Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an archive of past discussions about User:APK. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 21 | 19 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 22 | 26 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:56, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
JSYK (your edit summary came up on my watchlist), Firefox has a neat ttrick in that if you go forward or back or your browser crashes, it can restore with all the text on it. This was the deal-breaker for me over IE. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 07:24, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Firstly, great work with the African diplomat articles, I am always happy to see more contributers to articles concerning the African continent. Over at the stub sorting wikiproject, we are about to split {{diplomat-stub}} by continent. When creating new articles concerning any diplomats, consider leaving a red-linked template like this {{Africa-diplomat-stub}} for a day or two until we create and sort the actual template. Thanks and keep up the good work! BTW, please reply on my talk page--Thomas.macmillan (talk) 04:23, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey APK, I read you'd taken a photo of All-Souls Church in Washington, D.C.. Does that mean you live in the area? Because, if so, we are neighbors! I live near the MD/DC line. Funny. If I can help with something in the real world (?!) let me know. --leahtwosaints (talk) 11:05, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
A new discussion you may be interested in:Consensus on reasoning for LGBT Project Articles. If not, happy editing elsewhere. The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 07:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Suddenly, I find myself supporting this policy. Ten bucks says he's a power bottom. APK yada yada 22:52, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
That's a sucker bet (so to speak) I'll keep my ten bux and buy a Starbucks espresso drinkage or two instead. ☺ — Becks Talk to me 17:01, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello yet again. I regretfully inform you that the bot we were using to update the user status at Wikipedia:Highly Active Users, SoxBot V, was blocked for its constant updating. With this bot out of operation, a patch is in the works. Until that patch is reviewed and accepted by the developers, some options have been presented to use as workarounds: 1) Qui monobook (not available in Internet Explorer); 2) User:Hersfold/StatusTemplate; 3) Manually updating User:StatusBot/Status/USERNAME; or 4) Not worry about it and wait for the patch to go through, which hopefully won't take long. If you have another method, you can use that, too. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Useight (talk) 17:49, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey there, well done on getting your article up to GA. Feel free to take the album list article off your watchlist if you so wish. It has been semi protected again, there shouldnt be too many problems. Cheers. --Realist2 (Come Speak To Me) 23:00, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Help:Contents/Fun stuff - ✰ALLST☆R✰ echo 11:27, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
I hope you don't leave the project. I think you're a valued contributor. The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 00:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Becks likes it too. Can he come to the picnic also? He will bring the bug juice and KFC. — Becks Talk to me 17:43, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
I noticed you said you've been taking a lot of pictures of NRHPs in Washington D.C. If you take a picture of the old Perry Belmont House (now used as the International Temple for the Order of the Eastern Star), please let me know. I'd like to do that one. Thanks.--Bedford Pray 10:34, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
The project is really, at this point, more or less just a "bookkeeping function" to allow interested editors to know how good the articles relevant to the country are. It was always the intention to use the Central Asia banner, which should have Uzbek assessments built in. Unfortunately, historically, there have been several newly started projects which have been merged into others, generally including having to replace the project's own unique banner with the banner of the larger regional project, which can be more than a bit timeconsuming. The only way I could think of ensuring that didn't happen again was by creating the projects up front, having the parent project's banner include assessment parameters for the child project as well. John Carter (talk) 22:06, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 23 | 2 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:17, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Wow, hooks on three consecutive DYK groups. That's a great run! --Royalbroil 05:04, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
--BorgQueen (talk) 14:49, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
i noticed that there is a DYK reviewer's note about your June 7 created DYK, about some memorial, that the article is a bit short. it won't be approved without a bit more added, i guess. just happened to notice it, as i have a DYK nomination, for List of RHPs in Chicago, in the same cohort. doncram (talk) 19:15, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
You have been requested to weigh in at:
Thank you for your help in this matter. IP4240207xx (talk) 05:01, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
No, in this case it just means the hook didn't suit that particular update. I notice I forgot to reinclude a "verified" statement for it though, so thanks for reminding me, I'll go do that now :) Gatoclass (talk) 13:30, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
This is, quite possibly, the funniest photo I have ever seen. I didn't know who might appreciate it, so here it is. --Moni3 (talk) 20:27, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Becks appreciates it. ☺ — Becks Talk to me 20:55, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Took a while, but we finally got there :) --Gatoclass (talk) 20:27, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey there. I did see the redlink when I read your new article and was horrified no-one had written that yet—I hope I didn't pinch something off your to-do list ;). I know nothing about those people but will have a read over the next few days. Best regards. Moondyne 03:16, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 24 | 9 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:11, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Mmmhelloooo (sorry, I saw the "How you be durrin?" and couldn't help it). Thanks for your comments on the Dupont Circle article; I'm definitely going to need help with some of the sources. I'm going to go through and add {{fact}} tags to information that I think is true but for which I cannot find a source. (I know we're supposed to remove "I think I've heard it somewhere" information, but I think when an article is undergoing a major overhaul it's a good time to implement WP:IGNORE).
As for the fountain and historic district, I'm not sure if those need separate articles, at least not yet. Reason being is that most of the info about the historic district is about just about architecture, which would fit nicely into that section... and I'm not sure that an article on the fountain would be more than a few paragraphs (at most). Of course, if there's a source that has a plethora of information about the fountain, then that could change things.
One additional comment (sort of unrelated): I've done a good deal of work to the main Washington, D.C. article and nominated it for GA status. Nobody's undertaken a review yet, so I'd appreciate if you think there are any glaring errors or omissions. Thank you! Best, epicAdam (talk) 13:28, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Done. Dlohcierekim 18:35, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
I added content lest it be deleted again. Dlohcierekim 18:38, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey APK, I've been writing a new article on The Voice of the Turtle (play) in my sandbox, and I think it might be a candidate for DYK. I've never nominated an article for that before, and I know you have a ton of them, so I was wondering if you wouldn't mind taking a look at it, just to see if you can spot any potential problems before I move it into the mainspace. I've been going back and forth on a few things (ex. saying "9th longest-running non-musical" or "9th longest-running play"), and I'm still trying to find a good article to link to for "East Sixties" (I know nothing about New York) but I'm more or less finished with it for the time being. I'm still trying to come up with a tag idea... right now I'm thinking about doing something that mentions the lengthy run and/or the scripture reference in the show's title. Anyway, thanks for the help! —MearsMan talk 19:33, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
I also took pics of Tyler Hall (the building called "adjoining hospital" in the oldy-old picture) and some unknown old building to the left of Leonard Hall (well, I was parked there, so I thought I would take everything I could). I also have the following buildings if you need them. Let me know, and I'll upload them:
If you've got any more you need done, let me know. Maybe sometime in the next few months I'll pick them off... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 01:16, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 25 | 23 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 26 | 26 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:41, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
I'm emotionally unable to do anything but answer condolence messages, but wanted to let you know that your words gave me strength, and somehow I will get through this. Isaac and I were together 16 years, and legally a couple for 11. He was the light of my life. Now all I have is my work to sustain me. That will have to be enough. With love, Jeffpw (talk) 05:52, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Earlier this year comments were made here regarding the relationship between yourself and your father and its impact on the formation of your sexuality. Those comments should not have been made.
You have acted wisely in distancing yourself from the LGBT project. Their activity is agenda-driven with an aim to modifying their own self-image and the conceptual identification of LGBT issues among the readership. As such the project suffers a collective dysfunction and is inherently dishonest.
You would do well to continue to distance yourself from a certain no-longer-active pseudo-Photojournalist whom you have blindly supported in the past. Though you had given him special recognition as late as the day before his breakdown and departure, the absence of any comment from you on the Appreciation protest section of his talk page is conspicuous and has been noted.
This pseudo-Photojournalist along with a certain Prostitute from Eastern Europe recently uploaded and inserted into various articles on WP a series of gay pornographic images from the prostitute's studio. This action provoked strong reactions from certain quarters, including charges of pedophilia and the making of pornography available to minors. Once charges like this have been leveled, whether genuine or fabricated, from the right or from the left, or made calmly or hysterically, certain Federal Investigative Bodies will closely, very closely, watch all the actors involved.
The pseudo-Photojournalist's association and alignment with a certain "resting" former admin, a compulsive and pathological liar who can be identified by her eligibility to obtain a ten-cent deposit for the return of her eyeglasses, may buy him some immediate "airtime" but will purchase him neither immunity nor credibility in the long run. Their recent jointly-launched smokescreen will eventually dissipate, and their fraud will be fully revealed in time.
All the actors involved will be under the scrutiny of certain Federal Investigative Bodies for a long, long time to come. Far be it for anybody with any sense to interfere with or become entangled in their work, even if there exists a need for serious redress of any grievances. As investigations such as these can be quite protracted affairs, persons seeking redress of grievances with any of these actors might abide by a sort of tacit creed, which could hold, in part: "We are patient; we will wait for our time. We will never forget."
--72.68.112.13 (talk) 16:30, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Please get well soon, and I am sending my (reserve) energy your way to wish you a speedy recovery. Jeffpw (talk) 15:46, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Dude, get better. That's an order! Peace. — Becks Talk to me 02:30, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Check this out. -Aleta Sing 15:35, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Ur talk page currently includes a header saying u have some health issues, i hope u get better soon.
Actually i visit to give u some feedback, for u to take or leave as u like. On a couple occasions i have hesitated to give u a comment on your talk page, or to respond to an inquiry elsewhere like your "Kappa House" inquiry at wt:NRHP where i had "good stuff" to contribute, because the adjacent discussion, or your signature which now shows "APK PRAISE JEEBUS", was difficult for me to process. I do not want to align myself for or against various sides on various issues. As you know, i focus on historic sites. I don't really want to get involved in political or religious issues in wikipedia editing, especially as wikipedia edits live forever, and my positions might change but my words would come back to haunt me. So, a couple times, it has caused gaps in my occasional correspondence with you. I am not asking you to change your displays that seem to have political overtones, but i just want to let you know it complicates and reduces my interactions with you about historic sites and their presentation in wikipedia. I hope this is helpful to you to know. doncram (talk) 00:19, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.