Edward Kirk Warren
Created by Teemu08 (talk). Self nominated at 16:58, 30 December 2013 (UTC).
- Looks good to me. --AdmrBoltz 02:53, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Admrboltz, I'm afraid that this doesn't qualify as a QPQ, as you don't "indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed". Thanks, Matty.007 13:16, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- @Matty.007: Sorry, first time back to DYK in quite some time. The article is sufficiently long enough, its hook is cited, AGFing the citation as its from a book, its new so it didn't have to be 5x expanded. --AdmrBoltz 15:06, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- No damage done. (Not much point pinging, doesn't work in template space which is annoying.) Matty.007 15:08, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Admrboltz, you also have to click on the references and see if the article is closely paraphrasing what it says there. Yoninah (talk) 19:16, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- The hook is cited to a non-online source, so I can't do that. --AdmrBoltz 03:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
-
- Only two sources are not-online, and they pass the copyvio and dup tool. --AdmrBoltz 02:33, 5 January 2014 (UTC)