Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
User:Garzo/projects is a page where I work on current articles. This is work in progress, and the material here might be found in any kind of state of disarray. If you would like to alter any of this work, please do so. If you would like to make a comment, please use the 'discussion' tab at the top of the page.
This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Garzo/projects. |
Projects subpage | The main page for drafting material for articles |
Lala subpage | For working on languages and linguistics |
More-tea subpage | For working on religion and spirituality |
Elephant subpage | For working on all sorts of other bits and pieces. |
Projects' sandbox | My own personal sandbox |
Projects' template | The place to test-drive templates |
This wee bt of space is for useful links and things...
Searches for finding tool-bar vandalism | |
---|---|
Yahoo | |
JavaScript toys | |
|
-> Policy introduction <-
For the purposes of this convention, an Arabic article is a Wikipedia article with a title that is a transliteration of a word, name, or phrase that is most commonly originally rendered in Arabic script. These could be in any language that uses this script, such as Arabic, Persian or Ottoman Turkish. This policy may also be applied to an Arabic word or phrase used in an article that does not have Arabic in its title.
When an Arabic word, phrase or name forms all or a part of the title of a Wikipedia article it should be given in the customary transliteration. This is the form by which the Arabic is best known in English.
If necessary, create redirect pages from these alternative names to the actual article. Sometimes, there is no obvious single candidate for the customary transliteration. If this is the case, see #Finding the customary transliteration.
The first occurrence of the title of an article in that article's lead section is bold type. The Arabic word, phrase or name should be followed by the same written in Arabic script with a standard transliteration. This should be in parentheses.
Always use template:lang-ar around the Arabic script, as this helps web browsers choose the correct font.
Sometimes an Arabic word, name or phrase other than the title will be mentioned in the body of an article. If that word, name or phrase has its own article, there is no need to add anything to the customary transliteration. If, however, the word, name or phrase does not have its own article, and is a useful term related to the article, it should be followed by a version in Arabic script and standard transliteration.
Many Arabic place names contain the definite article: al- (or ash-, an- etc.). These are retained in standard transliteration, but may be removed in customary transliteration. The only good reason to retain the definite article in the customary transliteration of a place name is that it is retained in the most common English version of it.
Arabic personal names differ from region to region, and whereas many have Western-style family names, many do not. What might appear to be a family name often is not.
Always try to use someone's full name at the first mention (accompanied by Arabic script and standard transliteration). Thereafter, if the person is to be referred to by a single name, his or her personal name is often the most appropriate.
A person's personal name usually occurs first. Some people have two or more personal names: use the one by which he or she is better known.
Abdul is not an Arabic name, but the first half of a name. Do not refer to anyone as Abdul: it means servent of the.... Abdul is always followed by one of the 99 Names of God. Likewise, do not refer to any human being by one of these divine names.
Most Arabic names consist of a kunya. A kunya is a relationship term, which often demonstrates how one individual is related to another. A kunya usually consists of two words: the kinship term followed by the personal name of the relative.
An individual's entire genealogy may be represented with successive kunya. Sometimes, especially with Abu, a kunya be not refer to an actual relative, but to some idea. This is similar to the way that someone might be called the Father of Poetry or Father of the Nation. Sometimes a person is better known by his or her kunya than personal name
The laqab usually goes at the end of an Arabic name. It is very often prefixed by the definite article (al-). Traditionally, the laqab refers to the tribe or clan of the bearer, though often it describes some trait for which the bearer is famous.
The policy describes three ways of writing an Arabic title, word or phrase:
Arabic | Strict transliteration | Customary transliteration (* marks assimilation) |
---|---|---|
ا | omit | omit |
ب | b | b |
ت | t | *t |
ث | ṯ | *th or t |
ج | ǧ | j or g |
ح | ḥ | h |
خ | ẖ | kh or ch |
د | d | *d |
ذ | ḏ | *dh or d/z |
ر | r | *r |
ز | z | *z |
س | s | *s |
ش | š | *sh |
ص | ṣ | *s |
ض | ḍ | *d |
ط | ṭ | *t |
ظ | ẓ | *z or dh |
ع | ʿ | ' or omit |
غ | ġ | gh |
ف | f | f or ph |
ق | q | q or k or c |
ك | k | k or c |
ل | l | *l |
م | m | m |
ن | n | *n |
ه | h | h |
و | w | w |
ي | y | y |
ء | ʾ | ' or omit |
ة | ä or ät | a/ah/e/eh or at/et |
َ | a | a or e or other |
َا | ā | a or o or other |
ِ | i | i or e or other |
ِي | ī | i or ee or other |
ِيّ | īy | iy or i or eey |
ُ | u | u or o or other |
ُو | ū | u or ou or oo or other |
ُوّ | ūw | uw or ou |
آ | ʾā | 'a or a or o |
َى | à | a or other |
َي | ay | ay or ai or ei or ey |
َو | aw | aw or au or o |
There have been some thoughts about modularising template:language.
The basic template would look something like this.
{{{name}}} ({{{nativename}}}) | |
---|---|
Spoken in: | {{{states}}} |
Region: | {{{region}}} |
Total speakers: | {{{speakers}}} |
Ranking: | {{{rank}}} |
Genetic classification: | {{{family}}}{{language/{{{module}}}}} |
Language codes | |
ISO 639-1 | {{{iso1}}} |
ISO 639-2 | {{{iso2}}} |
SIL | {{{sil}}} |
The official module would look like this (module=official).
Official status | |
---|---|
Official language of: | {{{nation}}} |
Regulated by: | {{{agency}}} |
The extinct languages module would look like this (module=extinct).
Language extinction | |
---|---|
Year of extinction: | {{{extinct}}} |
Last known speaker: | {{{speaker}}} |
The literary languages module would look like this (module=lit).
Literary language | |
---|---|
Literature: | {{{literature}}} |
Golden age: | {{{gold}}} |
Do we need a Neo-Aramaic languages or Judeo-Aramaic page?
The following is an abridged version of the article of the same title by Professor Geoffrey Khan which appeared in the July 2000 issue of the "Journal of the American Oriental Society". All relevant grammatical examples have been omitted.
In Iraq, the Jewish Aramaic speakers were found in an area that may be defined as the land lying above a line drawn on a map across the country through the towns of Mawsil (Mosul) and Kirkuk. Aramaic was not the first language of all Jews of the area. In the large towns of Mawsil, Kirkuk, Aqra, as well as Arbel, Arabic was the Jewish vernacular. In some villages the Jews spoke Kurdish as their first language. In Iran, Aramaic-speaking Jewish communities were found as far south as Kerend. The northern limits of the Jewish Aramaic area were formed by communities in the region of Lake Van in southern Turkey and those around Lake Urmia in northwest Iran (Hopkins, 1993: 62-64). The NENA group includes dialects spoken by both Jews and Christians. The Christian dialects in all cases differ from the Jewish dialects, even where the Jews and Christians lived in the same town or geographical region. There are considerable differences, for example, between the Jewish dialect and the Christian dialect in the towns of Urmia (Also known as Urmi or Urumia. The official name of the town is now Rizaiye) Salamas, and Sanandaj, in which the two communities lived side-by-side. In other geographical areas, such as Zakho and the surrounding region, the differences between the dialects of the two communities are of a lesser degree (Hopkins 1993: 65). The Jewish dialects, moreover, differ from one another according to the geographical area in which they were spoken. In the present state of research it is not possible to produce a detailed atlas of the Jewish dialects, though a general classification can be made. Hopkins (1993: 67) divides the known dialects into four groups according to their structural affinities. These correspond to the following areas in the Aramaic speaking region: (1) northwest (Zakho, Amedia), (2) southwest (Arbel, Koy Sanjak, Ruwandiz), (3) northeast (Urmia and the surrounding region), (4) southeast (Iranian Kurdistan). Earlier classifications of the Jewish dialects by Y. Rivlin (1959: 80) and D. Cohen (1971, col. 948) did not recognize the distinction between the southwestern and the southeastern groups. Recent work on dialects from these regions, including my own work on the dialect of the Arbel region, has brought to light considerable differences between the dialects of the two areas.
The knowledge of Aramaic among the immigrant communities in Israel is quickly fading, especially among the younger generations, who generally are unable to speak the dialects at all. The Jewish Neo-Aramaic dialects, therefore, are approaching extinction. Over the last century some linguistic studies have been made of the Jewish dialects. Many of the dialects, however, still remain virtually unknown to scholarship. One such case is the dialect that was spoken by the Jews in the region of Arbel. For several months during 1991, I was able to undertake fieldwork in this dialect among the Jewish immigrants from Kurdistan who have settled in Israel. I collected some further data also during a short visit in 1994.
Re Hulaula, etc. - just use Jewish Neo-Aramaic dialects (because there is also Christian Neo-Aramaic dialects) - and this is the name used by all the scholars at present. The other names you mention are either totally wrong (e.g. Kurdit) or just folkloric identifier, e.g., Galli-Gallox (!) meaning "with me-with you", that is to say that the speakers use this preposition, whereas in another dialect they use immi-immox, etc. Compare British spelling "colour" vs. our American "color". Shall we call the British English "the U English"??
The most correct name you could give to Jewish Neo Aramaic dialects is simply Jewish Neo Aramaic. Since the Neo Aramaic speaking jews used to call their language Hodhuth/Hozus/Hulaul etc. which simply means Jewish. The christian Assyrians call their language Surayt/Suruth/Sureth etc which simply means Assyrian.
Lishana deni means simply our language in the dialect of Zakho.
Lishanid noshan means litt. the language of our selves in the dialect of Arbil.
Lishan didan, lishanan means our language in the peticular dialect.
Hulaula means Jewish is derived from Hudhayutha. Th and Dh becomes quite regularly an l in many jewish dialects.
Lishanid janan means litt. the language of our selves.
Galiglu is derived from Galli-gallox means simply mine and yours is pure aramaic has nothing to do with turkish.
Hulaula/Hulawla etc. is derived from Hudhayutha in many eastern Jewish Neo Aramaic dialects the dh and th changed to l. So mila for mitha, ila for idha etc.
deni, didan, etc has absolutely nothing to the with Dan. It is simply the genetive exponent in eastern aramaic dialects. The Hebrew counterpart is Shel- plus the pr. suffices the classical aramaic counterpart is dil- plus the pr. suffices.
Scholarly glossaries and dictionaries for Jewish Neo-Aramaic Dialects:
Good glossaries in books by:
Some of the grammar articles on WP are in a mess. They are heavily biased towards English and Indo-European languages. Grammatical tense/multilingual sources is a preparation area for a more universal approach to tense in language. This is my thinking outloud section.
Often blurred kinds of temporal deixis:
I am primarily indebted to the Sw Natl Encyclopedia and Siegfried Lienhard: Tempusgebrauch und Aktionsartenbildung in der modernen Hindi for what follows. (Another book to check out is, according to Lienhard, Horst Renicke: Die Theorie der Aspekte und Aktionsarten and perhaps also Max Deuschbein: Aspekte und Aktionsarten im Neuenglischen. There is also a more recent, massive tome, edited by Östen Dahl, Tense and Aspect Systems.)
Aktionsarten are verbal constructions, describing the general characteristics of actions, as objectively stated by the speaker. A personal involvement of the speaker is possible, but subordinate. Examples of Aktionsarten are starting (ingressive-inchoative), instantaneous, continuing (progressive-continuative) and ending (egressive-conclusive).
Aspects are kinds of time perspectives which describe the speaker's view, like perfective, progressive or habitual.
Lienhard regards tenses (at least in Hindi) as secondary phenomena that relate originally aspect carrying forms to time domains. "A tense" originates "by a kind of linear interpretation of a localized aspect". (My translation of Lienhard's quoting F. Rundgren: Intensiv und Aspektkorrelation. Studien zur äthiopischen und akkadischen Verbalstammbildung.)
Finally, it seems that Jerzy Kury
lowicz in Aspect et temps dans l'histoire du persan, and his L'apophonie en indo-européen discusses the pair of opposites imperfective-perfective in an interesting way, assigning different symbols consisting of combinations of Greek letters and subscripts to, for example, I write, I am writing, I have written, I have been writing, I wrote, I was writing, I had written and I had been writing.
|
This is true perfection: not to avoid a wicked life because we fear punishment, like slaves; not to do good because we expect repayment, as if cashing in on the virtuous life by enforcing some business deal. On the contrary, disregarding all those good things which we do hope for and which God has promised us, we regard falling from God’s friendship as the only thing dreadful, and we consider becoming God’s friend the only thing truly worthwhile. |
— St Gregory of Nyssa. |
If a cherry tree could eat its own fruit: that is pure satisfaction. |
— unknown. |
Turn the other cheek also is not about being a doormat: it is about breaking the cycle of violence, of not repaying evil for evil, of meeting evil with goodness so innocent that the heart of stone is turned to wax. |
— unknown. |
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.