Talk:Religious organization

This  level-5 vital article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Organizations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Religion Low‑importance Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Question

1. dontknowwhatimdoing can someone upgrade this page? i'm really interested in this topic and would like to know more — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.242.203.192 (talk) 04:40, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 06:03, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

---

Religion-supporting organization → Religious organization – Much more recognizable term. JFH (talk) 18:44, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

• Support; seems sensible enough to me. bobrayner (talk) 23:46, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move and scope

This move should be reflected by a change in scope. The original article referred specifically to France and the USA, while the current version deals in detail with France, the reference to the USA having been removed.

The new name suggests to me a much wider scope not just in the countries covered but in the types of institutions covered too. I could be wrong. Andrewa (talk) 06:21, 12 May 2013 (UTC)