Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an archive of past discussions for the period May 2014–May 2016. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
You're right, it's a spelling error in the index. The actually rock unit the fossils implicitly attributed to the "Tilgate Formation" listing in the index is the Hastings Beds, which crop out in Tilgate Forest. Thank you for catching the error. That article can be safely deleted. Abyssal (talk) 17:34, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prostigma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Respiration (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Agate, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Transverse, Apex and Vesicles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
I've made the duplicate formation articles into redirects. Abyssal (talk) 12:26, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Per you message request, I posted on the talk page of the "mudslides" article. What will it take for changes to be accepted? I noticed that there are other comments on the talk page that raise similar concerns to those that I have presented, but the article has not been updated to address those concerns. FWIW, I am a professional licensed geologist in the State of Washington and on the Washington DNR Forest Practices Division's Qualified Experts list of landslide and slope stability experts. I am willing to help clean up the "mudslides" page, if somebody will let me. It is currently highly inaccurate and misleading. Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.204.209.2 (talk) 03:30, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
In reference to the recent problem with the Snow Business (company) page. I would like to know what exactly it was that you found To be inappropriate with it so that it is possible to Edit it Again so that It is more descriptive but also expectable. I however found your Comment About The "filmography" some what confusing as almost all pages for special effects companies have a "filmography" section or a "credits" section — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruf3n (talk • contribs) 11:57, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Osialfecanakmg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elements (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
BracketBot loves me |
---|
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Stone of Scone may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:23, 7 June 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Riprap may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:22, 7 June 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Afro-Latin American may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:13, 8 June 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Benthic lander may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:00, 11 June 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Diaspore may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:18, 15 June 2014 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Topographic map (neuroanatomy), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Geniculate nucleus and Colliculus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
The Geology Barnstar | ||
For all your work assessing articles and adding articles to the project! RockMagnetist (talk) 21:23, 24 June 2014 (UTC) |
It looks like there is a discrepancy in the sources for the height of Charles Mound. The link below is the NGS data sheet for the Charles Mound location. http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/ds_mark.prl?PidBox=NJ0855
Thanks! Skyrunner75 (talk) 16:01, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi Gorthian! I'm not really sure why you reverted my citation when a simple message on my talk page would have been sufficient. In the future, could you just let me know so I can take care of my own mistake? Thanks, ceranthor 14:13, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
I was wondering if you could do me a quick favor. I've been working on Pedra da Gávea on and off for about a year now, and I've been focusing on the pseudo-archaeology aspect of the article mostly. However, I've started to expand on the geology part and to be honest, I don't know as much about geology as I do anthropology (I already got into some hot water awhile back for making a dumb mistake regrading Neoproterozoic and Meso-Neoproterozoic rocks). I was wondering if you could do a super-quick unofficial look-over/peer review to make sure I'm not writing anything egregious. Thanks!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 22:25, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Looking for a contact email for a club in Trinidad to host a club side in march 2016 from newcastle australia. Glenn Turner Wanderers rugby club Newcastle Nsw Australia glenn@cdrc.com.au — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.212.120.98 (talk) 03:01, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
Hope you get well again soon! --Tobias1984 (talk) 14:23, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello Gorthian,
You are receiving this message because you have a one-year subscription to Newspapers.com through the Wikipedia Library. This is a brief update, to remind you about that access:
Finally, we would greatly appreciate it if you filled out this short survey. Your input will help us to facilitate this particular partnership, and to discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.
Thank you,
Wikipedia Library Newspapers.com account coordinator HazelAB (talk) 19:39, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Gorthian,
Your application for a Newspapers.com account through the Wikipedia Library was approved last August, but we have no record of your having completed the process to claim your account. If you still want access, please let me know. If I don't hear from you, I'll assume you're not interested and the account will be given to another applicant. HazelAB (talk) 16:50, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Thank you! — Gorthian (talk) 18:44, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
the edit you have reverted is not true to history of marthoma church — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.99.184.208 (talk) 11:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heishansaurus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jiayuguan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of landslides, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Botn. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
I created a page here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mythological_or_fantastic_beings_in_contemporary_fiction , but it needs more contributions. If you'd wander by and add any series you can remember enough of, I'd appreciate it. Tamtrible (talk) 21:33, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Dear mr gorthian. With regards to zika fever. I have to inform you that. Homeopathy has treatment for it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Drzearsait (talk • contribs) 10:24, January 2, 2016 (UTC)
Hello! Vosahlikova is notably enough with no doubt to have an article on the English Wikipedia. She is a member of editor board of PSB, one of the best biographical dictionaries in the world. She had also an article in Lexikon současných českých historiků, which collected information about the most important Czech historians. I will add some more information. Regards Kmicic (talk) 22:20, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for the welcome message, but, I've been here and done that before. Perhaps it would be best if you read my reply to your welcome at my talk page. 69.47.10.171 (talk) 15:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I just realized it was you who reverted my edit on the Rommel page. I had assumed it was Rklawton, especially since he sent me a threatening message. I have one simple question: could somebody please tell me what it is in my edit that two people have objected to? And why do people want incorrect info in the article? (Okay, that was two.) Since Rklawton refuses to tell me what he finds objectionable, and since you seem to agree with him, would you please tell me what is supposed to be wrong with it? You know that one of the requirements of Wikipedia is that anytime someone takes some action he must explain why he did it, something that Rklawton refuses to do. (In my 15 years on Wikipedia, I have never known another editor who was as recalcitrant as he.) So would you please explain why you reverted my edit? Thanks in advance. __209.179.86.123 (talk) 03:23, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, I forgot to include something in my earlier post. When you reverted my edit, you specified WP:BRD, which is a good idea, but your vert revert violated it. Could you explain that please? Thanks in advance. __209.179.86.123 (talk) 20:54, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Erwin Rommel. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.179.22.107 (talk) 03:43, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Climate Action Plan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Climate Action Plan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. J♯m (talk | contribs) 16:10, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Since you contributed to the discussion over at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Climate action, I wanted to ping you and let you know that your input would be valued. I am posting this notice on the talk page for every editor who has contributed to that discussion and the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avoiding dangerous climate change, regardless of their vote or apparent viewpoint. J♯m (talk | contribs) 16:18, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
—cyberpowerChat:Offline 04:57, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for saying, "Wikipedia has become the default website for knowledge of all sorts". at "Volunteers are bringing reliable information about the Zika virus to the world". I also feel this is so, but I think there is insufficient popular recognition of this. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:08, 16 March 2016 (UTC) |
Thank you! Bluerasberry, I think that the popular perception is slowly changing for the better.— Gorthian (talk) 19:14, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Nikkimaria (talk) 18:24, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Thank you, you are doing a good job!
Hanyangprofessor2 (talk) 03:51, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi Gorthian- Regarding your revert of my change: I consider a term to be adopted into the English language once it appears in a major dictionary such as the AHD. See its entry here. After you alerted me to Wikipedia's presentation of the term at roman à clef, I was tempted to remove the italics there--and to upgrade the not-very-encyclopedic wording of its first sentence--but I'm not sure it's worth any grief that might cause. I find that unnecessary of italics comes across as an affectation. Eric talk 03:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
So, I had an idea to make Wikipedia better. I add the
1 | This user is a WikiInfant. |
template to new user pages to try to get the community to help them out a bit more. Is that okay? PrismTheDragon (talk) 18:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
Thanks for your help with the refspam. Doug Weller talk 10:57, 21 May 2016 (UTC) |
Thank you for picking up that thread and untangling it, I found it and it was like a cold shock when I realised the implications and had no idea what to do next. I'm semi-retired, I don't have the ability to do the kind of research you had to do to find and collate that situation. Ogress 23:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
@Ogress: You really did a lot of cleanup early on! I cheer every time I see you reverted him. When you do, 1) be sure he was the one that added the ref in the first place, and 2) remove the entire citation, not just his name. He adds the whole ref when he adds it, with occasionally a bit of supporting text. I take the text part out, too, when it hasn't been modified by other editors, but otherwise I leave it alone.— Gorthian (talk) 02:15, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
@Tribe of Tiger: You're right, lots of the pages edited on May 10, 2016 by 182.186.37.215 have been cleared up by other editors. But there's a swath—working upwards in the contributions page from Women's education in Pakistan all the way up the list to Agriculture in Pakistan—that haven't been fully checked yet. On each page, make sure that our guy was the one who added the ref in the first place. I saw you already ran across one of the rare cases where someone other than him actually cited his work—! ;-) — Gorthian (talk) 02:15, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
@Tribe of Tiger: It's DONE! Thank you so MUCH to you and all who pitched in. Tomorrow I will try to let everyone know, and then I'll be making an edit filter request to see if we can stop any more of this behavior. Right now, I'm off to sleep. — Gorthian (talk) 07:34, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
I have undone your good rath revert, please see the talk page Barryob (Contribs) (Talk) 13:48, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
left a note at Talk:List of epidemics--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:28, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Why do you undo my edit it's way for that very reason and the fact that it's was Supposed to be constructive in a way...SO WHY?! — 2601:183:4000:D5BD:ACDD:FFC9:ECF:2DDC (talk) 23:46, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Gorthian -- There are a few things that puzzle me about this article, and I wonder if you could help me understand them:
1) The lead starts out with this:
I assume that the "thin band of rock" is light-colored because "K" is "the first letter of the German word Kreide (chalk)", and chalk is usually light-colored. Is that right?
2) If the band is "usually a thin band of rock", what exactly is the boundary in the first image? Is it the light-colored band of rock or is it the border between the light-colored band and the dark-colored band just above it? If it is the former, that is a fairly wide band, so is that a good illustration of a "thin band of rock"?
3) In the first two pictures, there is a band of dark-colored rock above a fairly large light-colored band of light-colored rock. In the fourth image, of Trinidad Lake State Park, it's a little more irregular, but it looks like the dark-colored rock is above light-colored rock. If that is true, then why does the caption of that image say the boundary "shows an abrupt change from dark- to light-colored rock". Is it referring to the medium brown-colored rock near the bottom of the cliff being below the buff-colored rock? – Corinne (talk) 03:32, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Gorthian -- Out of curiosity I looked at an edit to West Virginia in which an editor linked "B.P." to the article Before Present. I suppose it was all right, but the periods after the "B" and the "P" didn't look right to me, so I looked at Paleontology to find an example of "BP", and I only saw "before present", but it was linked to Before Present, and in that article "BP" has no periods, so I removed the periods. I only realized it was in a quote after I saved my edit. Then I spent some time trying to find the original article to see if it was written with periods, but I couldn't find it there or in the article Prehistory of West Virginia. I know one shouldn't change things in quotes (but I have also been told that minor changes to correct spelling, etc., are permitted). Shall I undo my edit, assuming that it was "B.P." in the source, or leave it "BP", which is Wikipedia's style? Also, why can't I find the source (Mills, OSU 2003)? – Corinne (talk) 03:59, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited San Geronimo Valley, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Forest Knolls, California and Forest Knolls. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi Gorthian
Thank you for the welcome. I'm not very good at the deeper coding/editing but I'm finding my way slowly, mostly by example.
See you out there!
Chapeaubien (talk) 16:00, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
thank you for your suggestions. I tried my best to cite those statements.i want to hear further suggestions from you .actually i added further information that i know based on the topics--Belbasesuraj (talk) 18:42, 1 August 2016 (UTC). i am beginner in editing articles in wikipedia,i hope with your support and suggestions i could improve pages .Thank you again. Belbasesuraj (talk) 18:42, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Greetings, Gorthian. I've nominated The Left Hand of Darkness at FAC, and I know you've done some work on it over the years. If you could look in on the review and leave some feedback, it would be much appreciated: the review is a little low on participation right now. The review is at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Left Hand of Darkness/archive1. If I've asked this of you before, my apologies :) Cheers, Vanamonde (talk) 04:43, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
I wish the Rosetti clan had been more creative in naming their progeny, but oh well. For Bogdan-Pitești, it's Radu D., because we're talking about memoirs written in the 1930s and '40s, while plain Radu died in 1926. For Carp, it's plain Radu - he was pro-German during World War I (a tidbit hopefully to be included soon), while Radu D. was pro-French. I hope order has largely been restored regarding this rather confusing situation. - Biruitorul Talk 06:01, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Lloyd Stephens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Laki dialect, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Khorasan and Khurasani. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Regarding Zika Virus posting today 8-29-2016: You mention addition I made is spam. Why? Did you bother to read the link? ATCC.org, the organization itself, which actually sells the Zika virus CLEARLY warns, "Effect on Host Paralysis and death" AND "Accidental infection has occurred in laboratory personnel" https://atcc.org/Products/All/VR-84.aspx#characteristics
Denying this critical info to others, that Zika Virus results in "Paralysis and death", information which can save their lives, is criminal. I am going to give you the opportunity to put back the warning, else you will be held responsible. Documentation of your efforts begins now. And, as your incredibly pompous messages states, "This is your only warning" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:F090:B8F0:8C8E:D7D2:D2FB:67A8 (talk) 00:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Category:Wikipedians with red-linked categories on their user talk page
At some time or another in the last three years, the editors listed here reverted or deleted refspam that had been added into articles all over the encyclopedia by one M. Mughal. Some of us just finished a concerted effort to clean it all out; it was all of your work that got us there. Thank you!
-- Gorthian (talk • contribs) 00:33, 2016 August 11 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.