I've been helping the band Discipline - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Discipline_%28band%29 - on their Wikipedia profile. How can I help make this site more relevant? They don't tour often, but they are playing a show this October in Central New Jersey. I can probably find reviews of their work. What else might you need?
- mike, progscape.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Progscape (talk • contribs) 22:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Dear Bjelleklang,
I tried to give every reference. Please tell me, why my submission is rejected.
Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikikaviivek (talk • contribs) 15:09, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Added more details to the diffs of time and geocoordinate values (will show which globe the coordinate is on and so on now as well)
More work on badges by Bene* - most work left is now in the GUI part of it
Removed unneeded and unused permissions/rights
Fixed a bug concerning spaces in quantities (bugzilla:61911)
Started work on taking ranks into account for queries, the property parser function and Lua. (By default only preferred values should be used if available. If not available then it should use values with rank normal.)
test2.wikipedia.org and test.wikipedia.org now use test.wikidata.org as their data repository, instead of wikidata.org
Started work on WikibaseInternalSerialization component
Changed the {{property}} parser function and Lua’s mw.wikibase.entity.formatPropertyValues to only return the statements ranked as preferred or if none are available the ones ranked as normal (This will probably go live on April 25th.)
Worked on improving page load time further by reducing the number of reloads during page loading
Made diffs for time and geocoordinates more complete and prettier
Continued research for user interface redesign
Tpt worked on optionally showing links to other sister projects in the client’s sidebar (bugzilla:54374)
Wrote a fix for Wikidata changes not showing up in the client’s watchlist (bugzilla:62149)
Updated a major chunk of our inline code documentation
Continued discussing technical details about how coordinates should be stored in Wikibase
"reviews of his books to establish notability, as they aren't independent of the subject. For the article to be accepted and notability to be verifiable, you need non-trivial and independent sources"
why books' reviews are considered dependent?
Can you give an example what is considered to be independent or non-trivial.
Looking on many other biographies of professors in Wikipedia - I find many other with even less resources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.235.89.48 (talk) 16:37, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Replying here and to the IP in question. Sorry for the bad wording, I've updated the decline reason. But basically you need something other than reviews and his own books to establish notability, so the review result is the same. Also, the next time you want to ask a question adding the link to the article would be nice as I'm amongst the least active reviewers but still had to look through my contribs to find the article in question. Bjelleklang - talk 19:43, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Hi, is this necessary? Mees was not sentenced, the charges are set for dismissal. Why accept an edit that obliterates all her other achievements and only highlight the false accusations? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmwz3hm (talk • contribs) 00:39, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia is a nasty place. The charges against Mees are set for dismissal. She has not been convicted, she did not plead guilty so she therefore can not be sentenced. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmwz3hm (talk • contribs) 01:03, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Reduced page load time significantly once again. Page load time was cut to roughly 2/3. For now we’re happy with the resulting page load times. We’ll start concentrating on other areas of the user interface now.
Fixed faulty selection handling when adding a property using the keyboard (bugzilla:62868)
Worked on fixing issues with handling of spaces in quantities (bugzilla:62567)
Fixed miscount of Wikidata changes on the client watchlist (bugzilla:45812)
Wrote new browser tests for special pages using the Cucumber and Selenium frameworks
Improved error formatting, localisation and handling. We will work on error message wording next to make them more understandable.
Worked on the code which propagates page moves from the clients into Wikidata as a preparation for allowing page deletions to appear on Wikidata
Made the Wikibase extension work with the new “Compact language links” Beta feature and a bit more independent from the UniversalLanguageSelector in general
The student team working on the entity suggester has finished the first version of it. The code is being reviewed now and is hopefully ready for deployment soon. Once it is deployed it will show you what new properties you could add to an item.
You declined my submission for an article for the company known as Parature, citing lack of notability and/or reliable resources. I was hoping you could clarify which sources you considered unreliable; I found other sources, but after talking on the IRC with other editors, they recommended I look for others. As such, I found sources such as the Washington Post, Washington Business Journal, Techcrunch, and the Wall Street Journal, instead. I also tried my best in the Awards section to use the official website of the organization who issued the awards whenever possible.
The main reason I am trying to get this article submitted is that Parature was acquired by Microsoft recently (as stated in the text of the article) and I am trying to update this article so that it can be linked to in a list of Microsoft acquisitions, as well as display the most current information about the company. I understand that it was rejected previously because it was not stated what the company does (leading to confusion and the impression that it was a call center of sorts); however, I have tried to state as clearly as possible in my edits that it is a software development firm which creates, sells, and implements customer service software using a SaaS (Software as a Service) model.
If there is other information I can provide, please let me know. If this is an issue with sources, can you please tell me what is wrong with the sources I cited.
Thank you for your time,
kim2jy70.182.186.78 (talk) 18:32, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
RE your review of the draft that you reference at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Discipline_%28band%29…You wrote "From the contents and the sources cited I'm not convinced that the band is notable. Yes, they have released some records, been on tour and played at festivals, but there is still no evidence as far as I can tell that they've received any coverage outside interviews, tour info and reviews." Can you give a hypothetical example of what might rise to the level of notability for inclusion? The article sites sources, several that are verifiable online, so I suspect that is not the basis of the rejection for notability. The article cites another wikipedia article that specifically references the band. There are no publicity stunts; it is all just music press. Would additional critical acclaim raise the article's notability? For example, would the addition of the following help (this from June 2014): "There is no doubt in my mind that one of the most important bands to come out of America in the last 25 years is Discipline." —Kev Rowland, Amplified Magazine, Number 135, June 2014 (New Zealand). …Any guidance you can provide is appreciated.Disciplineband (talk) 08:15, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
I am not familiar with how "pending review" works. I would like to undo IP 122.248.140.29's four edits to the Heleen Mees article. Am I supposed to wait until IP 122.248.140.29's edits are reviewed/accepted? (It appears to me that all four changes have gone through.) Who is in charge of reviewing the edits? Can the reviewer deny an edit from being posted?
I undid my revert of IP user 122.248.140.29's edit (where he/she deleted Mees' birth name from the infobox without a reason in the edit summary) because I don't understand how the "pending review" process works and don't want to mess up the Heleen Mees article more than it has been already by users 210.87.255.235, 122.248.140.29, Kinker020, and Bilbao86 reverting/edit-warring. --TheCockroach (talk) 04:20, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
I haven't used it much myself, but if you review PC, there should be a form at the top of the diff asking you to accept or revert the changes. Undoing/rolling back works just as well IIRC. Reviews can be done by any established editor, and acceptance or reverts will be added to the page history as with any other edit. Bjelleklang - talk 07:34, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello TheCockroach - I'm Anupmehra. Heleen Mees article was recently protected to make [live] changes only by auto-confirmed users, because of edit-warring between several editors. However, the protection was removed barely after 6 minutes by admin Bjelleklang, for he/she misunderstood the request made to him or request protection page.
Pending changes protection enables only a group of editors to make live changes to the protected page. It may be set as, "[edit=autoconfirmed]" for users belonging to "auto-confirmed" user group or [edit=reviewers] for users belonging to "reviewer" group. Other people are able to edit these pages, but changes do not go live, until reviewed by the some editor belonging to a particular group, protection is set for. Hope, it does help. If not, feel free to open the request. Good luck! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 07:50, 28 April 2014 (UTC) Note: I reached here following "Category:Wikipedians looking for help". Just realized it is on another person's talk page not the requester talk page.
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Looking for a cool university project with impact? We have some of them around Wikidata - not just for computer science students. Get in touch with Lydia.
Had a lot to think about and recap from the Zürich Hackathon, e.g. things regarding search, suggestions as well as the user interface redesign
Started doing mockups of the new user interface (Nothing to show yet, sorry!)
Setup an autogenerating code documentation instance on labs at wbdoc.wmflabs.org. Hint: Submitting patches that make the inline code documentation even better is a good starting point to get involved in coding
Worked on new datatype monolingual text (basically a string with an associated language)
Reworked a hell lot of “change operations” code that’s responsible for each and every edit as well as validating user input and API requests, for example denying empty descriptions and finding and blocking unnecessary duplications
Checked all the new Beta features that the teams in San Francisco are developing and made sure they work with Wikidata
Our efforts to make Wikidata faster broke some gadgets so we helped fixing them. Sorry for the breakage!
Dug into odd display bugs with the MonoBook skin and attempted to fix them (bugzilla:64741)
More testing on simple queries
Tpt worked on making inter-project links in the sidebar a beta-feature
Editors may now include their ORCID identifiers (and others, such as VIAF) on their user pages, using the Authority control template. You can register for an ORCID at http://orcid.org
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
More cleanup for the coming switch to WikibaseDataModel 1.0.
Icinga Dispatch Lag monitoring scripts, including IRC notifier bot, have been tested and are ready for Ops implementation. This should give us quicker notifications in case the notifications to Wikipedia and co about changes on Wikidata are slow again.
GenderCounter uses Wikidata to provide an accurate service with distinguishing male and female names
ca.wikipedia found a nice way to use Wikidata. They're comparing their living people to Wikidata to see if any of them have a date of death there. They're then put into a category for review: ca:Categoria:Persones vives a revisar
Continued working on full redirect support for items. It touches a surprising big chunk of the code base.
Continued working on the QueryEngine code base and it’s data type support.
Fixed and updated the most recent implementation of the property and item selector widget, e.g. a MonoBook specific bug.
Pushed along reviews and deployment of the entity suggester code that will make suggestions for new properties to be added to items. Our hope is to have it through performance review for the next deployment.
Hey everyone, it's rare these small sections come along but there is a bit of interesting news to get across which one line under 'noteworthy stuff' won't be the best for. For the next 6 summaries, they will be translatable at Wikidata. This is an interesting idea which was first proposed on the delivery page and on Wikidata-l by Base. This is purely a trial and if you all want the summaries to remain translatable, please participate! You can view the first translated summary (hopefully) here! Also sorry for this one being late:)
As part of the Outreach Program for Women d:User:User:Thepwnco is continuing improving all help pages to help new users understand Wikidata better. At the same time w:User:Discoveranjali is helping with social media outreach and creating presentations workshops about Wikidata.
More work on redirects. They are taking shape. Done with much of the groundwork. We've seen the first one! :D
Continued work on user interface redesign mockups
Monolingual text datatype is also taking shape but needs more user interface love to make it intuitive.
Investigated making Wikidata.org its own client so you can for example get access to better Lua functions for access to an item's label on a discussion page. Outcome: Should be possible but needs some more work.
Two new GuidedTours (aka interactive tutorials) have been released—we now have one on editing items and one on editing statements! Both tours are available from the Wikidata:Tours portal and feedback can be left on the talk page at Wikidata_talk:Tours. The work was a combined effort of User:Bene* and Outreach Program for Women intern User:Thepwnco.
We passed another milestone \o/ 10 million items now have an "instance of" or "subclass of" statement making it easy to tell what the item is about.
Bene* worked with the dev team this week. He pushed forward support for storing badges (eg featured article) on Wikidata and implemented the first two guided tours.
CTRL+ click and middle click on a search result in the entity selector now opens the result in a new tab.
Further progress on redirects
Fixed a number of annoyances with the entity selector
Continued work on mockups for new user interface
Investigated what issues come up if we make wikidata.org its own client. Things look good so we will probably enable it soonish. This will mean you can link Wikidata pages in items and access the data in them on other pages on Wikidata.
Wikidata's new Main page is almost ready to go live, but is still in need of a visually-appealing banner! Got an idea for an eye-catching design that represents what Wikidata's all about? Submit proposals before August 11 at d:Wikidata:Portal Redesign/Banner
Hello, Bjelleklang. You're invited to join WikiProject Today's articles for improvement. Feel free to nominate an article for improvement at the project's Nominated articles page. Also feel free to contribute to !voting for new weekly selections at the project's talk page. If interested in joining, please add your name to the list of members. NorthAmerica1000 17:08, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Events/Blogs/Press
Wikimania \o/ It was amazing and Wikidata all over the place. Wikidata's true potential is starting to show.
Finished a large number of new features and got them ready for roll-out. More in this email.
Wikibase made a big step forward to finally switch to DataModel 1.0.
Improved support for entity IDs bigger than 2 billion (32 bit integer).
We had to adapt Wikibase to some major changes (more major than usual, partly caused by discussions at Wikimania) in MediaWiki core: The default Vector skin became it’s own component and the ResourceLoader got some small but important updates.
Continued work on refactoring code of the user interface to make it ready for new design
Wrote a script to get number of users having wikidata in their recent changes/watchlist from the database
It will be possible to show the badges like "Featured Article" stored on Wikidata in the sidebar of the clients (Wikipedia, Wikisource, ...) starting Tuesday. Wikipedia will follow on Thursday.
Starting Tuesday we will deploy a new beta feature on the clients. It will allow you to show links to other sister projects in the sidebar based on the links in Wikidata.
Badges support via Wikidata has been rolled out to Wikipedia and other sister projects. If the icons shown are not the ones your project would like please request a change here.
Performance improvements for "in other projects sidebar" beta feature and bug fixes in the feature on wikis with sidebar cache enabled (e.g. zhwiki, commons)
Worked on performance improvements to badges feature
Fixing bug with xml format in the API, and added tests for it so hopefully this does not break again!
Worked more on enabling statements on properties
Further work on new user interface design groundwork - mostly refactoring and enabling editing of multiple sitelinks and label/alias/description at once
First pokes at usage tracking
Drafted an RfC to improve recent changes so we can show Wikidata changes also when enhanced recent changes is enabled
With the deployment next Tuesday you will be able to edit all sitelinks at once as well as all fields of the "in other languages" box. This is an intermediate step towards the new user interface and will evolve further over the next weeks. You can see what is coming on Tuesday now already on test.wikidata.org.
WikiProject Names aims to improve name related data on Wikidata. Initial focus is on first names (given names). Half of items for first names still need cleaning up, but 15% of items for persons already have a given name defined.
Worked on supporting statements on properties in WikibaseDataModelSerialization (bugzilla:66425)
Fixed broken xml api output (bugzilla:70531), as well as some inconsistencies in the xml format and added tests that should help avoid future breakage in the xml format
Finished performance improvements for badges
Worked on entity usage tracking
Pietro from the EAGLE project came to visit us, one of the first 3rd party users of Wikibase. See http://www.eagle-network.eu
Added a hook point to allow 3rd party users (like the EAGLE project) of Wikibase to control what goes into the search index
Started work on a widget that lets you edit badges right in the item instead of going to the special page
The second AFD for Belle Knox has been overturned and relisted. As you commented on the original AFD, you may wish to comment on this one as well. As there have been developments and sources created since the time of the original AFD, please review to see if your comments/!vote are the same or may have changed. Gaijin42 (talk)
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Discussions
[[:d:Wikidata:Requests for comment/User conduct policies|Closed RfC: User conduct policies]
Want to be kept up-to-date on structured data on Commons? There is now a new newsletter you can subscribe to.
Interested in some statistics about the data on Wikidata? Check Wikidata Stats every now and then. (Thanks Magnus for moving it to the new dump format.)
Spent the week with the WMF multimedia team and volunteers to get more clarity about structured data on Commons. We'll be asking for feedback on a lot of stuff over the next weeks. The main info hub is taking shape at Commons:Structured data.
More fixes for the switch to HHVM
Looked into possible performance improvements. Some of them will be taken into the next sprint.
Battled a handful of nasty issues on the live-site
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Events/Blogs/Press
Wikidata turned 2 on Wednesday! Have a look at the notes from the community and development team and add your note. Also don't forget to check out all the cool presents (a painting, speed improvements, a huge load of unconnected articles that you can help connect via the Wikidata Game, WikidataLDF, a recent changes visualisation)!
Continued work on LabelLookup and related code to further improve performance
Made it possible to show references in statements on property pages. (Remaining bugs before roll-out are issues with adding/editing/removing statements on property pages.)
Further improvements to sitelink editing (The edit toolbar now floats so it doesn't scroll out of the page on a long list of sitelinks. An empty row for adding a new sitelink is shown by default when editing to make this faster and take less scrolling.)
Further adapting of simple query code so we can get it to review at the Foundation again.
Hello Bjelleklang. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.
The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.
If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)
If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.
Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.
I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Qaster. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. —Cryptic 12:53, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Work is ongoing for a bot job to tag thousands of objects in OpenStreetMap with the equivalent Wikidata ID
Resolver finds Wikidata items for a given identifier (VIAF, GND, IMDB, ...)
English-Wikipedia now has a template, RedQ, which puts a Wikidata link next to red links for subjects which have no Wikipedia article in any language, This should prevent duplicate Wikidata items from being created when an article is written, and assist Wikipedia editors to find relevant facts and sources. Please copy it to other-language Wikipedias.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pir Aaqa Ghulam Mujaddid Sarhandi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hijrat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ• Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
You Said -
Please avoid adding information that cannot be directly attributed to a reliable source.
Youtube is not such a source.
Me - but in the this case, there is a source b'cos this person become a popular b'cos of it.
so some of the information must be there like her youtube channel and some of the information about it.
you said -
lease avoid adding information that cannot be directly attributed to a reliable source.
there is no need to list every little thing she has appeared on.
Me -
Sir, I respect your review, response and rules.
but here my opinion is that if we're not putting the information than there is no wikipedia.
wikipedia made from the little little information. A single word has definitaion in the wikipedia.
but why not, there is no need to list every little thing she has appeared on.
You said -
The Windsong festival doesn't list her in their lineup,
so in other words her appearance there is likely to be minor,
and thus just another gig not really worth mentioning.
Me -
She performed there, there is a video outside in youtube while she is performing at windsong.
Sir, this gig or appearance is make the artist's life, they are living on these things.
you said -
Keep the article short and to the facts for now,
she simply hasn't done a lot worth covering (yet),
Me -
Sir, She became celebrity b'cos of that cover,
there are too many artist like Austin Mahone, justin bieber. in their wikipedia page,
there are little details available on it. where are they came from, what's their first video on youtube.
so why not for her?
you said -
As mentioned before we have a strict policy on biographies at Wikipedia,
Me -
Sir, I respect the policy.
I respect your review, response for this.
Thank you very much for that.
One request,
Just read once again that i previously uploaded information.
It's not wrong information but it's the little-little information that makes her an artist.
Thank you once again.
ℳ§ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meetrockin (talk • contribs) 05:44, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello Sir,
Thanks for your response and support.
i read the WP:UNDUE, WP:RS and BLPs.
Now I edited once again with proper reliable sources and other detailing which in the reliable sources.
there are little information and some of the numbers too but it's according to reliable source.
it defines that how she will become the celebrity.
I didn't used unreliable source or assuming something.
Hopefully, now you approved fully source page which i edited.
Thanks for the guide me.
and i want to ask something about Shraddha's picture,,
i don't have any copyrighted picture,,
so how can i bought the copyrighted picture from the web-site? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meetrockin (talk • contribs) 19:51, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ruby Duncan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages University of Nevada and Tallulah. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ• Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi Bjelleklang, I don't really understand why it is not st170e to review our article. He has assisted us through the whole process of article creation, citations etc. and we also implemented his last suggestion (inline citations) for having the article published on Wikipedia. Now it is again somebody else to review the article and the whole process starts from the beginning...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:St170e/Archive_2#Draft:_Zenon_Software
Thank you for your help.
Dear Bjelleklang, I do not understand why you are deleting my changes. It is quite obvious I am in history for being with Tony Curtis. If you look him up on Wikipedia Tony Curtis (by himself) I am also included in his history. Why can I not have my own page? There are other people less famous than I am with a page. I do not understand why Andrea Savio cannot be easily connected to Tony Curtis, and therefore the reason beyond my own film career why I am famous for this. That alone should make it notable. Why are you trying to erase my history as if it doesn't exist? How can you do that? It does exist. This is frustrating to me. I am not making a big deal about being famous if that is what you think, it is just a fact of history. Therefore it is notable. I will look for more references such as Life magazine. Might take a while to do so. I have magazines dated back to when I was with him. I will photograph them and submit. Thank you.Andrea Savio (talk) 01:15, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Closed/checked even more ‘testme’ bugs on Phabricator
Wikidata Query has gotten a number of stability fixes. To increase availability and performance we now have multiple instances of it with a load balancer in front of it.
The data for the entity suggester has been updated. Suggestions when adding new statements should be even better now.
106.79.24.96 (talk) 08:14, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
hey,
I submitted an article on kashmiri elegy and the draft was deleted with this comment, 21:52, 20 December 2014 Bjelleklang (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:KASHMIRI MARTHIYA (ELEGY) (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.aford.org/thehamdanis.org/kashmiri-elegy1.html).
Now the article quoted has also been written by me,so i am not sure,do i need to credit myself or what?
Hi. I'm sorry for deleting your draft, but when nothing is mentioned in the original text I have to assume that it is copyrighted, and thus delete the copy found on Wikipedia. If you are the copyright owner of the article and want to donate it to Wikipedia, please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. Keep in mind that the text still have to pass the requirements on Notability, verifiability and use of neutral language in order to be accepted as an article. Please review the instructions found on the page on donating materials and please let me know if you have any questions related to this. Bjelleklang - talk 12:36, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
This is regarding your reply ( Bjelleklang - talk 12:36, 21 December 2014 (UTC)).. First want to thank you for your reply. I have a small question, i had made certain changes to the draft on the Wikipedia page, unfortunately i never saved them on my system. Is their any way i can retrieve the same and then submit it back? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.97.181.112 (talk)
Hello Sir,
I'm waiting for your decision because this article you were restored in your revision area.
There are many artist's article has a each and every song list in their page then why not for this article.
Sir, you said this article hasn't reliable source for the information.
now i edited with reliable source. it's a biography. there are suppose to be a information or detail about her.
you said - She isn't notable for appearing in ads. Until there are proper reliable sources detailing other things she's done. If you have a reliable source mentioning her appearance there it might be listed if it gives some context, but keep in mind that a Youtube video isn't regarded as a reliable source.
Sir, as per you said i keep it in the mind and found the reliable source and edit the article and there are each and every detailed is according to reliable source.
Hopefully, you would note my point approve what i edited.
Thanks for your support/guide. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meetrockin (talk • contribs) 17:57, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello Sir,
you asked: What is your relation to Shraddha Sharma?
I'm her fan, & i want to give her a new year surprise!
and according to article rules-policy!
I submitted all the details with reliable source which you said!
sir, you said "If you have a reliable source mentioning her it might be listed if it gives some context"
Sir i research & observed all the wikipedia articles which related to this article,
there are all the little information about the artist and even a song has an different article, each and every song of the album displayed at the article! why not here!
Sir, now i submitted with reliable source.
than what's the problem? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meetrockin (talk • contribs) 13:18, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
OK Sir,
as per your policy, rule and your permission!
there is no need to list every track on it with a link to ITunes but every artist(article) has a list of every song track.
what about that?
what about the other articles which i observed and made this article.there are little details about an artist If you want examples of that articles i'll give you.
I'm not forcing for all the details but at least there must be sufficient information about an artist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meetrockin (talk • contribs) 16:27, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
armaan malik, Aditya Narayan, Mohammad Irfan Ali these are some examples of other articles where everything is listed.
each & every track is listed plus their early life means small detailed like edited.
Austin Mahone and justin bieber, they're starting their career from Youtube. in their article each and every details are available even when their first YouTube song release date? their mother & father details, how they becomes famous? every details.
when you noticed this article than you realized. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meetrockin (talk • contribs) 19:41, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Sir that's what i'm saying that if they notable at multiple thing than it shown in the article but in this article i edit the information (with reliable source) where she was notable you removed it!
there are each and every song track is shown in their article!
so why not here?
there are information that's why we know they notable at different different places,
if we can not put small information about artist than how people know about them that there are some song tracks of the artist.
if we put the information here which i edited with reliable source than people will know, she contributed to multiple notable ads & concerts & album!
i am not saying that put the wrong information but at least which information has reliable source you should put it into this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meetrockin (talk • contribs) 18:43, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello sir,
as you said, it's acceptable!
but what about the information which is already in the reliable source.
what am i saying is that if the reliable source has information about the artist than why not in the wikipedia article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meetrockin (talk • contribs) 10:45, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi! I saw you just recently posted in the Reliable Source Noticeboard. Would you mind giving a quick look to this and telling me your opinion? Thanks a lot! El Huinca (talk) 22:21, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Plese remove the ethinc slur you smear on my talk page. And revert yourself in Ce02. If you want to know reasons for the del read it. If you dont get why it was deleted ask for help. 73.50.83.60 (talk) 01:30, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
Wikiwand in your browser!
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.