Mahaganapati
- ... that Mahaganapati (pictured) is a depiction of the Supreme Being?
Created by Redtigerxyz (talk). Self nominated at 13:06, 19 June 2014 (UTC).
- Article is new enough, long enough, well cited and apparently comprehensive. AGF on offline sources, QPQ done, image is appropriately licensed. My only quibble would be that perhaps it should be mentioned in the hook that this regards a specific sect of Hinduism, e.g. "that... of the Supreme Being in the Ganapatya sect?", otherwise it is too generic. Constantine ✍ 11:09, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
- Constantine, for hookiness the detail was dropped. Also when the hook says "a depiction" (not the depiction), it indicates that other representations exist. Redtigerxyz Talk 12:02, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
- I realise that, that's why it is a quibble, not an objection ;). I just preferred it for clarity's sake. The hook is good to go as it is. Constantine ✍ 12:05, 22 June 2014 (UTC)