Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an archive of past discussions about User:ClueBot Commons. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I found this edit [] that is in the format of ClueBot NG's revert reports from an IP which appears to be reverting lowercase sigmabot's edits. Is this a bug? [Username Needed] 12:39, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
I know there have been identified issues lately with CB3 archiving user talk pages so I hope I'm not identifying an issue which has already been discussed. I noticed today that CB3 is failing to create or update its detailed index pages when it archives my user talk. My index was created automatically back in January, complete with three detailed index pages from my existing archives at the time. Then, in April, it added a link to its detailed index 4 ([]) but it did not create the index, User:ClueBot III/Detailed Indices/User talk:Ivanvector/Archive 4 is a redlink. It's done the same more recently for a fifth archive, so the index is broken. I'm not sure how to fix this, I could create the detailed indices manually but that's tedious, I'd rather see the problem fixed. Is it a bug or do I have something set up incorrectly? Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:38, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
[I] don't know how to fix it, stop bothering [me]—k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 13:42, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
@K6ka: Clue the third stopped archiving again. We should contact Cobie
—usernamekiran(talk) 20:31, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi Bot,
The "report false positive" link in your first-level vandalism warning (and maybe others, haven't checked) is broken. See User_talk:66.87.30.121 for an example with the broken link. It looks like this. This link from your edit summary still works.
Cheers, Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 02:02, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
I have noticed that CB3 hasn't been archiving my talk page near-daily, as it used to. I checked, and the bot is still working for other people, and my code hasn't changed. Does anyone know why since 6/21/17 it would ignore me? I tweaked my DNAUs as well. Thanks, L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 12:43, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
IPs has been adding extra reviews like this in the template in some articles lately, while the guidelines clearly says only add ten reviews. Can the bot revert these edits who add reviews more than ten?
My Watchlist is set to filter out bot edits, but I still see edits by ClueBotNG. Is this intentional, or something that should be fixed? Obviously not a huge issue, just curious. GiovanniSidwell (talk) 18:34, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
DoctorWho42 has given you microchips! Microchips promote WikiLove (📖💞) and hopefully this one has made your day more efficient. It is the food best preferred by bots. 🤖 Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else microchips, whether it be someone you have had robot wars with in the past or a good friend.
Spread the goodness of motor oil by adding {{subst:Microchips for you}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 07:16, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
The bot just moved a discussion from Talk:The Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential to Talk:The Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential 3 (which was then marked for speedy deletion as a talk page of a nonexistent article). I assume it meant to move it to Talk:The Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential/Archive 3 but I've moved the page it created to Archive 4 instead. Hut 8.5 20:43, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
Whatever happened to ClueBot V? There's a IV and a VI, but no V. Why is this? Are there any other "missing" ClueBots? WikiSquirrel42 (talk) 22:42, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Why did you shut down ClueBot III?!?!?! - 64.237.233.180 (talk) 16:56, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
The false positives section says "To report a false positive, or to see a full list of all false positives, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ClueBot_NG/FalsePositives." That page has information about how to submit a false positive but doesn't have a list of false positives. Is there a corrected link for the list of false positives? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8.26.157.145 (talk) 17:21, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Hopefully, someone who knows what they're doing will see this. An IP editor recently posted a note to ANI that said ClueBot NG is linking to missing pages on tools.wmflabs.org, such as this link, which seems to have been added in this edit to the IP editor's talk page. The IP editor made this edit, and ClueBot NG reverted it with this edit. That's about all the info I have. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:14, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
@Rich Smith and DamianZaremba: Something is very broken. TheDragonFire (talk) 05:33, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
I've never never seen something like happening. Someone vandalising Wikipedia, only to remove his edit because nobody reverted it! I would have expected that this was something that ClueBot would've reverted. Please, clear my cognitive bias, but has ClueBot NG become a bit lax? I've noticed this a few other times as well. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 17:14, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Why did you when you should read the text instead of undoing edits — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qutaro (talk • contribs) 20:09, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Nothing too huge, but Cluebot's vandalism reverts don't autoaccept themselves on pages with PC-1 applied, even though it has reviewer rights assigned. Exhibit A: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shakthi_Vasudevan&action=history 15 minutes before this post.
A ticket has been raised as to admins / XCon users not having their changes automatically accepted here but I think this is a bot issue. Cheers — IVORK Discuss 05:54, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.