Loading AI tools
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Gogo Dodo. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
Hope 2007 is a blast for ya. :) -WarthogDemon 05:56, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I have noticed that you often provide only a very short abbreviated deletion summary when you delete pages (like "a7" "nn-bio" and similar). Please keep in mind that most users do not know all of Wikipedia's speedy deletion criteria by heart. Please consider providing a brief "plain English" explanation without relying exclusively on "CSD jargon". Additionally linking to the relevant criteria so people can read it in full can also be useful, for example [[WP:CSD#A7]]. This will help a "layperson" better understand why something was deleted when looking at the deletion log.
Most browsers have a autocomplete or other "form filling" features that allow pre-prepared boil plate texts to be inserted into web forms with just a few keystrokes. This is useful for inserting detailed deletion summaries without having to type out the same things over and over. Please consider looking into it. Thanks. -- Longhair\talk 10:09, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Every little bit helps, and I've noticed less "hassle" in followup messages when the "kill command" is clear ;) Thanks. -- Longhair\talk 10:15, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- If you want a free bit of advice, using wiki features only, try this... find an article (take a nn bio for example, there's plenty of them to experiment with :-), edit the article and add the required {{db-bio}} tag, then click preview, but don't save. In bold along the top of the template you have your deletion summary. It works for me ;) -- Longhair\talk 10:36, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you so very much for redirecting my comments ro Mr. Case. Adknam 11:21, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Looks like a sock or imitator of Squidward vandal and therefore deserving of an indefblock instead of 24h. :) Syrthiss 20:32, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm, looking at this may just be an imitator. Squidward primarily used open proxy ips instead of usernames. Syrthiss 20:54, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
A page titled "Michael Malvasio" was recently deleted by you. I just wanted to take a screen shot of it, just to have, and then you can delete it again. Can you please put it up for 1 more day, so we can take a screen shot. That would be greatly appreciated. Sorry for any inconvience we have caused you. Thank you in advance for your response and help.
Darman06 06:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for taking care of those disgusting images. It is very much appreciated.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 22:01, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- You're welcome. -- Gogo Dodo 06:59, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
An IP user has added as an external link to Veronica Finn. Although it is a link to a realestate site apparently run by Veronica Finn, is it considered a commercial link? The link actually helps verify some of the information in the article, so I'm wondering if the link is okay or not. Should it be removed? -WarthogDemon 04:19, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 06:59, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. :) I'll do that. I think it actually might get discussed fairly quickly. Looks like Justin Timberlake is starting to date her again. Oo -WarthogDemon 07:34, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice, but I disagree about those pages being nonsense articles. Although I dont speciffically recall the articles, obviously an administrator agrred that it met the speedy deletion criteria as the articles were deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by EMT1871 (talk • contribs)
This is a shared account, it is from a school, and people can't go to the create account screen or log in screen, it's picked up from the schools web blocker, there are Some people that have contributed to Wikipedia in a proper way. So please unblock this, If you can't, I understand... RedAlpha 01:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Re: Okay I understand, thanks for clearing that up. RedAlpha 05:15, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
But can you delete Kayla (Orca)? The article had been recently created, then had a db tag placed on it for already having an article at Kayla (whale). It was then changed into a redirect to the second page. I'm thinking it'd be best to have Kayla (whale) moved over there, for consistency's sake. We already have pages like that such as Keiko (Orca). -WarthogDemon 06:49, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- I actually just now noticed that the correct page is Keiko (orca). That being said, is it alright if I just change it into a redirect to that page, and then move the Kayla (whale) page to Kayla (orca)? -WarthogDemon 06:54, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry for the confusion. ^_^;;; And thanks. :) -WarthogDemon 08:15, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Re: your message The next step is done making the red links blue ;) --Peter Eisenburger 14:08, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for copyediting.--Peter Eisenburger 07:56, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I should have checked the guidelines of wikipedia page before I let my friend post that. O and i'm pretty impressed. I new wikipedia was fast to clean up stuff, didn't know it was that fast. :P It won't happen again. —Nerdman01 04:51, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
In last edit by IP:63.250.143.9 the vandal included (at line 317) the team motto is "forever purple." This has never been the case. Please reconsider the request. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SERSeanCrane (talk • contribs)
i didnt do shit. --JohnYjidsjdfifu 20:52, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Uh huh, sure. . -- Gogo Dodo 21:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert. This fellow doesn't seem to realize the history keeps track of little things like edits. GJD 21:25, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- You're welcome. -- Gogo Dodo 23:40, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
My inclination is to block indefinitely; the account has been used for nothing but vandalism, and has had a string of warnings? If you agree, I'll unblock and block again indefinitely. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 20:51, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- OK. I must admit that I don't share even your glimmer of optimism, but let's give him one more chance. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick reverts to the vandalism and attacks on my talk page. I do appreciate it. --JFreeman (talk) 20:51, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- You're welcome. =) -- Gogo Dodo 21:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Kudos for catching the change on my user page. --SamMichaels 05:54, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- You're welcome. -- Gogo Dodo 06:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- ...and again this morning. Guess I'm getting popular. --SamMichaels 17:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I removed the section 'Clothes a nerd would wear' in the article Nerd as patent OR nonsense. Would you mind explaining why you reverted me? Thanks! GertrudeTheTramp 07:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 07:56, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Awesome. Thanks for the explanation; I'll re-revert. Cheers! GertrudeTheTramp 07:58, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
I refuse to concede defeat. --Foundby 08:24, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I am curious to know under which guideline within WP:EL you keep removing the Counterpoint link: (Rm, again per WP:EL).
Please note that I have no strong opinions regarding its inclusion or exclusion. Martin Allen 08:45, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the explanation. What is the postion with regard to 'podcasts' in terms of the BBC's Listen Again facility and Nature's weekly editorial podcasts? I presume as these are not widely spamed, these are OK? Martin Allen 20:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
I am the Drummer for the page you deleted J.R. Castillo and Unwound. I started this page today and you deleted it. I know it needed some work, infact. It is going to take a lot of work. I did leave his web page and myspace pages on the wikipage in case someone though it was a nonsense article. I would appreciate a little more time to complete a page!! I was getting the documentation I needed to fill out the rest of his music singles and albums. If you don't think that he was worth noting, you should have waited to see that his "Surviving Emily" song hit number 1 in Texas Country. I hope you can restore it, because setting up all the code for the tables, colors, etc. was a pain in the you know what. I did not save the notepad doc that I was working with, because it was on Wikipedia. Please put my 2 hours of hard work back up so I can finish it.
And next time you could message the person in the discussion thread and give it a couple of days before DELETING IT.Lancemurphy 07:00, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
User Subpage help
Yes I copied the table structure. The two hours of work was me floating around the different artists webpages to find a structure I liked. I thought the whole point of this wiki was to ultimately move towards a uniform structuring. All I asked for was my code that was ready for me to edit. I am sorry if I was heated, but you did just delete my work less than 12 hours after I created it. Please send me the code and I will build the subpage first. I had no idead you could build the subpage first. Thanks Lancemurphy 22:08, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
User Subpage Created
Thanks for your help, I am sure that when the site is done and referenced it will be wiki qualified. Lancemurphy 20:09, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
I just realized you're a WP admin. What's the proper tag to add to an image if it's a blatant advertisement? db-spam? --SamMichaels 05:44, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my user page. Black Falcon 05:43, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- You're welcome. -- Gogo Dodo 05:49, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Dear Gogo Dodo I am aspiring to become an administrator on Wikipedia, and I would like to know, from someone who already is an admin, whether I now meet the requirements and have enough standing here on Wikipedia to make a successful bid. Please assess my case, and provide an honest review on whether I am there yet and what should I do if I am not at where I need to be at the present point in time. Many thanks! Arbiteroftruth 04:19, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Just noticed you did send me a message about spliting it. Thanks! Surreal1221 10:48, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Whom should I report vandals and indulge in hate comments.Please help me.It is in regard to the articles .Please see this talk page The article has been protected . Vaikom Satyagraha and Periyar University they plan to start a revert war after the page is unprotected.further they will not allow any comment against the Brahmin an Indian caste.They have a dubious page called Parpanar Please help Adyarboy 17:15, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
In Business card there is a lot of adding and removal of external link spam. I recently removed http://www.ibccsite.com/ - which admittedly is not as spammy as some of what gets added, and it appears other editors have left it there. However I feel it does not belong in the article. Tontot (talk · contribs) seems very dedicated to having it in place, and I would like a third opinion. Thanks. --ArmadilloFromHellGateBridge 02:44, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
This is to thank you for your early support on my RfA, which closed favorably this morning. I appreciate the confidence the community has placed in me and am looking forward to my new responsibilities. Please let me know if ever you have any comments or suggestions, especially as I am learning how to use the tools. Best regards, Newyorkbrad 17:46, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry, i was experimenting. just please don't leave messages anymore :(
Heyhey Hey 05:38, 22 January 2007 (UTC)Heyhey Hey
can you add a this article may not be neutral or whatever to the THC artcile seeing as it doesnt have any of the long term damge of thc abuse etc. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.129.226.151 (talk) 17:32, 22 January 2007 (UTC).
- You can add them yourself. You don't need to go through me. -- Gogo Dodo 19:37, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, i was confused but now i get it.--Joebengo 23:24, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Please explain why Mr. Winer's article does not fit the criteria for being deleted. He gained the noteability by claiming to have created RSS and for having been one of the first bloggers. Both major accomplishments that have been attributed to him are untrue. --Nirelan
Although Wikipedia is supposed to use independant sources this page is made based on information from Mr. Winers own website. That is clearly a violation of the wikipedia guidelines including sources must be written from a neutral point of view, and the no original researchpolicy. That means it violates two of only three content policies.Nirelan talk
This made me chuckle. Good work soldier. lol --WoohookittyWoohoo! 09:23, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Ah ha! That's a wonderful idea. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:43, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi GD, just noticed you reply to my request to block 68.161.127.144. When I look here to see if this IP is blocked it is coming up empty. Am I looking in the wrong place? Thanks. --Roswell native 06:22, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. That was the first time I had run across a new article that needed to be deleted, and really had no idea what I was doing. I put the reason for deleting as vandalism, because it certainly was not a good-faith article, and the user had vandalized another page. Is there a more appropriate reason is usually cited in such stiuations? Thanks again. - BillCJ 07:43, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi Gogo Dodo
Thanks for your involvement. I've also posted a little note about this one to User:Lar due to the previous edits of this user. If you look at history of Normans the IP obviously knows both me and User:Inge from before and accuses us of POV-pushing. Given this and the IP's previous edits to Commanche's talk pages, it looks very much like Commanche CPH has returned. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 08:33, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- I hadn't noticed the IP's vandalism to my user page today, but he also messed around with it yesterday. It's Commanche alright. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 08:35, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Well now my page was targeted as well. Hopefully this can be dealt with swiftly.Inge 12:22, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Well, we can add trolling to the list as well . Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 21:57, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- No problem at all. I only posted this one here since I'd missed that you'd deferred this one to Lar. Sorry. I've posted a little note on Lar's page about my posts here. Oh and btw, since Comanche's IP also vandalized Inge's user page and subsequently removed a level 3 warning, I've taken the liberty of giving him a level 4. I guess being blocked the first 10 times didn't make him more cooperative (sigh). Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 22:34, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
24 hours? Look at the contribs — that's a throwaway vandalism-only account – Qxz 19:18, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the tip, Gogo Dodo! Could you give me an example of a report that I missed? I thought they all had plenty of warnings (and some of them, previous blocks), but I guess I missed one somewhere. Thanks again! -- P.B. Pilhet / Talk 20:37, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- Ahh, I see. I be more careful next time. Thanks for the help, Gogo! P.B. Pilhet / Talk 20:48, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, an article for Survivor: Cook Islands contestant J.P. Calderon is up for afd. Your opinions on the matter would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Scorpion 22:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, and congrats on your promotion! Per this discussion, I'm dropping a friendly note to some of the recently-promoted admins requesting help with speedy deletions. I am not an administrator, so if you don't feel comfortable diving into deletions - or if you need more info - please don't come to me, but I'm sure that Cyde Weys would be happy to guide you if you want to help. Any help is great, but I'm sure that Cyde and others would deeply appreciate it if you could put the page on your watchlist and do a bit of work there on a regular basis? Maybe weekly? Thanks in advance! Oh and if you're already working away on CSD please disregard this message; it's not meant as a slight against any hard work you're already doing. Cheers! Anchoress 18:27, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi a month ago you deleted the article about abortion titled "Fisherman's Choice" I am infact the author, under a new name Lordtortvillethegreat, formerly known as Lordtortville, but due to a messy run in with some of your administrators, I unfourtunately lost my posting privilages. I realise now that this article doesn't belong on Wikipedia, but have found a proper home on "Uncyclodpedia" Wikipedia's humorous counterpart. I, regretfully, forgot to save the original manuscript, so I fear it may be lost forever because of your deletion. I ask you then, is there a way that one might be able to recover the original text? Thanks.
Lord Tortville
Thanks for fixing that, was somehow multiple vandalism users, didn't saw that. →AzaToth 18:29, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. The page was a mess, so it took me awhile to figure out where the best revision was. -- Gogo Dodo 18:33, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Dirtydvd a1xl.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 18:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
You did not block 63.199.75.218 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), claiming that the vandal had not been warned. The vandal HAD been warned, see the final warning on his talk page!! Viewfinder 22:17, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Ah, missed that one. Thanks. --Selket 00:23, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Can you please put History of the guillotine in Russia on the front page? I want people to know about the article I am writing? --Linear Model 08:31, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
I think the comment on Nicole Kidman you reversed was valid - minus the racist language. We shouldn't try to sanitise these things too much, particularly on a dicussion page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.170.195.223 (talk • contribs)
Thank you for your kind welcome,I just joined today and am getting to know the ropes.Please excercise some patience and tolerance and please excse my ignorance.ny repeat postings were because the originals were being deleted.Hopefully the knowledge I have of Amalfi will outway mu current ignorance of how wikipedia operates.
Grazie
Gerardo--Gerardo1 17:42, 11 February 2007 (UTC) di Amalfi Gerardo1 12:04, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
sorry about that im new (obviously) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.91.206.128 (talk • contribs)
My vn-13 in 24 hours pale in comparison to your 104, but I know the feeling :D Fvasconcellos 22:14, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
He put my former address & phone number on here, I was just repaying the favor He also admits to being a doupalganger (having two accounts). He also is User:alexplank —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.225.124.175 (talk • contribs)
The guy just posted this article AGAIN. TJ Spyke 07:21, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you fir taking care of the anonymous user who vandalized Columbia University. Best, Matan 04:27, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
no...i go to frontier...people actually call us heroin high...were not proud of it...its just true. (sorry...i dont know where else to tell you this)
bibliomaniac15 00:59, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
(Copied from User:smmurphy/talk)
Sorry I didn't make myself clear. The fact that it was taken from another source shows that the author was likely close to Thea, and very possibly the same author as the pdf I linked to. Its not a copyright violation if the author releases it, and putting the article up for deletion seems to me to smack of wp:bite. The speedy tag was for non-notability, thus the question of copyright had not been raised or addressed (it wouldn't have been hard to reqrite the article based on the material provided, had that been the issue). Smmurphy(Talk) 07:13, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- The anonymous user has added the material again to the page Thea, which I still believe belongs at Thea (musician or possibly at Cynthia L. Stacey. I'm wondering if you mind if we put the page back and let it go through a normal afd, if necessary? Thanks, Smmurphy(Talk) 03:56, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
I saw the information about the race thing on an interview with Jeff Probst, however I don't know which one. I mean the "revelation" of the opening sequence, but it might be too confusing to keep on the page. Jordan 04:49, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- I mean the revelation of the actual opening sequence of the Survivors with the theme song. It is probably too confusing, so I'll reword. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thepangelinanpost (talk • contribs) 05:24, 16 February 2007 (UTC).
Thanks ... I appreciate you and the RC patrollers and other admins for taking care of the rash of vandalism of my pages and those of others.... The semi-protect is a good idea, as one of the anons declared that this vandalism would be occurring for the next week. This appears to be the result of reversions and blocks of User:Marshalbannana and his IP sockpuppets for introducing incorrect information into an article. I appreciate your help on this. — ERcheck (talk) 06:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protecting User:Looper5920's user subpages sounds like a good idea — thanks for taking care of that. The sockpuppets seem to have come out due to reversion of vandalism on Battle of Al Qaim. — ERcheck (talk) 06:30, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Please don't remove speedy delete templates on pages. At least put the hangon message on the talk page. Thanks. --ASDFGHJKL=Greatest Person Ever+Coolest Person Ever 01:27, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 01:52, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for clearing that up. I just nominated it for AfD. --ASDFGHJKL=Greatest Person Ever+Coolest Person Ever 02:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Sure, I will start doing that. What do subst do, however? - Ocatecir 05:45, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Got it, thanks for the help. - Ocatecir 05:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
BEFORE YOU DELETE SOMETHING YOU MIGHT WANT TO LET THE PERSON FINISH THE ARTICLE BUT HEY MABIE ITS JUST ME!!!!!
SINCERELY YOURS:
Muriness 18:35, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
TINKLECOMM WIRELESS REPLY
I cant get any other information about them, They are no longer existant because they had poor sales and were going to rebuild. I know this because I was a customer and now Im with AOL. Im new to wikipedia so I have no Idea what your talking about and just because you didnt see me enter anything in a hour does not mean you can just delete it, And on wikipedia it has NO time limit you have to finish your article. Please write back
SINCERELY YOURS:
Muriness 20:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
RE: TINKLECOMM WIRELESS REPLY
Be that as it may, I went to attend to other work. I do not like that policy that you have here at wikipedia. You really need to look into that because its not fair "And Im sure I am not the only one who feels that way" I mean look at it in my shoes, how would you feel if someone deleted a article you didnt even get to start yet! Now you have to start over again and you have to feel RUSHED or else it will get deleted. Come on, its comon courtisty
SINCERELY YOURS:
Muriness 08:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Another user just posted to it. Ronbo76 06:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Is it just my computer, or is the "Wherever You Are" EP that I put as the "last single" on that page, not showing up? >_> -WarthogDemon 23:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nevermind . . . it showed up suddenly. Sorry. ^^; -WarthogDemon 00:00, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for deleting the article, if you were the one who did so. I was going to do it myself, but apparently I was too slow. David Knowles 00:53, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for doing the reversions on my talk page! Beat me both times (so far?). Figma 06:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks again. Fine work! Figma 06:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for clarifying the reason for the deletion. Can I include a summary, followed by an external link to the article?
Thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Drabin23 (talk • contribs) 22:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC).
You reverted the change I made to the clubs at Redlands High School. I know Wikipedia has a policy of no original research, but I also know that the club is called "Young Philosophes" instead of "Young Philosophers" becuse I am currently involved in this club. If you want, you can check out the Redlands High School website http://rhs.redlandsusd.net/ . The Daily Bulletin under "General Information" will probably have an announcement regarding Young Philosophes every other Monday. I'm sort of new to the editing process though, so if I screwed up any pointers would be appreciated. --71.103.239.106 02:15, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. It seemed an odd change at the time. I checked the website and see that it's listed as "Young Philisophe Society" -- Gogo Dodo 02:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- It's okay. I actually thought I would end up getting a warning for vandalism because it's a weird change.--71.103.223.14 00:21, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- I normally wouldn't issue a warning for a change like that and certainly not one for vandalism (a "test" warning at maybe, but only if it was done over and over or along with something else). Having an edit summary like you did with your second edit helps. Have you considered creating an account? -- Gogo Dodo 04:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
You revised some of the information that shouldn't of been revised. The information about the city being created shouldn't of been revised because it is a fact. I do know that some of it is useless but some of it is not in the trivia section. I think other people should know some of the trivia about the city. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.2.93.76 (talk) 21:09, 25 February 2007 (UTC).
Well saying that you don't live in Cortland, Ohio, how do you know it is verfiable and notable. The Cortland Police does pull over cars that are out past curfew, McQuaid's selling beer is notable and verfiable because Cortland, Ohio was a dry town, and McQuaid's is the only place that sells alcohol in Cortland, Ohio. Everyone that goes to the Cortland Speedway can verify and note that Cortland Police does hang out there. The hill that everyone sleds on at Mosquito Lake is very notable because people do get caught and we advise against it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thorisgod (talk • contribs)
Hello Gogo Dodo. Just thought I'd let you know, the anon user 69.160.16.122 (who's been vandalising the New Jersey Devils, Buffalo Sabres, Chris Neil, Martin Brodeur pages (to name a few), has also been working from 24.52.59.7 (where he was given a 24hr block). A 1-month ban or a permanent ban made be needed. GoodDay 02:26, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
I couldn't find anything myself, though I didn't look too hard as it seemed to be so hoax-y (is that a word?). Anyway, I did put a sources tag on it to see if we could get some verification. Realkyhick 07:51, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
wanted to point you to this AFD discussion, with a consensus of keep for this particular list. Thanks! Locriani 02:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your help dealing with User:Slappy Kong. I appreciate it and was getting tired of cleaning up after him. Shimaspawn 21:43, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Any chance you can help me with something else? 140.211.69.11 is registered to a University, but someone from there keeps vandalising pages and I'm not sure what to do about it. Shimaspawn 22:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you. I appreciate your help and your advice. Shimaspawn 01:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
yea... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Soldier9599 (talk • contribs)
I just wanted to say thanks for blocking that idiot at I.P. 64.230.16.82 from vandalizing my (or anyone else's) user page. Some people must lead very empty lives... Anyway, thanks again, bro. Buck Mulligan 17:28, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- You're welcome. -- Gogo Dodo 06:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
You recently deleted this page because it did not display any notability. I am not saying your wrong, I'm just not quite sure exactly what would qualify as notable. They are a local band, but they are well known throughout the community, and are one of the most popular bands from the community. They have had concerts, but so far as I have known have not published and full albums. I didn't want to just remake the page because your probably right that they shouldn't have a page here, but I wasn't completely sure, so theres the full details; I just wanted to see if you still think they're not notable enough. -- Soldier9599 20:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Gogo. Just a quick note to say thanks very much for your support at my RfA. Very much appreciated. :) Bubba hotep 09:15, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
The Spiderman4 page urgently needs to be deleted, as you are an admin you can, it is discusting.
--Kai81123 12:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Your web site graphic of the purple heart "barnstar" is inappropriate and offensive to members of the United States Armed Services who suffered injuries to be awarded the medal. Reducing the purple heart to something awarded to wikipedians involved in anti-vandalism efforts seems disingenuous and is in bad taste. Please consider what message you are trying to send by posting this item on your user page, and whether it reflects poorly on the wikipedia community. Best wishes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.162.176.102 (talk • contribs)
User:Owie123 Has spammed my account page User:Kai81123. I am reverting it now but i have noticed that Owie123 has spammed a lot before, his talk page has been locked so i cant put a spam warning on it. Should he be banned for previous warnings of spamming or what?
--Kai81123 16:22, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
The person is right, I have immediately removed the medal. Thanks for the heads-up. Herostratus 18:01, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Someone went and deleted the section of video game characters in: List of Cars characters. As it is a rather big section, I felt it should not be deleted before discussion first. So I went ahead and placed a Unencyclopedic tag on that section and brought up what's happening on the talk page. Just want to double check to see if I've handled everything right. >.>; -WarthogDemon 00:32, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
I know, ridiculous, isn't it. I think there will be a community ban proposal very soon. Cheers, Sarah 23:58, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for protecting that page. The vandalism was getting out of control! In the future, is there a warning template I can use to tell them to use the talk page instead of the main article for discussions? Thanks! Sarc37 16:51, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- We are getting a lot of email about this. It was a good call to protect the article. Perhaps you could add it to your watchlist as well, if you haven't already? Jkelly 19:01, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what the whole story is, but apparantly a copy of our vandalised article was widely distributed. Jkelly 20:17, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Do you have a life outside Wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 7pac (talk • contribs)
Hi there. Looks like our mutual friend 7pac went anonymous as 158.59.242.67 and vandalised your page and Cremepuff222's page. Nothing further so far, but I'm keeping him on my watchlist for a while. Take care. --Finngall 17:28, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
I'm Really sorry about this.... It appears my idiot brother messed with you earlier today...He also changed my user profile alot... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 7pac (talk • contribs) 20:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC).
Thanks so much! Oh, I have nominated the list for featured list status and any comments or feedback would be greatly appreciated. I think it's good enough, but I'll just have to see if other editors think so as well. Thanks for your great comment! :) -- Underneath-it-All 02:32, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- I think I changed it to match another featured episode list, but if it's the same then feel free to change it back. -- Underneath-it-All 17:55, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding the writers and directors! :) -- Underneath-it-All 23:11, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for all your help on getting the list to FA status! -- 01:58, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
It looks like our reversions got tangled on Great Pyramid of Giza. Thanks for straightening things out. shoy 02:08, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
You said I was a spammer for the moors page? Being an administrator and "patroller", are you always as sloopy as this? JialiangGao 07:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Howdy! Noticed you deleted this as a G7. I'm not contesting the validity of it, but I was curious as to whether I could get you to undelete the history for me so I can work with it more. I made a link to his book, An Abundance of Katherines, before, and I think it was a valid stub at the time, so I'd like to be able to use that rather than have to start fresh. Can I get your help on this? Thanks. --badlydrawnjeff talk 17:10, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Done. I restored the stub, but didn't restore you tagging it for deletion. I figured you didn't need that. ;) I also added {{inuse}} for you until you return to edit. -- Gogo Dodo 03:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. Now I'm confused - who tagged it as a G7? I thought I had been the one to create this stub, and it appears I was, so now I don't know how it got tagged. --badlydrawnjeff talk 12:04, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Umm... you did. You were the original author and G7 is only valid for the original author. You blanked the article two minutes after you created it with {{db|author}} and an edit summary "aw, hell", then corrected the CSD tag a moment later to {{db-author}}. -- Gogo Dodo 16:22, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oh. Oh my. I'm completely stupid. I'm sorry about that, I screwed up. --badlydrawnjeff talk 23:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help, sorry to be a pain in the ass. Just so you know, I was G7ing it to make room for the move, and now I've done the move, so we're all set. --badlydrawnjeff talk 23:41, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Umm... you did. You were the original author and G7 is only valid for the original author. You blanked the article two minutes after you created it with {{db|author}} and an edit summary "aw, hell", then corrected the CSD tag a moment later to {{db-author}}. -- Gogo Dodo 16:22, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- No problem, though you confused me for a bit as when I went to move it after I deleted it, it was already moved. Glad all appears to be settled now. =) -- Gogo Dodo 23:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Got it. Good faith noob error. --Bakerstmd 00:32, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Can you please (Im asking wiki pedia for the 500 time) to Make an article on Angella Christie the gospel saxophonist!?!?!?!?!? I been asking since like January!
--Muriness 00:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- As I stated in the requested article, I left you guys her website with all the information you need which is Angella Christie . Whats the problem?? (And I am not creating another article for a while because Ill be mad again if my article is deleted and then Ill just cancell the service) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Muriness (talk • contribs) 23:17, 21 March 2007 (UTC).
- If You would go to her website and find out, you ould know that she is a GOSPEL SAXOPHONIST. And I do not know how to start a new page, why do you think I wouldnt have done it allready. And I am requesting that you do it because I do not know how and your an expert. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Muriness (talk • contribs)
- Thank You very much. Now the only thing is how do I expand this
- --Muriness 23:21, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- I need to find out more about her, but I really appreciate that.
- --Muriness 22:43, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Can you stop jeanclauduc from Vandalizing the MDS INternational page? He has several warnings on his user page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.34.44.240 (talk • contribs)
Hello Gogo Dodo, this is concerning the former article Spindel Lejon. First off, well done on the prompt response to the nonsense tag. However, I was hoping this content could be moved to WP:BJAODN as it quite humorous and I think other wikipedians might enjoy it. Any ideas? Wolphii 04:36, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Sorry that I had that little gold administrator image on my user page. I copied some source from someone else's user page that was an administrator nad I didn't see it in there. Thanks for correcting it. --M79 specialist 19:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
FYI: You're meant to {{schoolblock}} in your block reason. -- Netsnipe ► 18:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
I'm referring to your block log. You're meant to actually use the template itself as your blocking reason so that users can actually see the template in full on MediaWiki:Blockedtext, otherwise they'll fire off confused/irate emails to unblock-en-l because many people don't even read their IP's talk page. By the way, I've fixed all your blocks and in future, don't hesitate to schoolblock K-12 schools and districts 6 months at a time since 99% of thier edits are vandalism anyway. -- Netsnipe ► 19:08, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 |
Thank you for your Support on my recent nomination for adminship, which passed with a final tally of 89/1/1. If there's anything I can help with, then you know where to find me. Cheers. - Michael Billington (talk) 12:34, 30 March 2007 (UTC) |
Wikiwand in your browser!
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.
