Loading AI tools
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Cyclonebiskit. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
 |
Wishing you all the best on your birthday! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee. |
I recently finished JTWC tracks for 2006 and 2007. All of 2005's are still out of date, and I'm working on those when I can.
I can really only help with the track map program if you are wanting to run it under Mac OS X. I first installed MacPort and then I installed all the required packages (Gettext, etc.) using that. MacPort may need some other installations like X11 and other Apple stuff it tell you, but that's pretty easy to do. Once you have those you can install the track map program exactly as the instructions tell you. Potapych (talk) 02:07, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Just an on-Wiki reminder, try and focus on one project at a time. Otherwise, nothing gets done. ;) Cheers. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:04, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Number 23,
The Hurricane Herald
This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary, both of the activities of the WikiProject and global tropical cyclone activity. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. This newsletter covers all of November & December 2008.
Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve monitoring of the WikiProject's articles.
Storm of the month
Hurricane Paloma
Hurricane Paloma was the second most powerful November hurricane on record in the Atlantic Basin, behind Hurricane Lenny in 1999. It was the third and final major hurricane to hit Cuba in 2008, being the first time that three major hurricanes have struck Cuba in one season. It also marked the first time that at least one major hurricane formed in every month of the hurricane season from July to November, with only June not having a major hurricane this season.
Hurricane Paloma was also the last Tropical Depression of the 2008 season, and caused at least $1.4 billion in damage and was responsible for at least one direct death.
Other tropical cyclone activity
- Eastern Pacific Ocean– Tropical Storm Polo was the only Tropical Storm to form during November and December.
- Western Pacific Ocean – There were five tropical depressions during the last two months of the 2008 Pacific typhoon season. Though only four of them developed into Tropical storms with only Dolphin becoming a Typhoon.
- North Indian– There were three Tropical Depressions during the last two months of the 2008 North Indian Ocean cyclone season, however there were only two that officially became Tropical Storms being named Khai-Muk and Nisha.
- South Indian– Cyclone Bernard was the first cyclone of the year to move into the Australian Region from the Southwest Indian Ocean. Forming on early on November 19 it quickly intensified into a Moderate Tropical Storm the next day, however as it moved westward it weakened into a Tropical Depression and moved into Australia's Bureau of Meteorology's area of responsibility and dissipated later on November 21.
- Australian - There were four tropical lows during November and December with Tropical Low ex Bernard moving into the Australian Region from the South-West Indian Ocean. Two of the Lows developed into Tropical Cyclones being named Anika and Billy respectively. Anika intensified into a category two cyclone whilst Cyclone Billy became a Severe Tropical Cyclone after it had affected Northern Australia.
- The 2008–09 South Pacific cyclone season got off to an slow start during November and December, with three Tropical Disturbances forming during December. Only one of the tropical disturbances developed into a tropical depression.
Member of the month
The November/December member of the month is Thegreatdr, who has been a steady editor within the project for the past few years. Lately, the user's contributions include improving some of the Pacific Typhoon season articles from the 1980s. Thegreatdr has also tipped us off about going on's at the National Hurricane Center and the Hydrometeorological Prediction Center.
New members
- Aquamelli * DavidWS * Ramisses * Renereynoso * VeronicaPR * Neutralhomer * VOFFA * Catalan * HurricaneSpin * HERB * NuclearWarfare
New and improved articles
- There were new pieces of Featured content : Timeline of the 2005 Pacific hurricane season, Tropical Storm Erick (2007), Tropical Storm Gabrielle (2007), Timeline of the 2003 Atlantic hurricane season, Timeline of the 1983 Atlantic hurricane season, Timeline of the 1982 Atlantic hurricane season
- 1994 Pacific hurricane season became the project's first Good topic.
- New Good articles include: 1981 Pacific typhoon season, 1983 Pacific typhoon season, 1994 Pacific typhoon season, Hurricane Karl (1998), Tropical Depression One-C (2005), Tropical Storm Dorothy (1970), Tropical Storm Hermine (1998), Cyclone Gene
- New storm articles include: Tropical Storm Guchol (2005), Hurricane Paloma (2008), Hurricane Douglas (2002), Hurricane Florence (1994), Tropical Storm Vongfong (2008), Cyclone Rosie (2008), Tropical Storm Becky (1970), Hurricane Hector (2006), Hurricane Karl (1998)
- New non-storm articles include: Timeline of the 2003 Atlantic hurricane season, Timeline of the 1995 Atlantic hurricane season, Timeline of the 1983 Atlantic hurricane season, Timeline of the 1982 Atlantic hurricane season, 2009 Pacific typhoon season, Timeline of the 2001 Atlantic hurricane season
Main Page content
- Facts from 2008's Cyclone Rosie, 1970's Tropical Storm Becky, 2005's Tropical Depression One-C & 1998's Hurricane Lisa appeared in the Did You Know? section of the Main Page during November.
- Hurricane Paloma appeared on the Main Page in the In the News section.
- Facts from 1998's Hurricane Karl, 2006's Tropical Storm Olivia & 1969's Hurricane Holly appeared in the Did You Know? section of the Main Page during December.
Storm article statistics
Project News
During the last two months there have been several important discussions of which some are still seeking contributions from members. These include discussions about:
- Project Importance - Is it better to rate Storm Importance by basin or by overall importance? - There seems to be a consensus to rate storm importance on a case by case basis, though there still needs to be a bit more discussion on this matter.
- Prominent units within TC articles: Imperial or SI? - Which should be the prominent unit outside the Atlantic and Eastern Pacific Basins, Knots or MPH? Generally people think that Knots should not be used except in the general science articles and infoboxes.
- ACE - Where and how, should it be used? - We have decided that it should not be used outside the Atlantic or the Eastern Pacific hurricane Seasons. A debate is still ongoing with a view too get rid of it all together.
- JMA Tropical Depressions Should we include them with the season articles or not? - The general consensus so far seems to be that we should include them in the season articles though this debate is still ongoing.
We discovered during December that the Australian Bureau of Meteorology have started to designate the Tropical Lows that form within their region with letter U. It is unclear whether either TCWC Jakarta or TCWC Port Moresby assign any designations to lows that form within their Area of Responsibility.
–Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 03:09, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Cyclonebiskit (talk) 05:24, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Since you helped previously when I was last working on it, I'd like if you helped give any comments needed to complete the A to FL chapter so that I can see what is needed for it to pass FLC. Thanks! --Dylan620 (Contribs) 19:45, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
OK! I made another version of both the Auring's track map and the seasonal map using the JTWC's running best track. -Ramisses (talk) 17:31, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Cyclonica (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is correct with their edits and didn't add false information to the article. Tropical Cyclone Advice for System 1 and Tropical Cyclone Forecast Track Map System 1. Bidgee (talk) 02:06, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
The original reference from NHC contains no information on Mexican impact of Allen, although it was probably significant in the northeastern most section of the Yucatan peninsula and mainland Mexico. Are we holding these articles to higher standards than original sources would provide? Even if we do, C class allows for missing sections within articles. Thegreatdr (talk) 23:33, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Not than wikipedia standards, they're not. If you think the other sections need more info, add expansion tags and say it on the talk page. Thegreatdr (talk) 15:36, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Cool. I've been noticing over the past several months that people would rather pass over the C and B class options, going straight from Start to GA nomination. I've noticed this has been a personal preference of a couple of the members of the project, and it has allowed me to re-read the class structure within wikipedia. It doesn't seem like we use C class as often as we should as a project. You're right of course, it is minor, but it does impact the wikiwork score of the project. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:30, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
The track map is already made with the running best track. Only the track of the Cinda's remnant low is lacking and I think it's not very, very important. -Ramisses (talk) 23:00, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Cheers for the notice, I have passed it on :) Andy (talk) 23:24, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Sorry Cyclonebiskit. I unfortunately have no much time available in the coming days. -Ramisses (talk) 23:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
It does not appear I've placed any information concerning that season online. I'll take a look at the data this coming week and see if this is a problem to resolve. I can tell you this...Clark AFB was already gone by then due to Yunya and the volcano in the summer of 1991. Thegreatdr (talk) 02:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
It did not even remotely fall under G4. The article was not "substantially similar" to the its version before it was redirected. There was no deletion discussion involved whatsoever. Why? Jonathan321 (talk) 20:13, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry that it was incorrectly referenced. I was soon going to correctly reference it, as it was midnight when I created the article. Similar to your experience with deletion, I do not have much experience in article creation (except for this article). I wouldn't call the article "extraordinarily short". Many, many stubs are a mere sentence, and they are kept. I will probably work on it some more, but I would appreciate it if you would restore it, as I feel rather uncomfortable doing it myself. Cheers, Jonathan321 (talk) 20:28, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Read the article before slapping a {{fact}} tag on it. It's in the beginning of the MH, it wasn't OR.... is rather bad faith! Since I did look at the only source that was there until you added this source and I also didn't say it was OR. Bidgee (talk) 04:30, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on 2008–09 Australian region cyclone season. Thank you. Calling my edit vandalism is bad faith! Bidgee (talk) 04:38, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Please don't template experienced editors. I know you're not trying to, but it's very annoying to template regulars. VX!~~~ 04:40, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- There is no policy against "templating experienced/long term editors". It's clear that Cyclonebiskit assumed bad faith with my edits which my edit were clearly good faith edits. Bidgee (talk) 04:43, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- WP:DTTR –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 04:48, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Essays are not policies or guildlines! Bidgee (talk) 04:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, correct Essays are not policy, but we still use and heed many of them. For example, WP:SNOW, think how many times that has applied to WP:XfD or WP:RfA. VX!~~~ 04:56, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Essays are not policies or guildlines! Bidgee (talk) 04:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- WP:DTTR –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 04:48, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- There is no policy against "templating experienced/long term editors". It's clear that Cyclonebiskit assumed bad faith with my edits which my edit were clearly good faith edits. Bidgee (talk) 04:43, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Bidgee, I find it ironic that you come to Cyclonebiskit's talk page to complain about AGF, yet you leave a template notice. Perhaps you should heed your own advice? –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 05:01, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Excuse me? I left a nice message but it seems that Cyclonebiskit didn't read it or choose not to assume good faith to my edits. How would you like being called a vandal? Again there is no policy or guildline against "templating experienced/long term editors". Bidgee (talk) 05:04, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Sure, I wouldn't like to be called a vandal, but I certainly wouldn't make a stink of it. Also, templating an established editor is most certainly bad-faith, regardless of whether there is an official policy which says that. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 05:07, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Excuse me? I left a nice message but it seems that Cyclonebiskit didn't read it or choose not to assume good faith to my edits. How would you like being called a vandal? Again there is no policy or guildline against "templating experienced/long term editors". Bidgee (talk) 05:04, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
In principle, I'm not opposed to this idea, so I upgraded the 1985 Atlantic hurricane season to High as well. Besides, at the time it had the record for number of landfalling systems. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Done –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 21:03, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello, this is Irmela, can you rate Timeline of the 1972 Atlantic hurricane season? Thanks --Saola Talk to Me 21:58, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- I have a little problem, see the talk page. --Saola Talk to Me 22:13, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
I just moved it to FLC, I forgot and remembered when I was updating the notice board.--Saola Talk to Me 22:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi there- after a few months break I'd like to make another run at FAC for this article. Do you have any comments or suggestions about if you think it is ready? Rather than put it up for another peer review, I figured I'd just do a quick survey first in case people think one is not needed.
Honestly, I never quite understood what was wrong with it the first time (specifics) but I think I have found a few minor improvements here and there. WxGopher (talk) 05:33, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Per your request on IRC earlier herre are the advisorys for Typhoon Chaba Jason Rees (talk) 22:08, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
- First Poor - N/A
- First Fair - 0000z, 18-08-2004
- First TCFA - 1430z, 18-08-2004
First Warning : 1800Z 18 Aug 04 Last Warning : 0600Z 31 Aug 04, Extra-tropical Max Intensity : 155 kts, gusts to 190 kts Landfall : Near City of Kushikino, Kyushu Japan - Near Hikari, Honshu Japan - Near Shizunai, Hokkaido Japan
JTWC Advisories
- 01 // 02 // 03 // 04 // 05 // 06 // 07 // 08 // 09 // 10 //
- 11 // 12 // 13 // 14 // 15 // 16 // 17 // 18 // 19 // 20 //
- 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // 29 // 30 //
- 31 // 32 // 33 // 34 // 35 // 36 // 37 // 38 // 39 // 40 //
- 41 // 42 // 43 // 44 // 45 // 46 // 47 // 48 // 49 // 50 // 51 // (Final)
Prognastic reasonings
I didn't, the jTWC did upgrade the system to Tropical Cyclone 13S, and Meteo France assigned the name Gael, I didn't put incorrect anything on there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.143.29.183 (talk) 21:47, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- The JTWC did upgrade to TC13S, but I don't see an advisory saying MF upgraded to Gael yet. -- RattleMan 21:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Okay, someone keeps adding a "Tropical Depression 09F" to that season, but I cannot find anything on the net about it actually existing....does it exist? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Browns902 (talk • contribs) 04:27, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- 24-04-06 0600z
- 25-04-06 0600z
- 26-04-06 0000z // 1200z // 1800z
- 27-04-06 0900z // 1200z // 1800z //
- 28-04-06 0000z // 0100z // 0900z // 1200z //
- 29-04-06 0900z // 1800z //
JTWC 23-04-06 18z // 24-04-06 10z // Jason Rees (talk) 22:25, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
The template is not broken. The template automatically conserves the number of significant figures. If you want a different level of precision, add |sigfig=# to the end of the template ("#" being the number of significant figures you would like). I have restored the template to February 2009 tornado outbreak using this trick. Also, some of the figures you changed are too precise (for instance, when you say "winds near 70 miles per hour", the conversion should be 110 km/h, not 112 km/h, since you're dealing with approximate figures. If you have any questions/comments let me know.-RunningOnBrains 06:40, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
I worked hard on these pages and if it's so important, find references yourself. (I couldn't find a huge amount of information on those storms, they were almost twenty years ago, that's why the paragraph was not extremely long) besides, there are other short pages on Wikipedia, RIGHT? I also put the new articles there so that the info on those storms wasn't just a couple vague "descriptive" sentences, and that reference at the bottom of the pages leads to a page for NHC info on those two storms(best track,strength data,etc.), so there aren't ANY lack of sufficient references. By the way, I'm about fifteen years old, so if you want to criticize it,or delete my profile, or block me from editing (because I'm not "Old" enough to be as smart as you adults).(Because you adults think all people my age are just KIDS!!), besides, they were my first articles, so I don't have as much "Experience" as you adults who think they own Wikipedia!!Hurricanekiller1994 (talk) 22:12, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- Age does not matter; typing in all caps and accusing other editors of ageism is what we should worry about. Cheers, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 22:38, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
If you are sixteen, how did you learn so much about Wikipedia? When did you start learning about writing articles on Wikipedia? (I thought all people on here were adults!)I guess I'm not the only "younger" person on here after all. Also, some pages (ie. 2008-09 South Pacific cyclone season, 2009 Pacific typhoon season, etc. need to probably be updated a little faster).Hurricanekiller1994 (talk) 22:25, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active participant in WikiProject Meteorology, WikiProject Severe weather, and/or WikiProject Non-tropical storms. I have made a proposal to start an official assessment page for these three projects, under the WP:METEO banner. Since this would need significant participation to work properly, I'd like input from as many interested parties as possible (even those who may not watch the project pages), so please visit the discussion here and leave your thoughts/opinions. Thanks! -RunningOnBrains 02:40, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
I've reviewed the article and left notes on the talk page. I've put the nomination on hold for seven days to allow the issues to be addressed. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, here, or on the article talk page with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth - Talk 03:19, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Typhoon Conson (2004) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CB...(ö) 05:06, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Cyclone Arthur (2007) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! XLerate (talk) 00:33, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikiwand in your browser!
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.
