Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fawley Branch Line | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Table needs work (work needs table?) Britmax 19:26, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Well it works on my userpage - duff copy? Britmax 19:27, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Hythe Pier awaits blue seaward end Britmax (talk) 16:09, 7 January 2008 (UTC) Done and sent to article Britmax (talk) 19:42, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
About 75% of the text under reopening proposals describes ancient suggested schemes that have long since been discarded. This is part of the local government process, no doubt, but it is not "notable" to read that someone suggested something in 2015 and nothing came of it. It needs to be pruned.
Incidentally it's hardly proper that all the citations under the history section are from subterranea britannica, an online encyclopaedia. Wikipedia is a tertiary document and should source itself on secondary sources. If Wiki as an online encyclopaedia sources itself entirely from someone else's online encyclopaedia, isn't that a bit, well, unethical? And incestuous?Afterbrunel (talk) 14:24, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.