Talk:Thomas Langlois Lefroy

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Women's History Low‑importance History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics of the United Kingdom This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Ireland B‑class Mid‑importance Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. B This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Biography: Politics and Government Stub‑class Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation. Stub This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Untitled

Tom Lefroy called his eldest daughter 'jane'. this suggests a more prominent flirtation between jane austen and himself.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Cat123rox (talk • contribs) 00:33, 2007 April 12

I noticed that the dates given in the article (and the online archive) did not jibe (Saturday, January 9th cannot be followed by Thursday, January 16th). A quick check with a weekday calculator confirms that Saturday was the 9th, making the following Thursday the 14th.
Also the first quote had left out a bit that in context is pretty clearly also about Tom, which I added. —MJBurrage • TALK • 21:01, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

I am new to editing Wikipedia, so please bear with me. I have striked the following statement in this article, "However, it may have been he whom Austen had in mind when she invented the character Mr. Darcy in Pride and Prejudice — Darcy was quite a well known and distinguished name in Ireland at the time with legal connections and a family barony that could pass down the female line". Current scholarship is not consistent on this point. While I see the reference that is made here, Jon Spence's "Becoming Jane Austen" from 2003 suggests that Jane Austen used personalities as the models for Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth Bennett, using herself as a model for Mr. Darcy and Tom Lefroy as the model for Elizabeth Bennett. Also, while the courship between Tom and Jane took place over the year or so that Pride and Prejudice was written the comparisons between the then student Tom Lefroy and the accomplished Mr. Darcy are premature at best in terms of success and connections. If there are no objections I would like to suggest that the line I have striked be deleted, or instead I can add some language simillar to what I have done here to at least highlight that Tom Lefroy had some kind of impact on the novel. Skbruce (talk) 13:40, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

• • • For anyone editing this article, please note - John Spence's 2003 biography, "Becoming Jane Austen" suggests that Jane Austen actually used personalities as the models for Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth Bennett, using herself as a model for Mr. Darcy and Tom Lefroy as the model for Elizabeth Bennett. This is not a typo. Spence suggests that Darcy's more introverted manner and shyness was actually more characteristic of Jane Austen and that the witty, gregariousness of Elizabeth Bennett was more characteristic of the young Tom Lefroy. Please refer to Mr. Spence's book before editing - thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skbruce (talk • contribs) 07:54, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Dubious Sources

This article is full of supposition and perhaps even fiction. The source for the statement that Lefroy attended Jane Austen's funeral is dubious at best. (Some of the claims on that webpage are ridiculous and outrageous.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by BellyOption (talk • contribs) 01:46, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Why are the dates in brackets?

Are the letters undated, with just the day? Rothorpe (talk) 23:43, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Jane Austen

On her page it says she knew him from December to January, a maximum of two months, not the year indicated here. 86.134.83.50 (talk) 14:42, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Thomas Langlois Lefroy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930021621/http://www.carrigglas.ie/ to http://www.carrigglas.ie/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:01, 20 January 2018 (UTC)