Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
Thanks for the warning. I thought that edit was alright because someone else actually changed the heading first.
By the way, are you going to vote in the issue? I feel that everyone is siding against me unfairly. They are even being rude to me and claiming the reverse..71.202.1.48 (talk) 00:50, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
I actually haven't put in an edit summary. That's why I asked for deletion. But now I have put in an edition summary.Ssven2 (talk) 12:20, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
What was on this page? Also XtremeEditorz (alternate account) (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log).—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 18:47, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello. Why did you block the accounts User:Lake64, User:Lake65 & User:Lake66? Axl ¤ [Talk] 14:24, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Okay, is the place to ask, why not? I explained why so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeoStarDragon1 (talk • contribs) 14:56, 25 August 2014
You did a speedy delete on a page about a famous news site that I've been a fan of since the 1990's.
You labeled it a company or band page.
Can you undo the delete and if you don't think it warrants a page let it go for discussion.
I use their breaking news page several times a day myself, since it has the top 10 networks on one page.
Since you did a speedy delete there's no way to discuss it on the page.
Thanks
Aithre (talk) 14:38, 28 August 2014 (UTC)AithreAithre (talk) 14:38, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I'm one of the editors of 247 News
I got an email from a fan that created a page for us, and they claim you deleted the page and banned them.
They said in the email they sent us, that you accused them of being a 'sock' since another person in their office posted positive support on another page or something.
Can you put up the 247 News Page and allow the community to properly edit it.
I'll be happy to add any info about the News Site since I'm one of the editors.
Thanks
Dealexander (talk) 18:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)DEAlexanderDealexander (talk) 18:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC) Chief Editor 247 News Author of over a dozen books.
Hi I would like to ask you What was the issue regarding me creating Fluper Technologies page if you can help me regarding it then I will be greatful — Preceding unsigned comment added by SunShineFluid (talk • contribs) 17:17, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Dear GB fan,
We would like it very much if you remove the page Strathearn Station, it may effect the owners of the station. The page has information about what sheep they use and they would like to keep this private because this could effect business. It would be much apprishiated if the page was taken down because it could be giving them a bad reputation.
Thankyou — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.255.101.10 (talk) 23:26, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I mentioned your name at ANI here Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Abuse of deletion process so performing the mandatory notification. Cheers. Nil Einne (talk) 16:02, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I think you speedily deleted this article at the same time that I was contesting the deletion? The article was about an album that has received nationwide coverage by the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation, and I had just added references to verify this. There is no article about the band itself, should I create one and merge the album information into that one? MnrdJoe (talk) 12:36, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
File:Choco beats Milma chocolate 2.JPG | Chocolate Bar for You |
I want to share this chocolate bar with you in recognition of your kind work for wikipedia and the users of it like me. Hoping that you will enjoy this chocolate with me. Stay Happy Leena Barber (talk) 17:14, 8 September 2014 (UTC) |
Thank you for having the insight not to completely obliterate an hours work (maybe two - yeah I know its not great...but if you had been learning Salsa for less than a month and had heard of him...you too would have that inkling that Wayne Gorbea is notable) Stacie Croquet (talk) 20:44, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi GB! Hoping you are enjoying good health. As far as matter that I want to discuss is that I have completed the article on Pakistani Poet in a pure neutral way as you instructed that someone before tried to write but it was not neutral thinking. So I want you to please give one or two minutes and check the neutrality and every aspect that you think to be added as you are quite experienced in wikipedia. So take a look once and publish it if meets the criteria. Here is the link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Hafiz_Muhammad_Fazal_Azim_Taha. Thanks dear. Cheers! Alexandar Nicole (talk) 10:34, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
GB fan! Can u please take a look once? Cheers! Alexandar Nicole (talk) 17:44, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Yup! Thanks GB you are right that two of the links are not opening, I am working on it right now for other way to open them. Otherwise I will remove both of them. Cheers! Alexandar Nicole (talk) 08:33, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
I have removed the dead links as they are not opening. But for the reference, the published poem of that link is taken from wikimedia. Hoping that, now this article is ready for publish. Cheers! Alexandar Nicole (talk) 09:03, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
GB! Please take a look once again. Cheers!Alexandar Nicole (talk) 16:29, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi Jim,
You "speedily deleted" my page labeled RAC Clark. I wanted to contest it per directions I received to click on "contest button" on my page, but one did not exist. Can you please consider re-instating the the page? I am RAC's assistant and spent a lot of time on this page. RAC Clark is the son of the late Dick Clark of America Bandstand fame. RAC is a producer himself and we would like him to have a page showing his accomplishments and link to his father. If you can not re-instate the page, kindly please tell me what I need to do to fix it so it can be published. In addition, can you kindly send me the copy back. stephanie.f@lhent.com
Many thanks, Stephanie — Preceding unsigned comment added by RAC Clark (talk • contribs) 20:06, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Hey GBfan, its been a long you aren't unblocking this article. My article meets all the conditions of wikipedia, kindly take a review on recreation and unblocking of this article! Thankyou — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.110.109.145 (talk) 20:05, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi GB fan, Please move this Dare 2 dance page to Dare 2 Dance per caps. Chander For You 15:32, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
in the Medal of Bravery page created by the Gov Gen of Can my mother was mentioned on one of the notable receivers of the award, only 2500 people have this award in canada ... and she was on the first to receive the award and one of the first women and police officers to receive this award
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medal_of_Bravery_(Canada)#cite_note-8
I didn't originally add her page the Gov Gen people did ... all I was doing was starting to add to her page ... not really fair you strike her page as it has been created by the goverment — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soldbybrock (talk • contribs) 04:21, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
AND .... all the OTHER notable receipts still have their pages .... please put her page back and I will keep adding to it, thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soldbybrock (talk • contribs) 04:27, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
no .... all the recipients on the medal of bravery page have personal pages. her page was blank with no info. I took the info from her write up and included the link where it came from and after the 4 days was going to add some photos as well. now all the notable recipients have pages except her. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medal_of_Bravery_(Canada)#cite_note-8 all i was doing was making a minor change ... please put the page back as all other of the notable recipients have pages — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:E008:5E:1AB8:ACFA:3525:FBB9:1DD2 (talk) 15:04, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
and again i can write a new article and just include the link ... i thought i was doing right by adding the link where it was sited from, all the other recipients have pages, its not fair to not allow her page because i screwed up as she was one of the first to receive the award — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soldbybrock (talk • contribs) 15:59, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
ah ok, thank you for explaining further. email is such a crappy way to try and work through things. I'm the only surviving person with knowledge on this event and info so there is no one else to record and share the info. i will read up on the article. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soldbybrock (talk • contribs) 17:28, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
When you declined speedy deletion because the artist has an article, did you notice that the article on the artist was created between when I tagged this article for deletion, and when you declined it? Anyway, it's in AfD now. —Swpbtalk 23:50, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi dear, can u plz tell me how can i apply for WP:RFA. Plz tell me whole procedure from a to z. Thanks dude. Stay happy Leena Barber (talk) 09:46, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks dear! How can I review the draft articles and give my opinions? Stay happy Leena Barber (talk) 17:00, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Plz give me some links of articles that can be edited or needs editing. It is advised that they are of Canadian, Pakistani and Indian articles. Americans can also be admitted. Happy Leena Barber (talk) 17:07, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
I don't know who is Leena Barber but something went wrong with my id, but I still believe after reading some your user talks that she is interested in you and doing bad with me or may be with someone else. Cheers! Alexandar Nicole (talk) 08:53, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Delete it. It's made by the help of payment — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.97.182.255 (talk) 19:58, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Firat created AnkaferdBloodstopper and I haven't finished the article yet. Also, I don't know how to cite references properly. I thought I had. Redzimus (talk) 19:29, 17 September 2014 (UTC)RedzimusRedzimus (talk) 19:29, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, Im doing research into it. Needs rewording so Im probably going to need help. Im only one man, but I really care about this issue. I guess I just feel like Im hitting my head against a brick wall. The page, as Ive mentioned,has had over 80,000 hits in the last few days. I dont even think its a matter of censorship. Most sites seem to have an 18+ thing when things like this are being discussed. It would just be nice to see it more balanced in its style. So far Ive noted word combos like can be achieved. I guess mostly I find it a bit frustrating arguing my point, because I feel like its as clear as day. Before I got involved there were some horrible references, like proper suicidal ideation stuff. Info that prying eyes shouldn't see. There have been loads of cases of suicide and notably, in the UK, even a lad of 12 killed himself just because he was being bullied. So many people have access to this site.I mean its like saying, here's how you would murder your own grandmother to a serial killer. It just makes no sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redzimus (talk • contribs) 23:23, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
I do plan to make the article balanced throughout, to the point that people shouldn't edit it because it'll be well researched, grounded, relevant stuff. I'll start research tommorow. I cant believe nobody keeps a watchful eye over wiki. Before I make changes Im going to put it by other editors to make sure there is consensus. One idea Ive had is to put about how suicide methods demonstrated online with no censorship is a problem. Euthanasia for old and ill/in pain makes sense-but I can guess who the most of them are. Suicidal people. Sometimes you dont have the proof because confidentiality would have to be breached for that or any study like it. For that you'd need informed consent. Wiki:Why isn't there a criteria for harmful web pages. Probably because the consensus is the issue. I know Id be watching this page if I was suicidal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redzimus (talk • contribs) 23:49, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
@GB fan, it's pointless to make any changes to that page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alliance_Global_Group I will make sure it will be removed, as it's not relevant, you have conflict of interest to create and edit it ( I have necessary proofs). It's better to remove what you did and stop it, as I will do whatever it takes to see it deleted... — Preceding unsigned comment added by PapaDoc88 (talk • contribs) 16:58, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Please restore this article. Why did you delete this article? She is an award-winning university professor with her works exhibited in museums. That seems sufficiently good to have an article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrsmithincalifornia (talk • contribs) 02:38, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Vodabhao
This is the sockpuppet of LanguageXpert not Vodabhao himself--112.79.39.92 (talk) 12:37, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
It looks like CU turned up clean, but are we really certain that Synthwave.94 isn't indeffed user Anthony77600? I noticed that they both use the word useless in the same idiosyncratic way: Anthony77600 and Synthwave.94. Rationalobserver (talk) 20:42, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi, GB fan! I'm not sure if I'm supposed to notify you about this or not, but you are mentioned in this deletion review. Regards - Kelly hi! 08:55, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Please make the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donyi_Taga free so that anyone who have a good source of him/her could edit it. And make the wikipedia a free knowledge sharing site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.79.38.79 (talk) 14:50, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello GB Fan,
As a part of this article, I have put in the thought for the first time on table. This is related to Project Management using Agile Scrum. In a nutshell, Scrum gets in to multiple small waterfall cycles and each one of it becomes bonsai waterfall, when Scrum Project Management follows steps of traditional project management technique i.e. waterfall, but pretends following Scrum method on enterprise level. I have briefly explained the various scenarios on how this might happen and key step to avoid that. It is necessary for Scrum Technique users to understand this before/while adopting Scrum or while transforming their project management from waterfall to scrum. This article has been published on Scrum Website and accessible here. Share your views on this and we will discuss this till your satisfaction.
Best Regards, Manas D Shirode (Certified Scrum Master & Certified Scrum Professional) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manasshirode (talk • contribs) 06:12, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello. Randomly looking for an editor. I came across 1997 in NASCAR and noticed that one edge of the table is missing. I tried fixing it, Wikipedia excepted my edit, and in the preview of my edit, the table IS fixed. But after saving changes, it's still broken. Any idea what's wrong and how to fix it? -WarthogDemon 18:37, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
I have noticed that you have moved the page Rangiya railway station to Rangia railway station. Could you please move the page Rangiya to Rangia? I have tried this myself but not succeed. As per government record the English spelling is Rangia. Wikipedia and Indian railways are the two entities using the spelling Rangiya. Hope you will take appropriate steps. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marlisco (talk • contribs) 04:57, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello GB fan! Sir, to be more confident in my use of WP:CSD#A7, I have no idea of how the above deleted page was eligible for deletion under WP:CSD#A7. From my understanding of WP:Deletion policy, and the use of A7, WP:CSD#A7 does not applies to any article that makes claim of significance or importance, even if the claims are not supported by WP:RS or does not meet WP:GNG. The above article made claims of significance or importance with a quick Google search. I think WP:CSD#A7 does not applies in this case and the page should be deleted through WP:AfD. Thanks. Wikicology (talk) 15:47, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello GB fan. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of The Split Squad, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: With all the members coming from other bands, some of which are notable in their own right, and Burke having his own article as well, indiciates enough importance for A7. Needs to go to AfD. Thank you. GedUK 11:58, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
Might want to also have a infinite protection on Turk beezy thanks! Wgolf (talk) 19:48, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
I added these diffs because the user has been inexplicably reverting my edits. The fact that they reverted me at this page shows that they were still trolling. That is why I had included these diffs. Thank you. – Epicgenius (talk) 01:02, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Can you deal with an edit war with Epicgenius? Wildboardwoodwalk (talk) 01:04, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
I'm not a troll, I'm just new, and I just assumed it was done by vandal. I'll try to not do it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wildboardwoodwalk (talk • contribs) 01:07, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
You removed the image saying 'no fair use rationale' yet on the image page there is one that's been there since 2008? Am I missing something here? Tutelary (talk) 19:53, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello GB Fan, Why you are undoing here. what was your references websit?
If you Really thing you was right please see Henry de Jouvenel Because maybe I was wrong there too.--Reza amper (talk) 14:17, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
I will change the redirect to Henry de Jouvenel Reza amper (talk) 15:13, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
The article was updated with info received from the new Al Jazeer news magazine article. However others are coming by trying t take all our hard work dowm, will you please help?Unholyrollerz (talk) 08:20, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for blocking the Cosmos Master socks of Mr Wiki Pro that were messing up Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Li Lei (beach volleyball). I noticed you also undid the contribution for user 204.126.132.231 . That user is not blocked, so I'm guessing that means they're not a sock, and just got caught in the mess Cosmos Master made. Should I restore their contribution? --Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 17:53, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The ANI discussion involves the Molly Ringwald problems you have noted elsewhere. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 01:49, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thanks for your Help! i truly appreciate it Danielftwtx (talk) 12:30, 21 October 2014 (UTC) |
GBfan: I had emailed you yesterday via Wiki. It consisted of a thread of 3 emails which now stand partially corrected by various editors, however, my primary problems have not been answered. The emails were too lengthy so allow me to summarize below, as clearly as I can| a) Under "Create a book", "Start Book Creator", "Show book" you arrive at the page "Manage your book". This page allows you to title and subtitle your book, download it, save it, or send it to a printer. On the same page, lower right, is a box titled "Save and share your book" which includes an entry field titled "Choose a storage location for your book". Directly below this command, on my Manage your book page are 2 little dots, one of which you must click on/choose or the "Save" button remains greyed out. Question: What specifically do I type into the box labeled "Choose a storage location for your book"? | I tried a few different word combinations, which then activates the Save button and appends those words to User:Swamixyz on my user page. Eventually, I discovered that each time I had saved it added another page name. You and others have helped delete the 6 unwanted page links from a total of 7. | b)The book title and subtitle failed to appear anywhere on all 7 "saves". | c) Is it possible to have only your book name follow User:Swamixyz without the prefix/Books? This is what I was originally trying to accomplish. OR Due to my lack of understanding of the Wiki hierarchy, am I constrained to saving books under User:Swamixyz/Books? I hope this clearly explains what I'm not understanding about saving and naming your book. Thanks much. Swamixyz (talk) 22:44, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Dear Sir,
the article "Steven Z. Pavletic" was now removed due to "No indication of importance" (A7).
Indeed, there is merit to this, because the primary reason for which Steven Z. Pavletic is best known for and for which he has internationally been recognized, was not highlighted adequately.
Changes were made in the text regarding this, which will hopefully be adequate.
For your information, the changes are as follows:
1. Immediately in the very first sentence, the following has been added about Steven Z. Pavletic: "...who is best known for his achievements in developing national and international consensus guidelines for clinical trials in chronic GVHD."
(To go with REFERENCE: 1) Steven Z. Pavletic – Center for Cancer Research – Staff Pages. Retrieved 20 June 2014. http://ccr.cancer.gov/staff/staff.asp?profileid=8479 )
2. In the "AWARDS" section, it was further noted that the aforementioned 'achievements' "...enabled research to be conducted on one of the most serious late effect cancer treatment complications...", hence indicating importance.
Thank you for your input, we hope that the above changes will be to your satisfaction.
Best regards, DarkoDarko1983 (talk) 12:47, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello GB fan:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
– NorthAmerica1000 14:43, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for deleting my other page had accidently created it by mistake.D Eaketts (talk) 11:18, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi, GB fan. I'm sorry but I want my talk page deleted because I wanted to delete all history log (including users' contributions who edited my talk page) and then I re-create it without restoring it. Thanks, --Allen (talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me) 11:43, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
You are free to readd the speedy deletion tag and I will not remove it again. I will leave it for another admin to decide if they will delete the page. I can predict what will happen though. GB fan 12:19, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello Sir/Ma'am,
I wanted to inquire with you if the following content is permissible for publishing. Editing has been made from previous contents that were speedy deleted. However, if this is does not meet the requirements, please guide me on how to tweak it according.
Thank you so much in advance and I look forward to hearing back from you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gilfiley (talk • contribs) 18:47, 30 October 2014
you are in trouble not me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.4.33.158 (talk) 02:36, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Ah! Someone who is not a complete asshole who abuses their power! Hats off to you sir! 86.177.72.137 (talk) 22:10, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
But yeah the funny thing was, im genuinely a Wikipedia editor; albeit I put my account on a 'wikibreak' although that a couple years back. I think that guy was just trying to make something out of nothing, weve all done it- anything to make us feel more 'important' Human nature. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.147.74.60 (talk) 19:57, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
I echo the above. Really good WP editor, I nominated something that I knew was self promotion of a non-noteworthy individual without citations and it was quickly removed. Thank you for helping to clean up Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.197.122.77 (talk) 14:31, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks again for unblocking me. I haven't really approached anyone on Wikipedia yet regarding my actions here, but since a few users really are out to get rid of me, I was wondering if you could advise me if I'm doing something wrong. I follow Wikipedia guidelines, I properly source all additions to any article, and I am interested in Boris Malagurski-related articles the most as I follow Malagurski's work and I feel I can contribute most here as it is not a very popular topic - in fact there are only a handful of editors who contribute, and all of them seem to have personal issues with Malagurski, which really disrupts the editing process. Yet I continue to discuss everything, only add information to articles that is reliably sourced, only to turn out to be the bad guy in the eyes of some other editors. Then I get a quick topic ban, a block, and if it wasn't for the uninvolved editors who spoke out against what is happening to me, I'd probably leave Wikipedia (I was close to doing so, but I feel like I've contributed quite a bit that it would be a shame to stop contributing now). So, am I doing something wrong? How do I discuss topics with editors whose only interest is to make the person or his work which we're discussing - look as bad as possible? They've openly voiced their dislike of Malagurski and his work, their edits expose their POV, but that's their problem - where have I done wrong? I know I've engaged in edit warring in the past, I lost my nerve and that won't happen again, but even when I calmly try to discuss the topic area, I'm getting constant accusations and am disrupted at every corner. So, what should I do? I don't have the time or the patience to fight anyone, nor do I want to. I just want to edit and discuss in a civilized manner. One editor even pretends to be extremely polite, and then blocks every edit that doesn't have his approval. I'm not asking you to take anyone's side, nor should you. My co-workers find me to be very collaborative on everything we work on, and on Wikipedia it's just not working. I simply don't understand why. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Kindest regards, --UrbanVillager (talk) 19:57, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
check this "Barakoti's have contributed a lot in the world war" at the creators username, how can this not be a blatant csd violation ? Avono♂ (talk) 21:07, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks sir for your suggestion. And i have changed my signature ! :-)
--aDHi..Talk 16:00, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for seeing this sock. I spotted their edits just before leaving work. I've just gotten home, fed my critters, and then got back online to report them as a sock. Thank you for seeing what they were doing and taking action. Dismas|(talk) 13:13, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
This is not an appropriate posting for WP:AIV. The editor accused is not a vandal and clearly has problems understanding English. That page is devoted purely for emergency purposes so that editors currently on rampages may have their account nuked, it is not for people to blow the whistle on ordinary inexperienced editors. --Stars of 85 (talk) 14:17, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar |
Thanks for protecting my user page and blocking the sockpuppet. It's much appreciated. ![]() |
I don't remember creating this page last night, Burlington Council. If I did, it was a mistake. I meant to do it today and make it look exactly like, Champlain Council. Could you please restore the page and copy the text from the Champlain redirect? Thank you. --evrik (talk) 15:15, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi, GB fan. I have just revisited User talk:79.79.137.119, where you blocked and I then extended the block. The editor has admitted that his/her previous editing was unacceptable, and is now claiming to be willing to edit constructively. What would you say to a WP:ROPE unblock? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:06, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
I need help how can i insert finij in wiki? finij is a software company — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fiican (talk • contribs) 12:19, 17 November 2014
Thanks for the heads up, I'll take to AFD. GiantSnowman 12:58, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from editing this ongoing investigation in which the accused was blocked permanently so that they had no chance to defend themselves. Their use of proxy to respond is valid in this case. 81.164.69.68 (talk) 17:39, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
This article has been an orphan since creation in 2012 and the only "reference" is a repeated inline link to . It is about a living person, and my attempts to find further references using the standard procedures have met with little success. (He is not to be confused with the well-known and recently-deceased Nyingma ngakpa or tantric specialist, Lama Tharchin Rinpoche.) Should we keep a wikipedia page bio for every lama on the planet? I'm not sure where to go with this, but since you declined deletion and the page's author didn't even post... Ogress smash! 03:34, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I had created an entry back in July as a new contributor to Wikipedia and it was deleted. I am interested in individuals who have made interesting contributions in business or the arts, as they are areas that I have long followed and have written about from time to time for other websites. I wanted to create an entry about the founder of the company, but since an entry for an individual with the same name already exists, I wrote an entry about the company instead. Since the company entry was deleted (it was flagged as advertising, though that was not my intention), would it be possible for me to submit an entry about the company founder for consideration? I was going to do so, but saw the note that if recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, I should first contact the deleting administrator. Your response would be greatly appreciated. Thanks so much! Ecassin (talk) 22:28, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks so much for your reply and the resource links! Have a wonderful night! Ecassin (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
You beat me to the button... I'm a writer, but I still haven't got a clue what that one is about, but 'made up' it definitely wasn't. <8-( Peridon (talk) 11:56, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
why did you delete my page about australian tv personality rhiannon dillon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarahwee64 (talk • contribs) 11:55, 24 November 2014
Thanks for https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mrjulesd/drafts/&action=edit&redlink=1 , deleting my unwanted page promptly. I think it is strange that the software allows pages in the 'user:example/xxxx/' format.
Thanks for your earlier advice. You might be pleased to know I've made it up with Moxy, and I am contributing to the Wikipedia:Help Project now, and I am going to try to build consensus for some changes, to hopefully avoid negative aspects. --Mrjulesd (talk) 15:51, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Why pray tell would you choose to reinsert obvious personal attacks against me, thus burning one of my 3RR opportunities and giving the attacker the edge>? I kindly ask you to revert yourself or you may be subject to the same consequences for making the personal attacks as the editor who originally made them. Since you invite me to make a report - I shall now do just that against you, and the original author.Legacypac (talk) 16:22, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Legacypac (talk • contribs) 18:05, 25 November 2014
I accept that you are not intentionally attacking me (though I believe that is the effect), so I am not requesting action against you. I have notified you of the report that I was encouraged to make as a courtesy. Legacypac (talk) 18:40, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for spelling out the email address. I had pointed them towards wmf:Contact us, but when they followed the link I had provided they obviously overlooked the email address. That was listed twice. In the large, clearly labelled box on the right. Yea, okay, so they didn't bother to follow my link. You can lead a horse to water ... --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:53, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
I want to ask you why you deleted my following page? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunita_Dube
One side you are saying that wikipedia consist of your content and its open source. While I am trying to adding one Dr who doing good job at social level so why you not support us and deleted page without tell us the modification.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hem1982 (talk • contribs) 17:29, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! The first number on the disambiguation contest count is not supposed to change. That is merely the total number of links at the beginning of the month. The second number is changed as the count progresses. Cheers! bd2412 T 19:22, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
why was KAtie_nolan page deleted? IS wikipedia not a resource for famous people that people are googling? lourtney kardashian has a page!!! She's done NOTHIGN in this world... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmartin17 (talk • contribs) 20:44, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi I want to know why did you deleted this page ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohamed_Hassan
What shall I do to keep it ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emadido (talk • contribs) 23:10, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Yes, I know but i.m.o. this is a clear case of IAR. This user has been working and working and working on this. It has been declined three (3!) times—check their talk page at User talk:Magravat, and their last comment/promise. A clear case of wp:NOCLUE, and it really is patent nonsense. Any suggestion as how to proceed in such cases? - DVdm (talk) 18:00, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Please I want to create this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohamed_Hassan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emadido (talk • contribs) 02:24, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
I didn't notice the other birthdate information on Elena Satine, thanks for cleaning it up. I can't check sources, but if you could look at this and see if the original citation is acceptable and if might be worth adding the correct DOB back in. CombatWombat42 (talk) 15:50, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
He knows exactly what he's doing — the apparent confusion is part of his game, to snare editors into interacting with him on the only page he can still edit. He's blocked, and he'll never be unblocked, so it's time to ignore him. —Swpbtalk 21:05, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. This is obvious it is no sense. Please answer me on my discussion page. Eurohunter (talk) 20:30, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Why was Surfdome Brand Page deleted ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ebrar (talk • contribs) 12:54, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Good day to you, about the page you deleted(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C8%98chiopu_Cristian), mentioning about the lack of importance of the person that was written about, what should be done to prove you the importance of him? We wanted to write about a specific person known for his contribution in the legal system of the Republic of Moldova. A volunteer and a lawyer who has already helped society with a lot of activities which have the purpose of developing human rights in that country. A person that was eager to develop charity for orphanages and who is an event promoter of society as well. The quoted person is a founder of non-governmental organizations(that were to be written about soon) which were founded with noble ambitions and are meant to help people achieve their goals. Please consider telling the writer of the encyclopedia about what changes should be made so that both Wikipedia and the information posted should be relevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Legaladvisorgroup (talk • contribs) 00:51, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
This page was very important for the world to know about online shopping trends in Pakistan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shahenshahkillz (talk • contribs) 12:43, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I am relatively new to wikipedia, the pages An Insignificant Harvey (which you just undeleted, thanks for that, no idea why it was deleted to begin with) and Jeff Kopas, were originally created by the film distributor and Publicist. Alas, I have attempted to update them myself and make them more compliant with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. I THINK with the help of other users this has now been accomplished. Could you review please? I would like the pages cleaned up if they require it, so that the warning tags are removed. Thank-you kindly for any help you can lend.--Sapok2 (talk) 22:55, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
GB fan,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. NorthAmerica1000 10:38, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi you deleted my page yesterday and it was still being created, it was late at night so I saved it so I could get some sleep and when I came back it was deleted. I tried getting ahold of you yesterday but you didn't answer so if you can help me now that would be great Littlecop81 (talk) 00:58, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Do you realize you are overriding another Admin who deleted the article as G11 after the discussion started? That the page is still going delete at the discussion that continued after the first deletion? That your declining to delete the page again goes against community consensus in 10 other closed discussions to delete 26 other pages with identically formed names plus various related templates and list articles? Now please reconsider. Legacypac (talk) 00:34, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
I think (User:Samuell1616)'s actions of tagging articles (see Alhassan Andani and Umesh Upadhyay) for deletion are reckless, maybe they do not know what they are doing. I've already left a message on their talk page. Regards! —Sadat (Masssly)❤Talk☮C☺Email☯ 16:00, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Hey, please unblock this page I want to write article on this artist. He is a famous person, people need to know about him. search his name on google, you'll come to know then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shezad Ali (talk • contribs) 23:49, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
okay brother .
Dear Sir, Can I continue the page on the name of Mashal Khan Takkar which has already been deleted. Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mashal Khan Takkar (talk • contribs) 16:06, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello i posted this same message to legacy, I would like some feedback thank you for your time. "This page was deleted way to quickly with out any chance to even have a discussion. This article was also submitted for a speedy deletion contest. As stated before the this page has more sources cited and articles and this page does not Joey Bragg I ask to please reconsider and put a stub on the page for other people to contribute" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weeknd112 (talk • contribs) 20:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Thank you.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weeknd112 (talk • contribs) 20:50, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
I guess like any other i am having a little trouble with the claim of significance. If its possible can you help me?Weeknd112 (talk) 21:01, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi GB fan I didn't have any luck finding another article, just found the ones where they mention him. You can delete the article I couldn't find anything else.Weeknd112 (talk) 21:43, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi and thanks. The article has no significance plus sources are just review of films and just one source of Times of India. According to Davey and Me, The only results are of Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn. Plus afd didn't worked though it closed by me (Non Admin Closure). And i nominated with Speedy deletion. Just check if sources are really compatible with the page. Thanks once again. DerevationGive Me Five 15:37, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Why did you blank my talk page and not delete it? Timo3 18:11, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
It was an example, not a spam. Ready to quit smoking? (talk) 01:52, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
YouTube video is part of example. In fact, this videos doesn't even exist. Ready to quit smoking? (talk) 01:55, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
It was a real example. I edited a link, so the video doesn't even exist. People don't have to follow a link, they can just see it as an example. Ready to quit smoking? (talk) 01:59, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
No, I edited the ad by changing one letter of link so it wouldn't spam. Ready to quit smoking? (talk) 02:03, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello, GB fan! I got your name from Category:Wikipedia administrators willing to handle RevisionDelete requests. Could you revdel this edit. I believe it is a young editor and he gave a name that may or may not be his real one. I redacted it in the following edit. Rgrds. --64.85.217.55 (talk) 18:26, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alliance Global Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance Global Group (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —BarrelProof (talk) 19:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
hey man, I'm just here to let you know, Willow Shields is infact dead. Read the coroner report. Also, the Packers are gonna win this weekend, or NAH?
Alright thanks, but the account in question was made purely to advertise his product. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lynctekrua (talk • contribs) 21:04, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the deletion of ShameOnYouSBY which make me be lazy to contribute anymore in English Wikipedia. Let me work it for a week, because I couldn't finish it for a day. I also want other Indonesian people to contribute for it. What do you mean attack page? Have you seen Interwiki? Anbu (talk) 01:00, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
I told you that I haven't finish it, I will include references. I have included Interwiki, please see id:ShameOnYouSBY. You were hurried in deletion, it's new to be started. Wikipedia is free encyclopedia, and I know what I do. Anbu (talk) 03:05, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Why did you not give more time to me? You didn't need to delete it, just tag it. But if that topic isn't reasonable, you can delete it. The fast deletion is one of the factors which makes the Wikipedia users be lazy to contribute anymore. Anbu (talk) 13:09, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi GB, how are you? I hope everything is fine there. :) Regards A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 14:11, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Cheers for that. I've not edited Wikipedia in years and even then it was really small things. I tried added some links, but sometimes adding them worked and sometimes the HTML code was wrong, and I had trouble fixing it. I thought it might be a good idea to expand the information box beneath the main photo with his known political parties and allegiances. I couldn't get that to work though. Someone was asking for a bit more background information on his personal life, so I added his parents in there. Would it be OK to add their names unsourced? I mean, there's only one Joshua Bonehill-Paine, so it stands to reason that the information is reliable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ed4444 (talk • contribs) 21:04, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Very well, but as regards to how many Joshua Bonehill-Paines there are, the records for births only record one, who was born in Yeovil in 1992; making him the same age as and being born in the same location as our Joshua Bonehill-Paine lives. There have been no other Joshua Bonehill-Paines born in the UK between 1837 and 2006. http://www.genesreunited.co.uk/search/results?sourcecategory=birthsutf002c%20marriages%20utf0026%20deaths&collection=births%20utf0026%20baptisms&firstname=joshua&firstname_variants=true&lastname=bonehill-paine®ion=great%20britain I think therefore that that somewhat narrows things down a bit as regards to the names of his parents are. Although it's not the sort of thing I'd rely on to put in a Wikipedia article, his Facebook account also gave his date of birth as 7th December, which I agree could be circumstantial. Agreed that he is a very controversial figure, which is why most of what I posted was sourced from newspaper articles and what he was saying on his own webpages (the latter of which I was careful not to present as truth). Ed4444 (talk) 21:41, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi GB. He seems to have now withdrawn the legal threat via a comment on his talk page here. But he's a very new user, and I don't think he understands how to use the {{unblock}} template. I was going to mention it at ANI, but the discussion was already closed. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 14:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Can you clarify the reason for your block at User talk:StanfordLinkBot? It does seem to have been approved for a trial at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/StanfordLinkBot, and the edits seem to match the intent there. Kuru (talk) 00:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
A fan started a Wikipedia entry about me yesterday, and it seems that you deleted it a few hours after information was posted.
I'm sure that I'm not the most impartial judge of whether I should have an entry on Wikipedia, but I've been the curator of San Francisco's Cartoon Art Museum for more than a decade (http://cartoonart.org/), have written several books (http://www.amazon.com/Andrew-Farago/e/B00JVVPKR2/ref=dp_byline_cont_book_1), have an IMDB entry (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2253621/), am a member of the National Cartoonists Society (http://www.reuben.org/) and am head of the Northern California chapter of that organization.
I trust this will lead to the swift reinstatement of my Wikipedia entry.
Sincerely,
Andrew FaragoAndrewfarago (talk) 19:42, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification, GB fan. My webpage lists many notable interviews discussing my work: https://andrewfarago.wordpress.com/articles-and-interviews/
There has been a "stub" placeholder for a Wikipedia entry for almost a decade, so I'd assumed that someone had taken the initiative to create a proper article.
Thanks for your attention, and I hope that someone will go through the proper channels and make the proper citations this time around.
Andrew FaragoAndrewfarago (talk) 22:02, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
This user has tried to ping you at Talk:Thunderbolt siren, but failed utterly because he is incompetent with the new Wiki markups that aren't old-school or in the interface's macros! So instead, he hand-typed a notification of his reply with a question regarding the merger proposal. Sorry! rdfox 76 (talk) 13:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
I was going to tag this as A11 but, I see you already declined it saying "decline speedy delete, not a made up person", I was thinking more like an autobiography of this uploader who admits this is a self-portrait. Thought I'd poke you with it, in case one of us is missing something. Cheers, Mlpearc (open channel) 04:25, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Why was this page Katie Nolan deleted? http://espn.go.com/espnw/athletes-life/blog/post/14195/standing-ovation-katie-nolan-stance-ray-rice-situation http://awfulannouncing.com/2015/katie-nolan-finally-getting-fox-sports-1-show.html
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmartin17 (talk • contribs) 15:20, 17 February 2015
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
I am not complaining about you, but you may want the chance to defend the persons I am complaining about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.136.36.235 (talk) 23:43, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello GB Fan, just wanted to ask whether you saw my comments on the talk page that had seven links to articles I believe are RS that establish the notability of the subject. I'm going to put the page though REFUND, and I request that if you still find it a bad article, nominate it for AFD and let the community improve it.-- Aronzak (talk) 04:48, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
I replied to your question at User talk:Skycraftking, you haven't replied back yet so I'm just letting you know incase you don't have your notifications setup for mentions. PhantomTech (talk) 20:44, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
I absolutely agree that there is a conflict of interest. But the changes made are just updates from the company corporate page. The previous LFC version was completely outdated and some of the information was wrong (a site that had since closed was listed).
The changes are not advertisements as you put it. It's just an update/cleaning up. I don't know why problems are arising as there is no subjective or opinionated elements to the changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LFC80211 (talk • contribs) 23:40, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Please note the nominations have been posted, and there are standard questions to be answered. Members of the community may also ask questions, so please monitor your nomination(s) until the comment period is concluded on the 18th. Those who are running for both flags have two sections, and two copies of the standard questions -- the first two, at least, are likely to have different answers, so this isn't redundant. (The third one, well, it does.) Thanks for your willingness to serve. Courcelles (talk) 06:34, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
3RR does not apply to fixing vandalism. User:Shookenlover was told yesterday why his edits were inappropriate and he appeared to have relented on that article. He has resumed his vandalism again tonight. Plus there may very well be sockpuppetry involved. Harry Let us have speaks 20:27, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Hey GB Fan, I noticed that instead of deleting a few team articles that I proposed for deletion (South Dakota Gold, Bluff City Reign, and Chattanooga Steamers), you redirected them instead. I would like to let you know it has been demonstrated that its NOT the usual way that non-notable team articles are dealt with. First off, several WP:RFD discussions have deleted redirects like that in the past. The rationale being WP:RFD#DELETE #10, which states: "If the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject." You can refer to WP:REDLINK for more information on why this is a good thing. A few RfD examples that I have in recent memory include Atlanta Experience, Carolina Cheetahs, and The rest of the ABA redirects. On the converse, deletion discussions on teams have repeatedly shown that the team's article is deleted instead of redirected to the league. There are way too many examples of this to count. I would recommend that you reverse your decision to redirect those teams, and instead delete them as an expired PROD. Thank you. Tavix | Talk 20:17, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, GB Fan, I reported the user at WP:UAA because I think this account needs to be deleted altogether instead of simply suspended. Carwile2 *Shoot me a message* 16:38, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
I am sorry for my recent behavior. So many stupid decisions in such a short amount of time, I can't believe myself. Weegeerunner (talk) 00:58, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
When you removed the DB9 from Sacred Revolution you stated that the "artist has an article". I don't see an article for the artist. I see an article for the conferences where the series of seven different artists were recorded live. Only five of those artists have articles. Candi Pearson and Steve Fee do not. So it's not entirely clear that you understand the topic. I have moved onto the prod stage, but don't assume that because there's no redlink associated with the artist parameter that the article meets that criteria. Have a great day. 208.81.212.222 (talk) 00:45, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
As the attacks continue I will archive this now.-- GB fan 16:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
A IP editor has been inserting a personal rant over and over again at RSN. I'm surprised there haven't been escalating warnings issued. Could you look at the situation and take appropriate admin action, if any is needed? thanks. BusterD (talk) 10:40, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Leverage. Since you had some involvement with the Leverage redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector (talk) 14:47, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you declined speedy deletion on DOUGLAS NELSON. I was wondering if this was because I used the wrong criteria (which is the case - G6 would have been more applicable) or because you feel that the redirect should stay? I'm happy to start a discussion on RFD if you feel that would be more appropriate, but I just thought I'd check what your reasoning was first?--Hazel77 talk 16:17, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, what if I just created the S.P.Y page which redirect you deleted? Please don't get me wrong, I am pro deleting unnecessary entries but there are users who actually contribute and are not only registered in order to de-spam Wikipedia. Going through my contributions and looking for potential errors doesn't seem very helpful to me. --en:User:Darealclub 19:32, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The IP you reverted on Bullmastiff is probably evading blocks; it was briefly discussed here. Since then blocks have been handed out on quite a number of other IP addresses. It starts every few days and I usually revert and ping Drmies - I've been getting a bit fed up of having to keep doing all the checking and sorting of refs behind them. They have been messing with a few today. The IP talk page with conditions Drmies set is here but Drmies hasn't been around. The link to the UKC standard on Perro de Presa Canario has just been changed back to a dead link which I repaired the other day. I give up ... ... SagaciousPhil - Chat 17:47, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
This is occurring at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions. Courcelles (talk) 19:31, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi there. It's the first time that I need to create an account for a person. I uploaded the information as Joubert Botha, but received a message that this has been suspended/deleted. I am not sure why and how I can correct the mistake. Can someone please assist? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.225.78.186 (talk) 00:46, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for executing deletions of my work drafts in my userspace. I rely on you and others for these things. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:01, 31 March 2015 (UTC) |
I see you working on one. Many thanks. The userpage link I emailed to oversight, was that okay? I was trying to cut out steps for you. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:52, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you declined a speedy deletion request I'd made alleging a test edit. I think I might be misinterpreting how broad a test edit is. Could you provide some insight into the threshold for use of the G2 CSD? I'd like to continue reviewing AfCs but I want to make sure I'm crystal-clear on CSD policy. (Edit: for reference, the page in question was Draft:Peter J. Gotti.) Thanks, wia (talk) 13:21, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
I'm sorry you feel that honest criticism is continued personal attack. I'll leave you alone if you promise the same with any future CSDs I make. 208.81.212.222 (talk) 17:14, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
I actually need a dunce cap. When I was moving the sig code back & forth between vector.js and common.js it appears I missed some of the code during copy-paste, or forgot to save it. Who knows?? My sig reminder just reminded me, so here is my sig. It really does work. Atsme☯Consult 18:36, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
You might have recognized me by now but I would still like to as why you protected this page? Kindly un-protect it. 117.194.248.253 (talk) 18:44, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
yes apologies about the dual header but all the same why?
I know you said that is your last comment, but I still want to know about your stance on how I edit. Am I really the horrible editor the OP said I was? Weegeerunner (talk) 20:00, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, you just deleted the article tral killing. The article was quite inappropriately named, however the tral incident is quite real and happened 2 days ago. This is one of many news stories circulating about the incident. Does the incident meet GNG in your opinion? I want to create a news article detailing the incident but not sure if notable enough. Please do give input ty. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 10:36, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the help! -AsceticRosé 04:43, 22 April 2015 (UTC) |
Not sure, but it appears you've changed my wife's cause of death to assisted suicide.
That is incorrect. How does this get fixed?
Dan Diaz (Brittany's husband) DanDiaz1184
DanDiaz1184 (talk) 01:48, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi GB fan
Thanks for deleting the above page. I nominated it for deletion per A1 but amazingly, you deleted it per A7. Why do you think the subject of the article is eligible for A7 and why do you think A1 does not applies? Thanks! Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 13:57, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello GB fan,
I was creating this page this morning and already spent time on the InfoBox and categories before going to lunch break before completing the article. How can I get my source code back now in order to avoid starting from scratch now? I now understand I cannot create a page, even for a few hours, if it does not abide by WK's rules but as it is my first time I find it brutal to restart from scratch again.
Thank you, Erwan huelgoat (talk) 14:27, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! Erwan huelgoat (talk) 14:50, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Hey! Isn't it a conflict of interest for a Green Bay fan to decline a speedy about a former Green Bay player?!?!? That deserves a
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
LOL, I'm completely joking of course. I was going to PROD the article, but I decided to double-check WP:NSPORT and realized all that's required is for someone to have played a single game in the NFL to be considered notable. Seems like too low of a threshold, in my opinion, but if that's the general policy I wont bother nominating it again. I'm sure you didn't even realize he was a former player before coming across this article, given that he played in a grand total of 3 games many years ago. -War wizard90 (talk) 03:53, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar | |
I award you this barnstar for your much appreciated swift action in deleting pages in my user space and thus, while helping me in preserving a much needed level of privacy, enabling me to contribute more to Wikipedia henceforth. Law Lord (talk) 13:25, 1 May 2015 (UTC) |
Hi GB Fan. I was hoping would it be possible for you to add the protected padlock symbol to Rape:Jihad so users don't get confused about why they can't edit? Thanks, Banak (talk) 20:46, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
I marked the page because it was a useless user page created by a vandal. On the Wiki project that I volunteer for, those usually get speedied. As I should have remembered, trying to persuade you people into deleting useless user pages is a fool’s errand, so I’ll just leave you alone. --66.190.99.112 (talk) 15:14, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar |
For beating me to more than one WP:CSD! Chrislk02 Chris Kreider 19:17, 4 May 2015 (UTC) |
Could you please set up the deletion proposal discussion for me. It's not something I'm not really good at doing. Grapesoda22 (talk) 23:55, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi GB fan. I see that you tagged User:Johnatmicronews/sandbox1 for speedy deletion per WP:U5 -- and it was subsequently deleted. Though I don't know if you saw that I had opened an MFD on this at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Johnatmicronews/sandbox1. Of course, your tag was absolutely correct. I might have deleted it that way myself. (I had salted one of these articles in March.) But I wanted to establish a discussion so that any future actions would be easier. Which I predict may be necessary, especially because of this ever-expanding list of micronations and this message on my talk page. So I'd prefer the other one wasn't tagged and the MFD completed. Cheers. — CactusWriter (talk) 21:16, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
I am curious on how new words get adopted & what the criteria is that allows them to be posted on a page. The word Ioniton was deleted because it was considered an "invented" word. How do terms like Twerking & Selfie make it on a Wiki Page? Those are just as obviously "Invented" words. Until those words made it out of a small regional or social group to reach a larger audience, they were words with no definition. Someone had to be the first to post those words & make a Wiki page. Why were those words accepted & Ioniton not?
What I had posted was a completely legitimate word in South Eastern & Central Florida. It is a word that is also spreading to other areas as a name for a device that has the definition I had provided. It has been around for about 6 or 7 years now, & only recently been gaining more usage due to a local company that has been developing & selling these units. Harbor Freight carries a line of devices similar that in this area fall under the generic term Ioniton. If these products are being sold in stores, on web sites, & through sales people. Why is it not allowed to be posted as a word on Wiki? You tube has many DIY types of units that would fall under the term Ioniton by the definition provided. Instead of having a name linked with these devices many people are still using the description of the product. I figured having a Wiki page would allow people to start putting a consistent name to these devices so everyone understands what they are instead of just describing them.
Just like taking a self portrait was a description that eventually became called a selfie. A girl shaking her arse on a dance floor became Twerking. Words that were coined or invented to shorten a description of something & instead gave it a name.
Since there is a segment of the population already using Ioniton & many of these devices are already in mainstream use, I don't understand why there can't be a wiki page for them. At some point, every word is coined or invented.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by SunBlaidd (talk • contribs) 03:59, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi GB fan. I see that you deleted my CSD log after I had requested for it a year ago. I'm sorry, but can you please restore the deleted versions of the page this time? I think I accidentally tagged it for deletion, and now I need it back. Thank you GB fan! :-) Mediran (alt) (talk) 03:54, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Your private edit filter "Beals" prevented me from adding this:
to Wikipedia:GLAM/Thinktank/Event 2 #How to book. Changing Tipton to Dudley avoided the filter. What have you got against Tipton? --RexxS (talk) 15:56, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you reverted votes at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/TeaLover1996 and I just wanted to say that I am sorry for voting to early, did not realise it was not transcluded. Also the editor nominated me at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Qed237, without my knowledge, and even if I might actually pass (have not looked at all requirements though) I am not very interested at the moment to become an admin. I want to focus more on my own editing first, creating more articles and learn more about different processes. Is it possible to just make it "disappear" like it never happened or do I have to go through with this now? And will this affect my chances in the future? Thanks in advance for any response. QED237 (talk) 23:08, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
GB can you move Talk:Perla (Town) back to Talk:Perla too? I know I cant! 220 of Borg 11:36, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for deleting my post regarding Steve Womack. The internet used to be a haven for free speech. Not anymore I guess. You'll probably delete this one as well. That's not very nice. 79.178.181.25 (talk) 17:04, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Actually this is how dab pages work, at least in any other language version of Wikipedia. Im am doing this since 11 years and never had such a ridiculous discussion about that. A dab page should lead the reader to the relevant articles for a word with multiple meanings. The most important meaning of this specific one is that it is the Spanish word for contract killer. It is simply a synonym that is not only used in Spanish texts but also in other languages. For example the word / dab page was linked here from dozens of other articles in the meaning "contract killer". For a reader it would be very helpful to highlight this meaning and direct them to the contract killing article. --NiTen (talk) 13:31, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm sorry if this is the wrong place but I'm still a bit new at this. A page I created has been deleted before I managed to write on the talk page, just didn't get back home in time it would seem. I have left my reasons to contest the deletion. Where do I go from here? Many thank MAbbey (talk) 18:08, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I do not understand... You deleted page User:Debtcounseling What can I write on the User Page? Why exist User Page? Make an extra charge to create an account and You'll not have spam... Best Regards Serg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Debtcounseling (talk • contribs) 10:36, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
ok, I rewrote so good?-:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Debtcounseling (talk • contribs) 11:05, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm not going to edit articles I just filled out the User Page, but I see here it is not welcome... Wikipedia does not want a new members Why exist User Page? I think you need delete option "сreate account" and to edit themselves..-:(( — Preceding unsigned comment added by Debtcounseling (talk • contribs) 14:03, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
But, if in the future I'm planning to contribute to articles why I can't filled out the User Page? I'm tired of arguing with you -:((((( Goodbye! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Debtcounseling (talk • contribs) 14:25, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Do whatever you want, but remember simply keeping a pro-Pakistan wiki redirect won't change anything in real world. I don't care about some redirect as long as terrorists are bumped. Some people in WP will support them with the excuse WP:RNEUTRAL. Cheers, happy administrating. I am not interested in those redirects anymore, Real life is a bigger problem than Wiki life. I have seen some Wp administrators simply give warning message during edit war without trying to find out which side is right. We need more administrators as the number of users are increasing and it's becoming difficult for few to keep a track on them. Bollywood movies are regularly vandalized and as they have few page watchers, and the edit is not corrected for a long time. Especially those movies released more than 5 years ago--C E (talk) 17:45, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
First off, I've been editing Jaime Herrera Beutler for years.
Second, you wrongly accuse me of vandalism on this page. What part of Wikipedia:Vandalism had to do with my post? My edits were 100% factual and abide by all Wikipedia policies. How are they vandalism? Be specific.
Further, GB fan, you deleted my update to the page that Jaime Herrera Beutler is on the United States House Committee on Appropriations. Why? You're either being thoughtless in your reverts or ironically committing vandalism yourself as you A) Did not assume good faith; B) Committed blanking; or even C) Committed user talk page vandalism by illegitimately editing my Talk page over this nonsense issue.
I'll assume good faith and give you the benefit of the doubt, so unless you can offer compelling reasons on how BOTH of my edits were vandalism, as you claimed, I'll rightfully put them back. If you revert them again I'll accuse you of vandalism. If you keep being unreasonable or vandalizing, I'll have to escalate this and the moderators will decide that my two new pieces of content should stay on the page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CharlieHatch64 (talk • contribs) 02:29, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Have a look at the notes for edit filter 688. Best, —SMALLJIM 13:38, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Im sorry but this upset me a bit: calling editors "a bunch of jocks and male sports fans"? This would involve me because I offered my support to proposal 1, I certainly don't consider myself a "jock" though and definitely not a "sports fan" for having an opinion. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:32, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Soybean car dude now at 118.93.69.238 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). Thought you'd want to know. Skyerise (talk) 02:27, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Good evening, it is Istvan, singer of the Hungarian band Anton Vezuv. Why did you delete my band's page?
- Istvan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pityhaitt (talk • contribs) 01:10, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
I'm new to wiki editing, and sorry if I'm getting things wrong. I thought I did send a claim, if I did it wrong, I will read the rules and will fix it. I would be happy about some help. -- Pityhaitt
OK. So you remember me. Feel gratified that you do. How have you been? Now if I were to open a discussion on the article talk-page, would you weigh in with your (10 * 2 = value your opinion more than most others' = ) 20 c, about the changes I propose there? Last time you asked me to ["go somewhere else" if I wanted to make "non-constructive edits"]. Alas I realize, for me, all roads lead to the bottom of the Pacific .... I mean to this page .... and to you. Thanks. 117.194.225.233 (talk) 19:10, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Richard Kountz. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eldizzino (talk • contribs) 03:32, 8 June 2015
Operation Northwoods (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
I think I now added my source correctly. I am new to Wikipedia, and don't know if I did it right. I linked a cite that contains the actual operation northwoods documents, and after reading them, the documents specifically state on many occasions that people are not actually to be killed, and are the actions are to be staged. Please get back to me if I did not cite it properly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by USAismisunderstood (talk • contribs) 17:57, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Hey GB fan,
I now put in a pdf of the declassified documents for my source. Please let me know if there is anything else I need to do, I am new to wikipedia. Thanks for your advice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by USAismisunderstood (talk • contribs) 02:43, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/news/20010430/northwoods.pdf This is the source I most recently used. It is the operation northwoods declassified documents. It specifically on multiple occasions supports my edits. Do I need to give exact quotes from the document. What else do I have to do to get my edit through without getting reverted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by USAismisunderstood (talk • contribs) 13:28, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your help. I added a discussion to the operation northwoods talk page. Please let me know if there is anything else I need to do. Have a good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by USAismisunderstood (talk • contribs) 13:50, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Please read through the documents. The wikipedia page does not accurately sum them up. Also, what editor were you talking about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by USAismisunderstood (talk • contribs) 14:40, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi GB. Thanks for keeping a constant eye on this article. Mizabot does not appear to be working on the talk page. I don't understand the first thing about automatic archiving - perhaps you could look into it. Otherwise manual archiving might be just as effective, I have had this page on my WL for years. Cheers, --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:00, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, GB fan. How can this be block evasion? When the community unbans someone they are free to edit from any IP. Blocks are directed at a particular human being, and with the lifting of the ban this no longer applies. 109.155.12.254 (talk) 18:20, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
The unblock was followed by a discussion and the consensus was unban.
good enough?
Hello,
I am wondering why you deleted the New Hampshire Wing Civil Air Patrol page. I am thinking of remaking it if that is fine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adm.tang (talk • contribs) 19:53, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Alright, I would like too see it. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adm.tang (talk • contribs) 22:32, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello GB Fan.
Sorry to disturb you, but there is an issue that requires immediate admin action. 88.193.158.85 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) keeps adding unsourced content to Türkvizyon Song Contest and Türkvizyon Song Contest 2015, despite being advised to provide a source. I have acted in good faith and checked the internet to see if there are sources to verify their addition, just in case they do not know how to add citation. Alas there are none. I have reverted/rollbacked their edits and issued vandalism warnings to the IP, but they keep reverting such actions - a total of 8 times now. The IP has been reported to AIV and I have requested semi-protection to be placed on both articles. But I feel it is all for nothing as they continue to vandalise the articles. Is there anything you can do to help? Much regards, Wes Mouse | T@lk 12:16, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Dear GB Fan,
You have deleted the article AVS Video Editor referring to the discussion dated 2010 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AVS Video Editor (2nd nomination). However, the fact is the new article was not a simple recreation from the previously existed page, it was a completely new article with another content that meets the wikipedia guidelines of notability and has good references to reliable sources. The article was created through Articles for Creation page, was reviewed, approved and moved from Drafts page to Articles by a wikipedia editor. Please see Portal:Poland/New article announcements AVS Video Editor started on 2015-06-15, score: 20. Please specify why the article was deleted now and what is needed to recreate it. NeviRom 14:00, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
I accept your apology but my previously clean block record is now spoiled. Could you not expunge it altogether, rather than just cancel it and draw a strikeout line through the incorrect block notification? -- Alarics (talk) 12:59, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi GB Fan,
Maybe I wasn't able to prove the relevance of this writer but please let me try again saying that there's no person with such relevance on Protestant community in Spain than Jose de Segovia Barron. He is probably the Spanish alternative of CS Lewis on United Kingdom or Francis Schaeffer on United States and it's also relevant for English speaking community because he studied and he is even teaching in Welwyn, UK. Why if Lewis and Shaeffer has a Wikipedia page, this Spanish writer can't start its page?
What about a more structure page like this?:
Extended content |
---|
José de Segovia Barrón (Madrid, 1964) is a Spanish teacher, journalist & theologian. He studied Journalism on Universidad Complutense, (Madrid), Theology on University of Kampen (Netherlands) and Bible on The School of Biblical Studies Welwyn (England). He is currently leading active students groups as Grupos Bíblicos Universitarios and Unión Bíblica. He was also President of the Theology Department on Alianza Evangélica Española between 2001 and 2015. He is teaching on the following schools
Books
Digital Publications
Personal Life He is pastor at Iglesia Evangélica Reformada on Madrid, is married with Anna and is father of four kids called Lluvia, Natán, Noé & Edén.
Best, Pablo |
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Webmarkez-ca (talk • contribs) 15:04, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
I see, thank you!
Best, Pablo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webmarkez-ca (talk • contribs) 17:31, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Following Liz suggestion, I will start creating a new edition of the page including references and sources, as a DRAFT - so it can be leverage before it's pushed online. Thank you, Pablo
Hi. No worries about this. Personally, I would leave the IP comments there as evidence of the socking, but it's your call. They're certainly drawing attention to themselves, if nothing else! Cordless Larry (talk) 13:28, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Are you planning on doing further work on the articles? They were brought up at RSPAM. I'm not seeing any encyclopedic value in what's there, just SOAP value for credemographics. --Ronz (talk) 15:35, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
I apologize for tagging all those article for speedy deletion. I thought that anytime it is too short that it needs to be tagged, but now I realize that I should only tag it if they fail to indicate the importance of the subject. I will keep that in mind as I continue. I appreciate you notifying me about this because I don't want to waste your time by making you have to look through articles that are perfectly find. Thank you. 99.53.112.186 (talk) 17:34, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
Please help in restoring:
Special:Undelete/Camelia_Hristea
The article Camelia Hristea was deleted because it didnt meet WP:GNG. Now it does! Camelia made her WTA debut at the 2015 BRD Bucharest Open – Doubles. Thanks! (Gabinho>:) 08:27, 16 July 2015 (UTC))
I noticed that you have deleted the page that i created about Ulrich Oehmen, saying that the page was negative and not supported by proper referencess, that's odd, becuase while giving credit to Ulrich Oehmen for the quality of his photography I have referenced TV and newspaaer articles from Peru, from ROmania and from USA regarding his controversial role in the bodybuilding community.
I invite you to check better the sources that i referenced. Among them there is even an interview where Ulrich Oehmen confirms his activity in details. So I frankly don't understand what part of my article was not duly referenced!!!
Interview to Ulrich Oehmen: http://www.edgeboston.com/index.php?ch=news&sc=news&sc3=&id=80327&pf=1
Peruvian TV: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZ2QwBZxQ7s&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92B6Kt0VmM8
Peruvian Newspapers: http://peru21.pe/deportes/escandalo-fisicoculturismo-peruano-2118260
The Kai Greene case and other investigations on his activity: http://www.africanmuscle.com/Mag/Mag-re.php?ID=75
Romanian newspapers http://sport.bzi.ro/culturistii-romani-fac-furori-pe-site-urile-de-gay-7355 http://www.cancan.ro/actualitate/intern/culturistii-romani-recidiveaza-cu-masturbarile-pe-site-urile-destinate-homosexualilor.html
PLease elaborate how this isn't duly supported and referenced.
I ask that the page i created is put back online. Thanks
Billy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Billy.reaper (talk • contribs) 11:48, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The teahouse and i gave you a cup of tea! Icy monster gun (talk) 18:57, 11 August 2015 (UTC) |
This is extremely cute but must be very careful with it
Icy monster gun (talk) 18:52, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Please consider for RevDel: at Big Sean. Thanks. General Ization Talk 18:22, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, you were the last to edit this page: Mohamed Hassan. Could you make it a redirect to Mohammed Hassan please, the spellings are almost identical. Rgds, --Midas02 (talk) 00:33, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
You have reverted Sindh University Alumni Template , which is uncomprehensible. Plz don't revert it because it only adds a image of the relevant template. Kindly give an autentic reason behind your revert, I think its illogical to revert it.--Jogi don (talk) 10:12, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Dear , File:UOS logo.png is already used in Wkipedia article University of Sindh and its free image. so hope you do understand , ok.--Jogi don (talk) 10:32, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi, most of the references on the page have a "Missing or empty |title=" tag. Is there any way of fixing this? Thanks. 109.255.120.83 (talk) 20:15, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Ta for reverting my oopsie edit at Wikipedia:Administrators/RfC for BARC - a community desysopping process. Unintentional. I was scrolling through the revisions on my iPad, so the big thumb syndrome struck once again. Moriori (talk) 20:36, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
I am wondering why the page I created Gerard Lima was deleted. It is a credible page containing 100% real information with media coverage supporting the page. I have seen other pages for people who have less information and credibility stay up on your site. What would it take for my article to remain up and not get deleted. Is there a way for me to appeal the decision and have the article put back up?--Gerad Lima (talk) 16:01, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.