Loading AI tools
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Falafel article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 60 days  |
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered.
|
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Falafel. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Falafel at the Reference desk. |
 | Falafel has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This  level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
This paragraph in the introduction is inappropriate and should be removed: The Palestinian chickpea-only version of the falafel has also been adopted into Israeli cuisine, where it now features prominently and is proclaimed as the country's national dish – a situation which has been lamented by Palestinians, Lebanese, and other Arab groups alike as amounting to cultural appropriation. 82.19.192.8 (talk) 17:40, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- Why do you object to it? It is well sourced and I believe factually correct. Do you deny that there is debate about the cultural appropriation of Arab foods by Israelis? The phrasing is I think WP:NPOV, not taking sides on the issue. --Macrakis (talk) 17:55, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- Citation needed that Israel appropriated food. Israel is a middle eastern culture just like the others. 64.121.35.108 (talk) 13:00, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Macrakis, I think there is debate because there are Jews from several Arab lands who have settled in Israel therefore, not true cultural appropriation. Either more sources or different wording is needed. Chavmen (talk) 03:58, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- this is blatantly antisemitic Davidatlasdavidatlas (talk) 14:28, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Here are some constructive suggestions and comment:
- The Palestinian chickpea-only version of the falafel has also been adopted into Israeli cuisine, where it now features prominently and is proclaimed as the country's national dish. MISLEADING AND NOT NECESSARY FOR LEDE. DOESN'T READ AS NEUTRAL.
- History:
- The dish later migrated northwards to the Levant, where chickpeas replaced the fava beans, and from there spread to other parts of the Middle East. THERE WERE JEWS THROUGHOUT THE MIDDLE EAST INCLUDING A SMALL POPULATION IN PALESTINE. THEREFORE STATING THE FOLLOWING:
- The identification of Falafel with Israeli cuisine has been lamented by Palestinians, Lebanese and other Arab populations as amounting to cultural appropriation.
- SEEMS CONTRADICTORY.
- ALSO, RAVIV IS THE ONLY SCHOLARLY SOURCE CITING CULTURAL APPROPRIATION ALONG WITH OTHER ARAB ORGANISATIONS.
- CONSIDERING...it was consumed by Syrian and Egyptian Jews AND was adopted in the diet of early Jewish immigrants to the Jewish communities of Ottoman Syria. WOULD BE APPROPRIATE TO STATE JEWS AND ARABS CONSUMED/MADE FALAFEL AT VARIOUS POINTS THROUGHOUT HISTORY IN LEDE.
- Thoughts? Chavmen (talk) 09:20, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- The main note that I have on the above is: read WP:SHOUT. Iskandar323 (talk) 11:06, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- Of course Arab Jews (as well as Arab Christians etc.) in Egypt and the Levant ate falafel, but it was not regarded as a distinctively Jewish dish until recently. Treating falafel as a "national food" makes a claim about its distinctiveness.
- Not sure what your point about the "lamenting" part is. This is an WP:NPOV statement, not claiming in WP's voice that it is cultural appropriation, just reporting on what others say. Do you disagree that others say this?
- Not sure what you mean by Raviv "and other Arab organizations". Raviv is an Israeli-American scholar who has researched this issue and published it as a book and as far as I know has nothing to do with Arab organizations. --Macrakis (talk) 11:20, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Macrakis, I'll try to be more specific.
- If the lede is a summary, then it would make more sense, judging by the article and each section to say something like this:
- Falafel is a popular dish with a disputed origin, likely originating in Egypt and later spreading to the Middle East. The name is derived from the Arabic word for pepper. The dish involves fritters made from fava beans or chickpeas, often shaped into balls or patties and deep-fried or oven-baked. Preparation methods vary, with fava beans used in Egyptian cuisine and chickpeas in Palestinian cuisine. Falafel gained popularity across the Levant and the wider Middle East, often served during Ramadan. In Israel, the Palestinian chickpea falafel is considered a national dish, adopted by early Jewish immigrants. Falafel has gained global popularity as a vegetarian food in Europe, particularly Germany, and North America.
- This just seems to me to fit more with WP:NPOV and for summation purposes.
- 2. In terms of Raviv, I understand he studied it significantly, but I think it would be more specific (according to him also) that it wasn't a Jewish Ashkenazi dish yet Syrian and Egyptian Jews did prepare and eat this dish. Specifically here: Falafel was never a specifically Jewish dish, but it was consumed by Syrian and Egyptian Jews. Makes more sense. Also, one person is not enough experts on the topic, hence why I then brought this up:
- 3. In terms of my Arab Organisations comment, I was referring to this sentence:...has been lamented by Palestinians, Lebanese and other Arab populations as amounting to cultural appropriation. I didn't mean to get this sentence confused with Raviv - they were too separate points.
- To someone reading the article who doesn't look at sources, I would want to see both sides of the spectrum.
- But I will get out of here now and leave it to some ECs to figure out :) Chavmen (talk) 11:27, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- "Until recently" meaning almost all Middle East Countries were created by Europe recently? Alexfrombonn (talk) 22:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Macrakis, I'll try to be more specific.
- Sorry, will put in italics next time. Just wanted to create the distinction. Chavmen (talk) 10:58, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Iskandar323 :) Chavmen (talk) 11:30, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- The main note that I have on the above is: read WP:SHOUT. Iskandar323 (talk) 11:06, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- Raviv writes in citation [1] “The Jewish population in Palestine, the early halutzim, or pioneers - adopted the local Arab version made with childpeas. By the 1920’s falafel had become a popular snack with the younger generation." That does not directly correspond to the citation, which implies it is a Palestinian dish, with Palestinian referencing the modern usage of the term. In the 1920's the "Palestinians" were the people who lived in Palestine, including Jews, and Raviv is directly referencing the Jews in her paper. The citation should be removed, or it should be clarified that by "Palestinian, Raviv was referring to the Halutzim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psycholing (talk • contribs) 22:28, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- You are denying the whole history and culture of the Mizrahi Jewry.
- That paragraph is discriminatory, zero neutral and against the idea of wikipedia.
- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mizrahi_Jews Alexfrombonn (talk) 22:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I agree, especially since there seem to be several different theories and viewpoints, and dearth of any sources mentioning it before the 19th century. The summary of it certainly is phrased in a way that's opinion as fact. I agree that it's not necessary in the lede altogether and move to strike the whole sentence and keep the controversy sequestered where it belongs.
- Stampfer has an interesting viewpoint, which is that the deep-fried ball version in a pita pocket with tomato, which is certainly what would be called the iconic Israeli version of the dish, really couldn't have been created before the 20th century.[1]
- "Traditional Middle Eastern breads are dipped in sauces or used as a wrap. European baking technology that came to the Middle East in the late 19th century made the pocket pita possible. At the same time, inexpensive frying oil became available and a fried croquette that was popular in India was naturalized in the Middle East and given the name ‘falafel’."
- "At this time, the tomato, which had recently been introduced to the Middle East, began to be used for salad. The combination of pocket pita, falafel balls and vegetable salad, with a bit of tahini added, came into being in the 20th century."[2]
- Stampfer criticizes the culinary nationalism debate, saying most modern foods in general aren't such ancient recipes. I think that perspective is perfectly valid and certainly matches pre-controversy usage, i.e. the subject of the criticism. --Scharb (talk) 18:37, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Can’t believe its come to this, but with serious battleground behaviors being exhibited on this page, I’m placing a neutrality tag on the page until actual balanced consensus can be achieved on the political implications of falafel.
There are clear biases that are being railroaded into the edit. The largest Jewish ethnic subgroup in Israel are Jews from Muslim and Arab countries, yet accusations of cultural appropriation from both Palestinians and “other arab populations” are being given emphasis in the lede without any grounds for counterpoint? Not remotely neutral. Mistamystery (talk) 20:44, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Please provide something other than personal opinion to justify the tag. Please explain why what several reliable sources discuss should not be included. Please explain why when WP:LEAD says we should include noteworthy controversies about a topic in the lead you think we should remove them. And please do so with sources. nableezy - 21:00, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Because the representation of the controversy is one-sided, and excludes counter information now only available in the body that then flatly mischaracterizes the nature of the controversy. I’m putting the tag back on. Mistamystery (talk) 23:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- I've been doing some work on the article, do you still feel it is POV, Mistamystery? Falafel most likely originated in Egypt but the time is unknown; some say ancient, some say modern. It predates the modern states Israel or Palestine, or many of the nations on the present Middle Eastern map. Egyptians, Yemenites and others from the Arab world brought it to Israel. Other civilizations have a falafel inherited via the Egyptians: the Persians and the Greeks, who aren't Arab, but also had contact and their own spin on falafel. Andre🚐 00:14, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- This neutrality tag was not helpful and I have removed it. See Special:Diff/1191574503—Alalch E. 10:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- I agree the tag is not helpful. I believe Mistamystery was saying that the lead doesn't need to include the accusation of cultural appropriation. I think I agree. Can we remove that from the lead? It would of course remain in the body. Is this really one of the most notable aspects of Falafel? Can't we all share this food that everyone inherited probably from ancient Egyptians, who were neither Arab Palestinians nor Jewish Israelis? Andre🚐 10:25, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- I want to be very clear: the lede is not neutral and does not present a balanced view of the "controversy" (which I also do not think is sufficient to be included in the lede at all). This is why the neutrality tag needs to be restored and the above comments do not counter why I put it there in the first place. I merely
- left the convo for a few days and someone took the silence as grounds to remove it without actually addressing the clear issue.
- The point-counterpoint is not "Israelis consider it to be a national dish but Palestinians/Arabs consider that to be cultural appropriation" is not remotely balanced. The "Israelis" being referenced includes Jews from Arab countries (including Egypt, where falafel originates from), so it is non-sensical to place a claim of Arabs making accusation of cultural appropriation without counter-mention of the Arab Jewish influence on Israeli cuisine and dietary attitudes.
- Until this specifically is resolved (plus resurgent coatrack concerns all over the page that are an attempt to turn it into a PIA conflict battleground), then no, I do not consider this page to have resolved its neutrality issues. I will be (again) restoring the neutrality tag shortly until this is resolved, and will be happy to pull in an admin for feedback. Mistamystery (talk) 21:02, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- The controversy isn't about shared cuisine: it is about appropriation and lack of attribution of the origins of certain dishes. If a dish is thought to have originated in Egypt, it can reasonably be construed as "Egyptian"; but if an Egyptian moves to country X, taking that dish with them, it is not necessarily reasonable to then construe that dish as "country X-ish" in turn. Iskandar323 (talk) 23:56, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- I recently had to remove a quote that someone had added into this article which referred to those who supposedly were “appropriating” the cuisine as “criminals and misfits from American jewish ghettoes”, which I think both illuminates the core issue here (insofar as a distinct and venomous pseudo-legitimized bias finding its way both into sources and discourse on the subject) as well as a clear (and questionable) agenda certain editors are attempting to push here that - in spite of people’s appreciable frustration with all things Israel and Israelis - just simply does not add up.
- There is no dispute as to the genesis of falafel becoming an Israeli national dish. It was already widely consumed across the Arab world (including by Jews living both inside of pre-1900 Palestine, as well as across the middle east). When Jewish migration started to rise in the 19th century, cuisines were carried along from one location to another, new ones were adopted and adapted and modified and collided into the eclectic mix of influences that defines Israeli cuisine today. As a new community, and later national cuisine started to formulate itself, falafel (alongside many other popularly consumed dishes with influences from far and wide) came to be considered a staple dish.
- The lede does not currently say “Palestinians”, it says “Palestinians and Arabs” criticize this cultural appropriation, which in effect creates set up a lose-lose nexus that is profoundly unacademic, and nefariously so in its insistence that it somehow is a legitimate argument worthwhile of an article lede. A Jewish Israeli who ate chickpea-based falafel in Yemen and continued to do so in Israel is now an “appropriator” in Israel, when he wasn’t one in Yemen?
- This argument attempts to say “Israeli cuisine” is at fault, but clearly - given that it attempts to make no account for both the majority of Jewish Israelis who migrated from the Middle East and have often historically included falafel in their diet, or the 20% of Israelis who are Arabs - it is nothing but a byword for the toxic, highly politicized distortive bias that “Israeli” only means “European Ashkenazi Jew”…which we all know it very much doesn’t, and just mathematically is not the case.
- None of the sources on the page imply there is any dispute as to the trajectory of falafel dishes. Nor do any of the sources indicate any Israelis are claiming they invented falafel. Nor are there any sources claiming that the concept of falafel as a “national dish” preceded its popularity. It was a popular, cheap street food that grew in popularity alongside many other dishes that were influenced by the collision of subcultures happening at the time in the region.
- For it to be cultural appropriation the accusation would have to be applied evenly to all potential appropriators, and that just isn’t the case here. There is a bottlenecked and distorted fixation on one particular group, and we all well know what that is, and is sure as shootin’ isn’t academic or remotely NPOV.
- This theory is frankly very much WP:FRINGE and is nothing but a convenient coatrack for people’s general grievances around the conflict. It doesn’t mean we indulge it here.
- Someone just make a “food disputes” page or a “cultural appropriation in food” page and let us be done of this in this location. It’s super inappropriate. Mistamystery (talk) 02:01, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Claims of cultural appropriation are subjective and have been attributed as such. It sounds like you disagree with the claims - that's fine as many cases of cultural appropriation and the concept itself is controversial. VR talk 18:07, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- I agree the tag is not helpful. I believe Mistamystery was saying that the lead doesn't need to include the accusation of cultural appropriation. I think I agree. Can we remove that from the lead? It would of course remain in the body. Is this really one of the most notable aspects of Falafel? Can't we all share this food that everyone inherited probably from ancient Egyptians, who were neither Arab Palestinians nor Jewish Israelis? Andre🚐 10:25, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
I am pointing out an inaccuracy. The page states "The Association of Lebanese Industrialists in 2008 brought a lawsuit against Israel seeking damages for lost revenues, claiming copyright infringement regarding the branding of Israeli falafel, hummus, tabbouleh, and other foods.[25][26][61]" when in fact there is no evidence that such a law suit was ever brought forward. The citations simply refer to a quote about a plan to bring forward a lawsuit about copyright violations. I could find no reference to an actual lawsuit or a resolution or settlement to a lawsuit over copyright violation. This entire portion should be removed as inaccurate, or should be altered to say that such a lawsuit was considered but not brought forward. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psycholing (talk • contribs) 21:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The paragraph about cultural apropiation is clearly discrminating the descendents of the thousands of Jewish of non European origins that lived in Northen Africa,,Egypt, and the whole Middle East, their own history and the history of their families. The article is not neutral and heavily biased, ruining the whole idea of Wikipedia for political issues. This is not the standard of a neutral and unbiased colective construction of knowledge. Alexfrombonn (talk) 22:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
@TrulyShruti: Please note that the inclusion of this material to the lede is based on the WP:LEDE guideline which states that the lede is a summary of the body including any prominent controversies of which this is clearly one. This has already been discussed. Makeandtoss (talk) 14:31, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- Restored to lead. nableezy - 15:50, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- It is not prominent in the world mainstream discussion of falafel. This has long failed to gain consensus for the lead, and it should not appear there until consensus is explicit. SPECIFICO talk 16:02, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- There has been a consensus, you not liking that consensus but failing to achieve one to overturn it is a personal problem. nableezy - 16:53, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- Please give a link that demonstrates explicit consensus for this lead text. It's repeatedly been challenged by various editors. SPECIFICO talk 19:24, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- You were there the last time this was discussed. The sources, and the majority of editors, are on one side. You are on the other. Being challenged by various editors who either ignore or misrepresent the sourcing does not change that consensus. If you would like to try to establish a new one feel free. nableezy - 19:33, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- Nableezy, the link you provided demonstrates a failed attempt to elevate the grievance. No consensus was achieved there. Also, please try not to personalize talk page content discussions. SPECIFICO talk 16:24, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- I removed the content too. Consensus can change, of course. This is an unnecessary politicization of a cuisine-related article that doesn't belong in the lead section, where readers expect a straightforward introduction to the dish, instead of political wars over food. Controversies should remain where they belong, in the controversy section. PeleYoetz (talk) 09:00, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- Its inappropriate and presents a false view to have the inventors and native eaters of a dish in the same position as someone who adopted it. The history and background must be presented when there is text about the country that adopted it. Including the lede. ---Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 16:36, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- That’s absurd, this is stable content for a decade and the lead summarizes the article, including the controversy section. nableezy - 10:56, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed, no arguments based in WP policy have been made against its inclusion as well. Makeandtoss (talk) 18:35, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- All the "arguments" against are based on policy WP:NPOV. Consensus can change, and in the case of this page it has changed due to the many new editors who previously did little editing relating to the mideast and now find themselves browsing this and other related pages. So "absurd" and other non-policy-based reasoning is not going to help. SPECIFICO talk 20:58, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- Funny, since NPOV requires the inclusion of all significant views and a bunch of highly reliable sources have been provided to show this to be one. And lead requires in the inclusion of noteworthy controversies and again a bunch of highly reliable sources have shown this to be one. The effort to ignore the sources and the policies should be ignored. nableezy - 00:54, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- All the "arguments" against are based on policy WP:NPOV. Consensus can change, and in the case of this page it has changed due to the many new editors who previously did little editing relating to the mideast and now find themselves browsing this and other related pages. So "absurd" and other non-policy-based reasoning is not going to help. SPECIFICO talk 20:58, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed, no arguments based in WP policy have been made against its inclusion as well. Makeandtoss (talk) 18:35, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- You were there the last time this was discussed. The sources, and the majority of editors, are on one side. You are on the other. Being challenged by various editors who either ignore or misrepresent the sourcing does not change that consensus. If you would like to try to establish a new one feel free. nableezy - 19:33, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- Please give a link that demonstrates explicit consensus for this lead text. It's repeatedly been challenged by various editors. SPECIFICO talk 19:24, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- There has been a consensus, you not liking that consensus but failing to achieve one to overturn it is a personal problem. nableezy - 16:53, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Wikiwand in your browser!
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.
