|
| This article is within the scope of WikiProject Contract bridge, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Contract bridge on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Contract bridgeWikipedia:WikiProject Contract bridgeTemplate:WikiProject Contract bridgeContract bridge articles | | Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
The reasons for move copied from the entry on the WP:RM page:
- Thanks for the article; however,
- I'd like to turn everyone's attention to WP:NC#Lowercase second and subsequent words; IOW, the article titles should be all-lowercased except when uppercase is clearly indicated.
- This is far better known as "weak two bid" or simply "weak two". It doesn't quite fit into the definition of convention (bridge), too -- this is a pretty natural treatment.
- Link to weak two bid (now a redirect) is already in several articles.
Thus, I suggest moving this article to "Weak two bid". Duja 12:09, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Voting
- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
- Support as the proposer. Duja 12:09, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
- Either. As the creator of this article, either is fine with me. (Although IMHO, I'd say it is a convention. But it's also a bid, so that's neither here nor there.) – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 17:30, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Discussion
- Add any additional comments
- I've seen it capitalized as both "Weak Two" and "Weak two" in books on the subject, as well as "Weak-two", "weak-2", etc. I've made lots of redirects. – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 17:30, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
- Me too, but we should establish a consistent capitalization accross the wiki (and "bridge-wiki"). Since there is already WP:NC, I think we should follow it – there's no particular reason why "Two" should be uppercased. While most titles in English grammar are uppercased indeed, that approach is not practical on wikipedia for navigation and other issues. Duja 08:37, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.