Thank you. YE Pacific Hurricane 01:30, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Begonia Brandbygeana (talk) 12:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
I deleted the redirect, go for it. --Golbez (talk) 02:33, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Hey there JG (can I still call you that?). I was wondering if you thought to do more important articles ever? Most of the articles you've made in the past few days are of very marginal notability, and most previously had articles and were merged for a reason. You used to do WPAC articles on some pretty key storms. Is there a reason you stopped that? Hope all is well, cheers. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:25, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
I see that Raymond of 1983 was merged due to there being not enough info. However, I had the ability to create a sandbox of Raymond and I found as much info as I can, using this and this. Here's the sandbox. iPhoneHurricane95 22:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
That's only the preparations, and it shows how bloated the article is. It looks like a decent length, but when you look at the actual content, it's pretty scant. I would reconsider making the Raymond article, personally, since there is little additional good information than what is in the season section. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:54, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, could you please delete (or otherwise modify) User:IPhonehurricane95/sandbox/Template:Hurricane Same Name/doc. It appears to be 'unused', and is being filed in Category:Documentation subpages without corresponding pages, which I am attempting to clean up. Thanks. Revent (talk) 20:29, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Seriously, I'd advise you do some reversions before you ask for the rollback permission again. It's clear they're not going to give it to you. Make about 50 to 100 revisions and maybe they'll give it to you next time. NintendoFan (Talk, Contribs) 19:57, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --iPhoneHurricane95 16:58, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
IPhonehurricane95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am extremely sorry for creating sockpuppets, I was just bored. I swear to god that the sockpuppeteering shit won't ever happen again. Im not kidding. I apologize very much. May someone unblock me and also my doppelgänger CaliforniaHurricane25? :-
Decline reason:
No. You'll need to find some other way to deal with your boredom. --jpgordon::==( o ) 13:07, 27 June 2013 (UTC))
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
IPhonehurricane95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hmmmm, another way.........oh oh! I have an idea, how about a mentorship? I was mentored a few years back and it was successful :-)
Decline reason:
Doesn't look very successful to me. I feel it bears repeating that you are allowed this avenue of appeal as a courtesy and if your next unblock request isn't a lot better than these two that courtesy will not be extended any more. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:56, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
IPhonehurricane95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
After thinking for weeks and weeks, I have decided that I have learned why I have been blocked. I, JG, hereby apologize for sock puppetry. This block has taught me a lesson. It has hit me hard. I want to contribute constructively. I Will Refrain from making any mainspace edits for a long period of time, instead focusing on my own userspace (sandboxes, my userpage, etc.) because this block hit me hard. I admit the sock puppetry, and I swear to god that I will not do sockpuppetry again. Sincerely, iPhoneHurricane95
Decline reason:
Your current request for unblock is declined as you continue to create sock accounts. As has been noted elsewhere on this page, following the standard offer is likely the only way you will be able to find yourself able to edit (legitimately). Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 17:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Were you User:BlueTropicalWave? --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 12:50, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
you should note that I am currently in Beijing. iPhoneHurricane95 00:39, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
IPhonehurricane95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I can't wait half a year to be unblocked! Please, just give me a second chance! This block taught me a valuable lesson - never ever do sockpuppetry. I am sincerely sorry for the sockpuppetry. I was blocked for that reson, and I will not make illegitimate accounts ever again (BlueTropicalWave will be a doppelgänger as I may abandon this account and use that instead). I have a proposal - to get adapted, and this is NOT an excuse to get me unblocked
Decline reason:
This is a private website, and you agreed to the rules when you signed up. You MUST "tolerate" the block because you personally earned it. You have been advised that you must not edit Wikipedia for a minimum of 6 months - either anonymously or with another account. It is by doing this that the community will decide whether or not you can be trusted - because up until now, you have done nothing but break the rules. If you create EVEN ONE MORE ACCOUNT, or make even ONE MORE EDIT, the offer will be withdrawn, and you will likely be subjected to a lifetime WP:BAN discussion (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:36, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Now I am looking for adaption. iPhoneHurricane95 02:23, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Will the offer be withdrawn if i sock on commons? iPhoneHurricane95 09:54, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello Iphonehurricane95. One of your recent edits to this talk page added some personal information about yourself that you may not want publicly known. I have taken the liberty of removing it. Feel free to email me if you have any questions. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:09, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IPhonehurricane95, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Hell In A Bucket (talk) 03:40, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IPhonehurricane95, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Hell In A Bucket (talk) 23:03, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for a period of indefinite for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IPhonehurricane95. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here. ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rschen7754 17:09, 15 March 2014 (UTC) |
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IPhonehurricane95, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
There is an ongoing ban proposal regarding you at WP:ANI due to your excessive disruptive activity, as well as your request here to get banned. LightandDark2000 (talk) 03:41, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
IPhonehurricane95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #16888 was submitted on Nov 12, 2016 07:53:33. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 07:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
IPhonehurricane95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #17124 was submitted on Dec 15, 2016 07:20:19. This review is now closed.
Template:Most intense Category 4 Atlantic hurricanes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 07:13, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, IPhonehurricane95. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Typhoon Orchid (1994), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, IPhonehurricane95. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Typhoon Orchid".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:54, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.