Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tropical Storm Claudette (2021) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Uhhhhhh...no offense, but why is this here? If this system doesn't become Claudette, I literally see no reason to keep it.ChessEric (talk · contribs) 01:03, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
I agree. Sria >:3 SR.1111111 (talk)♥️ 01:18, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Although the chances of Three becoming Claudette are slowly closing due to land interaction (although the system can strengthen a bit before landfall, per NHC), the preparations and further impacts are the most important here. Just wait a little bit until the system makes landfall, impacts will be seen and that’s the time where we justify when this system needs its own article or not. 🌀HurricaneParrot🐦 02:26, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
We also have one for Potential Tropical Cyclone Seventeen-E since these are numbered by the NHC. No need for a removal of this article.DachshundLover82 (talk) 04:21, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Regardless of whether it develops in the Gulf, it may also become Claudette once it exits off the East Coast and into the Gulf Stream, as shown by some models. Also, I think it’s already very notable and justified due to the impact it’s brought in Mexico, which damage assessments are currently ongoing for. It’s also supposed to make landfall on the first federal holiday Juneteenth in the US, so that brings additional notability.DachshundLover82 (talk) 04:28, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
So, I found something out by using a site known as zoom.earth. The one that is currently being used doesn't seem to be at its peak intensity. As I am not a professional, I may or may not know what the hell I am talking about. What do you think?
-Solarrrr... Send a message to Solar? Tappy tap tap! ⏰Time: 05:29, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Hey. Isn’t Claudette a possible example of brown ocean effect since it reintensifed into tropical storm while over land? IBlazeCat (talk) 22:19, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
I did find a source to support the claim and I will add it in to the article soon.IBlazeCat (talk) 15:51, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Alright, sorry for the late reply, but I’ve added the source to article supporting brown ocean effect. Ill go ahead and end this discussion IBlazeCat (talk) 11:20, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 19:18, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
After having several articles vindicated by mindless image edit warring recently, I am going to start a discussion on this before this gets any worse. Are we going to switch to an image of Claudette off the coast solely because it is 2 mb or so deeper, a part of Claudette's lifetime which is relatively insignificant and not relevant to the storm and its impacts on the U.S, or of the image over the United States when most Americans would probably remember it for when it was delivering its impacts and near when it was named? Peak intensity isn't everything and everything was fine for months until someone suddenly decided to revert the image. Thoughts? Hurricaneboy23 (page) * (talk) 03:10, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Would the 3 deaths On June 11 count as indirect in the precursor? It is mentioned in the TCR. 108.170.65.170 (talk) 23:11, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.