Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bombardier Global 7500 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I realize that the article has no real photos of the subject, but I really question the idea of using photos of other aircraft here, like competitors. We don't do this on other articles, for instance you won't see a photo of an A320 on the Boeing 737 article, even though it is a competitor and is mentioned in the text. I am mostly concerned that it is confusing for readers. - Ahunt (talk) 20:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
It looks like to me that the Global 8000 is it's own type of aircraft. Shouldn't this airplane have its own page instead of being added to the 7500's page? Looking at Bombardier's web page they are marketed as fairly different airplanes. https://businessaircraft.bombardier.com/en KittyHawkFlyer (talk) 17:01, 22 July 2022 (UTC) Or at least we should change the page name to Bombardier Global 7500 and 8000.KittyHawkFlyer (talk) 17:05, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.