Talk:Jim Duffy

	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Disambiguation This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Periods at the end of items

Jtdirl has added periods to the end of the disambiguation entries. When I reverted that change, he or she re-reverted me with the rather cryptic comment:

rv not at the end of bullet points. But yes where a bullet point is followed be a sentence, which is the case here.

According to Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages):

• Entries should nearly always be sentence fragments. When the entry forms a complete sentence, do not include commas or periods at the end of the line.

Either the entry is a sentence fragment, in which case it should not end with a period, or it isn't a sentence fragment, in which case the Manual of Style explicitly tells us not to end it with a period.

I am removing the periods from the items. I ask Jtdirl to try to explain why he or she believes that a period should end a entry.

— DLJessup (talk) 12:14, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

It is called English. Where a bullet point consists of a small number of words, usually five or less , then it is treated under bullet point rules. Where it goes beyond that it is not a sentence fragment but a sentence without a verb. As such it is treated as a sentence for the purposes of capitalisation, grammar, commas, and periods. FearÉIREANN\^(caint) 12:17, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

FearÉIREANN:

First of all, a minor point. According to http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=sentence:

sen·tence (sĕntəns) n.

1. A grammatical unit that is syntactically independent and has a subject that is expressed or, as in imperative sentences, understood and a predicate that contains at least one finite verb.

To the best of my knowledge, every English grammarian defines a sentence as having a subject and a predicate, and the predicate must include a verb. The subject may be implicit, but the predicate must be explicit. Thus, a “sentence without a verb” is an oxymoron.

Moving on to the substance of your comment, you pull some rules out of thin air, offering no citation, simply claiming that, “It is called English.” I think I'll stick with a Manual of Style that both of us can read and that, if you think is wrong in some way, you can try to change.

— DLJessup (talk) 11:51, 27 April 2006 (UTC)