Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Why was my callwave article deleted? did i insert the information incorrectly?
UPDATE: just read your suggestions about CORP, im reading into that, thanks.
UPDATE: After looking for other companies in the same market, i have this company...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J2_Global_Communications. I think they are the owners of eFax and they list all thier products as well. I took the description of callwave straight from http://finance.google.com/finance?q=CALL so im not sure how it was blatant advertising. Im still reading through the TOS for CORP but im not seeing anyting that would get my page delted.
Hi - I've been putting some historic perspective on the Tain Hindu Mandir link and you have removed it. I think you need to rethink what you are doing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.250.34.161 (talk) 19:38, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
So is u that keeps deleting my section of the warren, mi article —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Home Slice7 (talk • contribs) 23:33, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
yea but i live in warren. what do u mean by source do u wanna a picture a website some thing like that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Home Slice7 (talk • contribs) 23:41, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
SO THEN WHAT IN THE HELL CONNOTATES A GROUP THAT ASSERTS SIGNIFICANCE GOOD SIR? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Punkorama024 (talk • contribs) 19:13, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Punkorama024 (talk • contribs) 19:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For your hard work on combating vandals, and your hard work in general --Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 18:42, 29 October 2007 (UTC)) |
I'm surprised that you didn't receive one of these yet, since you certainly earn one. Keep up the good work, and think about placing your barnstars somewhere on your user page, instead of your talk archives :) --Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 18:42, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for making a report about 209.96.105.20 (talk · contribs · block log) on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you! --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:43, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Dear Kwsn, I believe that user should be blocked. S/he is persistently vandalising the entry on Maria Gaetana Agnesi. Kind regards, --BF 01:04, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Further to the above message, please also block this one: . Kind regards, --BF 13:37, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations, you are now an administrator! Now is the time to visit the Wikipedia:New admin school and, if you haven't already, to look through the Wikipedia:Administrators' how-to guide and Wikipedia:Administrators' reading list. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me, or at the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. Warofdreams talk 00:09, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Great job! jj137 (Talk) 01:40, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Glad you've made admin! My ignorant advice? (Ignorant because I'm not an admin.) Make sure you take breaks from the project as needed. Rested and alert admins are much better than grumpy and snappish ones. Pigmanwhat?/trail 02:02, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
—treyomg he's back has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Congratulations and good luck! /me huggles —treyomg he's back 23:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Not that I have a major problem with it or anything, but I am curious why you declined the speedy on Cris P. You failed to note a reason when you removed it. Improbcat 18:29, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Isn't really vandalizing? look at the history for Bryan Adams (wrestler) they keep reverting to "...he became a bodyguard for his boyfriend..." when he wasn't gay...if I'm not mistaken he was married (to a woman lol) --Crash Underride 20:13, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
I noticted that you deleted this article under A1, and I tagged it as G1(patent nonsense) Sorry. It was only one sentence, and seemed like nonsense to me, but I realize now that A1 was more accurate in that situation.--U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 01:04, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey would you mind clearing the backlog (well there are only 3 reports, but they have been there like 30 mins) from WP:AIV? Thanks, Tiptoety 06:20, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Um, isn't that actually the same thing? :-) - ∅ (∅), 08:55, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Btw, how did you know I was a kid? I'll be 11 next month Botnet 22:36, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in my recent RfA. Although the voting ended at 36/22/5, there was no consensus to promote, and the RfA was unsuccessful. I would like the thank you nonetheless for supporting me during the RfA, and hope that any future RfA’s proceed better than this one did. Again, I thank you for your support. ≈ The Haunted Angel Review Me! 02:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
I fired you one. Cheers, Daniel 10:33, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi Kwsn, saw you also re-removed a bad UAA report by User:SqueakBox. Check out his talk page. Why do you think there's this bizarre insistence that 'smartypants' is disruptive? ~Eliz81(C) 18:25, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Would you consider changing that extension to 72 hours, I think one week is a bit long considering the block log. If you choose not to change the duration, I'll support you either way. Best, Mercury 20:28, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for extending my block. I think it was the right way to go. 84.44.174.127 21:23, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
I have deleted and restored your talk page in order to remove edits which published editors' real names. Do not be alarmed. :) -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:48, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Can you give me some diffs to support this? I know the blocked user has been emailing Fnagton and me, but I must be missing something. Are you suggesting it's not acceptable to discuss a banned user's implosion on one's own talk page? And is it really necessary to be so protective of banned users who have abused multiple socks, intentionally posted others' real names to harass them, made death threats, etc? -- But|seriously|folks 06:45, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey kwsn, I've started up a thread on AN about a possible unblock of Dorftrottel, due to him no longer being drunk - feel free to comment. Hope everythings going well, Ryan Postlethwaite 18:55, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations on becoming an administrator!
Just before you got your mop, a prominent Wikipedian made this comment: "I am running out of patience for incivility at Wikipedia,... Some people simply should not be contributing to an encyclopedia.... and note that all editors should always endeavor to treat each other with kindness, or else find another hobby. When we put up with this kind of behavior, we enable a hostile environment that drives away good people. We should be gentle, but firm: this kind of behavior is not allowed at Wikipedia." --Jimbo Wales 21:01, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
and I wondered what your attitude was?
The reason I ask is that there have been recent admin threads on whether, and under what circumstances one admin should overturn the block of another ...Alice.S 06:23, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
I too am concerned about your overturning of Tim Vickers block. I am posting it to ANI for review. --DHeyward 06:49, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Since this keeps getting reclosed at AN/I... please do not unblock users without first checking with the blocking admin and/or seeking consensus to do so at AN/I, except in very limited cases. It is not really a good idea to go in and unlaterally decide this. The blocking admin may know things that should not be made public, and in my view, in general it's just not a good idea to revert your fellow admins without consensus. Thanks. My advice to new admins is to avoid reverting the actions of other admins altogether for quite some time. ++Lar: t/c 14:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
You blocked this editor and now that same editor is listed at SSP. If you have an opinion on the SSP matter, please consider adding it. Thanks. -- Jreferee t/c 12:54, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
I've removed the AFD notice and added the "kept at AFD" notice to cPanel, as it appears that you did not delete it like the other articles. If this was my error, feel free to revert. Either way, you might want to clarify this at the AFD. Thanks, shoy (words words) 16:53, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Delivered on 12:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC).
for the revert on Eilat. It's ironic: travelers to the ME often have the reverse of what vandal was complaining about. Keep up the good work: it is appreciated. :] Shir-El too 23:36, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I realized that I was editing the old revisions in which some of the DVD Talk linkspam had been added and tried to go back and fix them. Thanks for catching my mistake! I was tracking down the contributions of an IP that had solicited DVD Talk across numerous film articles. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 17:01, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Wow, you are fast - thanks for the help! Inertia Tensor 05:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Hail to thee sir knight! Long may your shrubberies grow and prosper!
I noticed one of the surviving bits of BJAODN contains some libel about Jimbo, but I can't get rid of it myself cos the page is protected. As the first admin from the deletion debate who voted keep, maybe you could sort it out and stop anyone taking it as a reason to delete the whole page? Its section 15 I mean.
Moyabrit 14:08, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Looks like I messed up your revision to Mamba... Sorry about that! Thanks for helping with Vandalism!--PabloMartinez 19:22, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
hey man, we are a very real company. http://www.bubbleup.net/
and we have very real clients, such as Jimmy_Buffet, Daryl_Hall and Gretchen_Wilson. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Booleanoperator (talk • contribs) 19:46, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi just wondering how other online game sites such as runescape are allowed a page and yet funkypool isnt? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Funkypool (talk • contribs) 23:27, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Wait, how can runescape be a justified article? Seems to just be providing similar information which i would have included if i had been allowed to for funkypool. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Funkypool (talk • contribs) 23:39, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the more understanding reply, I see that such websites as runescape and habbo hotel are a more commercial enterprise and so this seems to give them more official presence on the internet. The thing is, if you are admin are you not able to question this? I am a very new user and I apologise if my knowledge of the restrictions implemented by this site is limited. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Funkypool (talk • contribs) 23:47, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Apologies, I didnt know how to... Personally I cant see a problem with creating an article about a popular online pool game. But if there is nothing i can do then i will have to accept it. Thanks for the lightning fast correspondence Funkypool 23:54, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
I only created an account in the hope of creating the article, if I have another reason to edit or create a new article (may have to flick through the guidelines more thoroughly next time) I will register a new account. I will leave this account so that if in the event of the restrictions being slackened i can re-create the article (better not hold my breath though) Funkypool 00:02, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
In response to FisherQueen's post I understand the need for the information to be independantly researched to ensure it is true, but why would this independant research be done for a "free" online pool game? With such sites as Habbo Hotel and Runescape charging for access to their site and the gameplay they are open to become an independant business where they are self funded. This also allows them to be open to scandal such as online fraud (specifically Habbo Hotel which has been very recently involved in such circumstances). Such scandal interests these independant researchers and so builds the site's name up to become a world wide brand. So the simple question is... are such smaller sites required to become a world wide name on the internet through online fraud just to allow them to make an article about themself on wikipedia? Funkypool 00:30, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
As you suggested I applied to have my username changed, however, my post has been removed for some unknown reason? Any ideas?Funkypool 01:07, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, done now and I'll just sit and wait for a reply! Funkypool 01:13, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Editor re-created, i have tagged it again, then user rm {{speed}} tag. Please delete, thanks. Tiptoety 23:42, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you, Tiptoety 23:43, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey, can you put my page for the EFFL back up. its just a thing i put on for fun, it me and my buddies football pool and i thought it would be fun to have a wikipedia page where we could store our history and stuff. it isnt for advertising or anything, it is strictly for fun, and isnt that what wikipedia is about
--K perry 1 00:08, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
hi kwsn .. would like to get your help to put some information about the Tain Hindu Mandir on line. any of your suggestions will be helpful :) dk —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.250.34.161 (talk) 16:35, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
They're after you today. I protected your user page for 24 a few hours ago. See ya'! -- But|seriously|folks 18:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you A7'ed this article. Can you userfy it for me so I can work on it for restoration? Chubbles (talk) 09:01, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
since you were a bit nicer in telling me why and this is my first article i am trying to submit can you possibly tell me idk what to different becuase i feel it should stay because there are articles like the montgomery dinghy dawdle that have little notability for signficane. Thank you Emargul (talk) 17:10, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
that it should stay, it has no direct violation really, and it has some significance i mean it was just launched and is beginning to get lots of traffic, thats why it is popping up on places like digg, so i feel to be fair there is no immdiate violation and it should stay. I am putting up the other sources on the page so please be helpful and maybe edit it. If you do feel it is really not notable after looking at my other sources than feel free to delete it. Also i shouldn't put a link to the actual web page right?
the title says it all
help me on the deletion page. There has to be some reason you didi'nt delete it so please tell them
WTF, u deleted the talk page, thats were we were protesting the deletion of the article, please bring back the talk page (and the article while ur at it) --Xgmx (talk) 17:14, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the unblock!--Diniz (talk) 18:13, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
My entry for the HUYA syndrome contains content of merit and is similar to concepts like Murphy's Law and the PETER Principle - which, while not quantifiable, have a place in the popular American lexicon. I ask the HUYA Syndrome entry be reinstated, or if you prefer, relocated to the entry on Allan Weisbecker, the author who defined the concept itself. Thank you.
Insert non-formatted text here
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.