Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wow. Nice stuff! Take an interest? This is one of my babies! I mean, I gave birth to this article, so be nice to it! heehee... Yeah, well you are doing a great job with it. I like your winter picture looking at the trees and stuff, but now is your chance! Go take a picture of the park in Winter in some path like my spring/summer picture, and then we can eventually get a Fall picture! We could show the seasons in that place. I agree with you taking the space needle thing off, I find size comparisons were quite hard since the place has an odd size. Anyway, cheers, goodluck! (And if I can help, let me know, but I think my baby seems to be in your hands now! Do good things! Can any more be done to this? Maybe a list of various native wildlife. [birds, bugs, etc] Or something?) Nesnad 14:00, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Bryan, in case there's any misunderstanding: the Charles MacKinnon of Dunakin book is certainly a reputable source, and there's no problem in citing the title and the external link as a reference for the Clan MacKinnon article. The general consensus for deletion is no reflection on its quality as a work, only its incompatibility, when used in full and verbatim, with the Wikipedia license terms. Tearlach 02:22, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I'm competely fine with the deletion. It was about my first wikipedia post before the best use of wikipedia was apparent. Bryan MacKinnon
Thanks for uploading Image:Tokorozawa-Shinmei-Shrine.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:08, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Image:Tokorozawa-Shinmei-Shrine.jpg Hey are you the photographer of this pic? Is then I can put the presumed gfdl tag or you can release it with the proper tag http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags#For_image_creators--Kolrobie 22:08, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I just forgot to tag it. Now it's done. Bryan MacKinnon 23:47, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Saitama-broncos-logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
In order to encourage more participation, and to help people find a specific area in which they are more able to help out, we have organized taskforces at WikiProject Japan. Please visit the Participants page and update the list with the taskforces in which you wish to participate. Links to all the taskforces are found at the top of the list of participants.
Please let me know if you have any questions, and thank you for helping out! ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 08:21, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Have a look at Tautog? The infobox is reading "struck" rather than the correct "stricken" & won't accept a change without wiping the line entirely, & won't accept an "as built" without putting it in a funky place. Trekphiler 15:59, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Sewanee-1899-football-team.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:30, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
It's been confirmed that it is acceptable to use this photo. Bryan MacKinnon (talk) 00:46, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Great start on this article. As we haven't connected before I thought I'd drop by to say that I trust you find my copy editing helpful. Please let me know if you have any queries and I look forward to reading more contributions from you on Scottish island and history issues if you have the time. Regards, Ben MacDuiTalk/Walk 11:16, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Yes, feel free to edit arms, I made them public domain. Editing and improving is very much in the spirit of wikipedia. Yours Czar Brodie (talk) 15:11, 17 August 2008 (UTC) ....p.s. on a side note, as the current chief is a lady the shield should technically be oval.
Hi, I saw yesterday you changed my "sea-god" into Amaterasu in the Siege of Kamakura (1333) article. I know you found this in a book, but I believe it's wrong anyway and, to avoid an editing war, I would like to explain why before changing it back to what it was.
First of all, almost all English sources speak of Amaterasu (Iso Mutsu being the exception), but no Japanese source I ever found does. Indeed, searching Google for "Amaterasu" and "Nitta Yoshisada" using Japanese characters produces less than ten hits, all false positives. This makes me think English-language article, always information-starved, very likely quote a single English source, and this single source is wrong. With one exception, my four sources (one English (Mutsu) and three Japanese), one of which is the monument on the very spot where the miracle supposedly happened, speak of a sea-god. The exception mentions a dragon-god. See for yourself. The monument mentions in no uncertain term a sea-god.
Second, I found English sources, particularly and specifically Stephen Turnbull (but others too) to be unforgivably error-prone. I was able to detect the errors because I live in Kamakura and I read Japanese sources. I therefore do not use English sources any more unless I have to.
I find very difficult to believe that the Japanese sources are all wrong, and the English ones right. Nonetheless, because the use of Amaterasu is so prevalent it must be somehow mentioned. Also, there are other articles on the subject, for example Nitta Yoshisada and Inamuragasaki, and they mention the sea-god, and not Amaterasu. We must get rid of the inconsistency. I think therefore we should use sea-god in the article, because that's what the most reliable sources say, and explain the situation in a detailed footnote. Let me know what you think.
urashimataro (talk) 00:51, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
First off, apologies for editing without consulting you first. I simply thought it was a typo. My primary source for this was the Taiheiki. In McCullough's translation on page 290 it refers to the "Sun Goddess of Ise" appearing in this world as the "dragon-god of the blue ocean." However, I'll certainly yield to you on this point but perhaps your idea of a footnote acknowledging the inconsistencies would be useful. Could it be that it's both a sun and sea goddess?
By the way, I live in Tokorozawa amidst Nitta's battlefields here. I've found inconsistencies between English and Japanese sources as well and always yield to the Japanese sources.
Bryan MacKinnon (talk) 05:05, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi, and no need for apologies. I have just consulted the original Japanese Taiheiki and this is what it says: 義貞馬より下給て、甲を脱で海上を遥々と伏拝み、竜神に向て祈誓し給ける。「伝奉る、日本開闢の主、伊勢天照太神は、本地を大日の尊像に隠し、垂跡を滄海の竜神に呈し給へりと、吾君其苗裔として、逆臣の為に西海の浪に漂給ふ。義貞今臣たる道を尽ん為に、斧鉞を把て敵陣に臨む。其志偏に王化を資け奉て、蒼生を令安となり。仰願は内海外海の竜神八部、臣が忠義を鑒て、潮を万里の外に退け、道を三軍の陣に令開給へ。
Don't really understand what it says, so for the time being I will leave things as they stand. Nitta does speak to the dragon-king, but there's an Amaterasu in there. Posted the passage in Wikipedia's talk page to see if anyone can understand. Can you? I think that extended footnotes are in any case the way to go. Thanks urashimataro (talk) 05:22, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
日本開闢の主 = Creation God and 伊勢天照大神 = Ise Amateraseu-o-mikami. However, the above text has "天照太神" which does not quite make sense to me. Then again, my Japanese is not great.
Bryan MacKinnon (talk) 05:46, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Bryan. Wrote the note. It was as you said: the dragon is a manifestation of Amaterasu. Take care and thanks for the gentlemanly exchange of info. urashimataro (talk) 07:11, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Bryan. I took the liberty to work on the Kamakura Kaidō article. It could use a quick revision made by a native speaker. If you have time, would you mind taking a look? And don't worry: I have no illusions about my English. BTW, I still have some stuff to add, but I thought I would put what I have on line. urashimataro (talk) 08:17, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Bryan. I finally finished an article on Hōkai-ji, and I thought you might be interested in reading it. I finally understood the nature of the relationship between Tōshō-ji and Hōkai-ji. Go-Daigo simply moved the Hōjō family temple (bodaiji) from Tōshō-ji to Hōkai-ji, reenshrining the Hōjō souls there so that the new Tōshō-ji would have no connection with the shogunate. urashimataro (talk) 23:14, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Bryan. Frank here. I would like to ask you a favor. I want to check whether it is in fact possible to send me an email from my user page. Could you try? Thanks in advance
UrashimaTarō (talk) 06:35, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
No. I didn't get any email. Bummer. UrashimaTarō (talk) 02:38, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
I have undid your modification that claimed that Margaret being uncrowned is "dubious". Please refer to the referenced source that was provided before deleting. If you have a reference that states she was in fact crowned, I'd love to hear about it.
Bryan MacKinnon (talk) 14:05, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for adding the Akasaka Palace to the table of National Treasures of Japan. Just wanted to let you know that I am working on an expansion of that article and will probably at some point also check the numbers in the table again. There have been two new designations in addition to the palace this year (one painting by Yosa Buson, one Dogū) which I am not sure are already in the table.bamse (talk) 13:01, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Done. I expanded the table a little.bamse (talk) 21:39, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
I attended the Japanese Wikipedia 10th Anniversary get-together in Kyoto. There seem to be very few people actively editing English articles on Japan. There also seems to be little teamwork between Japanese and non-Japanese Wikipedia enthusiasts in Japan. I wonder if you think that organizing a belated Wikipedia 10th event in the greater Tokyo area would help? LittleBen (talk) 14:01, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
How do you do? My name is Hot cake syrup, I read your article Kyodo no mori with considerable interest, thank you.
Maidashi ryokuchi is proposed deletion, but I think it is to leave over.
The reason is that the park is not famous, but it has substantial implication for the Fukuoka's modern history.
And in Wikipedia there are too few articles for Japanese garden.
If your concurrence on my opinion, please note your comment on Talk:Maidashi ryokuchi.
Bye for now.
--Hot cake syrup (talk) 10:37, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "TheRoD1988". The reason given for TheRoD1988's block is: "Disruptive editing: Right back after the blocke ended".
Decline reason: This autoblock is not currently active. It must ahave expired since you tried to edit. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:48, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Pasir Panjang Pillbox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pillbox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Matty.007. Bryanmackinnon, thanks for creating Submarines of World War II Specifications!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Wow, I bet that took some research. Looks good, just needs some categories.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Matty.007 10:12, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sewanee Elementary School may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:01, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sewanee Elementary School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public school (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Bryanmackinnon. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Sewanee Elementary School, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Barney the barney barney (talk) 21:11, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
You proposed that Sewanee Elementary School be deleted without giving any meaningful reasons. I disagree as the School played a significant role in the history of desegregation in Tennessee during the 1960's. A Tennessee Historical Commission marker has been placed at the school to that affect. This is explained in the article.
Also, it would be helpful you could explain exactly who you are and why you are taking such unilateral decisions. Bryan MacKinnon (talk) 02:24, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:24, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Bryanmackinnon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Hello, Bryanmackinnon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Bryanmackinnon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Mackinnon-Clan-CoatOfArms.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
The article Matsugaoka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
subdivision, does not meet WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 00:46, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Avent until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
The article Universities Research Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Appears to have been written with massive WP:COI, and it comes off as highly advertorial. Needs WP:TNT, and notability is dubious.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 18:43, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
1899 Sewanee Tigers football team has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.