Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Credo tu abbia ragione. Ti ho risposto nella mia pagina di discussione. Artwik 15:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Welcome! I hope you'll have fun here. Thanks for your contributions in algebra! --AxelBoldt
Welcome to Wikipedia, Daniele! Grand to see another mathematician. --LMS
You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Italy page as living in or being associated with Italy. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Italy for instructions. --Army1987 17:58, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
for the cleaning up, Goochelaar! -- P.B. Pilhet / Talk 17:05, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for catching the vandalism to H. G. Wells that I missed. I lost that revision from the vandal... which is exactly what he/she had hoped.
Thanks again
--KNHaw 22:02, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for clarifying the name issue! - Classical geographer 12:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Apologies for the vandalism. The offending IP (169.244.143.155) has been blocked from my proxy server.
~nhjm449
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 20:39, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eyes of Magic. One more unknown play from this spamming turkish... Clem23 20:15, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
The redirect link from Planetary Gemologist was Speedy'ed when I moved the article to my User space for protection. The actual article was never AfD'ed. The page was held in my user-space for evidence during a AfD on another article by the same author that seems to want to promote his own celebrity on Wikipedia. Now that it has been returned to its original spot, please feel free to propose a speedy deletion or AfD review. -- Emana 19:29, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
I've had several previous encounters with editors who obsessively edit a single article for the purpose of conveying a specific POV. They generally ignore all attempts to get them to work collaboratively and abide by Wikipedia policies.
One way we can respond is that we just keep reverting his edits. Often these people give up after a while when they realize that, as I said in my most recent edit summary, we can indeed outlast them. They go away and find something other than Wikipedia to occupy their time.
Another possibility is to block the problem user. This happened recently on Reuben Singh. There the user was determined to do character assassination, instead of puffery, but the pattern was otherwise the same. The user was blocked, and the article semi-protected so that he couldn't readily return to it with an anonymous IP. A few days ago it was unprotected, and so far all is well.
In the case of Geoffrey Giuliano, the author or his devotee (I'm not sure which it is) has used multiple IP addresses but not, I think, a registered account. Therefore, blocking wouldn't help. If the vandal persists for a few more days, then we'll be justified in seeking semi-protection (see Wikipedia:Semi-protection policy). Until then, we'll see if he gets the message with the help of a few more reversions. JamesMLane t c 01:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
No problem. SteveO 18:39, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Ciao Daniele,
sono poetry62. Ti ho dato risposta nella mia pagina utente in merito a quanto dicevi sulle Giubbe Rosse. Scopro adesso che sei italiano, non me lo aspettavo!
Voglio chiederti una cortesia pero': perche' non mi aiuti a sviluppare, migliorare quelle pagine?
Mi sembra che le Giubbe Rosse lo meritino ampiamente...
ciao
It is not vandalism if it is the truth.--138.162.0.45 15:31, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Being polite is like talking to the wind. I tried that & I was steamrolled. But don't worry. I've found new life at Wikipedia. It is not a far fall from gnome to troll.--138.162.0.45 17:47, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
In reverting my "vandalism" on her page, you reverted some genuine grammar corrections.--138.162.0.45 16:19, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Dude we sent in those GOOD reviews of Giuliano's work and you said you would include them . You have not. WHY ONLY THE BAD ONES. Is that fair?
And if I were Geoffrey Giuliano and I knew things to be true or not would this be vandalism. Repeating info you find on line is madness. The net is accurate. PEOPLE'S LIVES ARE BEING RUINED FROM ALL THIS. And I cant get anyone's attention. Wiki is a cult withoutr reason or compassion
Giuliano
Ciao! Thanks for inquiring. I think, it's because in Encyclopedias I have there's not such a massive translation of foreign titles. Just when needed, or when there's an English translation. Also, Wikipedia bibliographies tend to refrain from citing publisher, date,, location etc. Ciao and let me know (PS, I stopped editing the article as I was corresponding with a girl...) --Attilios 22:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
For the work on Peter Cameron Rich Farmbrough, 12:15 17 August 2007 (GMT).
Thanks for your efforts for the GURPS books. I'm not so familiar with them myself, but would hate to see all the information lost. I would suggest, however, in merging information into the List of GURPS books we should probably avoid incorporating the potentially troublesome aspects in the original articles like being the inspiration of, or source of, twenty novels. If we can't locate sources to insert into the original article (thereby establishing its notability), I think this can just end up "transferring" some of the notability problems onto the "List" article itself. In my opinion, if we can't locate sources, we should probably limit the information on a supplement to a short description of it. But this is one guys opinion. Thanks again. --Craw-daddy | T | 13:16, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I think the best thing to do at this point is to do the redirecting and such that has been talked about on Talk:List of GURPS books. I see that the editor involved in instigating all appears to be a strong deletionist. I also don't know if you've noticed but, for example, {{notability}} tags have been placed on Steve Jackson Games, Graeme Davis, S. John Ross, and David L. Pulver, the last three being writers of GURPS supplements (amongst other things). (So as I've mentioned elsewhere, a systematic "attack", for lack of a better word, on all things GURPS.) I've started to try and give some sources for notability on some of these articles too, but have a real job to do as well. :) I have actually e-mailed Daid Pulver to ask him if he's been interviewed for any (well-known) magazine. I'm tempted to do the same for the other guys, but haven't yet done so.
Feel free to take one on yourself (but don't feel obligated). Obviously there should be lots of info in various magazines and such on Steve Jackson Games, as well as these other guys. For example, Graeme Davis was one of the original developers of Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay! I've mentioned the {{notability}} tag on Graeme Davis on Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject Role-playing games but have received, at best, a lukewarm response. It's a bit frustrating when you encounter people who only want to delete things without (seemingly) bothering to help make them better. If no one else has done so, I'll probably mention the new tags elsewhere on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing games page later, but am not sure what to expect from them now. Everyone wants to talk, but on one seems to want to do anything. Anyhow, ranting off... --Craw-daddy | T | 13:59, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Hey. You might want to consider editing your comment to downgrade your example in the Collins RfC to something more restrained. I know you're not actually accusing him of anything, but pedophilia is such a massively sensitive issue that it might well draw attention away from your actual argument. --Kizor 22:20, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Dear Goochelaar. I'd appreciate your own view on this issue. Mine is that, as an old medieval dictum says: 'Entia non sunt multiplicanda sine necessitate' which, in Wikispeak translates: 'Pages should not be multiplied, as if they were the progeny of Genesis, unless absolutely necessary'.
I was working on the Toaff page, when Beit Or created a separate page suggesting that this was an improvement. I am not convinced. True, the draft is bulky (I could paste it into the Toaff talk page eventually) but should be able to be winnowed down to a few pages once all the chapters have been described. Other editors, for example, on the Oriental Culture and Languages pages, tell me brief biographical pages are usually eliminated unless they are expanded enough to justify their existence in Wiki. Without a discussion of the 'Bloodlibel' book on his bio page, Toaff, by this criterion, will also eventually be dropped.
My suggestion then is that the separate page be cancelled, and that, if acceptable, I proceed over the next week or so, to provide a chapter by chapter breakdown of the work. My work on the Toaff page is highly provisory, and requires some patience, since the synopsis is being posted there so that others, who haven't read the book (which is no longer in print) if they are so minded, can use my précis to get an idea of the book, ask me to elaborate or prune, then edit it all in turn and discuss it without leaving the article to a survey of gossip about it at third or fourth hand. It's materia prima for all those who wish eventually to give a brief run-down of the book. Regards Nishidani 18:04, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:SteveJacksonManToMan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:34, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Out of curiosity, how did you come up with this name? It's Dutch for "conjurer", but according to your user page you don't speak Dutch. Melsaran (talk) 12:54, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Gurps4e.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:28, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:GURPSFantasyBestiary.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:59, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:GURPSIlluminati.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:01, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Sorry if my note on the talk page was rather abrupt. I looked at your text and I thought "But I'm SURE it's "dal", so I looked in my Viking Opera Guide, and it said "dal", then I checked Google ("about 19,100" for "dal" and "about 543" for "del"), then I went for an online libretto ... then I saw that Italian is your madrelingua so I checked some more.... Best wishes! --GuillaumeTell (talk) 14:52, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Please consider visiting WP:RFD#Presidency redirects if you are interested in getting the Presidency of Andrew Jackson redirect deleted. Thanks =) --MosheA (talk) 00:31, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The E=mc² Barnstar | |
Thanks for answering my math question about equivalent fractions! More specifically, for explaining in such great detail!
Ye Olde Luke 05:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC) |
Well, here's a mystery! I agree with you about the turn, but it appears that my copy of the novel does not match yours. I have a TOR edition. It's TOR's first edition published in September 1997, and a softcover. Part Two ends on page 134 and covers the quasi-corporeal Angier's attempt on Bordens' life, and it's called 15 (chapter?). It is preceded by a three-paragraph "14". It definitely doesn't have 39 chapters or parts to it. So, did you get your version from Borden(s) or Angier? lol.
I'm going to scan through the whole thing tonight and see where the three parts are described, however, what page number did you find it on?
Jim Dunning | talk 01:11, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Jim Dunning is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Don't overdo it on the fudge!
Spread the Holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaminglawyer/MerryChristmas!}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Enjoy the day after as well!
Jim Dunning | talk 02:13, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
In effetti, era strano che non ci fosse ancora una voce. Purtroppo adesso non ho molto tempo per lavorarci sopra, e ho messo soprattutto l'esito di ricerche bibliografiche online. Un tempo conoscevo sua figlia, ma da un po' l'ho persa di vista. Se riesco a rimettermi in contatto con lei, cercherò di avere qualche notizia in più, in particolare riguardo alla data di nascita precisa. Buon anno anche a te. --Vermondo (talk) 13:09, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Whether or not schools are notable is a rather controversial issue - there have been several failed proposals to define whether or not a school is notable. Because they can be controversial, it's best to use another deletion process (like AfD) to delete them because then the article can be reviewed by more people. (This is noted at Wikipedia:CSD#A7.)
Speedy deletion shouldn't be used on appliances, fictional characters etc. For those, there's proposed deletion or articles for deletion. WT:CSD frequently gets proposals to expand A7 to include things like fictional characters, but they never get consensus. Hut 8.5 10:48, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
I noticed your comment there about Harvard references. Since the name of the author appears in the citation, you need to scroll and click less with Harvard references than with footnotes - once you know what publication "Smith 1984" is, you never need to look at the reference list again to know which source is being used when you see that in an inline citation. This makes it easier to see potentially outdated or biased sources, since the author and date can't be hidden inside footnotes. It also lets readers who are familiar with the sources tell instantly if a fact is being cited to a standard reference (a common textbook) or an uncommon reference (since the reader won't recognize the name in that case). Of course the links from the inline citations to the reference section are convenient, and I would like to use them more. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:41, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
See WP:EL. In general, we do not want links except where they provide extra, verifiable information. Fanzines do not generally fulfil this requirement. --John (talk) 18:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
I included the sources, the official website. Thanks. Scott335 (talk) 08:14, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I just declined the speedy on Salvatore Cusato aka Casco as I couldn't find evidence of a previous AFD - I could see that the article had been deleted as the result of a PROD once before but this does not qualify it for a {{db-repost}}. If there is an AFD (perhaps it is under a different spelling which is why I couldn't see it?) just drop a note on my talk page and I will reconsider the deletion. kind regards, nancy (talk) 19:34, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
I have re-added the page London Parachute School as I do not believe, it meets the criterea you cited. If you still feel it has no place on Wikipedia then you may propose it for deletion at Wikipedia:Proposed deletion. Unfourtunteyl I didn't get the message re: speedy deletion in time. Thanks -- Rehnn83 Talk 19:10, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Greetings, I added the Mark Twain thing. You removed my adds but you didn't remove this 1:
At the age of 23, basketball star "Pistol" Pete Maravich told a Pennsylvania reporter, "I don't want to play 10 years [in the NBA] and then die of a heart attack when I'm 40." In 1988 he collapsed and died of a heart attack at age 40, after playing 10 NBA seasons.
By the above, Pete Maravich predicted his death, the same way Mark Twain did. So logically, if you removed the Mark Twain thing, you should also remove that.
The reason I added the Mark Twain thing was because of seeing the Pete Maravich. If the Pete Maravich isn't fit for the article, then I would see how Mark Twain isn't either. Basically, I feel either both of them should be there, or both of them removed.
But if your argument was that Pete Maravich predicting his death is relevant but not Mark Twain predicting his death, then I would have a problem, and would like to see your reasoning.
In any event, I don't care to touch that article or revert to my edit, since I believe in only doing things once and talking about it, but just simply seeing your reasoning, so for the article, the honor is yours. Neal (talk) 23:14, 21 March 2008 (UTC).
Hi Goochelaar - a few days ago, you reminded anonymous user 72.241.104.7 not to engage in wholesale deletions of anonymous articles, many of which were (in your estimation) clearly Wikipedia-worthy. He or she apologised on his/her discussion page. However, I'm sorry to report that he/she has emerged once again, doing the same thing, under the anonymous number 72.241.101.20. It is clear that the same person is involved in these wholesale comments, as two of the articles he/she has attacked are Gerald Shapiro and Gary Forrester, neither of whom is remotely related to each other in any way. Both names appear in both anonymous contribution lists. I have an interest in this, because I have been very involved in the development of the Gary Forrester after an earlier go-round that was flawed because of self-edits and disorganized content. With the assistance of a number of Wikipedia editors, we have got the article into pretty good shape, I feel. You will find a very brief discussion of the latest attacks on Zagalejo's talk page, where the anonymous user makes some comments that are just plain factually inaccurate. What do you advise? We are happy to keep improving the article, if need be. The goal is to get the facts clear, with ample citation to sources, which we believe has been largely achieved - but there is always room for improvement. Cheers,--Georgette.mccallum (talk) 19:49, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello - you participated in Gavin.collins' Request for Comment, so I am alerting you that we are preparing a Request for Mediation regarding him. BOZ (talk) 03:16, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Gurps4e.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:01, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Gurps4e.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -Nard 07:36, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Caro Goochelaar, sono un curatore della voce italiana it:Poesia multilingue. Vedendo che nella vostra Wiki sono stati inseriti altri autori plurilingue, per esempio Antoine Cassar, ho ripreso questa voce dall'italiana "Multilinguismo cosmopolita" (http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multilinguismo_cosmopolita); ho aggiunto, sulla tua indicazione di miglioramento, l'importanza della rivista Words without borders, di Alaine S. Mason (la più importante traduttrice in inglese di Elio Vittorini, e il commento dello scrittore francese abbastanza noto Orlando de Rudder (ho accluso la sua bibliografia). Fammi sapere se è abbastanza... so che forse è improprio chiederlo proprio a te, ma posso chiederti se per gentilezza puoi anche "perfezionarmi" linguisticamente la voce? Grazie mille in anticipo, e a presto, --Egonon (talk) 12:10, 24 July 2008 (UTC) P.s. ho iniziato anche la parte interna di André Neher; spero di non aver commesso errori analoghi. Ho anche tolto Monte da "Italian poets", perchè in effetti fa più parte della poesia plurilingue non in italiano. Ciao:)
Ciao, effettivamente mi dici cose note (per quanto sia da pochissimo dentro questo mondo, ma per es. fare accettare anche in it.Wiki il Multilinguismo cosmopolita non è stato facile, e ho quasi "doverosamente" partecipato alla voce Poesia plurilingue), anche se d'altra parte altre voci di autori plurilingue in en sono piuttosto "scoperte" (addirittura una con come fonti una sola recensione e il sito personale del poeta). Certo è un autore italiano, quindi il discorso è più complesso, date le nostre tradizioni letterarie. Comunque riprendo qualche spunto, se tu ritieni una di queste fonti attendibile la aggiungo meglio alla voce: 1) pubbl. su riviste universitarie o para-univ. americane (di luoghi o persone ricordate da en-wiki): Segue ( Miami University Middletown http://www.mid.muohio.edu/segue/4.2/Segue%204-2.swf) e Gutcult (Aaron McCollough insegna all' univ. of Michigan http://gutcult.com/Site/litjourn8/GM1.htm) 1bis) articolo su Monte di un redattore di scriptamanent, rivista on-line della Rubettino (anche se in effetti M. aveva però già pubblicato su Rubettino nel 2000), che recensisce un suo libro: http://www.nuovaipsa.it/ddn/msovidio.asp?menu=ddn&liv=a&modo=html 2) articolo su estovest.net che indica M. come uno dei curatori (insieme ai co-autori del libro Cacciari, Vattimo, Magris, etc.) della memoria di Sergio Quinzio: http://www.estovest.net/letture/iritano_quinzio.html 3) è menzionato in Intralinea, Department of Interdisciplinary Studies in Translation, Languages and Culture of the University of Bologna, Italy: http://www.intralinea.it/members/profile_view_ind.php?id=564 4) l'editor giapponese Kazue Daikoku (è il suo editor, ma è anche l'inventore dello Japanglish http://happano.org/littlemark.html 和英混合) ne parla nel commento all'interno di http://www.happano.org/pages/fragments/63.html; 5) Come ti avevo accennato, Words without borders (dove M. ha pubblicato ed è ricordato nella sez.poesia solo con A.Merini e M.De Angelis) è lodato pure dal N.Y.Times, da quello che ho letto su Google http://www.google.it/search?hl=it&lr=&q=%22words+without+borders%22+New+York+times&start=0&sa=N, ed è quotato su http://www.lannan.org/lf/lit/grants/, su La Stampa http://www.lastampa.it/_web/cmstp/tmplrubriche/Libri/grubrica.asp?ID_blog=54&ID_articolo=728&ID_sezione=201&sezione=, http://www.lanotadeltraduttore.it/lettori_veri_falsi_nella.htm, etc. etc. (credo che per la pubbl. in questa rivista "a prova di bomba" vicina alla Columbia U. che il "multilinguismo" sia stato gradito su it.wikipedia, e suppongo che per questo gli utenti che hanno controllato la voce prima di te non abbiano messo in discussione la voce stessa; W.w.B. ha una bio di Monte su http://www.wordswithoutborders.org/?author=GuidoMonte) 6) dimenticavo: l'articolo della prof.ssa Saieva in effetti parla di lui: http://www.swans.com/library/art13/saieva01.html; di Monte e della Saieva si parla su http://www.swans.com/contrib/gmonte.html
Penso di non aver peccato di hybris... Fammi sapere, un abbraccio --Egonon (talk) 21:49, 24 July 2008 (UTC) P.s. sto scrivendo la continuazione de L'exil de la Parole di André Neher; come ti sembra l'inizio?:)
Grazie della fiducia, così posso occupare quel che resta delle mie vacanze con nuove voci (oltre a continuare Neher, vorrei inserire in en le altre voci che ho creato in it, tipo it:Ego non, Nesmelov, etc.). Inserirò senz'altro (stanotte o domani) questi spunti in inglese nella talk della voce , e magari reinserisco anche la poesia multilingue che c'era prima all'inizio:) Sarei lieto, comunque, se tu ogni tanto mi concedessi qualche suggerimento formale anche per il futuro, perché in questo universo sono piuttosto solo (anzi totalmente), più di quanto lo sia su it.wiki:) Con un caro saluto e augurio, --Egonon (talk) 16:09, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Grazie, seguirò di sicuro questo tuo primo suggerimento; sono nuovo di qui, quindi meglio seguire le abitudini dei padroni di casa!:) Ho aggiunto le mie presunte "Reliable sources" sulla Talk: Guido Monte della voce; certo mi dispiace se non contribuiscono a togliere uno dei due "marchi d'infamia" della voce (che la rendono peraltro un migliore "bersaglio":), ma per ora va bene così: "Poca favilla gran fiamma seconda:/ forse di rietro a me con miglior voce/ si pregherà perché Cirra risponda", tanto per tornare al caro Dante:) Un abbraccio, ciao --Egonon (talk) 22:37, 25 July 2008 (UTC) P.s. ho scoperto chi è de Rudder: professore di linguistica medievale all'Ecole Superieure de Commerce di Parigi, fa parte del CNRS dell'Université de Paris VIII e pubblica per Larousse P.s.bis posso far ricorso, interpellandoli in caso di bisogno, ai "Cleanup volunteers"? O ho capito male? A presto, ciao:) --Egonon (talk) 07:34, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Caro Goochelaar, ho creato, riassumendola dalla "mia" voce italiana, Ego non; secondo te ha bisogno di cleanup? O posso richiederlo ai volontari anche se non viene riscontrato? Che perfezionamenti che si differenziano dalla it.wiki dovrei apportare secondo te? Un abbraccio, --Egonon (talk) 19:22, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
I've removed the CSD tag from the BMX. article, as there is notability (of sorts) included in the article. Not a lot of notability, but enough to stop it from being a candidate for speedy deletion. I would suggest you take the WP:AFD route instead. StephenBuxton (talk) 22:52, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Scusami se ti disturbo di nuovo (anche se dalle tue non-risposte vedo che non hai il tempo materiale:), ma mi chiedevo: se spostassimo la voce Monte su Cosmopolitan multilingualism (naturalmente la modificherei opportunamente), tu saresti più obbligato a taggarla di inadeguate fonti? In fondo l'argomento (come in it:Multilinguismo cosmopolita) renderebbe Monte e le sue riviste "terziarie" rispetto ad esso, quindi più enciclopedico come argomento di cui parlare. Che ne pensi? E, se sei d'accordo, che tag devo mettere per farlo spostare? P.s. Ho riflettuto e credo di non rendere un buon servizio a monte, al multilinguismo e alla poesia plurilingue, conservando una voce che è etichettata come potenzialmente non adeguata ai canoni di en-wikipedia. Se per esempio la mia voce Ego non viene etichettata come inadatta, in fondo non ha importanza, perché coinvolge solo “me”. Credo che invece non sia molto giusto da parte mia coinvolgere su en-wiki in questo modo (in una voce cioè non perfettamente riconosciuta) così tante persone, riviste e studiosi (de Rudder, etc.) che neppure lo sanno. Ciao:) --Egonon (talk) 09:26, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Gratias tibi per le indicazioni:)
Ciao, volevo chiederti un consiglio:) ho scritto la voce Sed ipse Spiritus postulat pro nobis, gemitibus inenarrabilibus : secondo te posso scrivere un commento sul significato della voce, o diventa una ricerca originale (quindi non valida)? fammi sapere, grazie:)--Egonon (talk) 14:42, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Un abbraccio, --Egonon (talk) 19:33, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
P.s. Ti ho ricordato Handke perché me lo ha rievocato la descrizione del Naviglio nei versi di Raboni citati nella voce italiana:)ciao--Egonon (talk) 09:19, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
I agree "reader/fan created...." might of bad wording but it should be made clear somehow that the conterversies where not created by Crichton and *ARE* not what his stated purpose of the book meant to do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aryeh M. Friedman (talk • contribs) 20:38, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
See reply on my talk page --Aryeh M. Friedman (talk) 20:51, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
I thank you for the advice, and I do agree, it may looks as if I am trying to make a point. But after my own Notability errors were pointed out to me, I realized there is a great deal of book articles that do not meet the criteria as they are currently written. By placing notability tags, I was hoping that the community could expand the articles to meet the requirements. Would it be better to use an expansion tag instead? Barton Foley (talk) 14:43, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Scusa, ma non ho bene compreso le ragioni delle modifiche da te apportate alla pagina di Sofri. Sofri è stato condannato come mandante dell'omicidio Calabresi, il quale era del tutto estraneo alla morte di Pinelli. Dunque è bene precisare che fu "falsamente sospettato". Se neghiamo questi due punti, allora siamo nella piena malafede ...ed alzo le mani... 15:18, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello. A request for comment on user conduct has recently been filed regarding Gavin.collins. Since you were involved in the prior Request for Comment, I thought that you would want to know. You can see the RFC/U here. Thank you. BOZ (talk) 00:31, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Hiya - I've fulfiled your request. Although I have every confidence you know exactly what to do, please see WP:RBK for full instructions on use of the tool. Pedro : Chat 23:43, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I've completed the proofreading of the page you had requested. Please take a look at it and let me know if there's anything else I can do to help. I have updated the translation pages to reflect the changes made.
Thanks! Regards, --Campelli (talk) 04:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi! :) I have nominated the article Dwellers of the Forbidden City for Good Article status, as I feel it has undergone significant improvement from the point at which it was almost deleted. Since you were involved with improving the article, and/or sparing it from deletion, I'm inviting you to help out in any way you can to improve the article so that it may join its fellow modules, Ravenloft and Dragons of Despair as a Wikipedia Good Article. :) You may want to place the review page (which may not begin immediately) on your watchlist to keep track of the review process. BOZ (talk) 21:01, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
One has to start somewhere. Probably because I just got to work on it, and because this contribution wasn't really a very strong one--and unverified to boot. I'll leave it for now, but sometime soon we should all get serious about cleaning up this article and providing proper references. Regards, Drmies (talk) 00:22, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello. I disagree with your opinion on this problem, and have added my opinion on Talk:Sapienza_University_of_Rome#Official_name. When you have time, please have a look. Grazie! --GiovanniS (talk) 02:17, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
I have history merged your user page so that all the edits are in one place. I have also fixed a link on your talk page. Hope you don't mind. Graham87 06:23, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Ciao, spero non ci siano problemi a parlare italiano da queste parti. Premetto che fondamentalmente sono d'accordo con la tua modifica. Però ho qualche dubbio sul senso, perché il Webster riporta i nomi geografici in quanto tali. Guarda ad es. le pronunce: Latium all'inglese (e non alla latina), Lazio all'italiana. Per esempio São Paulo (main entry) lo fa pronunciare alla portoghese con tutta la nasale. Insomma non sono sicuro che scrivendo "main entry" questo dizionario intenda automaticamente "termine inglese". :) Per esempio l'American Heritage Lazio non ce l'ha nemmeno (mentre ha Latium, sia pure solo in senso storico). --Erinaceus (talk) 11:17, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
I've had an extended and fairly prickly conversation with the IP address who claims to be an expert on the Slavic language. He argues that when he started editing 4 years ago, reliable sources were not needed. It's fair to say that the lack of reliable sources comes under greater scrutiny now, but it has always been a rule. I'm not sure if the guy is clueless or trolling, but either way he's not getting it. Furthermore, speculation on the possible Slavic meaning of a name that Matthau simply made up, is kind of a futile effort. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 09:22, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
I have responded to your comment at the above talk page. -Stevertigo 00:45, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
After some digging around, I found the whole group of GURPS AFD (article for deletion) nominations from a couple of years ago. I've added pointers to these discussions to the talk pages of relevant GURPS articles which have become redirects.
What happened was this: I saw an article with some pretty substantial content made in to a redirect without seeing any discussion, so I undid the redirect and opened up discussion. I would have handled it differently if I had known about the 2007 GURPS AFD wars. Samboy (talk) 17:50, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
I suppose it is bad form to revert in talk, akin to vandalism. Btw, search on my birthday (6 July, 1964) did give an Italian entertainer (Cristina D'Avena) as the sole person born on it worthy of mention here.Julzes (talk) 12:31, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello Goochelaar, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to I Want to Go Home has been removed. It was removed by KittyRainbow with the following edit summary '(added some reviews; removed {{prod}}, {{notability}} and {{primarysources}}; removed inappropriate "Rudy's letter", "Rudy's escape attempts" and "Notes" sections; some cleanup)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with KittyRainbow before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 01:30, 18 August 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)
Hello Goochelaar, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Roman Catholic Diocese of Civita Castellana - a page you tagged - because: Please provide a reason for deleting this. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. NW (Talk) 20:46, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Yes I see. My internet connection crashed so only a part of the page was loaded. Thanks. Meursault2004 (talk) 21:10, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
The Second Coming of The Cookie Monster has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
Nice edit! Sincerely, Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 17:32, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
--ShelfSkewed Talk 05:22, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
This is the first page for Michelle Price. There are other Michelle Prices that may have attempted a page, but this one is the first for the Broadcaster, Michelle Price. She have verifiable references, international radio connections, and I have listed references. I noticed the Doug Banks radio page and it exists with much less creditial or reference verification. I appreciate your assistance! --Facts0920 (talk) 23:25, 29 October 2009 (UTC) Justin
Hello Goochelaar, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Keme Nzerem - a page you tagged - because: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. NW (Talk) 20:22, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi. This is to explain I have reverted. Not because of your edits, so much as those before yours. Please continue editing if you see any mistranslations. Thank you. --Kleinzach 08:51, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Under the "Entertainer" section of the notability critera for people on Wikipedia: "Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment." So writing 7 books in 6 years, with more on the way, that have been published and sold worldwide is not making a prolific contribution?
Absolutely -Div- (talk) 07:57, 27 November 2009 (UTC) -Div-
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.