Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: SMasters (talk) 16:00, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- There were a few minor errors, mainly to do with punctuation, which I have fixed.
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Article is properly referenced.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Article complies to WP:OR.
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Article complies to WP:NPOV.
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Article is stable.
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- All images check out.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- There were some minor errors which I have fixed. Everything else complies to the requirements for a GA, and I am pleased to pass this. Well done. – SMasters (talk) 16:44, 5 March 2011 (UTC)