Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an archive of past discussions about User:FULBERT. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 35 | ← | Archive 38 | Archive 39 | Archive 40 | Archive 41 | Archive 42 | → | Archive 45 |
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Angie Turner King on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Week 3 / Add citation / Aaronlai23
1. I added a citation to the EPS( earning per share) and Price-earnings ratio.
2. Link to diff1: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Earnings_per_share&type=revision&diff=970648671&oldid=969603527
Link to diff2: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Price%E2%80%93earnings_ratio&type=revision&diff=970649634&oldid=966889475
3. I learnt how to identify the section you want to add on wiki and find the right resource from an outside website to add. Aaronlai23 (talk) 16:00, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
This is Yue Wu. I'm currently enrolling in MASY program, and concentrating on database tech.
I did learn a lot from this extra credit work, such as what the reliable resource is and some types of plararism... Also, I know how to edit Wikipedia page right now.
1. I found that some articles are very poor-evident and out of date as well. In addition, it may miss some important information. When I was evaluating an article, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qingdao, the information was about 2018, which is 2 years from now, and things need to be updated.
2. Evaluation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:YueWu0928/Evaluate_an_Article
3. Talk page :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Qingdao#Updates_about_Qingdao
4. The difference : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Qingdao&diff=971272823&oldid=970059566
5. I learned that a good and reliable article is not just high-related to the topic, but also have to be comprehensive and updated. Important part (such as the identification of the city)should not be missed.
1. I assigned myself two more articles: (1) Search engine engine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine_marketing
(2) Vaccine policy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccination_policy
Also. I expanded a bit content about these two articles and added citations to the added part.
2. The difference links :(1)https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Search_engine_marketing&diff=971286294&oldid=969056342
(2)https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vaccination_policy&diff=971285132&oldid=967067826
3. I learned some content of the articles are related, but it may not be comprehensive. When we are adding citations, we can not just copy and paste the content from the reference literature. Even we have to paraphrase some sentences, we can't paraphrase them closely to the original ones.
Hi professor, thank you for your feedback. I re-assigned myself another article for the week3 assignment 1. I added a citation to the Group polarization article.
2. Link to diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Group_polarization&diff=971301341&oldid=944512526
3. So I add information that related to the real-life examples of Group polarization - the YouTube.
1. I added a citation and a comment to the LINK.
2. LINK
3. I learned how to do citations in Wikipedia and how important it is. With citation, people will have more context where the information is from, and how they came out of the sentence.
Yyl217 (talk) 01:00, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your feedback. I have now completed all the training.Yyl217 (talk) 03:35, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
@FULBERT: Here is a ping.Yyl217 (talk) 03:39, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
@FULBERT: I am now fixed the problem you talked about. Hope the new version will fit the requirement.Yyl217 (talk) 01:58, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
@FULBERT:LINKHere is the link where I added a further summary to summarize the difference between classical Newtonian physics and special relativity. Yyl217 (talk) 05:16, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
@FULBERT: I changed my article to honda. Here is a ping. Thank you. Yyl217 (talk) 08:49, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:26, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
1. In the article on Methylchloroisothiazolinone, I looked on the FDA website to verify the correct acceptable concentration in products and cited it on the wiki page as well as included the ratio of isomers. On the wiki page, I found a concentration amount that did not have a source and when I reserved it, I only found a magazine article with the same number, but did not have a source. This did not seem like a reliable source of information, so I had removed it. For the deforestation article, I added a citation where it was needed by looking for information in a scholarly journal that backed up a claim.
2. Methylchloroisothiazolinone: Difference between revisions, Deforestation: Difference between revisions
3. I've learned that some information, even though there may be a citation, may not have come from a reliable source, regardless of how true it may sound. I've also found some tools on Wikipedia to find articles that need help, like the Citation Hunt tool. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ikhan94 (talk • contribs) 06:44, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Ikhan94 (talk) 19:58, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:External links on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
1. This week, I worked on a new articles: Lo-fi music. I added a citation to add the development of lo-fi music in the late 2010s, specified within the realm of Spotify.
2. The link to the diff1: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lo-fi_music&diff=970912918&oldid=970316244
3. It's interesting to find out a very popular topic ("lo-fi music") doesn't have enough updated information on Wikipedia and it's necessary to put all relevant details in the article to give a more broad view for readers. Yaluys (talk) 03:34, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
4. The link to another diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chunyun&diff=969725539&oldid=937659095
5. I added a new citation to the "Chunyun" article because I found there is a recent study about this topic that can add value to this topic. Yaluys (talk) 06:12, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
1. I assigned two new articles to myself: (1)Employment discrimination (2)Occupational inequality. Also, I added references to these two articles.
2. the difference link: (1)https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Employment_discrimination&diff=970914887&oldid=963612071
(2)https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Occupational_inequality&diff=970916052&oldid=955496175
3. I found when we define a term, we should make it clears and reliable. Adding a true reference and defining a term clearly are important.
Gave a brief idea of how go karts transmission is about , how it works and the purpose of it
diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kart_racing&diff=prev&oldid=971127518
the citation was made through an article named Design of Transmission System for Go-Kart Vehicle
Lewis9763 (talk) 10:02, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
assigned myself a new topic https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_in_Massachusetts New citation was made. diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=COVID-19_pandemic_in_Massachusetts&oldid=971799934
Searched for new guidelines for the effects of the Sports and recreations.
1. I added a new citation to the article:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_equality. It talks about gender inequality, and I added a part that gender wage gap is a phenomenon of gender inequality. The cited article is "Do you get what you ask? The gender gap in desired and realised wages".
2. The difference link :https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gender_equality&diff=971279457&oldid=962233603
3. I learned how to add a citation to a Wikipedia article. When we are reading ,we should be critical. We should think about where this part comes from? Is this reliable ? Adding a good citation is really helpful.
1. This week, I assigned two new articles: Telemarketing fraud and High–low pricing. I added a citation to explain why older people are targeted by fraudulent telemarketers and another citation to explain why high-low strategy is effective to customers.
2. The link to the diff1: Telemarketing fraud: Difference between revisions
The link to the diff2: High–low pricing: Difference between revisions
3. From this practice, I have learned articles need enough explanations for readers to understand.Yixin97 (talk) 03:11, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
1. I added an image about Suzhou Museum into the article Suzhou. Suzhou Museum, designed by I. M. Pei, is one of the landmarks of Suzhou. The architectural style of Suzhou Museum is very distinctive so I think it is necessary to show this image to readers. This image with a CC BY 2.0 license was found from CC search.
2. The link to diff: Suzhou: Difference between revisions
3. From this practice, I learned what kind of image that we can use in Wikipedia and how to insert the image into articles. Yixin97 (talk) 04:17, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
1. I added citations on articles "Algorithmic bias" and "Lo-fi music" this week. I found a news comment article talking about the algorithm discrimination against women of Spotify, which I think can serve as a great example of "Algorithmic bias" on gender. I also found a study discussing the development of "Lo-fi music" in the late 2010s.
2. link to the diff1: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Algorithmic_bias&diff=971612223&oldid=969033931
link to the diff2: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lo-fi_music&diff=971439711&oldid=970912918
3. I find it important to have more diverse examples to illustrate one point of view to offer readers a better explanation. Yaluys (talk) 06:20, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi professor, I assigned these two articles in the dashboard. Please take a look. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaluys (talk • contribs) 16:29, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
1. I assigned myself two more articles : (1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Targeted_advertising (2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_pot
Added other perspectives to the first one and gave an example to the second one.
2. (1)The first difference link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Targeted_advertising&diff=971885460&oldid=971193232 (2)The second diffi link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hot_pot&diff=971888620&oldid=969519358
3. I learned sometimes we could provide an true example to the opinion, which will strengthen the original point. Also, when we are talking about the effect of advertising (for example), we can think about it in an opposite way : if someone uses ad avoidance tools, the results would be much different.
1. This week I assigned two new articles to myself: (1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_science (2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_analyst I added more details to the two new articles.
2. The difference link: (1)https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Data_science&diff=971874010&oldid=970358361 (2)https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Business_analyst&diff=971878502&oldid=959689125
3. I learned if we post some conclusions about survey results, we have to add a strong and reliable citation, such as which literature you reviewed that drives you to conclude that results.
Abraham Ortelius's world map, from the Typus Orbis Terrarum ("Theatre of the Orb of the World") atlas, first published in 1564
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: New World crops • Double standard Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 10 August 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
1. Question: What are some reasons you might not want to use a company's website as the main source of information about that company? Respond: Because the information on the website of the company is just published by the company itself, and there is no review and verification by any authorized party. In addition, the company definitely would like to report something good and positive for the sake of their reputation and profit, which is not comprehensive and trustworthy.
2. For me, the experience of doing this assignment is like: at first, I thought it's maybe difficult because I saw a lot of training guides, which seemed to be complicated. However, after you started it and focused on it, you'd find it's not hard as you thought before and you'll learn a lot. Also, when I was doing this extra credit work , I could relate this assignment to our other assignment, such as plagiarism, citation, and finding reliable resource, etc.
3. I learned how to recognize reliable and unreliable resources. Reliable resources includes: textbooks, literature review, and books or publications written by authorized party. Also, I learned three types of plagiarism. I used to paraphrase someone's opinion closely to avoid plagiarism, but when I saw the training guide, I just noticed paraphrasing closely to the original one is still a form of plagiarism. In addition, I know when we are adding some contents on Wikipedia, we are not only supposed to add reliable citation, but also avoid copyright violation and plagiarism, which means we'd better totally understand the cited content and paraphrase them with our own words.
4. I would intend to continue editing on Wikipedia. Because once I find some articles are out of date or incorrect, I would like to update them and add correct contents. Especially, when I find some articles I'm really interested in, and they have some fault contents. YueWu0928 (talk) 18:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
1. What did you learn about Wikipedia during the article evaluation?
Wikipedia is open to all and can be edited by everyone so some grammatical and spelling errors are inevitable. Writing a good article in the wiki is not easy as I think before. All the information on articles should be from a reliable secondary source. When writing an article, we must remember not to have our own subjective thoughts.
Summarizing my contributions: During these six weeks, I copyedited and evaluated Shanghai Disneyland Park, added 9 citations into 5 articles: Commercialization of the Internet, Information leakage, White hat (computer security), Telemarketing fraud and High–low pricing. In addition, I inserted an image into Suzhou.
2. Before this Wikipedia course assignment, I always use Wikipedia to find information and never thought I could edit Wikipedia. In the beginning, I was afraid to do this extra credit because editing Wikipedia looks complicated. However, after this Wikipedia assignment, I think it is a good opportunity to think from different angles.
3. During these six weeks, I have learned how to add citations and images into articles. I also understand the importance of picture license and know what kind of images can be used in Wikipedia. In addition, I have learned how to avoid plagiarism and it is useful for my research proposal.
4. I think I will continue editing on Wikipedia because it is meaningful and a very fulfilling thing. Once I search in the Wiki, I will revise the article and find mistakes to improve it. I hope my contribution can be beneficial to more readers. Yixin97 (talk) 02:15, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
1. Question: What are some reasons you might not want to use a company's website as the main source of information about that company?
The first reason is that company website information has bias which is subjective. because company want to make positive impact on their readers and hide something negative. The second reason is that if we wan to find information of a company, we want acquire as much as information as possible instead of focus on one aspect.
2. I actually learned a lot during the process of training course. I know about what source are credible and how to edit citation on wikipedia. I also think this training program provide us a very systematic overivew of wikipedia.
3. One important thing I learnt is importance issue of copyrights and plagiarism. There are three types that are unattributed plagiarism, where you copy text and don't credit the author. second is Plagiarism of cited sources, where you copy text exactly (even when you credit the author). The last is close paraphrasing, where you just slightly change the text of another author (cited or not).
4. I would definitely keep using Wikipedia editing. I really want to bring more credible resources to bring positive impact on society and influence more people.Aaronlai23 (talk) 04:08, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Religion in the European Union on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:31, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.