Loading AI tools
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Eddie891. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 15 | ← | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 |
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:33, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
 |
Job Done | |
| Awarded to Eddie891 for good services as an admin, and for resigning the tools in a noble manner. SilkTork (talk) 15:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC) |
- From the team: A new goose on the roost
- News from the WMF: Governance updates from, and for, the Wikimedia Endowment
- Disinformation report: From Russia with WikiLove
- Featured content: Topics, lists, submarines and Gurl.com
- Serendipity: We all make mistakes – don’t we?
- Traffic report: Mama, they're in love with a criminal
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:42, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Eddie891. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.
Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.
Useful links:
- Wikipedia:Requested moves
- Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! DanCherek (talk) 18:30, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- The article creation at scale RfC opened on 3 October and will be open until at least 2 November.
- An RfC is open to discuss having open requests for adminship automatically placed on hold after the seven-day period has elapsed, pending closure or other action by a bureaucrat.
Arbitration
- Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 13 November 2022 until 22 November 2022 to stand in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections.
- The arbitration case request titled Athaenara has been resolved by motion.
- The arbitration case Reversal and reinstatement of Athaenara's block has entered the proposed decision stage.
- AmandaNP, Mz7 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2022 Arbitration Committee Elections. Xaosflux and Dr vulpes are reserve commissioners.
Miscellaneous
- The 2022 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process has concluded with the appointment of two new CheckUsers.
- You can add yourself to the centralised page listing time zones of administrators.
- Tech tip: Wikimarkup in a block summary is parsed in the notice that the blockee sees. You can use templates with custom options to specify situations like
{{rangeblock|create=yes}}or{{uw-ublock|contains profanity}}.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
I saw you gave up the bit: thanks for your service. Take care, Drmies (talk) 01:56, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- thanks, @Drmies, it means a lot. I'm not sure where I go from here, but I don't imagine I will be gone forever. Best, Eddie891 Talk Work 00:45, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- I hope not, but whatever you do, you'll probably be good at it. Some of the things you have done here leave me in awe. Thanks for that--I love it when people make us look good. Drmies (talk) 00:47, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- I hope that you'll be able to return sometime, too. You've done really good work here. Hog Farm Talk 01:02, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
The 2022 WikiCup has drawn to a close with the final round going down to the wire. The 2022 champion is
Lee Vilenski (1752 points), who won in 2020 and was runner up in both 2019 and last year. In the final round he achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on cue sports. He was closely followed by
Bloom6132 (1732), who specialised in "In the news" items and DYKs, and who has reached the final round of the Cup for the past three years. Next was
BennyOnTheLoose (1238), another cue sports enthusiast, also interested in songs, followed by
Muboshgu (1082), an "In the news" contributor, a seasoned contestant who first took part in the Cup ten years ago. Other finalists were
Sammi Brie (930), who scored with a featured article, good articles and DYKs on TV and radio stations,
Kavyansh.Singh (370), who created various articles on famous Americans, including an FA on Louis H. Bean, famed for his prediction of election outcomes. Next was
PCN02WPS (292), who scored with good articles and DYKs on sporting and other topics and
Z1720 (25) who had DYKs on various topics including historic Canadians.
During the WikiCup, contestants achieved 37 featured articles, 349 good articles, 360 featured article reviews, 683 good article reviews and 480 In the news items, so Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors. Well done everyone! All those who reached the final round will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or the overall leader in this field.
- Lee Vilenski wins the featured article prize, for a total of 6 FAs during the course of the competition and 3 in the final round.
- Kavyansh.Singh wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 2.
Adam Cuerden wins the featured picture prize, for 39 FPs during the competition.- Z1720 wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 35 FARs in round 4.
Epicgenius wins the good article prize, for 32 GAs in round 1.
SounderBruce wins the featured topic prize, for 4 FT articles in round 1.- Lee Vilenski wins the good topic prize, for 34 GT articles in round 5.
- Sammi Brie wins the good article reviewer prize, for 71 GARs overall.
- Sammi Brie wins the Did you know prize, for 30 DYKs in round 3 and 106 overall.
- Bloom6132 wins the In the news prize, for 106 ITNs in round 5 and 289 overall.
Next year's competition will begin on 1 January and possible changes to the rules and scoring are being discussed on the discussion page. You are invited to sign up to take part in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to have a good turnout for the 2023 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners and finalists, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:33, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Drmies-- can't edit your talk page because of page protection so perhaps a ping here will suffice-- and any TPS that may see this. I just created 1839 Marion riot, and I'm relatively happy with the content, but I don't think the title is completely correct-- while contemporary sources frequently described it as a riot, I'm not convinced that does it justice, but not sure what a better title would be. I don't think there's enough actual biographical info to title it 'Bill Mitchell'. Any thoughts? Eddie891 Talk Work 14:49, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- Holy moly you've done great work. Thank you. For a moment I thought it was in Marion, Alabama, and this is of course a good reminded that lynchings, or lynching attempts, were everywhere. I have some things to do right now but I'll get back to it. Thank you so much. Drmies (talk) 15:12, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Eddie--sorry, I forgot. I read the article last week, but not the sources, and now I have. That account from the Anderson book, what a story. I agree that naming it for the person is probably not the best move here. "Trial of" would be kind of silly. Contemporaries have it as "riot", as you noted, but Harrold has it too and Hudson has nothing to suggest a change. I say go with it. God there are so many stories still to write up, aren't there. I just wrote Lynching of Orion Anderson; it just doesn't stop. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 18:58, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) can't edit your talk page because of page protection - Eddie, would you like me to re-assign you the extended confirmed user right? You clearly warrant it. Hog Farm Talk 19:17, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for having a look, @Drmies. It really doesn't stop. I was just reading "Bloody Caddo": White Violence against Blacks in a Louisiana Parish, 1865-1876 and it is simply horrifying.
On October 1, a band of some 75 whites from Shreveport on its way to the scene of the Bossier riot met a group of nine blacks who were taken to the bank of the Red River and told to swim for their lives. As they rose to the surface after having plunged in the river, the blacks were shot. Not one of them escaped. On the same night, thirty blacks were taken from around Shreveport, marched to the bank of the Red River, tied together with ropes and shot in the back. During the following days, a raft of swollen bodies drifted down the turbid river until the bodies were eaten by alligators. Few days later, seven blacks were chained in an old abandoned building which was then burned to the ground. On October 12, a group of whites went to the Johnson's brick-yard and took five blacks away from their work. After tying their hands, they riddled them with bullets.
It's an incredibly tough topic, encyclopedically, but that makes it even more worth tackling. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:11, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
What a waste of people's time guys like you are. Why not try to improve the article if you feel it's insufficient? SPEED II was a widely used software development back in 80s and early 90s. Trying to find info about it nowadays is very difficult. Isn't that why Wikipedia is supposed to be for? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=SPEED_II Brian Fenton (talk) 15:54, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, @Brian Fenton: The article was deleted as a result of the proposed deletion process, not because I personally felt it was insufficient. A user, in this case seemingly MrOllie, tagged the article, saying that it had
No independent sources, no assertion of notability.
All articles on Wikipedia must meet the notability guideline, meaning they have significant coverage in independent, reliable sources (such as, a profile in The New York Times or an entry in The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction). Other measures of importance, such as how widely used a software was or wasn't are hard to quantify without coverage that backs it up. Unfortunately, if coverage does not exist, an article is not merited (this is basically because we need enough verifiable content to write a substantive encyclopedic article). If you disagree with the deletion, you are welcome to request a refund, through which the article will be restored. Happy to try to explain further, if this doesn't make sense. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:55, 10 November 2022 (UTC)- This was raised on my talk page at the time of the tagging, see here. At the time Brian Fenton wrote:
Delete it if you want - I couldn't care less.
MrOllie (talk) 19:06, 10 November 2022 (UTC)- (talk page watcher) I find your hounding of people doing what they are supposed to - I this case closing a PROD case that you had every right to do something about - to be in bad taste Brian Fenton. You have to make an adequate display of something being notable and Eddie was simply closing an expired tag. If you wish to have the article moved to draft to work on, you could have just asked, rather than flounce and denounce other editors. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:34, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- This was raised on my talk page at the time of the tagging, see here. At the time Brian Fenton wrote:
As an FYI, I've now warned Brian Fenton for engaging in personal attacks.--SouthernNights (talk) 23:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry guys, I had forgotten about that reply I wrote to MrOllie - I didn't have the time or energy at that time to engage, so the article got deleted. I still think deletionists are completely in the wrong on this website, I don't know why I even bother engaging with you. You guys deleted a perfectly good article. For what? I log in to this site a few times a year to find articles I contribute to get deleted. It's so pathetic. But yeah, give me a warning for being nasty, I guess I deserve it. Brian Fenton (talk) 22:57, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Apologies also to Eddie. It was actually MrOllie who was the problem. I found the orginal argument I had with him here - seems he just can't get enough of removing other people's work! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MrOllie/Archive_12#Deleting_SPEED_II%3F Funny how every time I edit here, I come to regret it. Brian Fenton (talk) 23:03, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, several weeks ago you deleted an article at AfD. I would like to ask that you (I dunno... 'undelete' it? this is the first time I've requested this) perhaps move it to draft? I would like access to the content so that I might either improve it as an article, or re-add some of it to the page it was originally forked from. Thanks - wolf 00:06, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, @Thewolfchild, I no longer hold the administrator user-right, meaning I am unable to un-delete, or for that matter delete content. I would have no objection if you were to ask another admin, if you want to. Cheers, Eddie891 Talk Work 14:05, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for improving articles in November while I was on vacation. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:11, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Thanksgiving in the U.S. - Bach said it in music for peace --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:46, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:53, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I'm curious what you think of the new information and citations I added to David Lerner in response to the article's AfD. There's a major source of info on the subject that I can't easily access and I'm wondering if I need to arrange an interlibrary loan for that book, or if what I've added is sufficient. --SouthernNights (talk) 13:53, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for your work and letting me know, @SouthernNights, I'll respond at the AfD, to keep discussion centralized. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:41, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
- News and notes: English Wikipedia editors: "We don't need no stinking banners"
- In the media: "The most beautiful story on the Internet"
- Disinformation report: Missed and Dissed
- Book review: Writing the Revolution
- Technology report: Galactic dreams, encyclopedic reality
- Essay: The Six Million FP Man
- Tips and tricks: (Wiki)break stuff
- Recent research: Study deems COVID-19 editors smart and cool, questions of clarity and utility for WMF's proposed "Knowledge Integrity Risk Observatory"
- Featured content: A great month for featured articles
- Obituary: A tribute to Michael Gäbler
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
- CommonsComix: Joker's trick
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:40, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Consensus has been found in an RfC to automatically place RfAs on hold after one week.
- The article creation at scale RfC has been closed.
- An RfC on the banners for the December 2022 fundraising campaign has been closed.
Technical news
- A new preference named "Enable limited width mode" has been added to the Vector 2022 skin. The preference is also shown as a toggle on every page if your monitor is 1600 pixels or wider. When disabled it removes the whitespace added by Vector 2022 on the left and right of the page content. Disabling this preference has the same effect as enabling the wide-vector-2022 gadget. (T319449)
Arbitration
- Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 12, 2022 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
- The proposed decision for the 2021-22 review of the discretionary sanctions system is open.
- The arbitration case Reversal and reinstatement of Athaenara's block has been closed.
- The arbitration case Stephen has been opened and the proposed decision is expected 1 December 2022.
- A motion has modified the procedures for contacting an admin facing Level 2 desysop.
Miscellaneous
- Tech tip: A single IPv6 connection usually has access to a "subnet" of 18 quintillion IPs. Add
/64to the end of an IP in Special:Contributions to see all of a subnet's edits, and consider blocking the whole subnet rather than an IP that may change within a minute.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:43, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
 |
Hey, Eddie891. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 20:00, 5 December 2022 (UTC) |
 |
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Pages 197-198 of Allen (1997) are available at Google Books. I cut and pasted the URL, but it comes out as "A Reader's Guide to Walt Whitman - Google Books." I don't know if that is helpful. On both pages, Allen refers to "Lilacs" as a "great elegy." I am not going to edit this article; I'm just passing on this information in case you want to. Maurice Magnus (talk) 16:03, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
Hello Eddie891: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 03:20, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
,_cropped.jpg)
MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 03:20, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Eddie. You deleted the Goldberg Segalla page which a friend asked me to update. Can you please help me restore the page and provide me with guidance so the page has the proper disclaimers? Thank you. Bona1858 (talk) 14:30, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, @Bona1858, the page was deleted as a result of the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goldberg Segalla, where the consensus was that the topic did not meet the notability guidelines for corporations, which requires articles to have received significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. If you think there are three or more sources meeting this criteria that the AfD voters did not consider, I'd be happy to consider restoring the page. Unfortunately, if that coverage does not exist there cannot be an article about the subject on WikipediaI'd also recommend reading this guide to editing with a conflict of interest before going any further. Hopefully this helps somewhat, and happy to answer any questions you may still have. Best, Eddie891 Talk Work 15:02, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Eddie,
- Thank you for the prompt response. I very much appreciate it. So I understand the significant coverage in independent, reliable sources requirement: are The Buffalo News and Business Journals links not considered independent and significant?
- Kevin Bona1858 (talk) 15:43, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Per WP:AUD, I think the buffalo sources would fall under local coverage. Additionally, sources establishing notability should offer in-depth coverage beyond simply routine announcements and brief mentions. The corporation notability guideline specifically states that coverage of things like "the opening or closing of local branches, franchises, or shops" or "the hiring, promotion, or departure of personnel," do not count as significant coverage to establish notability. If you feel there is some aspect of the sourcing that I am missing, do let me know. Many of the links in the deleted article return as 404s for me, so I can't actually read the content. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:28, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
The article 1839 Marion riot you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:1839 Marion riot for comments about the article, and Talk:1839 Marion riot/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ovinus -- Ovinus (talk) 21:03, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy Holidays and Happy New Year, Eddie891!
The other day, I was having a conversation with someone about holiday cards and social media. It occurred to me that, in the years since I left Facebook, the site I use most to communicate with people I like isn't actually a social media site at all. If you're receiving this, it's pretty likely I've talked with you more recently than I have my distant relatives and college friends on FB, at very least, and we may have even collaborated on something useful. So here's a holiday "card", Wikipedia friend. :) Hope the next couple weeks bring some fun and/or rest. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 19:41, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
I just wrote up Macks Creek Law, which relates to controversial stuff such as police ticketing, municipal courts, the Ferguson unrest, and a guy who's now senator-elect. Since its only truly controversial subject I've ever written on (Battle of Poison Spring kinda?), I was wondering if I could get some people to read over it. The law's periodically a big thing in Missouri. Hog Farm Talk 04:12, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
,_Egrets_in_Snow,_1927.jpg) |
Have a wonderful holiday season filled with peace, joy, prosperity and wonder. |
|
Hi Eddie891, Thank you for all your contributions during the year. |
 |
Whatever you celebrate at this time of year, whether it's Christmas or some other festival, I hope you and those close to you have a happy, restful time! Have fun, Donner60 (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)}} |  |
Donner60 (talk) 01:21, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello Eddie891: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:27, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:27, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
 |
Happy Holidays | |
| Hello, I wish you the very best during the holidays. And I hope you have a very happy 2023! Bruxton (talk) 18:08, 25 December 2022 (UTC) |
Thank you for improving article quality in December! Best wishes for a joyful season! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:37, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Today, pictured, the soprano of our choral concert of the year. More in the context: User talk:Gerda Arendt#DYK for Talia Or, in case of interest. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:43, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
 
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Eddie891,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 21:33, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Eddie891,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:58, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:58, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
_(14573454469).jpg)
![Thumb](#/media/File:"Wishing_You_a_Prosperous_and_Happy_New_Year.".jpg)
.jpg)
![Thumb](#/media/File:"New_Year_Greeting.".jpg)
_(14752756965).jpg)
- – Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:58, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- Interview: ComplexRational's RfA debrief
- Technology report: Wikimedia Foundation's Abstract Wikipedia project "at substantial risk of failure"
- Essay: Mobile editing
- Arbitration report: Arbitration Committee Election 2022
- Recent research: Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement in talk page disputes
- Featured content: Would you like to swing on a star?
- Traffic report: Football, football, football! Wikipedia Football Club!
- CommonsComix: #4: The Course of WikiEmpire
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:44, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2023 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello Eddie891,
Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.
Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.
Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.
Suggestions:
- There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
- Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
- Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
- This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.
Backlog:
Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!
- Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Hi Eddie. I remembered you wrote articles about First Ladies memoirs like My Memoir. I was wondering if you were interested in making articles for the ones that are currently missing at List of memoirs by first ladies of the United States: The Times of My Life (Betty Ford), Nancy: The Autobiography of America's First Lady (Nancy Reagan), Reflections: Life After the White House (Barbara Bush) and Where the Light Enters: Building a Family, Discovering Myself (Jill Biden). All four of these are currently redirects. Thanks! :) MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:34, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, @MrLinkinPark333 and happy New Year! Yeah, those are on my to do list and have been for quite some time... I'll try and get around to them soon. Eddie891 Talk Work 01:56, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- No worries! Happy new year to you too :) MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 03:43, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
On 4 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Third Onondaga County Courthouse, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that although the third Onondaga County Courthouse was demolished in 1967, the hand-cut stones of its tower have been preserved? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Third Onondaga County Courthouse. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Third Onondaga County Courthouse), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
...and thanks for continuing to work on Lincoln/Whitman. I don't know what you do for a living, but you have an academic career right there! Take care, Drmies (talk) 20:18, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, @Drmies, and Happy New Year to you as well! All the best for the year going forwards. I'm hoping to send Walt Whitman's lectures on Abraham Lincoln to FAC soon this year, just needs one or two more solid copyedits but I think most of the content is there. I'm actually an undergrad at Cornell University (studying history), so some of these articles align pretty well with what I do in classes. 1839 Marion riot originated as a paper from a history class, in fact, and the re-write of O Captain! My Captain! began as part of an assignment as well. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:00, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, someone is going to be real happy to have you in class next week. But do not fool yourself into thinking that the professionals, by which I mean administrators, are going to care for this--I'm going to stop putting my Wikipedia work on my professional reports since administrators don't understand and/or don't care. Even convincing colleagues that this is worth doing is a stretch, though my historian friend across the hall gets it now. I'm working on a little something that (on his suggestion) I'm going to try and get published in the Alabama Review, and then I'll put a watered-down version on Wikipedia. Ha, more than once I've had to put a footnote in an article or presentation saying "if this looks like the Wikipedia article, it's cause I wrote that". Well, you'll be able to say that for an entire field, and good for you. Take care, Drmies (talk) 00:38, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversighter changes
Guideline and policy news
- Speedy deletion criterion A5 (transwikied articles) has been repealed following an unopposed proposal.
Arbitration
- Following the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, CaptainEek, GeneralNotability, Guerillero, L235, Moneytrees, Primefac, SilkTork.
- The 2021-22 Discretionary Sanctions Review has concluded with many changes to the discretionary sanctions procedure including a change of the name to "contentious topics". The changes are being implemented over the coming month.
- The arbitration case Stephen has been closed.
Miscellaneous
- Voting for the Sound Logo has closed and the winner is expected to be announced February to April 2023.
- Tech tip: You can view information about IP addresses in a centralised location using bullseye which won the Newcomer award in the recent Coolest Tool Awards.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Are you still using Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Featuredcontentimporting? If not, I want to either delete it or move it to your userspace. If you are still interested in automatic importing of featured content for Signpost stuff, of course, there is a thread at the newsroom talk page about it. jp×g 01:15, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:46, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Third Onondaga County courthouse/GA1begun reviewing the article Third Onondaga County courthouse you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 16:00, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
The article Third Onondaga County courthouse you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Third Onondaga County courthouse for comments about the article, and Talk:Third Onondaga County courthouse/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 11:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Special report: Coverage of 2022 bans reveals editors serving long sentences in Saudi Arabia since 2020
- News and notes: Revised Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines up for vote, WMF counsel departs, generative models under discussion
- In the media: Court orders user data in libel case, Saudi Wikipedia in the crosshairs, Larry Sanger at it again
- Technology report: View it! A new tool for image discovery
- In focus: Busting into Grand Central
- Serendipity: How I bought part of Wikipedia – for less than $100
- Featured content: Flip your lid
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2022
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:13, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
When editing, the section titles were bold and the picture links were light green and now all formatting is gone when editing. How can the editing format be restored? --Canton Viaduct 04:50, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, Canton Viaduct, without being able to see what you have on your account, it is hard to say definitely what the cause is. I would suggest going to Special:Preferences and under the 'gadget' tab click to enable "Syntax highlighter", which might be similar to what you're looking for. You could also go to 'beta features' and click to enable the "New wikitext mode". Let me know if neither of those work. Best, Eddie891 Talk Work 13:46, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Eddie.
Would these links fall under "articles to have received significant coverage in independent, reliable sources?"
Thanks.
https://www.law.com/law-firm-profile/?id=34934&name=Goldberg-Segalla&slreturn=20220701154156
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/goldberg-segalla-leader-to-leave-post-for-childcare-duties
https://www.law360.com/legalindustry/articles/491954
https://www.law360.com/employment/articles/753886/goldberg-segalla-opens-new-offices-in-fla-md-and-nj Bona1858 (talk) 19:58, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- Law.com doesn't seem to be selective in its coverage (instead indiscriminately covering all law firms), so I wouldn't say that that is indicative of notability. The second and fourth links you provide seem to be relatively routine coverage that does not meet the WP:CORPDEPTH threshold (if you look at the "Examples of trivial coverage" subsection, it specifically lists mentions "of the hiring, promotion, or departure of personnel," and "of the opening or closing of local branches, franchises, or shops." Particularly the fourth article barely seems to qualify as independent reporting-- nothing against Alex Wolf, but it looks like he basically just repeated everything that the company told him. The third link is an interview with an employee of the law firm, which is not independent and therefore not indicative of notability. I don't personally see those sources as being enough (the corporation notability guideline specifically asks for multiple high quality sources contributing to notability). Eddie891 Talk Work 13:59, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Your name caught my eye on WP:RX since you have access to the Cornell Library. I'm an alum myself and focus on Indonesia articles on Wikipedia. You might know that Kroch Library has one of the world's largest and most complete collections on Indonesian topics. I'm not sure what your situation with library access is like, but I'm wondering since I'm not anywhere near Ithaca whether I can ask you from time to time to look up hard-to-find sources that I know Cornell has. —Arsonal (talk + contribs)— 06:57, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Arsonal! I didn't know that off the top of my head, but yes, please do ask me if there's anything you need. I'm on campus during the school semester, so I should be able to get to Kroch relatively quickly during those months. More than happy to send scans of stuff on request. Cool to hear there's a fellow Cornellian around. Cheers, Eddie891 Talk Work 15:10, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, the administrator policy now requires that prior written consent be gained from the Arbitration Committee to mark a block as only appealable to the committee.
- Following a community discussion, consensus has been found to impose the extended-confirmed restriction over the topic areas of Armenia and Azerbaijan and Kurds and Kurdistan.
Technical news
- The Vector 2022 skin has become the default for desktop users of the English Wikipedia.
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 has been opened and the proposed decision is expected 24 February 2023.
- In December, the contentious topics procedure was adopted which replaces the former discretionary sanctions system. The contentious topics procedure is now in effect following an initial implementation period. There is a detailed summary of the changes and administrator instructions for the new procedure. The arbitration clerk team are taking suggestions, concerns, and unresolved questions about this new system at their noticeboard.
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2023 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
- Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:37, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations, Eddie891! The article you nominated, Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations, - for Christmas 2023? - The colours of my January calendar image are Ukrainian for a reason. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:42, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! Yes, hopefully this could be TFA next year Eddie891 Talk Work 21:10, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- Congratulations! Nice work. Should probably set this up on next December's schedule now (it's empty at the moment), would think the only question is Christmas Eve or Christmas. Then congrats on putting up the Viginia O'Hanlon page, a fitting companion piece. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:19, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! I have suggested it at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/pending, and the co-ords will see that when they get around to scheduling the TFA's for December. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:22, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- that's great! - today, I point at two singers I whose performance I enjoyed. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:20, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- I'm on vacation, - click on songs! I tell my own stories now, instead of relying on DYK. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- more pics --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:30, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- and now the rest - Melitta Muszely died, RIP - the other story is 10 years old OTD ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:44, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! I have suggested it at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/pending, and the co-ords will see that when they get around to scheduling the TFA's for December. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:22, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- Congratulations! Nice work. Should probably set this up on next December's schedule now (it's empty at the moment), would think the only question is Christmas Eve or Christmas. Then congrats on putting up the Viginia O'Hanlon page, a fitting companion piece. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:19, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- From the editor: New for the Signpost: Author pages, tag pages, and a decent article search function
- News and notes: Foundation update on fundraising, new page patrol, Tides, and Wikipedia blocked in Pakistan
- Disinformation report: Wikipedia on Santos
- Op-Ed: Estonian businessman and political donor brings lawsuit against head of national Wikimedia chapter
- Recent research: Wikipedia's "moderate yet systematic" liberal citation bias
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Organized Labour
- Tips and tricks: XTools: Data analytics for your list of created articles
- Featured content: 20,000 Featureds under the Sea
- Traffic report: Films, deaths and ChatGPT
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:43, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:27, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer on at least one article that is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 or you signed up for messages. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found here. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. You can opt in or out of further messages at this page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Some of my earliest work, and I think the lack of experience for me shows in the quality. Upon further inspection of Kennedy, the chapter in question is actually written by Shea, so the reliance on a single author is quite bad. I've since acquired several works that include content about Prairie Grove that could be used to fix it, but I'm busy with work and struggling with ongoing depression and post-COVID fatigue to the extent that I just don't have the energy to be able to confidently say I can resolve the issues quickly. I won't be offended at all if this goes to GAR. Just one request - if you GAR it, please leave a notice on my talk page. It might be able to attract some fixing-up attention.
Heck, 2nd and 6th Missouri Infantry Regiment (Consolidated) and 1st and 4th Missouri Infantry Regiment (Consolidated) might need to go, too. As I mature as an editor, I have started to harbor some doubts about the quality of In Deadly Earnest, and that source isn't really replaceable at either of the other works, because I don't know of any other sources that goes into a reasonable level of detail about the units' activities during that time.
Also not happy with my first GA, Battle of Wilson's Creek, as I didn't verify some of the sources to books I didn't have at the time (my current library is decent enough that I could flesh it out sometime, if it weren't for work/depression/exhaustion) and the content could use expansion in some areas. J. Johnston Pettigrew - the Pippen SCV source might need replaced, although I may be colored by experiences with the local SCV's "the South shall rise again" vibes (FWIW, the part of Missouri I'm from is a neo-Confederate hotbed, so groups like that are probably better elsewhere). The Civil War Roundtable in Springfield is great, though.
Also pinging @Peacemaker67, Harrias, and Gog the Mild: who were reviewers on some of the "early work" of mine I've noted here. I think everything else I've produced is either in excellent shape or could be brought up to snuff easily. I've been too tired to start new content work for most of the last month, and I don't see things getting better in the near future (I'm going to have a one-way 1.5 hour commute back and forth from the client site for probably almost all of next week, and a lot of the other weeks coming up ain't much better). Again, I just ask that any GARs get a notice at WT:MILHIST and my talk page; maybe somebody will show up and help me out like happened at the GAR for batted ball. Hog Farm Talk 04:40, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Plenty of far worse GAs around the place HF! Just relax and bring it up to snuff in your own time. I would hope no-one will be rushing to GAR it when there are far lower hanging fruit. Look after yourself mate. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:23, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Hog Farm: Let me echo what Peacemaker67 said. Unless you feel that the articles in question are actively likely to include false information, I wouldn't worry too much about it at this juncture. GAR isn't functionally operational at the moment anyway, so taking articles there is pretty last-resort unless there are serious issues. Harrias (he/him) • talk 12:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- I'd just emphasize both of the above comments. Take your time to clean up the articles. Absent major glaring problems I don't think GAR is necessary. Your clear integrity in matters like this never fails to impress me, however, and reflects well on your character. In fact, this reminds me that I've been meaning to go through my early GAs; I think there are some issues worth fixing there. Thanks for all you do here, and if there's anything I can do let me know. You're one of the good ones. Be well, Eddie891 Talk Work 13:03, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Echoing all of hte above. Chill, man.
- Oddly, I have just had a similar experience. Constantine III (Western Roman emperor) was my 18th GAN, some time before I nominated my first FAC. I always wanted to come back to it and see if it had FAC potential. Earlier this year I did. I was taken aback at how poor it was - still is, just look at it! It took me forever to dig out and then dig through some proper sources and effectively rewrite the article. It is currently going through an informal PR in a sandbox before being moved into main space, see here. I strongly suspect that the previous 17 GANs were just as whince-worthy, but I feel no great need to confirm this. It was, I think, a necessary part of "learning the trade". I believe I did learn from them, or I would not be looking back at them now with such concern. And, I suspect, similarly for you. It is part of the process; if we were not so self critical we would be worse content creators, but this can, I think, be overdone. Gog the Mild (talk) 20:24, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Hog Farm: I noticed the brief link to this post on your talk page and was curious. It prompted me to add some additional references and citations and a little additional text to the article. You are correct in noting that other sources don't go into the same level of detail as Shea's entire book about the battle. But I think that the additions should suffice to show that the description of the battle in the article is accurate and not based on a single source. Donner60 (talk) 09:13, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- I'd just emphasize both of the above comments. Take your time to clean up the articles. Absent major glaring problems I don't think GAR is necessary. Your clear integrity in matters like this never fails to impress me, however, and reflects well on your character. In fact, this reminds me that I've been meaning to go through my early GAs; I think there are some issues worth fixing there. Thanks for all you do here, and if there's anything I can do let me know. You're one of the good ones. Be well, Eddie891 Talk Work 13:03, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Hog Farm: Let me echo what Peacemaker67 said. Unless you feel that the articles in question are actively likely to include false information, I wouldn't worry too much about it at this juncture. GAR isn't functionally operational at the moment anyway, so taking articles there is pretty last-resort unless there are serious issues. Harrias (he/him) • talk 12:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I wanted to thank you for writing the page on Edith Alvord, who was my great-grandmother. Neither I nor my father, who was largely raised by her, had any knowledge of her accomplishments.
So, thanks!
Brian 68.115.41.82 (talk) 13:38, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note, I'm glad to hear that! @WomenArtistUpdates deserves a lot of the credit here. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:18, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- In the media: Arbitrators open case after article alleges Wikipedia "intentionally distorts" Holocaust coverage
- Disinformation report: The "largest con in corporate history"?
- Tips and tricks: All about writing at DYK
- Featured content: Eden, lost.
- Gallery: Love is in the air
- From the archives: 5, 10, and 15 years ago: Let's (not) delete the Main Page!
- Humour: The RfA Candidate's Song
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:01, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
This locality where Amon G. Carter is from? appears to be interesting. If it dovetails with your current investigations, I would be very happy if you saved me from starting a draft on it. Its history is noted here although I can't vouch for whether that site passes muster per Wikipedia standards. At least a starting point maybe. Take care. Thanks for your work. FloridaArmy (talk) 15:27, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Interesting find! I doubt that website is reliable for Wikipedia, but I agree it offers a useful starting point. I'll see what I can dig up. Thanks for bringing this up. Best wishes, Eddie891 Talk Work 15:30, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- @FloridaArmy, created an article. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:27, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Jerry Flemmons seems like an interesting subject. The flood and tornado happened quite a bit after the train routing issue. I wonder what the role of the relative factors was innthe towns decline. Thanks for writing it up. Have a great weekend. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:46, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Thank you for improving articles in February! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:22, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
My story on 24 February is about Artemy Vedel (TFA by Amitchell235), and I made a suggestion for more peace, - what do you think? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:09, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
today: two women whose birthday we celebrate today, 99 and 90! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:28, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, F10 (useless non-media files) has been deprecated.
- Following a request for comment, the Portal CSD criteria (P1 (portal subject to CSD as an article) and P2 (underpopulated portal)) have been deprecated.
- A request for comment is open to discuss making the closing instructions for the requested moves process a guideline.
Technical news
- The results of the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey have been posted.
Arbitration
- Remedy 11 ("Request for Comment") of the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been rescinded.
- The proposed decision for the Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 case is expected 7 March 2023.
- A case related to the Holocaust in Poland is expected to be opened soon.
Miscellaneous
- The 2023 appointees for the Ombuds commission are AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, JJMC89, MdsShakil, Minorax and Renvoy as regular members and Zabe as advisory members.
- Following the 2023 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Mykola7, Superpes15, and Xaosflux.
- The Terms of Use update cycle has started, which includes a
[p]roposal for better addressing undisclosed paid editing
. Feedback is being accepted until 24 April 2023.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
So ends the first round of the 2023 WikiCup. Everyone with a positive score moved on to Round 2, with 54 contestants qualifying. The top scorers in Round 1 were:
Unlimitedlead with 1205 points, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with two featured articles on historical figures and several featured article candidate reviews.- Epicgenius was in second place with 789 points; a seasoned WikiCup competitor he specialises in buildings and locations in New York.
FrB.TG was in third place with 625 points, garnered from a featured article on a filmmaker which qualified for an impressive number of bonus points.
TheJoebro64, another WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points gained from two featured articles on video games.
Iazyges was in fifth place with 532 points, from two featured articles on classical history.
The top sixteen contestants at the end of Round 1 had all scored over 300 points; these included 
LunaEatsTuna, 
Thebiguglyalien, 
Sammi Brie, 
Trainsandotherthings, 
Lee Vilenski, 
Juxlos, 
Unexpectedlydian, 
SounderBruce, 
Kosack, 
BennyOnTheLoose and 
PCN02WPS. It was a high-scoring start to the competition.
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. The first round finished on February 26. Remember that any content promoted after that date but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- News and notes: What's going on with the Wikimedia Endowment?
- Technology report: Second flight of the Soviet space bears: Testing ChatGPT's accuracy
- In the media: What should Wikipedia do? Publish Russian propaganda? Be less woke? Cover the Holocaust in Poland differently?
- Featured content: In which over two-thirds of the featured articles section needs to be copied over to WikiProject Military History's newsletter
- Recent research: "Wikipedia's Intentional Distortion of the Holocaust" in Poland and "self-focus bias" in coverage of global events
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:41, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello Eddie891,
- Backlog
The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.
- 2022 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!
Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)
New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js
Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.
Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.
- Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:30, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Message added 13:36, 11 March 2023 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
A bit late, but I sent you a reply about the PDF. - Carpimaps (talk) 13:36, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- News and notes: Wikimania submissions deadline looms, Russian government after our lucky charms, AI woes nix CNET from RS slate
- Eyewitness: Three more stories from Ukrainian Wikimedians
- In the media: Paid editing, plagiarism payouts, proponents of a ploy, and people peeved at perceived preferences
- Featured content: Way too many featured articles
- Interview: 228/2/1: the inside scoop on Aoidh's RfA
- Traffic report: Who died? Who won? Who lost?
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:16, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi Eddie! checking with you about my OTD questions. Philip Zimbardo is one of the most famous psychologists in history and will be 90 years old on March 23. Two questions: 1. Is his notability and 90th worthy of inclusion in OTD? 2. Is the existing quality of the https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Zimbardo good enough?
if the quality is not yet good enough, What specifically needs to be better before March 22? I know Zimbardo personally, so want to acknowledge my connection - i wont change the article myself, but have other wiki-friends who have offered to help if you can give us any list of what needs to be fixed. (sorry for typos - iPad user interface is not wikifriendly) DrMel (talk) 22:47, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @DrMel: That would be a great article to feature on the birth section of OTD, and I'd be happy to swap it in! He's definitely worth inclusion. Right now, the problem is the big orange tag at the top of the article that says "This article needs additional citations for verification." The article cannot run on the main page until that tag is resolved. Basically, every statement in the article needs to have a citation. So, scrolling through the article, you can see unsourced sentences like:
- "In February 2010, Zimbardo was a guest presenter at the Science of a Meaningful Life seminar: Goodness, Evil, and Everyday Heroism, along with Greater Good Science Center Executive Director Dacher Keltner."
- or
- "In 1971, Zimbardo accepted a tenured position as professor of psychology at Stanford University. With a government grant from the U.S. Office of Naval Research, he conducted the Stanford prison study in which male college students were selected (from an applicant pool of 75)."
- Those need to be cited to reliable sources or removed. Also, I cannot verify his birth date in the source provided for it, so that would need to be cited as well. Otherwise, I think the article could definitely be run, though there is other cleanup possible. Hopefully that is helpful-- let me know if you have any other questions! Best wishes, Eddie891 Talk Work 22:56, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Just a courtesy notice that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mateusz Grzesiak, which you closed, is now at DRV: see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 March 21#Mateusz Grzesiak. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:13, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Bimble's Bucket. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I saw your username on the list of GA mentors. I just attempted my first GA review, for the Empire Theater (42nd Street), and was hoping you could look it over. I currently placed the GA review status as looking for a second opinion in the meantime. Would greatly appreciate it. Please let me know if you have the time / interest. Thanks! Kting97 (talk) 11:52, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, @Kting97, I'd be happy to take a look. I'll leave some comments on the review. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:25, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Actually, @Kting97, I'll leave my comments here: It seems like you have done a very good job reviewing this article. You looked at the prose, citation formatting, image layout. I honestly think that this is pretty much exactly what we want a good article review to look like. The one thing I'd suggest is to specify under sourcing if you have (and in this review it looks like you have) checked some of the sourcing to make sure it verifies what it is supposed to and that the text is not too closely paraphrased from the original. You may find one of these templates useful so you can highlight which criteria have (and haven't) been checked. I've added the review to my watchlist and will follow along as epicgenius responds, but this looks like a very well-done review, and my main advice would be to keep doing what you're doing! I have seen far worse good article reviews from far more experienced editors. Happy to answer any specific questions that may come up, now or later. Cheers, Eddie891 Talk Work 12:35, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi Eddie. I see you were the closer of this AfD. I would like to get that content. Can you help me?
On 30 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lynching of Allen Brooks, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the site of the 1910 lynching of Allen Brooks was unmarked for 111 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lynching of Allen Brooks. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Lynching of Allen Brooks), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Aoidh (talk) 00:03, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Eddie, you carried the bulk of the work here and I thank you for it. I don't know where you live, but where I live, many aspects of history are still swept under the rug or simply ignored. To illustrate what all is wrong here, our governor just used federal COVID money and money from the education budget to help build a water park (I can't even afford tickets for it) and a billion dollar prison. Anyway, thanks for all you do here. Drmies (talk) 13:30, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, @Drmies, it was a needed article. I'm from New York, where history is generally well-regarded, though the corruption is still there-- our legislature just voted themselves a 29% pay raise making themselves the highest paid in the nation... I've got a few more highly notable articles on my immediate to-do list, but writing lynchings takes a lot out of me, so taking a bit of a break right now. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:45, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for improving articles in March! - Today we remember the 150th birthday of Max Reger, who saw the horrors of a world war right when it began in 1914, while others were still in high patriotic moods -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:47, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
sharing impressions from vacation on Madeira 20-30 March, pics now at 24 Mar from the peaks --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:02, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Was just wondering if you’d be able to inform Microvision Management, Staff and Investors who it was who requested/paid you to remove the Microvision page?
Thank you in advance. 2600:1006:A126:26AD:2098:522C:BBAD:2F0F (talk) 14:52, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, I can inform whomever it may concern that I have not been paid in any of the edits I do on Wikipedia. The article was deleted per the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MicroVision, Inc., where the consensus was that the article did not meet the notability guideline for corporations. If you feel that there are independent, in depth and reliable sources that establish notability that the discussion did not consider, please let me know and I would be more than happy to re-open it. Alternatively, you can bring your concerns to review, if you feel I am not adequately addressing them. Hopefully this helps, and don't hesitate to let me know if you have any further questions. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:58, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
- Before you delete something are you not supposed to have a reliable replacement source? You now have the attention of 40k sub members. Many really think the recommendation for deletion was intentional by a competitor. I think you thought you were doing the right thing by blindly following the deletion list. If you believe you're an active contributor to Wikipedia It is easy to find valid information on a company like Microvision and correct what you feel is the shortcomings of their wiki page. If you go to the company home page or r/Microvision for can find out a lot. One thing...it is not a meme stock. 73.75.69.81 (talk) 15:18, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
- Let's break up what is going on here, because you seem to be suffering from a number of common misconceptions, understandably enough. Please do take time to read through the below:
- No,
Before you delete something are you not supposed to have a reliable replacement source?
is a misunderstanding of Wikipedia policy. While verifiability and reliability of sources are key to writing a Wikipedia article, they are not the only factors. Wikipedia also has notability policies that determine whether a subject is notable enough for an article. Namely, the topic must have been the subject of multiple in-depth pieces of coverage. There is a higher threshold for companies, which applies to Microvision. Something being verifiable does not equal notability. - Additionally, the onus is not on the person removing content to supply a "reliable replacement source", it is on those adding the information (or wishing to re-add it)
You now have the attention of 40k sub members
OK, and ? Is this a thinly veiled threat, that the subreddit will come after me? The number of members of a subreddit is irrelevant to notability, unfortunately. Perhaps some of them can spend time reading the links I have offered to better understand how Wikipedia works.Many really think the recommendation for deletion was intentional by a competitor.
Baseless and unsubstantiated accusations of bias do not lend strength to your argument, and I'd highly advise against further implications without evidence.I think you thought you were doing the right thing by blindly following the deletion list.
I was not simply "blindly" following something -- I was assessing the consensus of the discussion, which certainly involved reading everything there.If you believe you're an active contributor to Wikipedia
this is not a subjective matter: I am an active editor, as can be easily verified in a number of placesIt is easy to find valid information on a company like Microvision and correct what you feel is the shortcomings of their wiki page
I'd suggest having a read of No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability, which is the problem here. The shortcomings can only lead to deletion, without the question of notability being resolved. Additionally, it is not my responsibility to do such work on someone else's behalf.
- No,
- I know this is a lot, and please don't hesitate to ask if anything needs clarification. Apologies if I come off as a bit blunt, but it would be better for you to understand where the deletion is coming from than wasting your time on something that may never be successful. Best, Eddie891 Talk Work 16:11, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
- Again, if you think the arguments in the discussion did not consider or misrepresented the coverage in certain sources that do contribute to the notability of the company, please highlight those sources here, which will aid us in determining how best to move forward. I'm not saying this article is categorically non-notable, but that the way you are trying to go about getting it restored is not going to help you. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:13, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
- Let's break up what is going on here, because you seem to be suffering from a number of common misconceptions, understandably enough. Please do take time to read through the below:
- From the editor: Some long-overdue retractions
- News and notes: Sounding out, a universal code of conduct, and dealing with AI
- Arbitration report: "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland" case is ongoing
- Featured content: Hail, poetry! Thou heav'n-born maid
- Recent research: Language bias: Wikipedia captures at least the "silhouette of the elephant", unlike ChatGPT
- From the archives: April Fools' through the ages
- Disinformation report: Sus socks support suits, seems systemic
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A community RfC is open to discuss whether reports primarily involving gender-related disputes or controversies should be referred to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.
Technical news
- Some older web browsers will not be able to use JavaScript on Wikimedia wikis starting this week. This mainly affects users of Internet Explorer 11. (T178356)
- The rollback of Vector 2022 RfC has found no consensus to rollback to Vector legacy, but has found rough consensus to disable "limited width" mode by default.
- A link to the user's Special:CentralAuth page will now appear in the subtitle links shown on Special:Contributions. This was voted #17 in the Community Wishlist Survey 2023.
Arbitration
- The Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 case has been closed.
- A case about World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been opened, with the first evidence phase closing 6 April 2023.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:30, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi @Eddie891! Just popping in to say I appreciate your note about Joseph (art model). It was quite a fascinating project and I'd love to, at some point, try to get it up to FA. Feedback is always welcome! :-) Ppt91talk 18:03, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Come Up From the Fields Father/GA1begun reviewing the article Come Up From the Fields Father you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 18:40, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
The article Come Up From the Fields Father you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Come Up From the Fields Father for comments about the article, and Talk:Come Up From the Fields Father/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 01:03, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
@Eddie891:, Why was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ömer Aysan Barış relisted? The only "delete" vote was by the nominator themselves... if this were the other way around (all delete votes), surely this would not get relisted... Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 15:39, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- If you read @Jogurney's comment, they seem to feel that the case for notability is not particularly strong, but indicate an intent to comment later, saying "I'll see if I can find something else." I read that as "Here's a comment, I intend to look further into this. As that was only one day before I looked at the discussion, I opted to relist to give Jogurney a chance to do so, if they wanted. I would have done the same if there were primarily 'delete' votes, and one user commented "I might be able to find something" shortly before the discussion closed. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:45, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Impressive work on White Antelope (Cheyenne chief). Thank you for contributing your efforts to Wikipedia. jengod (talk) 14:35, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello,
This is to request you to undelete the article 'Akhilesh Sheshmani Dubey.' I was aware of the Deletion nomination and was under talks with the individual who nominated it to move it back to userspace if I was allowed to do so while the article was still nominated. Moreover, I was monitoring the talk page as well but it did not have any discussions going on. I am asking to undelete the page as I want to work on the article in the aspects that it lacks in and do not want my edit history to be lost.
Hope you can help me out with this.
Regards,
Jae Yumeko1 (talk) 06:01, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I would be willing to restore this article to your userspace. I'd just like to confirm before doing so that you're confident you can resolve the notability concerns raised at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akhilesh Sheshmani Dubey (2nd nomination), namely that there are not sources to establish notability of the subject. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:30, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
| New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for improving articles in April! - Today is the 80th birthday of John Eliot Gardiner. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:23, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Myla Vicenti Carpio. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. CT55555(talk) 23:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- News and notes: Staff departures at Wikimedia Foundation, Jimbo hands in the bits, and graphs' zeppelin burns
- In the media: Contested truth claims in Wikipedia
- Obituary: Remembering David "DGG" Goodman
- Arbitration report: Holocaust in Poland, Jimbo in the hot seat, and a desysopping
- Special report: Signpost statistics between years 2005 and 2022
- News from the WMF: Collective planning with the Wikimedia Foundation
- Featured content: In which we described the featured articles in rhyme again
- From the archives: April Fools' through the ages, part two
- Humour: The law of hats
- Traffic report: Long live machine, the future supreme
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:16, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
The Core Contest—Wikipedia's most exciting contest—will take place this year from April 15 to May 31. The goal: to improve vital or other core articles, with a focus on those in the worst state of disrepair. Editing can be done individually, but in the past groups have also successfully competed. There is £300 of prize money divided among editors who provide the "best additive encyclopedic value". Signups are open now. Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24.
If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list.
I need help with the building blocks of people's centred approach and their references --Kopanoneo (talk) 17:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:White Antelope (Cheyenne chief)/GA1begun reviewing the article White Antelope (Cheyenne chief) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 00:03, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Eddie891,
I have had a Wikipedia page for many years. I did not set up this page, but I did add a photo to it some time ago. Today, I was notified that it was deleted! (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophie Chiche).
After reading the deletion comments and doing some research, it appears that the reason for deletion is that the biography and other sections on my page were too "thin" and lacked substance. In no way was my intent for this page to be a "promo."
This topic (Wikipedia content standards and deletion) is brand new to me. I am happy to dig deeper into these standards and provide relevant content that matches Wikipedia's requirements. What is the best way to re-activate the page and make the required updates? Or is it better to start a new page entirely? Alternately, is it better to have someone else create the page?
Any help you can provide on this is greatly appreciated. Thank you. Sophiechiche (talk) 03:30, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Sophiechiche, the main issue here is that of notability. Wikipedia requires that the topics of articles have significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources. Many, in fact most, people do not meet this requirement, and as such don't have Wikipedia articles. Do you have that? Let me know which sources you feel meet this requirement. If there are enough, I'd be willing to restore this page to a draft that you could work on. The other issue was that of self-promotion, which Wikipedia is not the place for. I'd recommend reading the guide to editing with a conflict of interest. The wikipedia Women in Red project may help you with rewriting the promotion, if you are notable. Basically, it's not a great idea to, but if you intend to, you should be transparent with your editing. Happy to look over any sourcing or answer any further questions. Eddie891 Talk Work 11:39, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your kind and prompt response. I will read your recommendations and get back to you.
- I appreciate the integrity of your work- and do not intend to use the space to promote my business.
- I was very honored when I was informed that someone had started a page about me years ago, and will dig in the experiences of my life to see if they are notable enough to be on the platform. Thank you for your time. Take good care,
- Sophie Sophiechiche (talk) 14:29, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
The second round of the 2023 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to have scored 60 points to advance into round 3. Our top five scorers in round 2 all included a featured article among their submissions and each scored over 500 points. They were:
- Iazyges (1040) with three FAs on Byzantine emperors, and lots of bonus points.
- Unlimitedlead (847), with three FAs on ancient history, one GA and nine reviews.
- Epicgenius (636), a WikiCup veteran, with one FA on the New Amsterdam Theatre, four GAs and eleven DYKs
BennyOnTheLoose (553), a seasoned competitor, with one FA on snooker, six GAs and seven reviews.- FrB.TG (525), with one FA, a Lady Gaga song and a mass of bonus points.
Other notable performances were put in by Sammi Brie, Thebiguglyalien, 
MyCatIsAChonk, PCN02WPS, and 
AirshipJungleman29.
So far contestants have achieved thirteen featured articles between them, one being a joint effort, and forty-nine good articles. The judges are pleased with the thorough reviews that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 | |
| Five years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:53, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.
Technical news
- Progress has started on the Page Triage improvement project. This is to address the concerns raised by the community in their 2022 WMF letter that requested improvements be made to the tool.
Arbitration
- The proposed decision in the World War II and the history of Jews in Poland case is expected 11 May 2023.
Miscellaneous
- The Wikimedia Foundation annual plan 2023-2024 draft is open for comment and input through May 19. The final plan will be published in July 2023.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:22, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:35, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- News and notes: New legal "deVLOPments" in the EU
- In the media: Vivek's smelly socks, online safety, and politics
- Recent research: Gender, race and notability in deletion discussions
- Featured content: I wrote a poem for each article, I found rhymes for all the lists; My first featured picture of this year now finally exists!
- Arbitration report: "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland" approaches conclusion
- News from the WMF: Planning together with the Wikimedia Foundation
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:24, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- In the media: History, propaganda and censorship
- Arbitration report: Final decision in "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland"
- Featured content: A very musical week for featured articles
- Traffic report: Coronation, chatbot, celebs
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:38, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello Eddie891:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Editathon event in June 2023!
Running from June 1 to 30, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event – another Wildcard Edition! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to any and all women and women's works during the event period. Want to improve an article about a Bollywood actress? Go for it. A pioneering female climate scientist? Absolutely. An award-winning book or film by a woman? Yes! GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi, how would you indicate a page is biased ? I wrote a message in the talk page but I don't think it will be seen for a while. The Monaco (country) page reads like a tourism ad. --Ophelia (talk) 10:09, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article White Antelope (Cheyenne chief) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:White Antelope (Cheyenne chief) for comments about the article, and Talk:White Antelope (Cheyenne chief)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 10:42, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- Congrats!! I'm very proud of the article you wrote and thank you for the opportunity to read it and review it. You did amazing work. --ARoseWolf 13:25, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- I agree, and thank you for improving other articles also in May. - I had a good story on coronation day: the Te Deum we sang that day. And the following day we sang it for the composer ;)
I nominated Soňa Červená for GA just to give her a bit more exposure, and I took some pics of bright scenery - click on songs. -- (and then I forgot to sign)
Pentecost was full of music, and my story today is that 300 years ago today, Bach became Thomaskantor, with BWV 75, writing music history. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
  Welcome, subscribers, to the seventh Discontent Content newsletter! Discontent Content is a newsletter aiming to collate and improve Wikipedia articles in need of more eyes and hands to get them in shape. Its unique trimodal structure allows editors to work where they feel comfortable -- with stubs and starts needing to be brought to standard, mid-quality articles with Good or Featured potential, or quality-assessed articles needing help to maintain their status.   Articles in this category are those that need to be brought up to a minimum quality standard. Some will be stubs; others will be longer articles that nonetheless have significant concerns putting them far below B- or C-class adequacy. This issue's Category 1 articles are:
  Articles in this category, while in better current shape than Category 1, are still missing something. They have the potential to be truly high-quality content, and may have been at one point. With work, they can be brought up to dizzying heights. This issue's Category 2 articles are:
  Articles in this category have been assessed through a content review process in the past, but may require work to be brought up to current GA/FA standard. Editors can help bring them to a level where the star or plus near their names can once again shine. This issue's Category 3 articles are:
  I LIVE. Hi, guys. Great to see you. I felt like doing this again. Will I do more? Let's find out. I hope you're all well, you beautiful people. |
- News and notes: WMRU director forks new 'pedia, birds flap in top '22 piccy, WMF weighs in on Indian gov's map axe plea
- Featured content: Poetry under pressure
- Traffic report: Celebs, controversies and a chatbot in the public eye
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
- As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.
Technical news
- Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.
Arbitration
- The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.
Miscellaneous
- Following a community referendum, the arbitration policy has been modified to remove the ability for users to appeal remedies to Jimbo Wales.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:32, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:31, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- News and notes: WMF Terms of Use now in force, new Creative Commons licensing
- Featured content: Content, featured
- Recent research: Hoaxers prefer currently-popular topics
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:08, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
The winners of the 2023 The Core Contest are announced 🎉. We had an amazing set of improvements this year, and the judges (Femke, Aza24 and Casliber) would like to thank everybody who joined and congratulate the winners.
- First place goes to Buidhe for improving The Holocaust; very core, highly relevant; their work on bringing geographical balance to the article puts the topic in a whole different light. We also commend improvements to sourcing and prose
- A close second place goes to Phlsph7 for improving Education from an unstructured jumble into a well-sourced piece of instruction
- Third prize goes to Johnbod for improving Donatello, a near five-fold expansion with great sourcing and fantastic imagery
- A tie for fourth place goes to Thebiguglyalien for improving Crime, for a strong improvement in sourcing
- A tie for fifth place goes to Sammielh for International law, improved by converting contextless listicles into a proper sourced prose
If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 20:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Everlasting Summer. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. WhyAddX (talk) 16:25, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
On 26 June 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article White Antelope (Cheyenne chief), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the song supposedly sung by Cheyenne chief White Antelope as he died at the Sand Creek massacre has been used at remembrances commemorating the event? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/White Antelope (Cheyenne chief). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, White Antelope (Cheyenne chief)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for a needed topic! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:59, 26 June 2023 (UTC) I summarised my latest vacation in images (click on songs), and my recent musical adventures can be found here. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:06, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
I’m professional football player in Cambodia. Actually I need your help to make my Wikipedia page. I will give you my sample of my sandbox. I hope you see it, thank you for your contribute.
rim soheng
| Personal information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Full name | Rim Soheng | ||
| Date of birth | 8 May 2004 | ||
| Place of birth | Battambang, Cambodia | ||
| Height | 1.86 m (6 ft 1 in) | ||
| Position(s) | Center back | ||
| Team information | |||
Current team | Angkor tiger football club | ||
| Number | 19 | ||
| Youth career | |||
| 2019-2021 | National football academy | ||
| Senior career* | |||
| Years | Team | Apps | (Gls) |
| 2021- | Angkor tiger football club | 2 | (0) |
| International career | |||
| 2019– | Cambodia U-16 | 15 | (0) |
| *Club domestic league appearances and goals, correct as of 20:12, 10 February 2023 | |||
Rim Soheng (born 8 May 2004), is a Cambodian football player currently playing as a centerback for Angkor tiger football club in the Cambodian League, and the Cambodia national team.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.gofootballtogo.com/team/cambodia-u16/24105/ https://globalsportsarchive.com/people/ Rim soheng (talk) 15:32, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello Eddie891,
The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.
Reminders:
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).
Administrator changes
Bureaucrat changes
Guideline and policy news
- Contributions to the English Wikipedia are now released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) license instead of CC BY-SA 3.0. Contributions are still also released under the GFDL license.
Technical news
- Discussion is open regarding a proposed global policy regarding third-party resources. Third-party resources are computer resources that reside outside of Wikimedia production websites.
Arbitration
- Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
- Disinformation report: Imploded submersible outfit foiled trying to sing own praises on Wikipedia
- Featured content: Incensed
- Traffic report: Are you afraid of spiders? Arnold? The Idol? ChatGPT?
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:13, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
The third round of the 2023 WikiCup has come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 175 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
Thebiguglyalien, with 919 points from a featured article on Frances Cleveland as well as five good articles and many reviews,- Unlimitedlead, with 862 points from a high-scoring featured articles on Henry II of England and numerous reviews,
- Iazyges, with 560 points from a high-scoring featured article on Tiberius III.
Contestants achieved 11 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 47 good articles, 72 featured or good article reviews, over 100 DYKs and 40 ITN appearances. As always, any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:18, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:58, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- In the media: Tentacles of Emirates plot attempt to ensnare Wikipedia
- Tips and tricks: What automation can do for you (and your WikiProject)
- Featured content: Scrollin', scrollin', scrollin', keep those readers scrollin', got to keep on scrollin', Rawhide!
- Traffic report: The Idol becomes the Master
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:00, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
|
Women in Red 8th Anniversary |
| In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello, I'm doing my first GA review, if you could take a look as well, that would be appreciated.
You can find the review here Talk:Fanya_Baron/GA1 Bart Terpstra (talk) 12:17, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- i've contacted another mentor. Bart Terpstra (talk) 12:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
On today's Main page, you can find a cantata that Bach first performed 300 years ago (thanks to you!), and an iconic saxophonist from East Germany. Also: a bit about the history of QAI on my talk. Thank you for being part of it! A new member designed a user box that I adopted. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
While today's DYK highlights Santiago on his day, I did my modest share with my story today, describing what I just experienced, pictured. I began the article of the woman in green. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:39, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
| Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive |  |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
- News and notes: City officials attempt to doxx Wikipedians, Ruwiki founder banned, WMF launches Mastodon server
- In the media: Truth, AI, bull from politicians, and climate change
- Disinformation report: Hot climate, hot hit, hot money, hot news hot off the presses!
- Tips and tricks: Citation tools for dummies!
- In focus: Journals cited by Wikipedia
- Opinion: Are global bans the last step?
- Featured content: Featured Content, 1 to 15 July
- Traffic report: Come on Oppie, let's go party
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:37, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
how can i make a artist profile? --Prateekjojawara (talk) 11:56, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello my name is Paul I was hoping for some help on identification of a rock possibility of fossil like thanks in advance I have pictures I can send --Pjchaser8383 (talk) 22:05, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Pjchaser8383, I'm probably not the best person to answer this question. I would recommend asking somewhere like r/WhatIsThisRock, which has members who would probably be better skilled at rock identification. If you have any questions on Wikipedia editing, I would be happy to try and answer. Eddie891 Talk Work 00:30, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:29, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Technical news
- The tag filter on Special:NewPages and revision history pages can now be inverted. This allows hiding edits made by automated tools. (T334338)
- Special:BlockedExternalDomains is a new tool that allows easier blocking of plain domains (and their subdomains). This is more easily searchable and is faster for the software to use than the existing MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. It does not support regex (for complex cases), URL path-matching, or the MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist. (T337431)
Arbitration
- The arbitration cases named Scottywong and AlisonW closed 10 July and 16 July respectively.
- The SmallCat dispute arbitration case is in the workshop phase.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- News and notes: Dude, Where's My Donations? Wikimedia Foundation announces another million in grants for non-Wikimedia-related projects
- Tips and tricks: How to find images for your articles, check their copyright, upload them, and restore them
- Cobwebs: Getting serious about writing
- Serendipity: Why I stopped taking photographs almost altogether
- Featured content: Barbenheimer confirmed
- Traffic report: 'Cause today it just goes with the fashion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Hey there Eddie891, I'd like to wish you a happy adminship anniversary! Congratulations on your special day, and thank you for all the contributions you've made.
Avi :D (talk) 10:26, 19 August 2023 (UTC) On behalf of the Birthday Committee
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
- From the editor: Beta version of signpost.news now online
- News and notes: You like RecentChanges?
- In the media: Taking it sleazy
- Recent research: The five barriers that impede "stitching" collaboration between Commons and Wikipedia
- Draftspace: Bad Jokes and Other Draftspace Novelties
- Humour: The Dehumourification Plan
- Traffic report: Raise your drinking glass, here's to yesterday
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, TFAs will be automatically semi-protected the day before it is on the main page and through the day after.
- A discussion at WP:VPP about revision deletion and oversight for dead names found that
[s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment
.
Technical news
- Special:Contributions now shows the user's local edit count and the account's creation date. (T324166)
Arbitration
- The SmallCat dispute case has closed. As part of the final decision, editors participating in XfD have been reminded to be careful about forming
local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus
. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged tonote when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful
.
Miscellaneous
- Tech tip: The "Browse history interactively" banner shown at the top of Special:Diff can be used to easily look through a history, assemble composite diffs, or find out what archive something wound up in.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:21, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:37, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
| New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
- In the media: "Just flirting", going Dutch and Shapps for the defence?
- Obituary: Nosebagbear
- Featured content: Catching up
- Traffic report: Some of it's magic, some of it's tragic
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:35, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for improving articles in September! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:06, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I've noticed you have been assigned as my mentor, so I wanted to ask if you could review my first edit. Is it appropriate and are there things I could have done better? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategies_for_engineered_negligible_senescence Thanks! --Feyquin (talk) 16:46, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, @Feyquin, I'm not familiar with the theory, but I'd say you need to supply a more independent source than you currently use to suggest that SENS is no longer a fringe idea. Your current source website advocates heavily for SENS and seems to have ties to a/several foundations that do work relating to the therapies, and can't be considered independent information. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:46, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello Eddie891:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
Alanna the Brave (talk) 00:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.
<noinclude>
Hello Eddie891,
Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!
October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.
PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.
Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.
Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
I was looking to create a page for James Naleski, but it seems to require admin access. How would you suggest I go about obtaining this? JoeK2033 (talk) 14:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, @JoeK2033, creation of the page has been restricted because the article was repeatedly recreated after being deleted for not meeting wikipedia's notability guidelines, specifically those for musicians. First you have to consider, has the situation changed? Has this figure received substantial coverage in reliable sources? Then, you should make a case (probably here first) that this is the case, and an administrator may remove the requirement, which would allow others to create the article. I'd suggest reading the following information on removing 'salting' of article creation: Editors wishing to re-create a salted title with appropriate content should either contact an administrator (preferably the protecting administrator), file a request at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level, or use the deletion review process. To make a convincing case for re-creation, it is helpful to show a draft version of the intended article when filing a request. Happy to discuss further if you have other/similar questions. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- I wonder why the page was categorized under musicians. He is primarily an artist who is involved in government. Here is what I have found. Would it support the notability guidelines for a page stub? Thank you for your expert advice.
- https://www.24-7pressrelease.com/press-release/503536/james-naleski-celebrated-for-dedication-to-the-entertainment-industry JoeK2033 (talk) 17:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- This source alone would not, as it is a press release and not independent coverage... Eddie891 Talk Work 20:54, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello! I created this account because the professor I research for has asked me to create a wikipedia page for him. How do I go about doing that? I essentially want to plug in his CV and he can give me more information after. --Ajaber333 (talk) 21:56, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, @Ajaber333. First of all, it's not a great idea to write the article of someone you know, *especially* if they have asked you to do it-- have a read of our conflict of interest guidelines, and consider that if your professor is notable enough for an article (specifically, if they meet the notability guidelines for professors), sooner or later someone will create it.
- If you still want to create the article, you first need to make sure that this figure meets a notability guideline (which I've linked above). For professors, we have the following criteria that can be indicative of notability:
- The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.
- The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level.
- The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g., Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers or Honorary Fellow of the Institute of Physics).
- The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions.
- The person has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon.
- The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society.
- The person has had a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity.
- The person has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area.
- Does this professor meet any of these?
- \
- Also, I wouldn't recommend just plugging in a professor's CV to their wikipedia article, but if you wanted to create an article, you could definitely use that as a source. You should look for other reliable sources that offer substantive coverage of the professor and/or their work. For information on the fundamentals of article writing, I would have a read of this page, and you can also look at articles of similar professors for ideas. Does that help a bit? Best, Eddie891 Talk Work 17:31, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- News and notes: Wikimedia Endowment financial statement published
- Recent research: Readers prefer ChatGPT over Wikipedia; concerns about limiting "anyone can edit" principle "may be overstated"
- Featured content: By your logic,
- Poetry: "The Sight"
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:29, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Wikiwand in your browser!
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.
