Loading AI tools
Hi (talk to me), / Bonjour, / Hola,
Find me on Commons On Wikibooks On Wikinews On Wikiquote On Wikisource On Wikiversity On Meta-Wiki Not on Wiktionary
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| My userpage | Talk to me | Email me | Edit Count | Workshop | Sandbox | Userboxes | Accomplishments |
Note to posters: Let's try to keep two-way conversations readable. If you post to this talk page, I will just reply here. If I posted recently to another talk page, including your talk page, then that means I have it on my watchlist and will just read responses there. Alainr345 (T)
 |
Hello Alainr345. You have been invited to join WikiProject Java, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the Java-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in, or edits relating to or within the scope of the project. If you would like to join or just help out a bit, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of project members. |
 |
Hello Alainr345. You have been invited to join WikiProject Industrial design, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the Industrial design-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in, or edits relating to or within the scope of the project. If you would like to join or just help out a bit, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of project members. |
- A request for adminship is open for discussion.
- An open letter regarding the Wikimedia Foundation's potential disclosure of editors' personal information is collecting signatures.
- Should it be a requirement for all administrators seeking resysop to have completed their last administrative action within the previous five years?
- Extended-confirmed pending changes and preemptive protection in contentious topics
- Are portals encyclopedic, and are they appropriate redirect targets?
- Should recall petitions be limited to signatures only?
- Nominations for the Arbitration Committee elections
- Should the length of a recall petition be shortened?
- Striking others' comments from archives
For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard.
My personal website is located at: / Mon site internet perso est à : / Mi sitio web está en:
http://www.alainrenaud.ca
( curriculum vitae , resume , informatique , programming , java , geomatique , GIS , maitrise , lidar , cpx , girih , 3dinks , ecolocal , genealogie , BD , animation , 3D , jeu , gaming , photographie , art , economie , politique , ebenisterie , voile , nuclear )
|
|
- NEW! The meaning of all this is that the 'startup' phase of the Java project is finished. The project now switches to its 'mature' phase. I encourage you to put your name in the todo page after one of the remaining
tasks. You can also aim to be Coordinator if you so desire. (2010-05-13)
- Great day kids! All 1482 Java pages are now importance-assessed. From now on, let's increase article quality! (2010-05-11)
- Great news folks! We recently got our first-ever Featured Article rating. (2010-05-03)
- We reached another important milestone: all 1450 Java pages are now quality-assessed. Let's finish importance assessment! (2010-04-25)
- Hello guys and dolls, good news! Our second Cleanup listing is now available. So, no more excuses for laziness, let's get to work, all of us... (2010-03-24)
- Totally awesome news! Our project was featured in this edition (2010-03-08) of the Wikipedia Signpost (2010-03-09)
- The Java Cafe is now opened! (2010-03-03)
- Big news again, we now have 300 images within the project scope with more to come soon! (2010-03-02)
- Great news folks! We recently got our first-ever Good Article rating. (2010-02-27)
- Last month ranking stats for the WikiProject Java articles is here. (2010-02-01)
- Current monthly ranking stats for the WikiProject Java articles is here. (2010-01-01)
- Hello guys and dolls, good news! Our first meaningful Cleanup listing is now available. (2009-12-11)
- Hi everybody! We just opened the WikiProject Java (and portal) for business. So enjoy! (2009-10-26)
- Hello everybody! Now that we are at least 5 members, we are able to officialize this thing. Don't you think it would be great if each one of us proudly displayed his membership by placing the Java Userbox on its user (or talk) page... (2009-10-23)
- Hi supporters of the WikiProject Java! And thanks for your support. Now that we are more than 5 supporters, I gather from the Wikipedia guidelines that we CAN proceed with the groundwork, for releasing the project and portal in the open soon. To that effect, we would appreciate it very much if you could copy your name in the List of participants page. (2009-10-23)
- For better and faster discussion between WikiProject Java members a IRC channel could be created at: irc://irc.freenode.net/##WikiProject-Java. For instant access click here: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=##WikiProject-Java. Please use your Wikipedia nickname. (2009-10-23)
- All members of WikiProject Java are urged to install the Centralized Announcement System on their talk page. (2009-10-23)
- NEW! The meaning of all this is that the 'startup' phase of the ID project is finished. The project now switches to its 'mature' phase. I encourage you to put your name in the todo page after one of the remaining tasks. You can also aim to be Coordinator if you so desire. Thank you again and see you around, --AlainR345Techno-Wiki-Geek 05:54, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- Great day kids! All 2022 ID pages are now importance-assessed. From now on, let's increase article quality! (2010-05-20)
- NEW! We reached another important milestone: all ID pages are now quality-assessed. Let's finish importance assessment! (2010-04-15)
- Hello guys and dolls, good news! Our first meaningful Cleanup listing is now available. (2010-03-24)
- Auto-assessment is finished: 1719 pages are now assessed. We now move in the manual edit mode phase of the project as of... TODAY. So, no more excuses for laziness, let's get to work, all of us... (2010-03-20)
- Big news again, we now have 1000 images within the project scope with more to come soon! (2010-03-04)
- The Design Cafe is now opened! (2010-03-03)
- Current monthly ranking stats for the WikiProject Industrial design articles is here. (2010-03-01)
- Great news folks! We recently got our first-ever Featured Article rating. (2010-02-27)
- Good news team: the first automated tagging yielded 530 articles for the project, let's grow this number! (2010-02-14)
- Hi everybody! We just opened the WikiProject Industrial design (and Design portal) for business. So enjoy! (2010-01-31)
- Hello everybody! Now that we are at least 5 members, we are able to officialize this thing. Don't you think it would be great if each one of us proudly displayed his membership by placing the Industrial design Userbox on its user (or talk) page... (2010-01-24)
- Good news folks! We now have Assessment statistics for the Industrial design articles (albeit reduced to the one Industrial design article, the only tagged so far with the project banner); See: Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Industrial_design_articles_by_quality_statistics (2010-01-05)
- Hi supporters of the WikiProject Industrial design! And thanks for your support. Now that we are more than 5 supporters, I gather from the Wikipedia guidelines that we CAN proceed with the groundwork, for releasing the project and portal in the open soon. To that effect, we would appreciate it very much if you could copy your name in the List of participants page. (2009-12-31)
- For better and faster discussion between WikiProject Industrial design members a IRC channel could be created at: irc://irc.freenode.net/##WikiProject-IndustrialDesign. For instant access click here: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=##WikiProject-IndustrialDesign. Please use your Wikipedia nickname. (2009-12-23)
- All members of WikiProject Industrial design are urged to install the Centralized Announcement System on their talk page. (2009-12-23)
I recently posted the following text on this sexy page regarding the creation of a new computing-related project in Wikipedia:
'WikiProject Java is a Wikipedian community that aims to better organize information in articles related to the Java programming language and its platform.
- If I'm cor-rec-to, there are about 900 articles on Java technology in Wikipedia, which may be more than ALL other programming languages articles combined...
- At least, it's more than for C++, and there IS a C++ WikiProject...
- And it's MUCH more than the .NET WikiProject with 82 articles...
- There is also a Python project and a Ruby project so...
- Now you can also see a proposal for the Java Portal (temp location).'
Please support this initiative, --Alainr345 (talk) 03:55, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- FYI, I added a link to Wikipedia:WikiProject Java on the Template:WPComputing sidebar sidebar. — Loadmaster (talk) 18:06, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Java WikiProject messages
You could have a wonderful future as a beat poet. :) --Cybercobra (talk) 07:25, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Portal Java and WP Java
I added one or two comments at Talk WP and Talk Portal.
- As a lot of the templates, and concepts you have started are sound and you have a good grasp on the wiki mark up Be bold and put them into article space rather than user sand box space...Bo for it!!! You will get more editors helping once you have a functioning preliminary draft up and running in real space away from your user page. Use the sand box to get it working and to see that all the i's are dotted and t's are crossed, once it operates, take it out of your personal user space, and stick it in the real world of wikipedia. You are doing very well.
- Remember to make an award for editors helping out on articles or a barnstar for fellow contributors to give each other a pat on the back using user talk page templates ...WP awards .
Kind Regards, and all the best and your ventures, it looks like you will have a lot of fun with it!!!
- I will support your initiative, as it is always helpful to get articles organised and provide guidance for article content in WP and showcase finer content in Portals and quality with members who have expertise in the area. Thank you for contacting meSriMesh | talk 17:05, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the boost. I acted on the Award front. I will release the Portal as soon as there are at least 5 participants on the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Java page... AlainR345TechnoWikiGeek 05:22, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Java logo in templates
Hi. Image:Java logo.jpg (claimed public domain) was listed here at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files. Since it is superfluous to Image:Java logo.svg, its only use was in the WikiProject Java templates that you created. So that they would not be left blank, I replaced them with Image:Wave.svg. I hope this isn't too annoying. Unfortunately, Wikipedia's current fair use policy would not cover the use of a copyrighted logo outside articles anyway, but Duke isn't too bad. • Anakin (talk) 16:00, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- Well I thank you for the notice and care you took in REPLACING the image (instead of mopping it like the last guy), but still it is NOT OK. As you know damn well, a project does not have the SAME logo as its portals and that's to avoid mixing things too much. In any case I found a logo thats 100000% FREE, but I thing that policy is bull...
-- A l a i n R 3 4 5
Techno-Wiki-Geek 18:29, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Note: On reflexion, I DO understand the policy; what I DON'T understand is why it took 2 years to spot that File:Java_logo.jpg is not FREE (if it's not)...- It guess it wasn't spotted because it wasn't used. There are a lot of junk files sitting around. I'm pretty sure the coffee cup logo is non-free. http://java.sun.com/logos/ lists a number of official Java logo variations, and they explicitly point out that Duke is open sourced, whereas they don't for the don't for the others. • Anakin (talk) 21:04, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Help
Hi AR!! Need some clarification what exactly to be done on Did you know Did_you_know subpage page. If you could help me to give some hint to complete the task will be appreciated. It will be my pleasure to work with you on this project. KuwarOnline (talk) 17:33, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Vinod, you can call me Alain or Al... Regarding the DYK subpage, I think you can put whatever you feel that is even remotely connected to the portal subject... But first I'll tell you what little I know about DYK in general:
- The DYK concept in portals seem to derive mainly from the same in Main_Page
- When designing the Java Portal, I took our current DYK 'as is' from Portal:Technology
- I think item 1 and 3 in our DYK are relevant enough for the time being...
- The main source of DYK material in Wikipedia is Wikipedia:Recent_additions
- There, if you Search archives for Java, you will find nothing relevant unfortunately
- If you search for something like "programming" or "software" (with the ""), I think that's the nearest you are from Java
- You may find other ideas in DYK of Portal:Software and Portal:Information_technology
- Obviously you can find ideas elsewhere, as long as they are corroborated by some text in Wikipedia
- 4 to 8 DYK items are enough for now I guess
- As said before, I will move the whole portal to its official site tonight (Tuesday at 3 UTC) so beware of your edits. Good luck, -- A l a i n R 3 4 5
Techno-Wiki-Geek 19:02, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi I have updated the DYK Page sorry forgot to login while doin editing anyways tell me what is next priority task to do so i can help on it. KuwarOnline (talk) 06:42, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks Vinod, good job; I just want to point 2 things 1) it's better not to put the _ character in links (for example put [[Java (platform)]] not [[Java_(platform)]]); 2) beware of the link [[Java]]; it points to the island of Java in Indonesia! You must put either [[Java (platform)]] or [[Java (programming language)]] depending on the context.
- The tasks are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject_Java/Things you can do/to do. If you have some time, you could take a look at
- create Selected_biography/3 subpage (PYNHAGFIP)
- create Selected_biography/4 subpage (PYNHAGFIP)
- create Selected_biography/5 subpage (PYNHAGFIP)
- possible names: Bill Joy, Erich Gamma, Michael Kölling, Patrick Naughton, Todd Greanier, etc.
- Look at Portal:Java/Selected_biography/1 and Portal:Java/Selected_biography/2 for two different ways of doing it.
-- A l a i n R 3 4 5
Techno-Wiki-Geek 18:35, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi Alain, just wanted know about uncategorized article. I saw some of the article which i marked as good candidate its been re-tagged to bad candidate, In some cases its fine but with some exception like Serialization,Reflection (computer science), Application programming interface and so on....its all used in java. This is general term and we achieve this things in Java to solve certain issue/problem while developing softwares/application. So my opinion to re-tag them back to good candidate. So just wanted know about ur opinion. KuwarOnline (talk) 07:25, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hi again Vinod, sorry for the delay. I understand your concern and it MAY be valid... but I don't think so personally. Let's take Reflection (computer science) for instance. Is Reflection used in Java? Certainly it is. Is reflection a mostly exclusive concept of Java? If you look at that article, you will see examples in Java, BUT also in C# or in PHP, ect. Now, if you look at the categories for that article (at the end of the page), do you see a C# tag or a PHP tag? nop. You see only a Programming paradigm tag. Now another example, is IBM_WebSphere a good candidate? yep, because when one talks about Websphere, one cannot avoid but talk about Java (that's why we classified it as Good and then did put a Java category on the article page). When you look at List_of_shopping_malls_in_India, would you put a Category:Mumbai on it? I would not. I therefore maintain my opinion, the one that is expressed at the beginning of the Uncategorized page.
- Good candidates articles are those that document a topic that pertain MOSTLY to the Java platform or programming language.
- Articles that make a mention of the word Java but talk MOSTLY about something else are probably Bad candidates (including Disambiguation pages).
- Articles written about a piece of free software which is related to Java just because it is written in Java can be classified as Good dependinng on your judgment.
Hope this helps clarify things a bit, --AlainR345Techno-Wiki-Geek 17:14, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
- Good point Alain!!!! KuwarOnline (talk) 11:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
verify
Hi Alain I have linked biography3,4 and 5 please verify and let me know if anything more can be done on these biography. KuwarOnline (talk) 18:40, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hello Vinod, good start; on a purely personal note, I was astonished about that Indian guy that co-founded Sun! Now, there is a bit more work to do I think. First of all, we want the portal to be a slick representation of Java on Wikipedia. In theory it will be accessed by both Java techies and other people too. So, if you look at Portal:Java/Selected biography, you see that the #3,4,5 bios are full of details (categories, templates, stubs, sorting, inter-wiki languages, References, See also, External links, etc.) that are not in #2, although you used the same transclusion technique I did! And you say: 'How is it so?' Then I invite you to take a closer look at the Kent Beck article and familiarize yourself with the <noinclude> tag. At that point you see what you have to do... When done, please edit the main Portal:Java page to put a 5 instead of 2 in the 'Random portal component' related to biographies. Then when you 'purge server cache' hopefully you see your changes on the Portal... Good luck,
-- A l a i n R 3 4 5
Techno-Wiki-Geek 22:39, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Alain, Please check biography 3 I just did one for sample if it looks fine then i'll go with other's too. KuwarOnline (talk) 19:36, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
- OK, that's another way (I just removed the unlinked ref tag). I immediately placed it on rotation by modifying the Portal main page. You can finish 4 and 5 if you like. Bye now Vinod, AR 3 November 2009
- Hi Alain, I have updated biography4 and 5, it looks fine still just have glance over it. I m wondering cant we create more biography,, I mean more than 5. KuwarOnline (talk) 04:36, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Great work. Of course we can have as many biographies as we want on the Portal! On the other hand, if you feel up to the task I think working on more quote, sound or video subpage content would be more urgent: I think I read the recommended minimum for random rotation on portal boxes is 5. You may have to go outside of Wikipedia (or even outside of Wikimedia) to find something. In any case Vinod, could you please put this on your talk page as a member of the team:
- ==WikiProject Java (announcements)==
- {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Java/Announcements}}<!---->
-- Alain R 3 4 5
Techno-Wiki-Geek 05:18, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Sure Alain!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by KuwarOnline (talk • contribs) 17:35, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- OK, thanks Vinod. Forget about the quotes, sounds and videos subpages, I did them now, as I saw you were into the articles subpages, which is great; if you can finish the 8 (maybe Sun), 9 (maybe Applet) and 10, we can launch the Portal and go about the main business of the WikiProject Java which is after all the "List/Tag/Assess/Write/Maintain" motto...
-- Alain R 3 4 5
Techno-Wiki-Geek 09:13, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- OK, thanks Vinod. Forget about the quotes, sounds and videos subpages, I did them now, as I saw you were into the articles subpages, which is great; if you can finish the 8 (maybe Sun), 9 (maybe Applet) and 10, we can launch the Portal and go about the main business of the WikiProject Java which is after all the "List/Tag/Assess/Write/Maintain" motto...
Reply
I thought the user was a member of the project. Sorry for the misunderstanding. However, the issue is simple. Two users including yourself objected the assessments from the articles, both which were categorized under Category:Articles with example Java code. I already asked if the WikiProject Java wanted the articles in that category, but I did not receive back a thorough reply. If the articles in that category should not be assessed under WP Java, I can easily remove the assessments. I still await consensus on that. ZooFari 03:08, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- I think you don't need further reply, and don't loose sleep over it my friend. Each case in that category Category:Articles with example Java code is different. I saw the 2 contentious articles were already 'undone', and if any other odd case arises in the future in that category, we will resolve them on the spot. For me you should consider the case closed. Thanks, -- Alain R 3 4 5
Techno-Wiki-Geek 03:17, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Re: WikiProject Java template
Eh, don't worry about it. The editor wasn't rude or anything, his position just didn't seem to jive at all with my (from what I can tell, correct) understanding of the WikiProject system. --Cybercobra (talk) 03:30, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Java
What the heck is this? Perhaps not a good idea to put something like that in a WP recruitment note? I was the second supporter for the Java WikiProject. I've unfortunately not been able to put in the time I'd planned on the project just yet but once this is resolved I'll be able to get to work on some of this stuff. --Tothwolf (talk) 01:30, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Fair enough; we'll see if the s h a r k s get you. If not, the first step would be putting your name here, thanks,
-- Alain R 3 4 5
Techno-Wiki-Geek 21:58, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- I don't tend to add my username to such lists, the very reason for which is linked above.
As for class= for {{WPBannerMeta}}, I guess you are unfamiliar with how it functions? The class parameter is required for the WP1.0 statistics Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Java articles by quality statistics. The class= parameter adds the article's talk page to the categories that are used to generate the WP1.0 statistics. The few articles I went ahead and set the class= parameter on are those that are now in the chart. I plan to put in a bot request once I get some other backlogged tasks completed and see if we can get about 90% of the articles auto-assessed using the class parameter from existing banner templates.
I eventually plan to phase out the TF hook stuff, but I saw many articles already using java= for {{WikiProject Computing}} while working on that banner template so I went ahead and implemented it.
(PS, it is easier for me to keep up with a discussion when it isn't split across multiple talk pages.) --Tothwolf (talk) 05:09, 9 December 2009 (UTC) - Btw, I just happened to notice you'd added a comment here. Technically that page shouldn't be modified once a case is in progress except by a clerk or arb, so a clerk may remove your comment. This page is the active one, although it is starting to get a bit late to add to that one as well. --Tothwolf (talk) 06:06, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
- I don't tend to add my username to such lists, the very reason for which is linked above.
- Re: no, the {{WikiProject Computing}} template does not share its class parameter with the {{WikiProject Java}} template. The Mediawiki template "language" has basically no concept of variables and it lacks any sort of string functions. The TF code I added to {{WikiProject Computing}} allows for limited use of {{WikiProject Computing}} in place of {{WikiProject Java}} given the proper parameters, but
|class=is still required for {{WikiProject Java}} to function correctly and to be able to categorise articles for the articles by quality/importance stats generation. --Tothwolf (talk) 20:20, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
I moved this interesting discussion here where it belongs.
Java WikiProject
Hi Alain,
You invited me to join. While I was quite active in the Java pages several years ago (did some fairly significant clean ups, reorgs and new content development), I'm no longer active on Wikipedia. Occassionally I still contribute to the poker probability articles that are mostly my work, but other than that I don't have the time. I wish you well.
(Since the comment you left on my talk page is more than two months old, I moved the conversation here.)
—Doug Bell 22:26, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Your recent edit to GNU Compiler Collection was really helpful; see Talk:GNU Compiler Collection#Dead link re optimization. Thanks again, CWC 13:11, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Well that's strange, but your message prompted me to go back to that edit history and see from what you did after (putting the right title) that I still have things to learn in Wikipedia (don't we all...), and I thank you for that also Chris.
-- Alain R 3 4 5
Techno-Wiki-Geek 04:40, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
WQA
Hello, Alainr345. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. SpitfireTally-ho! 13:44, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
File:Dukesource125.gif
I appreciate your attempts at finding a free license equivalent for File:Java logo.svg. However, the source page that you reference does not contain any verbiage to the effect that this file has been released under Creative Commons 3.0, nor do the subsequent pop-up windows when you click on an image. It does contain terms of use, which do not reference Creative Commons.
As such, I've tagging the image as missing evidence of permission, making it subject to deletion in seven days. This is to give you an opportunity to find the appropriate release statement from Sun that this is in fact available under Creative Commons. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:02, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- Apparently I don't know how to read (thank you for informing me) because I can find no mention of Creative Commons on the link you provided or the pop-up windows indicating terms of use. I do find:
All articles, text, graphics, audiovisual and other content items ("Works") of Sun Microsystems are copyrighted and/or licensed by Sun Microsystems, Inc. ("Sun"). Parties outside of Sun may not reprint or redistribute Sun's Works in any format, whether online or offline, or translate such Works to another language, in whole or in part, without the express permission of Sun.
- Perhaps you can point to the explicit language that indicates this image was released under Creative Commons 3.0? --Hammersoft (talk) 21:10, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- I also note that the terms of use on the Sun pop-window notes "This license is revocable at any time at Sun's sole discretion", which directly contravenes Creative Commons 3.0. It is blatantly obvious Sun has not released this image under Creative Commons 3.0. This is a candidate for speedy deletion under criteria for speedy deletion, files #9. I'll give you an opportunity to respond with a link to the proof that this has been released under the license you claim rather than immediately tagging it for speedy deletion. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:20, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- Ya, you're right (as always), the problem is that I did not SEE the damn pop-up because Sun does not prevent right-clicking on that page (bad websters they've got)! I changed the info on the image. Where you're wrong(!) is that I don't care for a free license, as it is not included on the Java portal...
-- Alain R 3 4 5
Techno-Wiki-Geek 22:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- I've added {{non-free logo}} to the image for the license. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 23:06, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- Ya, you're right (as always), the problem is that I did not SEE the damn pop-up because Sun does not prevent right-clicking on that page (bad websters they've got)! I changed the info on the image. Where you're wrong(!) is that I don't care for a free license, as it is not included on the Java portal...
Comment removed
Hello Alainr345. I've removed this comment for two reasons. Firstly, that area is for comments made before the case opened. Secondly, you deliberately doctored the date on the time stamp to read as if it was made before the case opened, when in fact it was made today. The second point is slightly more serious and I urge you not to deliberately attempt to deceive like you did then. If you have any comments to make, please direct them to the proposed decision talk page. Regards, Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 11:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- It appears I was wrong about the second point - you were merely reinserting a comment that you made earlier and there was clearly no bad faith on your behalf. Please accept my apologies. That said, just so you're aware for the future, the main case page and additional statements section should only be for statements made prior to the case opening. If you wish to comment on the case now, please do so at proposed decision talk page. Regards, Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 16:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
i think your sig is too big
per WP:Sig, i think your sig is too big and conspicuous. although it's not up to me, since i'm not an admin, i wonder if you could make it the same size as everyone else's? that way it won't take up as much space. you are free to use your sig however you want on your own talk page, of course. i am talking about on other pages. Theserialcomma (talk) 21:13, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- I think it's no more 'conspicuous' than this one: ╟─TreasuryTag►inspectorate─╢
- , that one: Abce2|Free lemonadeonly 25 cents!
- or that other one: —Sincerely, Street-Legal Sockpuppet Jack Merridew
...
- In any case, I just changed mine because the <br/> in it was causing me formatting problems. Hope you sleep better tonight... --AlainR345Techno-Wiki-Geek 23:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- i slept great last night. thanks! your sig in places like here [] is still what i would consider a bit disruptively conspicuous. you might want to ask an uninvolved admin for an opinion on the matter if you are going to continue taking up all that space and extra bandwidth for a signature in places other than your userspace. Theserialcomma (talk) 20:23, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- I think you did not sleep enough, that signature is historical... Bye now, --AlainR345Techno-Wiki-Geek 20:38, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- i would appreciate if you would stop with your lame personal attacks. your unproductive comments about my sleep, or lack thereof, are irrelevant to constructing or maintaining an encyclopedia. however, a legitimate issue is that your vainglorious signature takes up too much space and bandwidth. i hope you will cull your superfluous sig in the future (its fine in your userspace, of course) and continue working on the encylopedia. cheers! Theserialcomma (talk) 21:41, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- I think you did not sleep enough, that signature is historical... Bye now, --AlainR345Techno-Wiki-Geek 20:38, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- i slept great last night. thanks! your sig in places like here [] is still what i would consider a bit disruptively conspicuous. you might want to ask an uninvolved admin for an opinion on the matter if you are going to continue taking up all that space and extra bandwidth for a signature in places other than your userspace. Theserialcomma (talk) 20:23, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject Java Again
Hi. Just responded to your Java project note. I currently have a lot of free time between programming contracts, so I'm happy to contribute, but I'm not sure what stage the project is at right now. Can you bring me up to speed, cheers? — M3TA(info) @ 19:48, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
response
Category:Unreferenced BLPs: 45,634
See this section to get a bot for your project: Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Biographies_of_living_people#A_Bot_already_exists_to_inform_projects Okip (formerly Ikip) 17:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Signpost Article
Hi Alainr345. WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Java for a Signpost article to be published February 22. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? -Mabeenot (talk) 20:28, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
- If you'd like to be in the interview, the questions can be found here. Answer as many as you feel comfortable answering. If there is anything else you'd like mentioned in the article, feel free to leave a note at the bottom of the interview page. -Mabeenot (talk) 22:33, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
I recently posted the following text on this unsexy page regarding the creation of a new Visual Arts/Technology-related project in Wikipedia:
WikiProject Industrial design is a Wikipedian community that aims to better organize information in articles related to Industrial design (also called Product design). Right now, this topic is not well covered, being squeezed in between its Visual Arts and its Technology roots.
- If I'm cor-rec-to, there are about 1850 articles on Industrial design in Wikipedia...
- At least, it's more than for Typography, and there IS a Typography WikiProject...
- And it's more than the Fashion WikiProject with 482 articles...
- There is also an Urban studies and planning project and a Video games portal so...
- Now you can also see a proposal for the Design Portal. (that portal would be for Industrial design AND Graphic design/Interior design)
-- Alain R 3 4 5
Techno-Wiki-Geek 03:30, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
- I just joined the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Industrial_design initiative, kudos for the idea
Ed Mercer (talk) 21:32, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
- Alain, sorry it took me so long to get back to you, I was hospitalized for surgery. I have no idea what I can do to contribute, but I'm here for the long haul, so just let me know what's needed, specially in the product design area. Ed Mercer (talk) 16:27, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- Hi again Eduardo. I hope your health is now good. Schluum is working on the List of uncategorized articles and Intelligentsium on the Portal. Until we get our Cleanup listing and Project tags, I think the best you can do now is take a look at the New articles page: you have to check each article in the list and determine if it is really related to Industrial design as a category; if it is, you tag it with the most precise subcategory. By the way, could you please put these two tags in your talk page:
- {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Industrial design/Userbox}}
- {{Wikipedia:WikiProject_Industrial design/Announcements}}
- Muito obrigado, --AlainR345Techno-Wiki-Geek 08:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Prod removed from User:AlexNewArtBot/IndustrialPlatformLog
I have replaced the prod tag you placed on User:AlexNewArtBot/IndustrialPlatformLog with a {{db-g6}}. Prod is for use on articles rather than user pages. I believe that deletion is uncontroversial and can be completed quickly. Cnilep (talk) 18:51, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
- OK, thanks, I knew something did not fit, but did not know which other tag to put; now I'll know... --AlainR345Techno-Wiki-Geek 17:59, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Barnstar
Hi there, I just noticed the barnstar you left on my user page. Thanks! I did want to point out, though, it's generally preferred that you leave it on the talk page, not put it there yourself. That's why it took me so long to notice! Anyway, thanks again! --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 02:18, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject Industrial design
Oh well, I've been inactive for a looong time, so prolly wasn't the best choice anyway :) Snowolf How can I help? 10:59, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 20:28, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Robert Giguère sur Wiki français
Je constate que les Ayatollah n'interviennent pas uniquement dans la version anglaise de Wikipedia.
Je vous suggèrerais bien de contester cet abus, mais je crois que vous y perdriez beaucoup de temps et d'énergie.
Je vous suggère plutôt de préparer cette page dans votre «Bac à sable» puis de la renommer lorsqu'elle sera prête (état similaire à celle en anglais) pour une première publication. Je vous recommande aussi d'intéresser au préalable autant de contributeurs qu'il vous sera possible afin qu'ils l'édite aussitôt que possible. --Jazzeur (talk) 04:12, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Weblogic, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Weblogic was changed by Alainr345 (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2009-03-06T01:01:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:02, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Assessment of the article Peter Saville (artist)
Hi. I just want to say that is not that dificult to fin the proper project, you just have to go to the basics, in this case i think the proper project you are looking for is Wikipedia:WikiProject Arts, or perhaps some of its sub-projects. I hope it helps if not, don`t hesitate to ask for help. Zidane tribal (talk) 21:29, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
I assessed the article. The quality assessment should be the same for every project (WP:1.0/A says: "Unlike the quality scale, the priority scale varies based on the project scope.") You can request reassessment if you think the rating should be better. Normally you can assess articles to which you are not the main contributor with no problem, simply stick to WP:1.0/A. And be patient when waiting for reactions, this is all volunteer and never fast :) Best wishes Hekerui (talk) 20:54, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Dukesource125.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Dukesource125.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.
- If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to somewhere on your talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 03:51, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Search page shortcomings (a comment to Jimbo Wales)
Hi, Jimbo Wales. Recently seeing this comment (again): ' Typically, Google search results are better ' about Wikipedia's Search page (and its 'cancer' outgrowth, the aptly named CatScan tool) made me think that reading it over and over in different places means that people consider this a fact of life; which seems to me strange, since after all the whole of Wikimedia sites have a very specific structure and meta-content that is not taken into account by Google at all (I guess); Wikimedia must have a 50m headstart there, not taking into account the more frequent indexing (I guess), nevertheless.... I've mentioned this pet concern of mine in other places without much reaction from Wikipedians so far and since I've not seen much improvement over time to that sorry state of affairs (I found out has a definite influence on my Wikipedia 'productivity'), I thought this page was my last hope of having a decent search tool on Wikimedia anytime soon. Thanks for your time and many thanks for having founded Wikipedia... --AlainR345Techno-Wiki-Geek 16:41, 20 March 2010 (UTC) (WikiProject Java and Design portal founder)
Speedy deletion nomination of Good design awards
A tag has been placed on Good design awards, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 16:01, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 19:36, 26 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Eliot Noyes
It surprised me to see a bot assignment of "low importance" to the article on Eliot Noyes. would seem that Noyes, the designer of the appearance of the iconic IBM Selectric typewriter and the modern look that still persists in Mobil Oil gas stations should receive a higher rating than "low", assigned the article. I would recommend reconsideration. Sincerely, User:HopsonRoad 19:02, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- Yep, thanks for the tip, I changed it to Mid for the time being. You must understand that we are a fairly new WikiProject and therefore these rankings will move as we refine them. Hope this helps, --AlainR345Techno-Wiki-Geek 20:55, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, Alainr345! Sincerely, User:HopsonRoad 02:22, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 21:49, 29 May 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 21:49, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
You're invited!
Hello, Alainr345,
You are invited meet with your fellow Wikipedians by attending the Montréal meetup scheduled on Sunday, June 27, 2010; between 1500 - 1700 to be held at the Comité Social Centre Sud (CSCS), located at 1710 Beaudry, in Montréal. You can sign up at the meetup page.
The meetup is happening in concurrence with RoCoCo 2010, a free, bilingual, weekend unconference including many people involved with Wikis both within the Wikipedia/Wikimedia Community and abroad. You do not need to attend the conference to sign up for the Wikimeetup, but you are certainly welcome! Bastique ☎ call me!
(PS: Please share this with those you know who might not be on the delivery list, i.e. Users in Montreal/Quebec)
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) 00:41, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 02:31, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Davison Associates for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Davison Associates is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davison Associates until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Edcolins (talk) 19:21, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians
You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Dukesource125.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Dukesource125.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:29, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Industrial design/Deletion
Wikipedia:WikiProject Industrial design/Deletion, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Industrial design/Deletion and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Industrial design/Deletion during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:10, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
WP:AALERTS need some help on Community Wishlist Survey
This may interest you, btw. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:36, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Your signature
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Also, link colors override font colors set outside wikilinks, so your markup color="#4590ff" has no effect.
You are encouraged to change
<font face="Times" color="#4590ff" size="2">[[User:Alainr345|<i>AlainR345</i>]][[User_talk:Alainr345|<font color="#ffb000"><sup>Techno-Wiki-Geek</sup></font>]]</font>: AlainR345Techno-Wiki-Geek
to
<span style="font-family: Times; size: small">[[User:Alainr345|<i>AlainR345</i>]][[User talk:Alainr345|<sup style="color: #ffb000">Techno-Wiki-Geek</sup>]]</span>: AlainR345Techno-Wiki-Geek
If you want the user page to have the color #4590ff, do it this way:
<span style="font-family: Times; size: small">[[User:Alainr345|<i style="color: #4590ff">AlainR345</i>]][[User talk:Alainr345|<sup style="color: #ffb000">Techno-Wiki-Geek</sup>]]</span>: AlainR345Techno-Wiki-Geek
—Anomalocaris (talk) 20:38, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Done (what a beast that Lint ;-)) --AlainR345Techno-Wiki-Geek 20:54, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 04:48, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Alainr345. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Alainr345. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Portal:Java (programming language)
Portal:Java (programming language), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Haskell (programming language) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Java (programming language) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
MfD nomination of Portal:Java (programming language)
Portal:Java (programming language), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Java (programming language) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Java (programming language) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 12:02, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Good Design Award (Chicago Athenaeum)
The article Good Design Award (Chicago Athenaeum) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Don't see any evidence these awards pass WP:GNG. References appear to overwhelmingly be quasi-press-releases.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 20:31, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Good Design Award (Chicago Athenaeum) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Good Design Award (Chicago Athenaeum) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Design Award (Chicago Athenaeum) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 20:57, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:IndustrialDesignDeletionday
Template:IndustrialDesignDeletionday has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. TheImaCow (talk) 09:46, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:IDesignDeletionday
Template:IDesignDeletionday has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. TheImaCow (talk) 10:14, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of File:Fall building.jpg
The file File:Fall building.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Only used in sandbox for deleted design portal. Doesn't have a current encyclopedic purpose.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Logan Talk Contributions 20:18, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Not missing
Hello! I was going through the list of missing Wikipedians and I saw your name on there. However, you seem to edit sporadically (once every two years approximately, including this year) and edit another Wikipedia on a more regular basis. Therefore, I am removing you from the list. It’s great to see you’re still here, even if I don’t get a response until 2022! Happy editing Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 15:29, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- I’m not sure where to leave a response so I will place it at my talk page and the talk pages for both your IP and your former frequently used accounts. Thank you for getting back to me! It’s a shame you think of it that way, I think there are plenty of spots that could have improvement and relevant information. However, if you believe differently, then good luck with wherever life takes you! Since you clearly are still here and edit sporadically (not fully retired), I will not add you back to missing Wikipedians. Even if you are busy with life, I hope you still have the chance to check back in and let us know how you’re doing every once in a while. If you ever do fully retire (hope you don’t!) then you can add a retirement message on your talk page. Happy editing and enjoy life wherever it takes you! Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 21:09, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Jacques Raymond (accountant) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Jacques Raymond (accountant), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. It is not clear that the video is an independent source. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 04:49, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacques Raymond (accountant) (February 25)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jacques Raymond (accountant) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jacques Raymond (accountant), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 |
Hello, Alainr345!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jenyire2 20:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC) |
Concern regarding Draft:Jacques Raymond (accountant)
Hello, Alainr345. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jacques Raymond (accountant), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Jacques Raymond (accountant)
Hello, Alainr345. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jacques Raymond".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:09, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Java/When graphical timeline
Template:WikiProject Java/When graphical timeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:43, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:JavaDeletionday
Template:JavaDeletionday has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 08:44, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Wikiwand in your browser!
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.
