Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • Monsters in Dungeons & Dragons Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Monsters in Dungeons & Dragons |
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I believe the description likening the bulette to a badger is entirely unjustified. The bulette has a sleek, pointed shape and a fin-like protuberance on its back, much like a shark's fin. It does not really resemble a badger in any way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.190.85.4 (talk) 04:49, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Much better, overall, to have this fully-sourced, mostly out-of-universe, by-edition description of the creature, which should be the standard by which all D&D fictional element articles are written (and eventually re-written). I'm not sure that the details on statistical information such as hit points and damage and description of game scale are necessary - would someone who's never played the game even remotely have a clue what that means? - but I'm glad the overall focus is on the more tangible aspects of the creatre rather than the absract aspects of its statistics. I'm a bit more concerned about statements such as "a formidable challenge even for a large party of low-level characters" and "making it a much tougher challenge, even for a mid-level party of adventurers"; are these ideas taken from any kind of source? If we have Gygax saying "I think the bulette is definitely a challenge for low-level PCs" or Skip Williams saying "We made the 3E bulette a much tougher challenge, even for a mid-level party" that's one thing, as that's quotable - or even if one of the monster books, or an article about monsters, or anything makes such a conclusion that we can draw on, that's fine, but I think if that's an assumption made by someone reading the books then we cross the line into WP:OR.
Otherwise, I feel it is well done and now a much stronger article! 24.148.0.83 (talk) 18:51, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Added a citation for the "Hamburger" reference and reverted. Also, it's only called that in Berlin, so I added that descriptor. SuperAnth: so dubbed by others, perpetuated by action (talk) 22:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
What is the origin of the word? Sounds French. Equinox ◑ 11:24, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bulette. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:14, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.