|
To-do list for Ockbrook: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2006-06-15
This page lists other community groups that should all be considered for inclusion. Done. 81.79.18.99
Find a local history book, expand slightly the "History" section and then add a "References" section (just before the "External Links" section) in which to cite it. Done. 84.64.45.167
Streets: Find the correct name for "W. Lane". Done. 84.64.45.167
- Create or obtain a large scale street map of the village.
- Obtain a list of gittys and map showing same.
- Obtain a list of footpaths and map showing same.
Obtain additional population statistics from later censuses. In progress 84.64.45.167 Done. 84.67.48.122
Graph the population data. Done. 84.64.45.167
- Obtain a list of all available large scale maps of the village with scans where available.
- Obtain a list of all relevant surveys (eg censuses, poor law surveys, etc).
- Obtain or create a building phases map.
Add a "Further reading" section. Done. 84.64.45.167
- Add information about other streets where verifiable eg Bakehouse Lane, Collier Lane (tramway), etc.
|
The references section could do with modifying to use the ref tags <ref>This is an example, reference ABC</ref> which when placed in the text gives, [1]
This ia an example, reference ABC
- Are any of the large list of other reading not references to the material in the text ?, as if used as the source they can be used as references using the <ref>Quote the source here, book by, publisher, ISBN 1234577890 </ref> as above as well.
The Giant list of External links has a lot of links that are the same basic link and they should be at the base of the page in the external links section WP:EL gives details on external links (note: Wikipedia is not a repository for links to other things). They can be incorporated in the body by describing the organization and adding them as a reference as shown above which gives a number automatically to each one which are then listed by the {{reflist}} function in the refs section. Article has some good material but is duplicating the community nets purpose and lots of links back to that and similar sites is un-encyclopedic. - BulldozerD11 (talk) 20:26, 19 October 2008 (UTC)