Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
——————————————— TALK PAGE ———————————————
User Page |
Talk Page |
Sandbox |
Site Map |
Monobook.js |
Contributions |
Email |
Click to Vandalize! |
Hi, Welcome to my talk page. If you are wondering why I reverted your edits, leave a message here.
If you have any other comments or if I had made a mistake in one of the articles I've edited, leave a message here aswell!
You gave me a warning for posting a "spam Link". The link in question is to www.roblox.com which you say has unsafe downloads. Where do you see these "Unsafe Downloads"? Over 3,00,000 people have downloaded the game hosted on that site and not one has reported any malicious content. If you can please pinpoint what you find unsafe it would be greatly appreciated.--gordonrox24 (talk) 20:21, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Well, strangely - I got a sniper rifle free model on Roblox, which then said the word INFECTED written all over it and then it shut my monitor off and then it overrided one of my computer's directx drivers. This says that regular Roblox users can have power over other user's PCs. And as little kids use this they won't know whats happening and will just let their PC get destroyed... So thats why - and Wikipedia is for everyone and won't want to be the fault of whatever-thousand computer crashes. Thanks, Darren•M540 U|T|C 15:29, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Have a look at this thread - it sounds a little exaggerated but its basically what happened - my user name is dazzameach and my post is on page 2 of the thread. And, to be safe, if you go on my place - don't go on roblox studio or whatever cause it went phsyco when i did that aswell... Thanks, Darren•M540 U|T|C 18:35, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Hmmm... I can't find the link for the gun but all I did was - when I was on my place, I went on the free models thing and searched for Sniper rifle and it came up with that gun - it had an easily recognisable fire-design case and it was near the top of the list. Hope this helps, Darren•M540 U|T|C 19:17, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Alright then, sorry and thanks! I will continue to use Roblox, thanks a lot for the help, and sorry for any inconvenience - I will take in your advice and think more before editing! You see, I was just curious for the security of Wikipedia! Thanks, Darren•M540 U|T|C 19:34, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Westminster tube station, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 17:13, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi Darrenm540. My name is Toddst1. I am a Wikipedia administrator, and I noticed you have recently created a subpage at User:Darrenm540/Dárren Meacher. I don't intend to scare you away or attempt to intimidate you, but I thought you might want to reconsider some of the items on that page. You may have not realised that the items on your userpage release personal information about yourself (real name or age etc), which could be used against you in the future. While 99% of all the editors on Wikipedia are friendly, welcoming and harmless, there is a chance your personal information could be misused by editors not so 'high-minded'. A handful of editors have even felt real-world implications due to their Wikipedia edits and release of personal information.
Protecting your privacy, and remaining anonymous while on the internet — on any site — is a good idea. The internet is a worldwide and largely unregulated medium, and while Wikipedia is one of the safer sites, there are definite risks while online. With cyber-bullying and cyberstalking becoming increasingly commonplace, it is important that you take every precaution to remain safe.
I have deleted some revisions of that page in respect to your privacy for the time being, just in case you wish to reverse on your decision to have such content on public display. As a result, the information is only available to administrators. You are, of course, welcome to ask myself or another administrator to restore them, but I just wanted to make you aware of the risks involved with releasing personal information on such a public forum. If you wish to have the personal information removed so that even administrators cannot view it, I can request oversight on your behalf. You are also welcome to discuss this with me on my talk page, or privately via e-mail if you have any concerns. Again, I do not want to scare you. Wikipedia is a fantastic place with an incredibly supportive community. I'm just trying to ensure you are fully aware of the risks involved in editing, which are very similar to the risks you come across every day online. Hope to hear from you. Toddst1 (talk) 17:30, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Darren, when an administrator deletes subpages of your userspace with a message along the lines of "for user's own good", it typically is for your own good. It's not vandalism, and it's not polite to leave the administrator a template message asking him to not vandalize.
Okay? DS (talk) 17:42, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
My apologies sir but I would have appreciated you discussing the matter on my Talk page prior to your deletion of the pages
Thank you, --Darren•M540 U|T|C 17:53, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:OTSE.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Dream out loud (talk) 04:15, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
The official opening is at about 5.30 am BST. I won't be up to convert it then, but I could do the updates after midnight (i.e. once it's 13 June, opening day. Del♉sion23 (talk) 17:33, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Richard Leese may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:28, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peter Law, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gwent. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Look, I can't really find any information available on the Internet (ideally for all to see, and for free) which would say as proof that Amjad Bashir joined the Conservative Party in the year 1997, or that he had only joined Respect for only a year; and let's face it, there isn't any! We don't really know what he was up to until the year 2012, when he became a member of UKIP, and also an MEP representing the Yorkshire and the Humber Region and sitting as a person officially affiliated with UKIP. Short of finding reliable sources (and information supplied by his party-political opponents are not reliable ones; not even UKIP, not even if both you and I were members of UKIP) which would prove any of this, we can't really put them in, onto his article within Wikipedia. -- 212.50.167.15 (talk) 16:13, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Ashton-on-Mersey School (logo).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 12:21, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
The file File:WoodheysPrimarySchoolLogo.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 15:04, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Sale Grammar School.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 12:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Woodheyslogo.svg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 12:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.