Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the St. Joe Company article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I came across this article, and it reads like a hatchet job. Somebody with an axe to grind against this company has edited in all sorts of uncited, biased nonsense. Additionally, what is cited is written in a highly slanted tone. I have no particular affinity for the company, but the tone of this article is thoroughly inappropriate for an encyclopedia. I will leave this tag in place for a couple of weeks, but after that I will go through and rewrite the article to restore some semblance of neutrality. Horologium (talk) 03:54, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
This article reads like a ranting Facebook post. Came here to get some information on the subject, as we are having issues with the subject. But can't use any of this as it is just hate talk. Can someone please provide factual information on this subject. Also many claims are not cited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:4C1:C980:3DA0:84E4:E81:4B43:BADD (talk) 01:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.