User:Doncram/NRIS-onlyDoncramByState25June2016
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is a list, generated by a script authored and run by another editor, of 681 articles originally created by Doncram that were tagged "NRIS-only" as of 25 June 2016. (At an earlier date, a similar run identified 784 such articles, not sorted by state, and apparently 97 of those, especially in Iowa, of NRHP bridges, and of some other NRHP types were done before list of 681 created.)
As of March 24, 2017, all but one of the articles are "done", in terms of their having another source (usually the NRHP registration document) and some additional content added. The one exception was redirected instead to its county list-article; it is an archeological site for which I could find no mention anywhere at all.
Some were expanded quite a bit, many to a medium degree, some not much expanded at all. Almost all are over 325 bytes of prose-only text I believe.
This list, sorted by states, identifies 681 (that's the total of the individual state section counts). Some were done in batches separately listed at:
- User:Doncram/Iowa pre-Nov2013 NRISonly all authors,
- User:Doncram/Batch 2 expansions of pre-Nov2013 "NRISonly" articles,
- User:Doncram/Batch-Georgia-plus,
- User:Doncram/Batch-DC-FL-MI-OK-plus,
- User:Doncram/Batch-CA-KS-MS-plus,
- User:Doncram/Batch-OR-WA-plus,
- User:Doncram/Batch-AZ-plus,
- User:Doncram/Batch-PR-UT-MT,
- User:Doncram/Batch-ID-KY-ND-WI,l
- User:Doncram/Batch-NM-SD-TN
Some notes below and at those batch lists mention problems remaining, or opportunities for expansion or whatever, with some articles. Template talk:NRHP row#"No article" option needed, and row anchor mentions a problem remaining for a Kentucky topic, Martin Site (Stanton, Kentucky), which I want to resolve by deleting the topic article (now a redirect), but with the corresponding list-article showing a blacklink, i.e. not showing a redlink. This resolution would apply for some other "NRIS-only" articles where no substantial info is available and none is likely to be forthcoming, so it seems best not to call for an article.