User talk:Denisarona/Archive 1

Sorry not familiar with talk pages but I'd like to know why you reverted my change to the page as 'vandalism'? Isn't a link to what freestone actually is helpful and informative within the context of this article? 91.143.78.44 (talk) 14:16, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! :)) --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 08:12, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

OOO! Now I see. My bad. Lovely song though, innit? Ratibgreat (talk) 16:24, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

There was no need for the message - I was trying to revert at same time as User:Xionbox - and have apologised direct to him. Denisarona (talk) 13:55, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

You know, I looked at your edit again and again and just couldn't figure that you would have made that particular edit. I should have just posted a personal message asking you about it, rather than slap the template on you. No worries, I removed the warning. Sorry! Wikipelli ^Talk 14:03, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks - no problems. Denisarona (talk) 14:04, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Dear Denisarona,

I got the message as well. Thanks for notifying me and don't worry about it. ;-)

Xionbox^₪ 14:08, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

The IPs that have been making strange edits to the See also sections of fighter aircraft pages appear to be the same person, despite that they come from different IPs. Geolocate shows that they have the same ISP and location. Should a WP:SPI be filed? -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 12:48, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

I agree that something needs to be done and possibly blocking them may solve the problem. If you have time to file a report I have no objection - vandalism annoys me!! Denisarona (talk) 13:16, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

We'll see if they come back again. Once they've made 4 reverts using any of their IPs on the one page we can file a WP:3RR violation which almost always results in a ban; SPI is too slow to have any significant impact, as it takes a matter of days to progress an investigation. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 16:12, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

You have been undoing a lot of vandalism lately, which is great. I realized that it might be hard to revert vandalism using the undo button. If you would like to easily revert vandalism in a single click, you might want to request Rollback rights. You can quickly request them by clicking here, but I recommend you read this page first. Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) ^{T or M}/_{Sign mine} 15:58, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

I agree with Crazymonkey1123: your anti-vandalism work is great, and you would find rollback rights very useful. I'll grant them to you if you'd like them. Acalamari 16:05, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

You would also get access to Igloo, a powerful anti-vandalism script that requires Rollback rights in order for it to be used by a user. You can click on the Igloo link, which will take you to a page that shows you how to install and use it. You need Rollback rights first before you can use it though! Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) ^{T or M}/_{Sign mine} 16:17, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Rollback granted: just remember that it should be used for reverting blatant vandalism/spam, and that using it to revert anything is considered inappropriate use of rollback. Wikipedia:New admin school/Deleting/delete is a place to practice if you wish to test the tool first. Have fun! Acalamari 16:45, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Nice job in using rollback! I just have one suggestion for you: you could type {{subst:template:Uw-unsourced1}} (without the template word) ~~~~ when you want to let new users know that they added unsourced or improperly cited material, which would have made it easier to warn 2.50.44.134. Keep up the good work! Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) ^{T or M}/_{Sign mine} 16:52, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

I don't understand this. The infobox parameters are formatted correctly, the photo is located on Commons, yet it doesn't display in the article. Do you have any idea why is that? - Darwinek (talk) 08:28, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sure, but it's possible that the "name.jpg" is incorrect - you used 'Ospedaletti_panorama.jpg' - is this the correct caption? My technical knowledge of images is almost non-existant!. Regards Denisarona (talk) 10:11, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Have again corrected the Tall Dwarfs page - their first release WAS on Furtive Records (Propeller's sister label) in 1981 -, and was later re released by Flying Nun. For the sake of accuracy and to no further perpetuate the growing number of Flying Nun myths this correction should stand.

http://www.discogs.com/Tall-Dwarfs-Three-Songs/master/149658

is merely on reference and i can supply more -not to mention the actual copy that I have - but can supply more evidence.

Cheers Elscarface (talk) 02:29, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

The reference is correct, but if it had been quoted/shown when making the edits, then there would have been no need to revert "unsourced" edits. Denisarona (talk) 05:45, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

for the help on my talk page. Bentogoa (talk) 12:55, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Many thanks, Denisarona, for all you do on Wikipedia—especially keeping my user page vandalism free. Regards, Pinethicket (talk) 19:04, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Denisarona. You have new messages at JohnCD's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

... for cleaning up vandalism on my talk page. Cheers, Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:06, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

To be honest, I don't know off the top of my head either. I'll have a look, though - my rule in situations like that is to revert if anything smells fishy, legitimate or no. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 14:58, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

I left word over at User talk:Polylerus - he knows far more than I. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 15:08, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Sure thing - happy to be of help. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 15:55, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

I appreciate your enthusiasm but it really is me (check the IP if you really care). Can you leave my post as it was. Thanks Polargeo. 194.66.0.122 (talk) 15:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

This is not vandalism. The edits to create that was. ℥^nding·start 19:06, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

I did not say your edit was vandalism, I'm just telling you the blanking was not vandalism and that the content that the person blanked was. Sorry if I wasn't too clear on that. ℥^nding·start 05:20, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, guardian angel! Fleet Command (talk) 12:59, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Why do you keep deleting the Gym's section?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.32.247.172 (talk) 08:14, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

...For reverting a fan of mine. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 13:49, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Why did you automatically "undo" my edit and mark it as "minor"?

Would you care to read the talk page? Look at the edit history? Do a quick Google search on the article topic?

58.164.118.105 (talk) 04:30, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

I've responded on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 11:00, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

I asked another user to look at the Amanda Lindhout situation. And the IP has been warned not to engage in edit wars. Lets hope this is the end of that discussion.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Unfortunatly this are the kind of tactics some IP/users use to distract from their edits. I have asked for the article to be indefinitly protected for sometime so the situation can calm down. Perhaps you can make a comment to, as to why it should be protected so atleast not IPs can do edits on the article. Well, lets hope that particular situation is over with. Cheers.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:24, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Also just to mention it, I find it to be really inappropriate by the IP in question to label you as an "idiot" in his/hers edit summary on the IP talk page. Just because you simply dont agree with the IP in a matter.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:36, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Maybe you could start a discussion on the Amanda Lindhout talk page about reverting back to an earlier version of the article. Perhaps to your latest edit?. Would be easily fixed. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 10:25, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Sorry. I am not a registered with Wikipedia. And I do not know how to post properly. But I was a former student of that school and an archivist with the school too. The school does not maintain the page. It's maintained by students who overwhelmingly over exaggerated it and it's misleading other students. And they maintain topics which serve no purpose to people wanting to have a general view only. I am basically removing topics which have take up too much space in that particular page and as well as trimming it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.138.123.168 (talk) 13:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

I have responded on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 13:33, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi you added a very poor addition/BLP violation/reported defamation to this article - it was removed correctly and you added it again - please investigate more and take care what you add to articles - thanks - if you want to discuss there is a thread at the BLP noticeboard - Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Vic_Mignogna - Off2riorob (talk)

I've responded on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 06:07, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

But in 1031 Caliphate of Cordoba finish, How is possible in 1040 Caliphate of Cordoba was a country??87.217.106.39 (talk) 13:25, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Then Caliphate of Cordoba crash 1009-1031 formed a lot of countries (taifas)

Banu Ghaniya was a almoravid rulers of Mallorca, but when almohad invasion they flight to them

Maps:

http://www.euratlas.net/history/europe/1100/index.html Here Almoravid map in 1100, in this time Balearic was a independent taifa, later part of Almoravid Empire
http://www.euratlas.net/history/europe/1200/index.html, Here Almohad map in 1200, Banu Ghaniya ruler in Mallorca an some parts of Algeria and Lybia to try reconquest Almoravid Empire, and you can see a litle country (taifa of Albarracín). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.217.106.39 (talk) 13:35, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

I've responded on your talk page. See message about using the article's talk page. Denisarona (talk) 13:43, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Remind

I was just reverting trashy fake animals that don't appear in those games. You did not need to revert them. And I wonder why they put Scillian in the Dwarf elephant's name in Zoo Tycoon 2. That was also true. Don't revert my edits again. And you must type in a summary when editing also. 58.110.247.14 (talk) 08:18, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Read your talk page! Denisarona (talk) 08:39, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

What are you talking about? 58.110.247.14 (talk) 09:55, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Stop making your vandalism.--87.17.227.198 (talk) 14:26, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

I've responded on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 14:33, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Why did you threaten to block me over cited edits of the incorrect "Purgatoire River" page? The changes used citations from a college and a newspaper in the area of the Purgatory River, reflecting the correct name of the river. That name is also shown in the USGS link on the page as the first of the two official USGS alternate names, and it's also the name reflected on all maps of the area and in every verbal reference in the area. There was absolutely no vandalism of the page involved; I was attempting to correct it, not disrupt it. 50.102.250.142 (talk) 20:17, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

I've responded on your talk page. I didn't threaten you - just asked 3 times for you to provide reliable sources for your edits. Denisarona (talk) 20:20, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Were the college and the newspaper I cited unreliable? That's what confused me about the harsh tone of the third note (I saw the first two after you reverted the second edit). 50.102.250.142 (talk) 20:22, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Check the article again - he is a cousin on his mother's side: a maternal relative.Denisarona (talk) 05:52, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

HI there. I received a message saying that I had edited some pages about the Don Valley Parkway. This is impossible as I have not been at work for three weeks this month, and didn't go on this to look at that page. Just wanted to let you know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.92.126.10 (talk) 17:12, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

According to the History Log of Don Valley Parkway you made an edit at 16:59 UTC today and this is the edit I reverted. Denisarona (talk) 17:38, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I received a message from you on my edits to the National University of Singapore page. I am not sure if this is the right channel to reach out to you so do let me know otherwise. But I need to understand why my edits were reverted. They were done to update information on the page as well as to correct some misinformation. All edits were done based on the content on the official website of National University of Singapore. Please let me know how I can edit the page again to avoid further reverts as I am new to Wikipedia editing. Thanks. Ocrbsk (talk) 09:51, 2 September 2011 (UTC)Ocrbsk

I have responded on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 10:04, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello Denisarona! I hope you enjoy this cookie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 06:18, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

hey thanks for reverting my edit, it was by mistake actually and i didn't even pay attention to it. I was just adding a picture which i will re-add right now. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A.K.Khalifeh (talk • contribs) 13:46, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to INFINITE MLM SOFTWARE: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Alex^{discussion ★} 09:19, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

I left a message on your talk page - I don't really understand what your point is. Denisarona (talk) 09:33, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

after your warnings the Vandal account Bilalsafdar1 has been blocked. dBigXray 21:30, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

I would also like to bring to your notice the Page Kashmir Conflict the user Mustihussain has already done many vandalistic changes on the article that had been noticed and reverted by other editors in past. User Mustihussain keeps editing the content and presents not a neutral viewpoint to the issue but a viewpoint biased with Pakistan.I tried to revert back to the last neutral version by Wikireadr41 but he has edited it again. I am not reverting his changes any more as i feel that if i do it again he will revert it back . Hence I am bringing it to your notice. Kindly look into the matter and revert back the vandalistic changes by Mustihussain , with possible warning (if applicable). Thanks dBigXray 21:39, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

is this a canvas-attempt? your allegations are completely nonsensical. my edits have infinitely improved the "pakistan administrated kashmir"-chapter by removing brazen examples of wp:or, especially concerning gilgit-baltistan. i have brutally complied to wp:npov. absolutely no-one has complained except for you. why don't you tell denisarona the truth about your stupidities on the discussion page ? it's clear that you're not interested in improving the article as demonstrated by your deletions of sourced content. my advice to denisarona is to read the "pakistan administrated kashmir"-chapter and the sources used . the blatant lies of dbigxray will become obvious... "vandalistic changes"? "pakistan biased"? my foot!-- mustihussain (talk) 22:19, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Mustihussain First please do not forget that these discussions must occur at talk page of article not on Denisarona's page. Moreover What makes You Mustihussain think that you your editings have a wp:npov when in reality you continue removing many lines related to human rights abuses by Pakistan in Pakistan Administered Kashmir, a difference between your version and the unbiased version by Wikireader41 clearly proves this. Its evident that for a Biased wp:pov like yours they are needless. Please do not remove precious unbiased contributions by other users. dBigXray 08:27, 17 September 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deepeshraj1 (talk • contribs)

are you blind or something? read the section and you'll see that it mentions human rights abuses in kashmir. the topic covers almost the whole section! in addition, the section now complies with wp:nor and wp:npov. the older, unimproved version was not "unbiased" at all. what a joke..-- mustihussain (talk) 08:30, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

How is this an A7? ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 06:10, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

I've responded on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 06:24, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your attention, let's rejoice in well editing, and sorry for disturbing with bad notification. Alex^{discussion ★} 18:32, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Roland Dyens was only born in Tunisia, and he only has French citizenship: http://www.classicsonline.com/composerbio/Roland_Dyens_22835/ http://www.trueknowledge.com/q/what_is_the_nationality_of_roland_dyens — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.51.92.161 (talk) 08:30, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

I've responded on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 08:41, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

In his biography in his official website it is written "Born on October 19, 1955, French interpreter, composer, arranger and improviser Roland Dyens began guitar studies at the age of nine." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.51.92.161 (talk) 09:36, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

"Please go to talk page and state reasons for using a non-officail language . IF YOU CAN PROVE THIS IS AN OFFICIAL LANGUAGE PLEASE DO (http://www.gov.ie/)" Do not use languages that are not officail state languages , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IMOS#Place_names "For articles on places on the island of Ireland, show the modern name in English, Irish and, if appropriate, Scots in the infobox if the article has one." If appropriate , considering that its NOT an official language of the State , its NOT appropriate , if you can prove the Ulster Scots is an officail language include it , but only Irish and English are so stop using it .

Denisarona, you have reverted a recent edit - I planned to move a couple of paragraphs I have previously contributed to a more relevant section in the article on Algeria because I felt I was perhaps repeating what had already been said. As such, it was constructive but I accept I should have given a better explanation. However, you appear to have reverted it back several versions somehow because additions near the beginning of the article I did earlier today have disapeared as well. In my opinion this is very un-constructive as it has removed useful information about his early life--Godwhale (talk) 14:19, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

All ok again, thanks. I will tidy it up from here, thanksGodwhale (talk) 14:55, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Sophus Bie has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

I noticed the vandalism patrol that you were doing this evening, and I just wanted to say well done! Sophus Bie ^(talk) 09:24, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome! Sophus Bie ^(talk) 04:02, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. They did more damage as 58.173.108.97, and then as 58.173.109.51, and I have now blocked them - this amount of damage while ignoring talk is simply unacceptable. If you notice any similar pattern of edits from other 58.173.* addresses (or anywhere else in the same TELSTRAINTERNET42-AU netblock), please feel free to ping me again. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 15:36, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Denisarona, I hope this is the way to send you message! Today I have made some changes on the topic of religion of the Romani people in Bulgaria. I found it necessary, as the statement that majority of the Romani people in Bulgaria are Muslims is completely false. Even the supporting reference of this statement (reference number 132), which is available on internet, says "In northwestern Bulgaria as well as in Sofia and Kyustendil, Muslim Gypsies have dominated in numbers in the past, but in the independent Bulgarian state most of them have converted to Eastern Orthodox Christianity. They have also preserved their Roma identity and their internal group division into e.g. Erlii, Kalajdžii etc. In most cases, they lost their century-old designation of Xoraxane Roma (i.e. “Turkish Roma”, in the sense of Muslims). In southwestern Bulgaria (Pirin Macedonia) some of the Xoraxane Roma have preserved their Roma identity. A smaller fraction prefers to declare themselves as “Turks”, although not very emphatically, mixing ethnicity with the professed religion (Islam). ". So even the supporting reference claims that the majority of the cited Romani populations are Eastern Orthodox Christians (Bulgaria have been independent since 1908). Another issues is the fact that this reference 132 is entitled: "Roma Muslims in the Balkans". As far as it is the sole reference on that topic and one could not expect to cover all the religious believes of the Romani people in Bulgaria, it makes it inappropriate as a source of information about Romani religion in general (outside Islam). As you could prove by yourself, the topic of the inaccuracy of that article on the Religion of Romani people, have been mentioned already in the talk on the Romani people article by several different Wikipedia users from several different countries. Thank you! 210.137.74.131 (talk) 07:44, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Please see my post regarding the picture of King Abdullah in the discussion page of "Habbani Jews" article. Thank you. (Rider In The Storm (talk) 00:42, 26 September 2011 (UTC))

I've responded at the article's talk page. Denisarona (talk) 04:18, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

You left a message on my talk which is completely out of context there. I'll leave your third attempt, it can't get worse. To mention something (no matter what) on a talk watched by many (Materialscientist in this case) is the opposite of privacy, imho. I am not interested in the case itself. but in privacy, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:59, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

If you are interested in privacy contact User:Cncplayer who invaded MY privacy. Thanks Denisarona (talk) 13:55, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Hey, on the off-chance that you're not an idiot, please carefully consider these two alternatives:

Posttraumatic stress disorder (also known as post-traumatic stress disorder or PTSD)

vs.

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)

A hyphenated variant (posttraumatic vs. post-traumatic) does not constitute an alternative spelling. Including it adds absolutely nothing to the introduction and only clutters the first sentence, which should be optimized for readability. --213.196.213.195 (talk) 19:40, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi, yes, I noticed the editing blitz. I am not sure if everything is correct and, frankly, I am not the one who should provide the sources. I always had my doubts about this list, although I did edit it in the past. I have placed a tag asking for more sources and also posted my doubts a the Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#List_of_Sicilian_Mafiosi_by_city. - DonCalo (talk) 16:50, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello,

The Israel on campus coalition page is out of date.

Please allow us (staff) to update it.

thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.208.13.249 (talk) 15:09, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

The above user has been warned for COI, as well as failing to cite sources. Calabe1992 (talk) 15:16, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry but I just did the right thing, Belén Estevez is just a dancer, not a TV host or an actress.--190.43.128.126 (talk) 04:44, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

See my response on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 13:20, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

I have (somewhat belatedly, I confess) replied to your query on my talk page, at User talk:JamesBWatson#Warnings & Templates. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:16, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Erm, well I thought I had. This time I really have done it. Sorry. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:27, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

The trouble with posting those tests here is that it could mislead other editors, who may see them here and think they are genuine messages to you. I suggest starting a separate page, such as User:Denisarona/Sandbox, for the purpose. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:43, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 19:45, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the beer. I will enjoy drinking it. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:38, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi Denisarona. I see that, not long ago, you posted a warning on the talk page of User talk:Webmaster1967 for inappropriate editing at International Churches of Christ. Could you take a look at that page again and see if the current editing patterns are similar to the earlier problematic ones. I also wonder if the new editor User:JamieBrown2011 might be a puppet, but I don't have any experience with addressing such things. Thanks, --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 00:25, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

See my message on your talk page. Matter referred to User:Edgar181 who was involed in blocking Webmaster1967 earlier in October.. Denisarona (talk) 08:44, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

please send the same message to user secret of success who is vandalizing other articles and glorifying your favorite tamil cinema article I am trying to improve Tamil cinema article by correcting original research but you are trying to glorify it I am correcting your point of view from original research and your doing POV edits (Indian cinema admirer (talk) 07:55, 26 October 2011 (UTC)).

If you are 'correcting' an article, you must provide sources & references to back-up your edits, not just your opinion. Denisarona (talk) 07:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove changes and additions to articles that replace inaccurate statements with true ones. While you are technically correct about citing sources, your deletion of revisions perpetuated inaccuracies in the story about Carlie Christensen. Perhaps it would be better to request citations rather than rashly erasing appropriate updates68.46.70.19 (talk) 05:44, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

See my response on your talk page and check out Wikipedia:Citing sources. Denisarona (talk) 09:50, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed you reverted something on Indianapolis Motor Speedway. Why did you revert it. The information there is, as the ip stated, pointless. Did you even look at what was removed before you reverted? Regards, Mythical Curse (talk) 18:45, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

See my response on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 10:38, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

What was my offensive comment? and another race has also been confirmed in New Jersey. Surely that makes the comment on the IMS page not valid that there's unlikely to be another US Grand Prix when another one has already been confirmed. Mythical Curse (talk) 11:37, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Oh good, now I can reverse the offensive comment. Did you even read the information on Indianapolis Motor Speedway? The information stated that there wouldn't be a Formula One race at IMS until at least 2021. It didn't say there wouldn't be another Formula One race in the US. Denisarona (talk) 11:59, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

The page you reverted Peter Holmes à Court after it was vandalised by several IP vandals has been reverted back to the last vandal edit. Everton Dasent (talk) 07:52, 31 October 2011 (UTC) Saw your reversions. This guy looks like a spammer with some sort of axe to grind. Everton Dasent (talk) 08:02, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

User secret of success is removing crucial info in the article, please have an eye on him

This article requires crucial information. I have not included any trivial info. these are constructive edits from me linguistics had amajor influence in telugu films??? has no meaning, info about lyricists can be included. Constructive edits must be retained

(Ramajogayyasastry (talk) 10:46, 31 October 2011 (UTC)).

		The Purple Star
		For all your work fighting bad faith editors despite being personally attacked by them. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 07:32, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks a million! Denisarona (talk) 08:35, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Why do not you add accurate information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdullin ilyas (talk • contribs) 10:26, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

I didn't add any information - I simply replaced information you deleted without giving verification or a source for the deletion. Denisarona (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Fine!! Just delete my article about Advent Bangun!!! sorry... E.t.believer777 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:17, 5 December 2011 (UTC).

You just reverted one or two of my recent edits. It could be that it wasn't clear what I'm doing, and it looked frivolous, or perhaps like vandalism. Since I've lately done a lot of similar edits (and anticipate doing many more), let me explain.

I'm working through a couple of hundred articles on species of snail in the genus Vexillum. That genus belongs to the family Costellariidae.

There is a category page for that family Costellariidae. And most of the genera do not have their own category pages, so many species in that family go properly on that category page.

But there IS a category page for the genus Vexillum. And it's listed as a subcategory within the family. But I found that roughly 50 articles on species of Vexillum were listed on the category page for Vexillum. The rest--probably a couple of hundred--were listed on the page for the family Costellariidae.

It's my understanding--and it certainly makes sense--that Wikipedia prefers things to be listed under the most specific category that applies to them. At the very least, they should all be done the same way (and if they're all listed under family, then there's no point in a category page for the genus).

I know of no other way to change these things than to go through one by one and change the coding for the category. If your objection is THE WAY I CODED for the category Vexillum, it determines how they're alphabetized on that page--and the way I'm doing it is consistent with absolutely everything that was already there before I began. 140.147.236.195 (talk) 15:57, 9 December 2011 (UTC)Stephen Kosciesza

I too was wondering why you reverted the edits of this IP. He was certainly doing a good job. It is an arduous task to categorize so many articles about gastropods. JoJan (talk) 16:06, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Stephen, see my response on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 18:29, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Why did you revert these edits? They look legit to me. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Batavia_High_School_%28Batavia,_Ohio%29&action=history

They are unsourced. Denisarona (talk) 07:52, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Maybe we can give this new editor a few minutes to complete his changes. It looks like he is trying to add references as fast as you delete them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peboki (talk • contribs) 07:53, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

I am sure you are aware that your little friend deleted a new entry from my talk page, yes? While my reaction was equally wrong and vindictive, I do so hope Benlisquare receives the warning he deserves, just as I have, being that my reaction does not somehow vindicate his act of deleting an entry from another user's talk page (a practice that is frowned upon is it not?). However, I am used to doublestandards here at Wikipedia, so I will not be surprised in the least if he is allowed to slide on this. Jersey John (talk) 07:58, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Your comments don't deserve a response, your offensive attack on another user (who I don't know) did deserve the response it got. Denisarona (talk) 11:57, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

How is it "vandalism" to include the name of the new 2nd ID Commanding General, which is public knowledge? By the way, I am an ranking offical at Camp Casey. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.59.12.226 (talk) 04:21, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

You could be Kim Jong-un for all I know - you vandalized the Camp Casey, South Korea article at 04:26 on 14 September 2011 and I reverted your edit one week later. Denisarona (talk) 13:07, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello. I have just undid another unconstructive and inappropriate edit by the person whose IP address is above. This editor made an unconstructive edit by placing the previous Epic Records logo on the Tetragrammaton Records article. I have already undid the edit and left them a note about it on his talk page. I just thought that I would let you know since you also have left him a note on his talk page about previous unconstructive edits that they made. Again, I just thought that I would let you know. Frschoonover (talk) 00:46, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

I would like to ask you something out of curiosity. You left me a small note in your message to me on my talk page. I would like to know what "Auguri di buon anno nuovo" means. I am not an expert on foreign languages and that is why I ask you this. You can answer on my talk page.

Thanks for any answers. Frschoonover (talk) 03:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

I left you another message on my talk page. Frschoonover (talk) 01:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Why did you revert the referenced edits to the above article by 109.78.200.151? Hohenloh⁺ 18:56, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Because the edits read that she died on 9 FEBRUARY 2012! This is January. Denisarona (talk) 13:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

I've semi-protected your userpage for a few weeks as it appears that you are undergoing a spate of IP harassment. Please let me know if you would like me to lift the protection at any time. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 16:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

I have rev-deleted the last two pieces of vandalism - would you like me to semi-protect the page? JohnCD (talk) 16:10, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Ignore the above - I see Ponyo's already done it. JohnCD (talk) 16:10, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Dear Denisarona, I am here to ask for your advice, and help. I am a frequent contributor of wikipedia, and recently i have been reverting and undoing a lot of edits on the page of Tiger versus lion. Not much of edits, just reverting, because recently there are some new users, two in particular who are creating a little bit of "disturbance" to that page. That page is fairly new(in terms of numbers of edits) and definitely requires much more information and assistance from established users. However these 2 users, User talk:Alchemist51 and User talk: Alex gnpi, have been editing the page, adding materials without citations onto the page. In fact, one of them actually added a paragraph using a Youtube video as evidence. And the other, simply keeps copying and pasting materials which have been erased(due to lack of citations) back to the page. I have tried asking for semi page protection, which has been approved, but both of them are apparently "established" users and they can continue editing the page.

I tried reverting the page back to the stable version, but within hours they are edited again, its almost like an editing war. Whenever i revert the page, i explain the reasons for the edit, while these users simply edit the article. Hence i am here right now, writing this to you, asking for your assistance in what i should do. I do not want to continue this "edit war" as i find it pointless, so is there a way to stop them from editing this page for a while? This has been occurring for almost a full week, that is what i came here to raise my concern.

I hope you understand where i am coming from. Cheers.

Brazilian Tiger (talk) 15:49, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

His edit to Nicene Creed, removing the link to mb-soft, was valid, in my opinion. He removed nothing of substance from the article, just ancient variations on the wording of "there was a time when he was not" (such as "there was a time before", "there was a time before he was", etc.), not the statement itself: the article didn't really need every variation of statement used by the Arians either; it's not like he removed "homoiousious" from a list of "homouosious" (same substance) "homoios" (alike) and "homoiousios" (similar substance), which were major words, extensively fought over, to win orthodoxy (homoousious), over and against the Arians (homoios), and the compromisers and semi-Arians (homoiousios). St John Chrysostom ^view/_my bias 18:06, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm still thinking about it. A lot of his removals of refs are unjustified, and some leave the article unreferenced, just because the ref is a tertiary source. Assume good faith, but this guy is doing nothing but deleting refs, adding nothing, doing no other function, and his talk page is full of warnings for vandalism. St John Chrysostom ^view/_my bias 18:30, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

That's why I was a bit worried - he's using the same reason for deleting references in almost all his edits. Denisarona (talk) 18:36, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

mb-soft.com is not a reliable source. There are plenty of other reliable sources out there. We don't need to have it in place as linkspam. It's not about it being a "tertiary source". It's about it being hosted by a private website and essentially being the opinions of an individual. Even where primary source documents are ostensibly being hosted, there is no guarantee that the owner of the website isn't altering the documents. Reference the original document, by all means, but please do not restore mb-soft.com citations as they ruin the respectability of the sourcing in Wikipedia's articles. 69.86.225.27 (talk) 02:31, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Dear Denisarona I should probably have left notes in the edits that we are doing today and tomorrow on certain Wikipedea pages, but did not feel it was necassary at the time - I am the editor of HistoricalFoods.com where a lot of references on wikipedea food pages point to - the site has moved name and domain to RecipeWISE.co.uk so all of the old links on wikipedia pointing to historicalfoods.com are now dead, the exact same recipe or article can be found on our new named website recipewise.co.uk ... by altering all the names accross today and tomorrow we are attempting to clean up all the dead links - but you keep changing them back ... ??? so either they need to be removed or changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.168.160.136 (talk) 13:22, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

If you had stated why the edits were being made then they wouldn't have been reverted. Check out Edit summary for further guidance. Denisarona (talk) 13:26, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Like I said, not a noob, didn't think it was necassary as the pages are all quite niche and not particularly contentious with editors. We don't put the links here, we are just helping people out by changing the link to point to the correct address, (they seem quite popular as the links show up in our analytics) while changing nothing else on the page ... but yes, I could have added something into the pages talk - thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.168.160.136 (talk) 13:30, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

thanks Denisaroa - we were 301 ing the new links accross but the site has now been pulled offline so the new site needs the new links put into wikipedea to be updated, we will be doing about twenty page changes (just the links). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.168.160.136 (talk) 13:36, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi Denisarona. I saw one of your edits in Methodism and I assumed you could help. I'm quite concerned about a lot of revisions happening in Methodism particularly that part of History of methodism in the Philippines. Edits contained vandalism and inappropriate language and citing some insults, in the other group. If my opinion counts, that would be a kind of discrimination. Isn't it? Are allowing it in Wikipedia? Thanks. Christian Eilers (talk) 12:59, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

I've responded in detail on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 08:17, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Mr Person, I was not adding incorrect information or vandalizing the article, I was adding a reference to a ship that appears in Halo: First Strike, which is named Trafalgar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.2.98 (talk) 07:02, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

I've responded on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 07:07, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

I see things listed in disambiguation that don't have wikipedia articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.2.98 (talk) 07:09, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Be a dear and take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halcyon. It also has a non-article pertaining to Halo listed in the disambiguation page, yet I don't see that get reverted every 10 seconds. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.2.98 (talk) 07:19, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

See message on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

theres no proof that the mahdi army is allied with the iranian army

its all allegations — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.148.5.228 (talk) 07:49, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

See my response on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 07:56, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

i didnt say iraqi special forces i said special groups

search special groups (iraq) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.148.5.228 (talk) 07:59, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Special Groups (SGs) is a designation given by the US military to the cell-based Shi'a insurgent groups operating within Iraq, backed by Iran. These groups are allegedly funded, trained, and armed by the Iranian Quds Force. According to American General Kevin J. Bergner, the Special Groups receive between 750,000 and 3,000,000 dollars funding per month, from the Quds Force.^[1] These groups are separate from although possibly connected with the Jaish al Mahdi or Mahdi Army, of Muqtada al-Sadr. A distinction between these groups and the Mahdi Army has been maintained more clearly since al-Sadr called for a ceasefire at the end of August 2007 following Mahdi Army clashes with Iraqi Security Forces in Karbala, Iraq but the Special Groups continued fighting. After the disbanding of the Mahdi Army in 2008 its successor was announced as a group called the Brigade of Promised Day; however the largest special group which emerged after the Iraq spring fighting of 2008 was a group called the Asa'ib Ahl al-Haq or Qazali Network. Another large special group is Kata'ib Hezbollah (or Hezbollah Brigades) which started to operate independently from the Mahdi Army and the other Special Groups. Suspected leaders include Qais al-Khazali, Laith al-Khazali, Ali al-Lami, Azhar al Dulaimi, Akram al-Kabi, Abu Mustafa al-Sheibani, Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis and Abu Deraa.

Hi there

You deleted something I wrote about Dean Koontz. I've first noticed it now. Had to make a profile to be able to communicate with ya. English is my second language so sorry upfront if my grammar is off. Now! What did you delete? What did you find to be "incorrect"? You claimed that what I added was incorrect so I would love to know what you deleted and why - since you did it without asking me about correctness and/or checking it online I bet. So let's get a little dialog about this.

I am returning, slowly, after a long illness. Denisarona (talk) 13:41, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

I'm glad you're back, Denisarona; I hope you're feeling better now. :) Acalamari 22:38, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello you reverted my change to Bangor, Gwynedd because a category did not exist. According to the time stamp, you did this exactly at the same time as I pressed save to create the category. Please will you allow a bit more time, I could not have done it any quicker. Op47 (talk) 13:49, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Responded on editor's talk page. Denisarona (talk) 13:58, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your note about my changes to the Eton College page. Just FYI, I had only changed the location of a couple commas that were outside quotation marks (as a point of basic punctuation consistency) and had made no subject matter changes. --JacquesOLantern

As I mentioned, please read MOS:CONFORM. Denisarona (talk) 05:21, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Denisarona. I've noticed we might have gotten into a bit of a spat over the Norsefire wikipage. I just wanted to explain to you why I was making my edits. In regards to the deleted ref from the lede paragraph, unlike the other two it does not reference Norsefire's Nordic supremacy or Nordicism. In regards to the second lede paragraph, it's WP:UNDUE and unnecessary to list every single minority in the UK. In addition, the sentence also suggested that religious and ethnic minorities were political opponents of Norsefire, which they were not (just left-wingers, pretty much). Regards, 31.205.38.57 (talk) 15:29, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Got your message. The reason the edits were reversed was because there was no edit summary. Regards Denisarona (talk) 15:34, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:29, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Many thanks, much appreciated. Denisarona (talk) 04:41, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Dear Denisarona, you reverted my correction of the Albert Einstein residence in Caputh, back to Kaput, but that's the way it appears even in Google Maps. So why? Kaput, as you surely know has a completely different meaning in German. The place is called Caputh. Let's keep it right. --Ophirbaer (talk) 12:12, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Fixed link in the article. The previous link was to a disambiguation page. The article about Caputh also states that the town is also known as Kaputh. All ok now. Denisarona (talk) 12:27, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you!! Was starting to lose my patience and confidence with Wikipedia editors (because of others, not you). --Ophirbaer (talk) 12:39, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Oratory of San Leonardo and San Leonardo is the same building...--Alienautic (talk) 17:25, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

The information in the article was not correct - the Oratory of San Leonardo is not the main parish church in Borgomanero. Denisarona (talk) 17:35, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

I went with the earliest I found, but as long as it all the same I do not mind what it is. Red Jay (talk) 17:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi Denisarona, I understand the removal of my change to the Italian Language page, but I was just rewording the information that was already there to make it less ambiguous, hope that helps to potentially make it more correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BeauregardAs (talk • contribs) 03:08, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your response. The original was longer, but much clearer. Regards, Denisarona (talk) 11:14, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Denisarona, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021.
Happy editing,
JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 16:47, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Hello Denisarona, I wish you and your family a wonderful and healthy new year 2021. Hope we meet again next year on Wikipedia.. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 16:16, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Dear Denisarona, I'm writing you from Sarajevo (Bosnia & Herzegovina), in behalf TV O Kanal. I tried to edit page O Kanal on Wikipedia (english version), but you rejected it. We want have the same information about O Kanal, as Bosnian as English. It's reason of our editing today.

Please, let me do it.

Thank you in advance.

Best regards, Team O Kanal — Preceding unsigned comment added by O Kanal (talk • contribs) 15:07, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Your 6 deletion edits were reverted because there was no explanation or source. Regards Denisarona (talk) 16:14, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Denisarona! FYI, the first IP that has run amuck in Austronesian peoples has been blocked for disruptive editing, the second IP immidiately follows in the same path. I have asked for page protection now (I have done so before but is was declined beacuse it's a "content dispute"...). –Austronesier (talk) 13:59, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

I only made that edit that large-scale conversion to Islam happened in the 18th-19th centuries for the Yoruba people because I found a reference that makes it valid. That reference is www.instantlawblog.wordpress.com. Trust me, you will find it there. Abal126 (talk) 14:27, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

I noticed that you warned this IP as well, and I wanted to run by you the idea of reporting them (Contributions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/27.125.240.210). They have not reacted at all to two warnings from me and one warning from you, and they continue to make unsourced, poorly formatted, and incorrect edits. Do you have any those on this? Anwegmann (talk) 03:48, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Denisarona. I acknowledge the fact that you did sort the names of Rosogolla as it was. However, I would like to point out the fact that in general, the sweet is known as Rosogolla or Rasagola throughout. It is also true that Hindi speakers refer to this as Rasgulla. It is to be noted that although they enjoy Rosogolla much, it is not native to them. It is rather unfortunate that even the wiki page is titled Rasgulla whereas in general throughout Indian subcontinent, most people refer to the sweet as Rosogolla. I hope this clarifies my intention. Looking forward to your reply, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.220.209.142 (talk) 15:58, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Instead of changing the article, please open a discussion on the talk to have a consensus for a change of name of the article. Regards Denisarona (talk) 16:01, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion. Since I am new to wiki, I was unaware of this procedure. Any inconvenience caused by my edits is deeply regarded.

No problem. Denisarona (talk) 16:04, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

It seems you reverted a recent edit of mine solely because it was made under an IP address rather than a user name. It is my understanding that IP addresses are allowed to make edits and reverting them based on a person not using a user name is against Wikipedia policy, constitutes vandalism, is unfriendly, feels like bullying, and discourages new users. I appreciate your work on Wikipedia but ask you to be more conscientious in this regard. Thanks. User:68.239.27.30

I made the edit because I was correcting a grammar error, not because of your IP address. Denisarona (talk) 05:29, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

A [period ending a sentence belongs inside quotation remarks] and that's the only change I made. You reverted it incorrectly. User:68.239.27.30

Unless we are defaulting to UK usage because Sykes is English in which case an explanation of my error would have been an appreciated time saver. User:68.239.27.30

Please read WP:LQ. Thanks Denisarona (talk) 09:40, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Mind reviewing?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Michelle_Enrile

Six Feet Apart Or Six Feet Under, Your Choice (talk) 09:26, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

The article is currently under review. As I know nothing about the subject, I cannot help. Regards, Denisarona (talk) 09:55, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

I just wanted to thank you for protecting the Kwasizabantu page from vandalism. Previously I made some changes to it to correct problems but was warned about a conflict of interest. I am so thankful that I don't have to do it and that other people are looking out for it. Thank you for making Wikipedia a better place. I'm not an experienced editor. When I have a little more time on my hands I wouldn't mind getting more involved with Wikipedia.Potolozi (talk) 06:56, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Denisarona, he made the statement today on LBC radio, Yahoo and others confirm about the amount ie he states 120 when it was 20 and that it was personal goods not rubbish, the other checking web sites say about the cannabis rally. LBC is verbal, the others are links, do I just need to attach links? Please can I have a copy back of what i wrote

A reliable source (e.g. newspapers, television channels, etc.) is required when adding information to an article. Denisarona (talk) 14:14, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Check the Wikipedia regulations at WP:SOURCE. Regards Denisarona (talk) 14:17, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

What did it say? (Employ discreet paraphrase if necessary.) E Eng 13:44, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Couldn't read what was written because there was a "weird design" over the writing!! Denisarona (talk) 14:02, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi, you reverted my change to Schindler's List Wikipedia page, but I think my change was valid.

I changed "It is based on the 1982 historical fiction novel Schindler's Ark by Australian novelist Thomas Keneally." to "It is based on the 1982 historical non-fiction novel Schindler's Ark by Australian novelist Thomas Keneally.", but you changed it back.

When you click on the Wikipedia link for the book, Schindler's Ark, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schindler%27s_Ark, the first sentence says "Schindler's Ark is a Booker Prize-winning historical non-fiction novel." Obviously, when one page says it is a historical fiction novel and the other says it is non-fiction novel, this is a problem. Therefore, the Schindler's List Wikipedia page needs to be changed to reference it as a historical non-fiction novel.

The novel follows the genre of a historical non-fiction novel, as it is based on true events. It "depicts real historical figures and actual events woven together with fictitious conversations and uses the storytelling techniques of fiction" following Wikipedia's definition of non-fiction novels. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-fiction_novel — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2620:46:8000:76:70A5:4F8F:65A5:2D64 (talk) 20:28, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

The Schindler's Ark article was changed to non-fiction novel on 27 November 2021 - previously it was listed for years as historical fiction. Denisarona (talk) 07:45, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi, you made a wrong revert here. By your revert, you reverted to an already vandalized revision. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 09:10, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Please check again. Regards Denisarona (talk) 09:13, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Got it thanks. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 09:13, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

I won't be reverting anything you've done at the Sidney (given name) article, but in "the name Sidney was itself a fashionable name given to girls", I still don't understand what "itself" means here. I see it was added by an IP way back in August 2021 , so it obviously means something to people. But I can't figure out what. _signed,Willondon (talk) 16:44, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi, in this case, it is the use of a reflexive pronoun as an emphasiser, to mean that person/thing and nobody/nothing else. Regards Denisarona (talk) 09:02, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Is it worth getting this page protected? Nick Levine (talk) 10:15, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Definitely, I totally agree. Denisarona (talk) 10:20, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

r:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=1073746289 -->

Any guess which controversial-topic area this one is going to edit after breaking autoconfirmed? Or whose sock it is? :) DMacks (talk) 09:36, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, but absolutely no idea (I'm useless with IT !!). Hopefully they will stop soon. Denisarona (talk) 09:46, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

‎Bbb23 didn't even wait to figure it out. Problem solved! DMacks (talk) 04:19, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I need your help. There is an IP that insists on eliminating information with source and adding a table that duplicates an existing table, triggering an edit war. Could you give me some help? A greeting. --LukeWiller (talk) 11:18, 25 June 2022 (UTC).

Hi, Denisarona. I see you removed an edit of mine. You said it was unsourced, but in the line the goddess name is linked and the info is in that link. Do you think I need to add further links? (In general, I try not to clutter up pages with duplicate links. ThanksJohundhar (talk) 11:42, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

OK, no problem. Denisarona (talk) 12:17, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Could you explain why my edit was reverted? I created a section on the talk page for it 216.173.152.45 (talk) 20:25, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Responded on the article's talk page. Denisarona (talk) 12:30, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Dear Denisarona, Grandmaster Editor, >100,000 (I am in my early 8,000s). Thank you very much for all the corrections you did on the Irish biographies that are on my watchlist, which allows to see the tip of the iceberg of all the work you are doing. Many of the corrections I saw there were necessitated by mistakes of mine (I should be more careful!). Thank you also for the 'beer' you sent me recently. I like to click the Thank button when I see good corrections.

I think you would agree with me that errors in quotations should not be corrected, even if sometimes it might be useful to add a "sic" or an explanation between square brackets. However, in your recent corrections on the article Elizabeth, Countess de Gramont you made such changes. You removed a comma out of "... death in June 1708, it was ..." and removed a hyphen out of "chief-surgeon". I would guess these are 'corrections made by AWB genfixes, which has a bug described in Phabricator task T236729, submitted in 2019 by User:Tom.Reding. These errors are in quotations inside citation footnotes (see WP:FOOTQUOTE) which I like to use. I do not know how this problem should be solved, but this is up to you. With many thanks and best regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 07:50, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Fixed, thanks for the alert - was going too fast and didn't notice it was a quote. Again, thanks. Denisarona (talk) 08:25, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Dear Denisarona, Grandmaster Editor. Sorry to bother you again. I just saw your edit on Luke Plunket, 3rd Earl of Fingall where you replaced the non-breaking space ( ) between the date and the month with an ordinary space. I thought non-breaking spaces were de rigeur in that place. I learned this from User:Twofingered Typist (deceased), formerly of the Guild of Copyeditors (GOCE), when he copyedited Donough MacCarty, 1st Earl of Clancarty in February 2021 in preparation for a GA review. Is it not good practice? Could you please cite a policy or guideline to assure me? With many thanks and best regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 08:40, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Dear Denisarona, thank you for your recent attention to the article Richard Butler of Kilcash. You changed "His descendants would succeed to the earldom of Ormond ..." to "His descendants succeeded to the earldom of Ormond ...". The "would succeed" is future in the past and expresses that this will happen much later, not in the flow the the narration which is in the past. The Wikipedia article explains it nicely. Your correction removed this admittedly relatively subtle difference. This future-in-the-past has been there since September 2018. Admittedly, you are the second user to criticise my use of the future in the past. Laurel Lodged also disliked it (in other articles) but seems to accept it now. I looked around about future-in-the-past and there seems to be nothing wrong with it. It does not seem to be considered old-fashioned or stilted. What do you say? Best regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 17:39, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

I'm still not enamoured of it. It seems too Germanic \ Dutch and not natural, modern English. Laurel Lodged (talk) 18:20, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

I used it because it describes what happened after 1758. The use of both is correct, but the "future in the past" tends to be more formal. If you want to change it back, there's no problem. Regards Denisarona (talk) 10:22, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Dear Denisarona. You know well how much I appreciate your many corrections and improvements, but from time to time an error creeps in. Usually when the apparent mistake is in a quotation and should therefore have been left alone. That is the case of your recent correction of the date format in the article James FitzGerald, de jure 12th Earl of Desmond, where on 12:04 7 September 2022 you corrected an old-fashioned date that happens to appear in one of these many footquotes that I like to put into my citations. You replaced "March 19, 1540" with "19 March 1540". Note that this is not the latest correct on this article. Please repair the damage. With thanks and best regrds, Johannes Schade (talk) 18:16, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, missed that it was part of a quote - now fixed. Thanks for the heads-up. Regards Denisarona (talk) 08:16, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Wishing Denisarona a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman (talk) 13:26, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Many thanks - has a wonderful day. Regards Denisarona (talk) 07:30, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Dear Denisarona. First of all a big THANK YOU for the many, many genuine fixes that you did on text I added or edited. I should be more careful when writing and check my spelling better. You are of course a much more experienced Wikipedian than I am: an amazing 121,676 against my 8,000-and-something. However, with all respect due, it also seems to happen to you from time to time to go a bit too fast and to correct text that is not wrong.

On the article Theobald Dillon, 7th Viscount Dillon your correction "forfeit" -> "forfeited" is needless as "forfeit" can be used as an adjective. It is correct to say "his title and his lands were forfeit." (see Wiktionary, which gives the example "to tread the forfeit paradise").

On the article Henry Dillon, 8th Viscount Dillon your correction of the date format "July, 1687," -> "July 1687," is wrong as this is inside a citation (more precisely a footquote, see WP:FOOTQUOTE) from Burke 1915 where the date is given in that form.

On the article Charles Dillon, 10th Viscount Dillon your correction of the date format "Ireland in September, 1736, to" -> "Ireland in September 1736, to" is wrong as this is inside a citation (more precisely a footquote, see WP:FOOTQUOTE) from O'Callaghan 1854 where the date is given in that form.

I do not want to change what you did. Please fix your fixes if you agree with what I said. With many thanks and best regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 09:14, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello! I see you also had a try with the Linate Airport bloke, thank you. I bl**dy hate conflict on here but I have tried a (relatively) nice note about their editing and I've templated them over edit warring, with no effect either way. Others have warned them too. They seem wholly unresponsive – like, I am wondering if they are absolutely unaware of all of this or that there is even conflict. I know some users (mobile apps??) tend not to see their talk page. They are not vandalizing, I get that – it seems to me that it's mostly bad editing but done in good faith, it appears. But it's getting to be a bit of a time sink ... how to communicate??? Cheers DBaK (talk) 10:19, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Dear Denisarona. Please be careful. Your latest edit in the article Donough MacCarty, 1st Earl of Clancarty, concerning hyphened vs. unhyphened words, sea-fight -> sea fight and brother in law -> brother-in-law were both in a quotes. Please look up and correct. With thanks for all your other valid corrections, best regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 16:58, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Fixed. Thanks Denisarona (talk) 17:11, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Dear Denisarona, I feel you should stop replacing "spelled" with "spelt" in British-English Wikipedia articles. Both are acceptable and "spelled" is now (since about 2000) more common in British English than "spelt"; See the ngram (https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=spelled%2Cspelt&year_start=1900&year_end=2019&corpus=29&smoothing=3). Otherwise, you might want to team up with user Antidenisarona to catapult you both into breaking all records of edit counts by changing from the one to the other and back :) Just joking - and thanks for all the useful ones. Best regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 11:38, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi Johannes, the reason I change is that spelt is more common in British English, whereas the alternative spelled is more typical in American English (according to Oxford and Longman dictionaries). The articles where I change are British-based English articles. Regards Denisarona (talk) 12:18, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Denisarona,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:05, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:05, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Denisarona. In Wyatt's Rebellion, you changed all of the instances of ." to ". and I'm wondering if that's the standard in England. I'm in the United States, and the . before the " is the standard here. I use Microsoft Word, for example, and it flags ". and wants to change it to ." I will use ". for anything else I might post, but am curious about the difference. Agunter137 (talk) 03:05, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi, there is a difference in English. When the quotation is a complete sentence, then we use ."

When the quotation is part of a sentence then we use ". For example: During the dinner James said "I love fish".

Regards Denisarona (talk) 10:42, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I am writing to you because I saw that you too intervened in the edit war with two IPs on the Italian name of some Croatian cities. I warn you that the IP has now been registered, and the removal of the Italian name of these cities has started again, in other forms. Try looking at the history of the Šibenik article. I contacted you because you know the English Wikipedia policies better than I do. Hi, --LukeWiller (talk) 13:12, 25 February 2023 (UTC).

Hi Luke, thanks for the tip. Will check them when I'm free from work. Have a good weekend. Best regards Denisarona (talk) 13:21, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi, there is a problem with the "Italy" article: a user persists in inserting an image of the "tourism" chapter, but his image causes the chapter to become too crowded with images. I keep reverting the edit explaining the reasons, but he insists. Please note that this user has already been blocked recently for edit war. I contacted you because you know the English Wikipedia policies better than I do. Hi, --LukeWiller (talk) 21:22, 6 April 2023 (UTC).

Hi Luke, thanks for the note. Will try and keep an eye on the edits. Don't forget to post warning messages on his talk page. In bocca al lupo! Denisarona (talk) 08:29, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

^{[citation needed]}... I am assuming that you are joking? But would like to hear your response anyway. Shyamal (talk) 11:13, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

No, I'm not joking. According to the OED, the use of animal for humans is not normal and only applies in certain conditions. Regards Denisarona (talk) 12:33, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

I think that is an inappropriate application (of the lay usage) when it comes to scientific articles (Tabanidae being one). Unless you have a more reasonable source supporting the idea that Tabanidae look upon humans as exceptional hosts, I will have to revert you. Shyamal (talk) 13:12, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I would like to inform you that the IP 5.91.142.177 has added the template message of bad translation from English to some articles concerning Italy. Would it be a problem for you to solve the issue by arranging the articles in such a way as to eliminate the template message? Hi, --LukeWiller (talk) 15:14, 21 April 2023 (UTC).

Hi, will try over the next few days. Denisarona (talk) 16:43, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Ok, thank you very much... :-) Hi, --LukeWiller (talk) 17:15, 21 April 2023 (UTC).

Hi — just making sure you saw ToBeFree's message at your permissions request. — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 13:17, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Don't understand what I have to do. Regards Denisarona (talk) 13:21, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi, and thanks for the notification – Denisarona, looking at your permissions log, there's an entry labeled

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=940705679#User:Denisarona's%20repeated%20rollback%20misuse%20and%20failure%20to%20communicate

...the title of which alone is already worrying, and which came with a revocation of the rollback group membership you had for years.

This puts you in a difficult situation. It's easier to trust a stranger than someone who has betrayed you in the past. It's easier to grant rollback to a newcomer than granting it to someone who has misused rollback before.

The current wording of your rollback request does not seem to address your rollback history yet. It reads like any newcomer's request for the permission, but you are not a newcomer. DanCherek noticed this and could have declined the request, requiring you to provide more details in future requests. Instead, it seems that DanCherek would simply like to hear – from you, Denisarona – why the issues from 2020 are no longer relevant. Imagine you're blocked and are requesting an unblock. Your unblock request says "I'd like to be unblocked, so I can edit Wikipedia". An admin responds: "Why were you blocked? Why can you now be trusted, what has changed?" Your current response to that is "Don't understand what I have to do." ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:51, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

There's no problem at this time. My lack of response in 2020 was due to COVID and, thankfully, I have fully recovered. If the rollback cannot be given, then I will continue as I have done since recovering. Many thanks for your help. Denisarona (talk) 13:57, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

That does sound like a good explanation and a clear reason for a change. Would you mind writing that at WP:PERM/R? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

OK, will do. Denisarona (talk) 14:01, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello Denisarona!

The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 10:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

hello, could you write me the wikilink of the test page? I can't find it, even if I try to write "test page". Unoduetrevia (talk) 10:51, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi, sorry I don't understand your question. Denisarona (talk) 14:16, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Io purtroppo non parlo inglese e avevo chiesto se mi potevi mettere qua la pagina delle prove Unoduetrevia (talk) 14:45, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Hai presente che nella Wikipedia italiana c'è la pagina delle prove? Qui in questa inglese la pagina delle prove c'è o no? Se sì dammi il wikilink. Unoduetrevia (talk) 15:27, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

What is the name of the page on the Italian Wikipedia?? Denisarona (talk) 05:14, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Pagina delle prove Unoduetrevia (talk) 18:39, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Try connecting to Wikipedia:Sandbox. Good luck Denisarona (talk) 07:48, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Apologies for this bad revert I made of one of your recent edits. I must have pulled the trigger too quickly on that while going through changes to my too-many watchlisted articles and not been clear about Paracels vs. Spratlys when I did that. My bad revert was subsequently undone by AristippusSer (talk · contribs), and I have thanked that editor separately for doing that. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 08:37, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

No problem. Many thanks - keep up the excellent work. Denisarona (talk) 08:40, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I need a favor. Would you have time to arrange the articles Culture of Italy, Cinema of Italy, Kingdom of Italy and Italian literature, in order to remove the tags at the top of the articles ? I would like to do it, but I'm not so familiar with the English Wikipedia policies (I'm mainly active on the Italian Wikipedia). Greetings. --LukeWiller (talk) 14:48, 1 July 2023 (UTC).

Hi Luke. I don't agree with the tags at the top and will try to help, but I can't at the present time. I am preparing to go on holiday tomorrow and won't be accessing Wikipedia until I get back in 10 days' time. Then I will try my best. Regards Denisarona (talk) 14:53, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Ok, thanks, that's the answer I was expecting: I'm also not very convinced of tags but, as I said, I'm not very familiar with English Wikipedia policies, and I preferred to ask an expert user. Thanks for the help: the articles are important for the "Italy topic", and should be fixed. Apart from that, I wish you happy holidays... :-) Regards. --LukeWiller (talk) 15:10, 1 July 2023 (UTC).

Hi, I wanted to let you know that I fixed the articles Culture of Italy and Kingdom of Italy. The articles Cinema of Italy and Italian literature should also be fixed, but unfortunately I'm not able because I don't know much about the English Wikipedia policies: would you take care of it in order to remove the tag at the top ? Regards --LukeWiller (talk) 22:17, 14 August 2023 (UTC).

While I am not going to revert some of your recent edits at Odoacer, please note in the future that this page was written in American English and your edits (while not wrong technically) introduced British spellings and thereby, inconsistencies. Obenritter (talk) 19:51, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your note. Looking back to early edits to the article, I don't see anything that says it is in American English. In fact, it states that dmy dates are used, which is not the American style, but the English and European style. Regards Denisarona (talk) 10:59, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I need some help with the article "Fauna of Italy". An edit war is underway with a user who is clearly not in good faith. Regards. --LukeWiller (talk) 22:07, 2 September 2023 (UTC).

Hi to you. Will try and keep an eye on the article. Regards Denisarona (talk) 08:30, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Ok, thanks... :-) Regards. --LukeWiller (talk) 12:18, 3 September 2023 (UTC)-

Wishing Denisarona a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:19, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Many thanks - very much appreciated. Denisarona (talk) 13:52, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello Denisarona, regarding Callum Voisin, I edited the section incorrectly stating he is a Swiss national/duel national. He is not. He is British, albeit born in Switzerland. This, unfortunately, does not give automatic Swiss citizenship. He still lives in Switzerland so having a Swiss flag next to his name is fine. Just to clarify, I am his father so (hopefully) am qualified to clarify his nationality. If I edit anything further I will explain the reasons in the section provided. CycleDee (talk) 09:12, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

The edits I made to the Campione d'Italia article were just small spelling and grammar fixes. I am unsure as to why you reverted them.

Regards, Astral AstralDrag0n27 (talk) 14:09, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Responded on your talk page. Regards Denisarona (talk) 14:25, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

I appreciate the clarification. Regards AstralDrag0n27 (talk) 14:26, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello! I noticed that you are signed up for the January 2024 NPP Backlog Drive. However, you're going to be unable to participate if you do not have the New Page Reviewer permission. If you are still interested in participating in the backlog drive, then I encourage you to request the permission at WP:PERM/NPR. I have, for the moment, removed you from the participants list as you not able to participate at this point in time. – DreamRimmer (talk) 09:48, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I need a favor. I would need you to copy edit the Lombardy article, which I have expanded quite a bit. Generally I ask to Vaselineee, but I have already given Vaselineee to reread and copy edit a rather long article (Expedition of the Thousand), which he hasn't sorted out yet, so he doesn't have time to copy-edit also Lombardy article, which is also very long. A greeting. LukeWiller (talk) 16:28, 14 February 2024 (UTC).

Hi, I need you to copy edit the article Autostrade of Italy, which I have expanded quite a bit. Usually this type of job is done for me by the user Veselineee, but for him the article Autostrade of Italy is too long. A greeting. --LukeWiller (talk) 16:51, 9 March 2024 (UTC).

Will do, but bit by bit. Best Wishes. Denisarona (talk) 16:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I need you to copy edit the articles Autostrada A8 (Italy) and Autostrada A9 (Italy), which I have expanded quite a bit. A greeting. --LukeWiller (talk) 15:51, 25 March 2024 (UTC).

Will do, bit by bit. Best regards Denisarona (talk) 11:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

What was wrong about the disamb page Theben that you redirected to one of the possibilities? this edit On the talk page you said it contained wrong information? 82.174.61.58 (talk) 13:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I added a fictional reference that I know pretty well, being the author (https://www.editionsdurocher.fr/product/130753/la-paix-paresseuse/), and I don't understand why you removed it ? Thank you 193.48.70.254 (talk) 13:37, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, If you are the author, how can you be the independent source? Regards Denisarona (talk) 16:27, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi Denisarona, I saw your reversion of my edit changing unicolourous to unicolorous in Tulip. Unicolourous (with the extra "u") is exceedingly uncommon in British English and almost never used in American English. See the Google Books Ngram Viewer on the question. It's the same for concolourous. I don't know why that is the case, but I think skipping the "u" there is correct. Does that make sense to you? Thank you. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 13:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

OK, as you want. Denisarona (talk) 06:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

"The use of a literal translation is not always correct." is a useful phrase.

Esteban.Vicenzi (talk) 23:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

kindly self-revert, per the explanation I left in my reply on my tp. Cheers. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:951C:542B:7B33:1FC9 (talk) 07:03, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

[1]
http://www.usf-iraq.com/?option=com_content&task=view&id=12653&Itemid=128

[1] [1]
http://www.usf-iraq.com/?option=com_content&task=view&id=12653&Itemid=128

[1]

Portland stone

Josef Váňa

Istanbul not Constantinople

April 2011

Vandal on fighter aircraft-related pages

maybe you would like this...

Ospedaletti

Tall Dwarfs

Thanks

Thanks

Thank you

Medieval saints

polargeo

Demi Lovato

A cup of tea for you!

Jannali, New South Wales

Thanks...

Why?

Methodist Boys' School (Kuala Lumpur)

Vic Mignogna

Almoravid dynasty

Zoo Tycoon Articles

Pablo Daniel Osvaldo

50.102.250.142

Prasanth Thyagarajan Paternal relative to Vikram, Source Article Vikram (actor)

Don Valley Parkway

OCRBSK

A cookie for you!

Thanks

September 2011

Thanks

Kashmir Conflict

Feliks Kryski

A cup of tea for you!

Dyens Citizenship

County Donegal

Charles de Gaulle

Re: Balkans etc.

Habbani Jews

Privacy?

hyphenated variants are not spelling variants

List of Sicilian Mafiosi by city

ICC page

El gran show 2da temporada

Warnings &amp; Templates

International Churches of Christ

Hii

Do not delete accurate alterations

Indianapolis Motor Speedway

Peter Holmes à Court

Cinema of andhra pradesh

A barnstar for you!

Timur Kulibayev

TOO COMPLICATED!!!

Hi! You reverted me in Category Vexillum

Batavia High School (Batavia, Ohio

Benlisquare

Camp Casey, South Korea

Editor 4.255.49.90

Bridie Gallagher

Protection

Your user page

Users editing articles like newbies?

The Creed

Pork Pie et al

Vandalism on Article about Methodism in the Philippines

Trafalgar

Mahdi Army

Dean Koontz

Hello

Quick off the mark!!!!

Eton College punctuation changes

Norsefire

Happy Birthday!

Wilfrid Israel

Borgomanero

Italian Social Republic

December 2020

A Joyous Yuletide to You!

2021

Warnings & Templates