 |
 | This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria articles | | | High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
 | This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles | | | ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. |
|
 | This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eastern Europe, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Eastern EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject Eastern EuropeTemplate:WikiProject Eastern EuropeEastern Europe articles | |
|
 | This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles | |
|
|
I think in English Wikipedia only the English and native name should be in as we have wikipedias in many languages. You can see information of the city in other languages in the language box or create a new article.--Valkov 05:27, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
Hello,
There is a big mistake in the location of SIlistra. When i open the page in Wikipedia or check in myself in facebook it's come out as a location - Silistra, Razgrad. Razgrad is different, smaller city in Bulgaria , close to Silistra . There is not reason after Silistra , to put Razgrad. Silistra is not part of district of Razgrad . They are two different and separated cities and districts of Bulgaria and it's a big mistake to put after the name of Silistra in the location, the name of Razgrad. Please, make the necessary changes. It's not good too see one of the biggest cities of Bulgaria , put as a part of a smaller and different city and municipality of Bulgaria. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.90.14.143 (talk) 07:55, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: rough consensus not to move. Andrewa (talk) 02:58, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Silistra → Silistra,_Bulgaria — The change is needed in order to show the name of the country, not only the name of the city. This way it will be more precise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nevca (talk • contribs)
- There's no need for that. The name of the country is only added when there's another place of the same name in order to disambiguate between the two. See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names) and particularly Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)#Disambiguation. There is no other Silistra, so there is no reason to move. Thanks for initiating a discussion instead of moving the article yourself though, that's the correct way to do it! Best, — Toдor Boжinov — 16:17, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose if this is the only place named "Silistra", see above reasoning. JIP | Talk 17:37, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose. Completely unnecessary. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:52, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
 |
An image used in this article, File:Archmuseum.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
- What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
- If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
- If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
- If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Archmuseum.jpg)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:13, 13 February 2012 (UTC) |
The "Dristor" district of Bucharest has nothing to do with Silistra or Durostorum. The name "dristor" comes from the word "dârstar".[1]
Porcina (talk) 19:18, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
There's a certain mistake in the climate data for record low temperature, which reads -13 Celsius degrees. It simply cannot be because in that case Silistra would have the same climate as Trieste and Istanbul and would be surrounded by palmtrees. The record low for that latitude and inland position should be at least -26 degrees. Salutations; — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:569:71B5:7000:20CD:7103:9FE5:A504 (talk) 07:02, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- not in Europe
... compare Genoa, Italy#Climate for example. However, on closer inspection, I think the entire weatherbox is erroneous, as it was added here in a single edit unrelated to the source given at the bottom of the table, which seems not to contain annual climate data for this site at all. So I have removed the box entirely. Thank you for indirectly bringing it to my attention. —Soap— 17:39, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Silistra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:54, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Darstor is the historical name of Silistra in Romanian, just like Drustur in Bulgarian. The present-day name is Silistra. Silistria (ending in -ia) was another name that is no longer used in Romanian.
Also Tinutul Marii should be translated in English since this is the English wikipedia page for Silistra. It means Sea County. I will correct these errors myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2F07:93FF:FFFF:0:0:6460:266B (talk) 09:34, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Why is there no mention of the Ukrainian name of Silistra?
I used to be a part of Kievan Rus' for 2 years. There is no reason for the mentioning the Romanian name which is exactly the same as the Bulgarian/official one (only the scripts differ: Cyrillic for Bulgarian, Latin for Romanian) without mentioning the Ukrainian and Turkish ones too.
Romanian possession of Silistra lasted for some 20 years during the Middle Ages and some 25 years in the 20th century. Compared to Bulgarian rule, that's nothing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2F07:93FF:FFFF:0:0:6460:266B (talk) 09:50, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
