Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Your recent edit to Holy Hell (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 01:27, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
I would probably be able to work on the project, but I'm new to wikiprojects and don't know much about what is exactly involved. Is it just adding to articles relating to the topic and creating new ones if need be, and if so, what is the reason for the "project" designation? Tim Long 03:06, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the Cristian Metal project link. --Trusader 00:32, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Pyramaze.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:14, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
looks as if it does now, jimfbleak 19:12, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
I have recently reverted an edit of yours where you re-inserted an image on the article of Dave Mustaine. The image copyright tag says that the image comes from an album or video, therefore the image is violation of the policy at WP:FU since it is not being used as "critical commentary" on the album or video from which it came. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 06:20, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Dave Mustaine. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 23:30, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Please do not re-insert images that are not correctly sourced. Your recent upload has been auto-tagged for speedy deletion. If you continue to breach policy by re-inserting an unlicensed image, you will break WP:3RR and will be blocked from editing. Read WP:FU if you wish to learn more about proper image use on Wikipedia. Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 23:29, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add images into pages that the uploader has the label template:musicpromo-screenshot unless it is being used as critical commentary on the show, movie, ect. in question. Cheers! -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 00:13, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Your edits to the sandbox is funny. You should be a user at Uncyclopedia, if you aren't already. --66.218.12.113 04:15, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi - when an editor feels that in image is replaceable fair use, they have every right to mark it as such and add the tag to the articles, for an administator to later decide on the validity of the request. By reverting the addition of the notfication tags, you are, I feel, in some violation of WP:OWN, and you are most certainly edit warring. I suggest that you leave the tags for an admin to decide - if you have permission (or can get it) from the copyright holder, please send a forward of that permission (to license under a free license such as GFDL or CC-by-SA 2.5), along with the emailer's assertation of ownership to permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org. Also see WP:COPYREQ. Thanks, Martinp23 19:08, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disrupting Wikipedia by making personal attacks. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Martinp23 19:56, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Regarding the SSP, thank you for your apology, which I accept. It is important to assume good faith and keep a cool head when the editing gets hot. Thanks, Prolog 20:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Look I know you are just hell bent to list both Nightwish and Kamelot as Prog Metal. But netiher one of them are Prog Metal
Nightwish does not have one thing Prog about them. As for kamelot have one concept album does not make them Prog show some proof of what you are talking about then go ahead and list them. Until then listing them as such is wrong.
So show me and others where Nightwish is Prog Metal? Show me and others where Kamelot is Prog Metal? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Turemetalfan (talk • contribs) 00:09, 11 January 2007 (UTC).
And where is your proof that Kamelot, Nightwish, and Sonata Arctica are Prog Metal. Other then odd time signatures and long songs on any album here and there. Show some real proof to what you are claming. I have shown you proof.
Nightwish is not Prog metal They are Symphonic metal and Power metal or what is called Symphoinc Power metal. Kamelot is Power Metal, Sonata Arctica is Power Metal. That's what many many many sites list them as. Ever review site and even Last.FM. AMG is a really poor site to use when the list Ngihtwish as a Symphoinc Black Metal band.
By the way I have shown you more then enough proof. I listed three sites two of which aer very big sites that list them as Power Metal not Prog Metal. You listed three bands as Prog Metal Kamelot, Nightwish, and Sonata Arctica but never gave any proof as to why they are Prog Metal other then you feel that they are.
You did not just list Kamelot is Prog metal you listed Nightwish, and Sonata Arctica as prog Metal to and they were both taken off. So again I will ask for the last time. How is Nightwish Prog Metal? How is Sonata Arctica Prog Metal? How is Kamelot Prog Metal? What site has them listed as Prog Metal. And using AMG is not a good enough place. I listen too all three of those bands and they are not Prog Metal in any way what so ever. Nightwish is Symphoinc Metal. Sonata Arctica is Power Metal. Kamelot is also Power Metal. So what was your reason for listing those three bands as Prog metal?
In what CD is Nightwish Prog Metal and what song of there's is Prog Metal? Samw answer for the other two bands. truemetalfan Jan 14, 2007
Please don't remove valid fair-use-replacable tags from images and articles - your habit of doing so is beginning to violate WP:OWN and perhaps WP:POINT. Please, stop. Martinp23 20:09, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Majestcvanguardband.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 00:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Temple of Blood, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Esurnir 20:47, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
I was interested that you reverted my edit removing the flag icon. You might care to read the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music and justify there why you think having the flag there is a good idea. WP:FLAG also makes interesting reading. Best wishes, --Guinnog 22:10, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Please don't do this again. You know what you are doing, and frankly you are wasting both my and your own time. -- Karl Meier 21:57, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Patrobertsonmetaler.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BigDT 01:29, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Apology accepted. I was actually more amused than upset. Asarelah 04:05, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
It's a good idea for a project(why didn't I think of it?) Actually, since the wiki-metal project is over-populated with 13 year olds who think that Nickelback is a heavy metal band....having a splinter group of editors dedicated to such a unique sub-genre like Christian metal is a good thing. My local Christian FM station play happy happy "boyband" faith music all day long...I always get a chuckle when I flip it on around midnight and hear Extol or Mortification. Pretty broad ends of the spectrum there. You should take your project to the next step. Format a project page. Create guidelines, tasks, infoboxes, templates...etc. The more "pro" the project looks...the more editors will take interest in it. Good Luck. Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 04:48, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
I haven't done what you think YET, will after you respond; I'm slightly confused.
Anyway even if it isn't fair use I have the right to use it - it was released to the public to be used freely. So if it isn't fair use how else should I tag it, as it can be used on wikipedia? --Mudel 08:47, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Chill out, be patient. Links can be fixed, and I'm sure there arent many broken ones. If I thought there would be I wouldnt have made the move. -Ste|vertigo 05:05, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
I dont see what WP:WINAD policy has to do with it. We point things according to an order of importance. There are lots of kids who want their favorite band to keep a top word association, even when it goes counter to the basic definition. Thats not a case of violating WINAD, its a case of violating WP:WWIN - namely WP is not a fansite for musical acts. -Ste|vertigo 06:14, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
E Tac: I suggest you read the discussion page of List of progressive metal artists before adding again Kamelot. --Dexter prog 22:28, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
On top of that using progarchives.com is the wrost site to use. Tell me E tac do you really trust a site that lists Nightwish as a Prog Metal band? How do you list Nightwish? Just answer what I have asked. Why use a site that's lists a band as Prog Metal when they are not. Progarchives.com is wrong in what they say. The other prog metal site you listed as also wrong. Do you think Epica is really a Prog Metal band? How about the band Within Temptation and Visions of Atlantis? How can your sources be good when they don't even list the bands right? Within Temptation, Visions of Atlantis, Epica, and Nightwish have never been Prog Metal? Yet two of the sites you listed list them as that. On top of that a myspace site is not a godo place to get info. turemetalfan Jan 22nd, 2007
Hey there again! I just noticed you uploaded Image:Theocracygroupshot.jpg, but there are two concerns. 1) It doesn't have a copyright tag. 2)The image is "public" in the sense that anyone can see it on flikr; this doesn't nesscarily mean that the image is "released to the public." (there is a copyright symbol and the words "all rights reserved" under additional information.) Perhaps if you can contact the photographer and ask them to released it under GFDL. Let me know if you have any questions. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 22:03, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
If you'd like to add information about Kirby Puckett's legal problems, please make sure to cite a reliable source. I noticed on your user page that you're a Puckett fan. If you check out the talk page of the Puckett article, you'll see that there have been a number of problems with vandals adding unfounded attacks against him. If we let positive information in without sources, it makes it harder to keep the negative stuff out. Thanks. --djrobgordon 11:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Unless you can tell me how Nightwish is Prog Metal. Why becuase they list Nightwish as Prog Metal. So until you can show me why that site is right then stop putting Kamelot as Prog Metal. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Turemetalfan (talk • contribs) 00:07, 26 January 2007 (UTC).
The discussion concerning the deletion of the article is happening at a separate page linked to from the article's tag. Click here to go to it. The AFD tag stays until the discussion is complete, regardless of any concerns you have regarding the validity of the nomination. Removing the tag does not stop the discussion, all it does is prevent other editors of the article from discovering that it is taking place, which only hurts your cause. If you disagree with the nomination then the proper course of action is to go to the AFD in question and protest it there. There you have the opportunity to put forth whatever evidence you have concerning the deleted article. Seeing as this is a band, I would recommend going to WP:MUSIC, which contains various notability requirements for music related articles, and proving on the AFD page that those notability guidelines are sufficiently met to warrant keeping the page. Be sure to include reliable sources in your arguments. If you have any further questions about the AFD process feel free to respond to this either here or my talk page and I'll be sure to get back to you. But be sure to stop removing the AFD notice.--Dycedarg ж 09:30, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
As I said in my note above, each article must pass certain notability guidelines in order to warrant inclusion. Also, while some leniency is given as to whether or not every single fact needs to be sourced, all articles require at least some verifiable sourcing. Notable does not mean popular, what it means is that the band's work has been deemed significant by sources other than themselves. The primary criterion of WP:MUSIC is that "it has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable." If you can find published sources on the Internet with articles concerning the band apart from the band's own website than that would be an indication of notability. Merely publishing albums is not in and of itself indicative of notability unless the label under which they were published is itself notable. I can't even find any references on the internet pertaining to Godfather Records at all, so that's definitely out. The thing about their being confused for Metallica would be notable if there was press coverage of the phenomenon by multiple independent and reliable sources. Your only recourse at this point is to find reliable, independent, and verifiable sources concerning this band, be it press coverage of a national tour they went on, press coverage of a national competition they won or placed in, or something similar. Otherwise there is no justification for the inclusion of this band. Also, as someone noted on the AFD page about your comment: AFD is not a vote. People state their opinion of whether or not they feel it should be kept, but must then base their opinion on established policy. Someone who voted delete or keep with no reason for doing so or if the reason was based on something other than policy would have their votes discounted out of hand.--Dycedarg ж 21:52, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Jdlogo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 21:08, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Stryper_logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:03, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Theocracybandpic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:28, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Right, apologies if I took offence early, I just feel that, for me, anger had been building up over a long time. When I first joined the discussion, reading through it, you were been rather challenging, didn't understand the issue with the article, and challenging people's comments about directories. You showed little understanding of the AfD process, little understanding of notability and sourcing guidelines, yet were still throwing around Wikipedia policies and comments to disagree with everyone else. Also, what you said about the idea that Wikipedia says 'If a band isn't on MTV selling millions of records it is not notable' really irritated me. Then, when I linked to the article on Voltaire, you talked about how it was sourced from only his MySpace page, his official site and Projekt Record's official site. This was blatantly untrue, as I explained. However, then, when I explained this to you, instead of apologising, you said 'Hmm I sourced 1 independent interview, and an independent biography, I could probably find more interviews but the information doesn't currently require it. So why did you vote delete? Just because you never heard of the band?' I found this VERY offensive. You had not said that you had resourced the article, and I didn't even have it on my watchlist. How on Earth was I to know? Yet still, you accuse me of blatantly ignoring Wikipedia policy and voting delete because I hadn't heard of the band. That is not the way I behave. I am a fan of alternative music, and I spend a lot of time in AfD debates. There is no way on Earth I am going to vote delete to something because I haven't heard of it. Put short, you were confrontational in your tone, showed little understanding of what you were talking about (AfD procedure, Wikipedia policy, the Voltaire article) and made things overly personal, partly because of the fact you were accusing me of voting delete just because I hadn't heard of the band. When you behave in such a manner on AfD, it does not help the case of the article you are trying to support. J Milburn 20:28, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
I don't know whether you are deliberately trying to be funny or sarcastic here, but, if you are, it hasn't translated well. Yeah, I brought up Voltaire, but I wasn't saying 'You can't vote, because you have also written an article on Wikipedia.' I was using the article to point out that a band does not need to be hugely famous to be notable, and you know I was. The discussion was about Eternal Decision and Eternal Decision only, bringing up the other article was just a waste of space. Please see this. The reason I voted 'abstain' was because I realised that there was no way I could make a fair assessment of the article when I had you shouting rubbish and hurling abuse around, and no matter how well sourced the article was, I was going to want it to be deleted, just because you wanted it kept. As for the matter of me 'bothering to even read it', like I have already said, I am not watching the article, but I will take a look now. Ok then, we have four sources cited. Clumsily, but cited nonetheless. Let's go through them.
But wait! There are more that could be relevent in the external links section! I must check them as well!
There, just for you, I looked at your article. I would still vote to delete. As I have mentioned before, the reason I am saying you have not done anything is that you don't tell us that you have done anything, and, on top of that, become incredibly aggressive when we don't realise that you have done something. And I stand by the fact that you are being abusive and challenging, I stand by the fact that most of your 'arguments' are a joke, and I stand by the fact that you do not back up what you say. You know what? Give me a specific example of something I have said to you that is a joke. Maybe there is something. Maybe there are even a couple of things. I would love to see them. J Milburn 22:11, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Theocracygroupshot.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:49, 29 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 20:49, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Theocracybandpic.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 02:39, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
So, since I created an article on a band, I have to defend every other article on bands? I created the article on Heavy Trash because I think they are notable. I voted delete (after a lot of thought, you should notice by my previous comments) on Eternal Decision because I don't honestly think they are notable. I'm trying to be principled about this. I want the articles to stay or go based on the notability of the band. If the one I started deserves to go, so be it. But I don't understand how that makes me a hypocrite, and I don't think you should be throwing around that word, as I'm trying to act honestly. Sorry if I offended you, but you have for sure offended me. Deeply. I'm no hypocrite man. --Tractorkingsfan 09:48, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Anybody who edits wikipedia has a right to be involved in anything, so I don't have to answer to you in terms of why I'm where. What you said to me doesn't make a whole lot of sense, but I would say I'm being the grown up one here. You're clinging to this article like a child because you created it, which is clear to everyone except you. And you called me a hypocrite. Is that true or false? And you can't seem to explain why, all you're saying is that you're mad at me for not supporting your article. Well, sorry, but what matters here is policy. If you don't like that, go somewhere else.
Look dude, I'm into music too, I like metal, I like sports, whatever. There's no reason for us to be going at it like this. Just give me a little bit of understanding here and realize that I'm not being a hypocrite because I support one article and not the other. I have listened to what you are saying, but you seem really really pissed off about this. I'm willing to let it die. But you shouldn't have called me that, and you know it. --Tractorkingsfan 10:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
No worries man! Yep, I lay it on a little thick sometimes with the reasoning. That's why I joined this thing, because it's like a little debate club. But I realize that can be really irritating with an article you spent an hour and a half creating and fine-tuning. Shit, maybe Heavy Trash should go, who knows. I'd probably react the same way if somebody came after it as hard as I did. Well, I'm not even going to look at that deletion debate again; it got me way too fired up. But yeah, apology accepted, I'm sorry to you, let's forget it it's just wikipedia. Cheers, --Tractorkingsfan 10:17, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Huh? As far as I know, I've never deleted this article or commented on it one way or the other. And I do give deletion reasons, both in my edit summaries and on the authors' talk pages. NawlinWiki 22:03, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
"Delete, fails WP:BAND, arguably speediable but probably better to settle it here. NawlinWiki 13:31, 27 January 2007 (UTC)" Why does it fail WP band? I'd say 3 albums released in 16 different countries gives them notability, they are known for their song hunger being thought to be a bootlegged new metallica song, They have had several songs near the top on a Christian Rock Chart. They are on may online music directories.--E tac 22:10, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
OK, I did vote, and I stand by the vote. The band's notability is not backed by verifiable sources, as is explained in detail by many of the other contributors to the AFD. That's all I have to say on the subject. You'll find that haranguing people and accusing them of bad faith is not the way to get them to agree with you. NawlinWiki 22:16, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
How do I go about putting images on a page that aren't free use? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alldaiallnite (talk • contribs) 00:56, 1 February 2007 (UTC).
No problem. Just a quick note to say that sources don't all have to be on the web. If there are newspaper/magazine articles, etc., that can be cited as well. WP:CITE/ES. Cricket02 14:29, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Theocracyalbum.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 09:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mort envision.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:18, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Robrockholyhellcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:23, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Narnialogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:49, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Jplogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:47, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Celladorindexlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:54, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Savatagelogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:54, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Majestic vanguard logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 14:00, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:XPantera logox.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 14:16, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Helloweenlogoxxx.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 14:39, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Skilletband.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 18:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Avianband.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 22:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
You have breached WP:3RR on St. Anger. However, I have not blocked you for violation but protected the article. Please discuss changes on the talk page of the articles, as it is more productive. Regards, — Nearly Headless Nick 14:32, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Either give proof that Kamelot is Prog Metal ot stop editing. And the link you post is not proof of anything Unless you can tell me how Nightwish is Prog Metal.
So stop editing them as Prog Metal when you have not proof.
Wow it's more like your point of view and why do I bring Nightwish into this. Because you keep listing Kamelot as Prog metal with nothing to back it up but prog metal sites most of which list other bands that have nothing nothing to do with Prog.
Two such sits are:
http://www.progarchives.com/Progressive_rock_discography_BAND.asp?band_id=1486 they list Nightwish as a Prog Metal band. So right away this site is wrong and is not reliable http://www.proggnosis.com/MUSIC_DBArtist.asp?txtArtistID=724 They are listing bands that don't even have anything to do with Prog metal. 99% of the bands listed on this site are not prog metal. Half them are Gothic metal bands. The other half are Power metal bands.
So I ask what songs are Prog Metal? What CD's etc etc etc. Where is your proof? Other then listing sites that are not reliable.
And a myspace site is not a reiable site.
http://www.metalstorm.ee/bands/band.php?band_id=136&bandname=Kamelot that is a reliable site.
But if you really most keep this up then this is the only way I will accpet the change:
Kamelot is a melodic power metal band with some progressive metal elements from Tampa, Florida, founded by Thomas Youngblood and Richard Warner in 1991 truemetalfan
And as for not listening to Nightwish you sure felt the need to go and edit that they were Prog Metal for some odd reason.
Wow there is just no point in doing this with you any more. You just don't care you are so blind and don't care what any one else has to say. You still have yet to point out where they are Prog Metal by the way. And I guess you never will.
I'm done here. truemetalfan Oh and by the way if you can't go into my discussion area to leave a topic then please stop. I don't leave messages on your frotn page.
Hah this is funny you accuse me of not being able to point something out and when I do you say its not reliable even though you completely contradict yourself.--E tac 11:59, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I know we had a fair dispute recently (over Eternal Decision, if you don't remember) and I have just come to make amends. I know that you aren't a bad faith editor, and thanks to your work on the article, it is now a good one. If I was offensive in any way, then I really do apologise, I understand that you were creating (and editing) this article purely to try and improve the encyclopedia, and had no hidden agenda with it. I wish you the best of luck with future articles. Happy editing! J Milburn 19:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
I've changed the naming of the band's style by adding "with progressive metal elements" to make everyone happy. I also added a small section about "upcoming music videos", since the band officialy announced that the shooting of the video for Ghost Opera is done. No words on the album's name though.
That's okay, sorry as well, I was a bit hasty. The edit histories were both in the same minute. Only realised that after checking. --Dane ~nya 11:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
If you liked Becoming The Archetype, I recommend checking out The Red Chord's newest release, Clients, on Metal Blade Records. --hXc ryan-- 18:52, 7 February 2007 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hxc ryan (talk • contribs) 18:52, 7 February 2007 (UTC).
Thanks for uploading Image:Puffyjeffdubay.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 23:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Just so you know, the redirect does not need to be deleted before you write the article. Just. Write the article. :) --WoohookittyWoohoo! 11:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Theocracyband.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 23:03, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
What's up E tac, I'm the guy who you argued with on the Eternal Decision deletion debate. So you might find it funny that I'm asking you this, but I'm looking for your help on the only band article I've ever created, Heavy Trash (remember we discussed it in the aforementioned debate). Everything I said to you aside, I've paid attention to the Eternal Decision article and it's become very solid. And the amount of band articles you've created is, to say the least, impressive. So, if you can help me expand this, in any way, that would be much appreciated. Doesn't seem like your type of music, but maybe check the internet or help me with some format, my wikipedia article-creation skills are weak. I'm looking for basic stuff like how to upload images that are okay to use, I've never done that. No problem if you pass on this, but, again, your help would be appreciated. No time frame. Later, --Tractorkingsfan 06:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Heavy trash.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:06, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mortlogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 14:45, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mortlogo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 14:45, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Logo green mort.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 14:45, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:L 2b396baea01e05bb9f7728a956e0ac61.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 21:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I don't why you removed a photo from the Homophobia article with this edit: . The photo is free from copyright and was originally from the website of the church in question, which is apparently proud of its anti-gay activism. Could you explain your reasoning (it might have been helpful if you'd used an edit summary). Thanks, WjBscribe 09:25, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello WikiProject Metal member.
WikiProject Metal music is important in expanding encyclopedic coverage of the metal. It brings attention to the lesser-known bands, and significantly improves the quality of the famous ones. Five Featured articles and two formers is proof of that.
This is the stuff I wish to achieve with the somewhat recently resurrected WikiProject Rock music. I hope to also attract attention to rock music articles of all sorts, and hopefully change some to GA or FA status. I invite you to come join us, and embrace the links between metal and rock music in general.
Rock on.
-- Reaper X 04:50, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Theocracy (band). The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 06:01, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
I've nominated Theocracy (band), an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Theocracy (band) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theocracy (band) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Theocracy (band) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 06:03, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Rather than clog up the AfD page any more! To be fair to Moeron he has said he'll get a photo-experienced admin to look at your theocracy.jpg picture. The problem is that even if the band has said you can use a picture posted on a forum, it may well still be the copyright of the original photographer. Perhaps you could ask on the forum again to make sure the photographer is OK with its use? As regards the AfD itself, WP:MUSIC unfortunately does stack itself again "less popular" sub-genres sometimes precisely because they don't get the exposure that more "mainstream" music does. As regards that I agree that the guidelines can seem overly harsh sometimes - all I can suggest is to pack as much reference into your article as you can, and have a look here especially at items 3 and 6. EliminatorJR 09:29, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Hey E tac! I just wanted to thank you and introduce myself. I'm chrisw357 and I wrote the original entry that got deleted. Now, imagine my surprise when I do a kicks-and-grins search on bands I like and I see your entry. You succeeded where I failed (It just wasn't the right time for that article) and I thank you immensely. I'm glad you cleared up the air about your identity in relation to my blog, as I don't want anyone's deeds to be mistaken for my mistakes... LOL.
Whatever I can do to help in keeping the article alive in Wikipedia, just name it. I support you 110%! Besides... you have the almost exact same taste in music as I do, with that list of bands on your user page being 90% of what I listen to!
Sincerely,
Christopher —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.251.254.161 (talk) 00:33, 24 February 2007 (UTC).
Sorry about the lack of WP etiquette... I forgot I had to sign in for proper editing!
Chrisw357 02:58, 24 February 2007 (UTC)Chrisw357
It took me way too long to say that, I just forgot. But your help with the photo and advice on the Heavy Trash article is much appreciated. Take it easy, --Tractorkingsfan 09:37, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Would you like to join Conservapedia as a editor? Conservapedia is looking for good editors and Admins. Please send me your email if you want to join Conservapedia. If you feel reticient about giving out your email address you can simply create a new account at hotmail and yahoo so you don't risk getting a lot of junk mail. Regional123 01:33, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Regional123
Hello! If you are receiving this message, that means that your user page is in a specific year category. Per a recent user-category per deletion, all specific year categories are to be deleted. If you wish to continue using year categories, you have two options:
If you wish, you may do both. Hopefully, this change in categorization will be quick and painless. Happy editing! --An automated message from MessedRobot 13:12, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Theocracyband.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:36, 13 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Martinp23 18:36, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Well, the above article had been up for five days and only had three entries. Anyway, I've copied the content to your userspace at User:E tac/List of Christian Music Videos. Feel free to repost when you've populated the list a little more. NawlinWiki 20:37, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi E tac. I've deleted the Theocracy image yet again, as the ownership *remains* unvierifiable, and we have no real statement of free licensing. Please read Image talk:Theocracyband.jpg, and I must warn that if the image is reuploaded without the appropiate permission having been forwarded to me by email (or to permissions at wikimedia dot org, who will be able to undelete the image when permission is granted), I will be forced to block you for a short time as a result of your blatant disregard for policy. Martinp23 20:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Theocracybandname.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:54, 17 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Martinp23 16:54, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Theocracybandname.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Martinp23 16:54, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Vengeance Rising logo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Martinp23 17:12, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi - could you please take a quick look through your upload log and fix the licensing problems with most of the images in there. I've pointed out a couple of problems by use of warnings above, but rather than fill your talk page up with them, 'd appreciate if you'd take a look and fill in the various required details. Please bear in mind that these aren't just Wikipedia polices which you need to comply to - they are the copyright laws (of the US). Martinp23 17:14, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent tagging of images, such as Image:Moegroup.jpg. This worked out good since I was able to find an image Image:Moeband.JPG, that does not violate WP:FU and that a photographer has given up for the public domain. Keep it up! -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 19:10, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Dragonforceband03.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 19:45, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Tourniquetbandpic.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 02:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Audiovision band.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 02:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
You have recently uploaded several album covers for the WOW Hits series to go with their album articles. The images are certainly appreciated, but if you could, please provide fair use rationales for these images. Thanks! -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 02:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Justin Morneau2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:43, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Justin-morneau-ttrookie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:44, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.