Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the A Polish Nobleman article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
A Polish Nobleman has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 22, 2013. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that scholars are not sure who is portrayed in Rembrandt's painting A Polish Nobleman (pictured)? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Some suggestions for further improvements:
– Editør (talk) 10:00, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
A photograph of this painting is currently a featured picture candidate: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/A Polish Nobleman. – Editør (talk) 10:23, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Rembrandt van Rijn - A Polish nobleman.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on April 26, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-04-26. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
I own the original painting of the Picture made by Rembrandt. (the picture is a foto of a copy of my painting) I added in the Further reading section new information and a link to a pdf document that is a good article. Wikipedia:Good article criteria . How can I, in the article, let the people know of this new information...an email of the museum seems not to be relevant!? Pmnedus (talk) 20:29, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Rembrandt or his pupils could never have given the painting a name like “The treasurer of our archaeology”. “The treasurer of our archaeology” is the title of a book which was published in in the year 1854. In that book on page 61 to 68 one can find an Polish inventory of belongings made in the year 1655. There you’ll find a list of paintings and one of them is called “Wladyslaw in Elk Skin”. I apologize for making you think otherwise. Can you advise me how to proceed. Pmnedus (talk) 12:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
The National gallery in Washington has a pdf ("Rembrandt van Rijn - A Polish Nobleman" National Gallery of Art)used in this article, and are using with this Pdf their own research and opinions. They are the owner of the object. Is it not, that this is in conflict with the “No original research” rules !?
And the content of “A Corpus of Rembrandt Paintings All Volumes: Rembrandt's Paintings” and the RKD webpages, also have the same conflict!? Does did mean all the art articles have to be reviewed!?
Awaiting for a constructive answer. Thanks. Or does this question belong in the Teahouse?
The disclaimers:
This is a publication of the Stichting Foundation Rembrandt Research Project. The opinions expressed in this volume (VI), and the previously published volumes I-V in the Series A Corpus of Rembrandt Paintings, should be understood as “opinions” that are meant for academic use only. The opinions represent the Foundation’s best judgment based on available information at the time of publication. The opinions are not statements or representations of fact nor a warranty of authenticity of a work of art and are subject to change as scholarship and academic information about an individual work of art changes. Opinions have been changed in the past according to new insights and scholarship. It should be understood that forming an opinion as to the authenticity of a work of art purporting to be by Rembrandt is often very difficult and will in most cases depend upon subjective criteria which are not capable of proof or absolute certainty. Therefore, the conclusions expressed in the volumes are only opinions and not a warranty of any kind. Third parties cannot derive any rights from these opinions. Neither the Foundation, nor the members of its board, nor the authors, nor the cooperators, nor any other parties engaged in the Rembrandt Research Project accept any liability for any damages (schade), including any indirect or consequential damages or losses and costs. Anyone is free to disagree with the opinions expressed in these volumes.
Disclaimer RKD All users with access to the RKD – Netherlands Institute for Art History website and who use this site for whatever purpose, agree to the following.
The RKD has the right to refuse services to users of the RKD. The RKD devotes a lot of time and energy to ensuring the information on the website is accurate and up to date. Despite this, inaccuracies may be present on its website or those affiliated with the RKD. The RKD does not accept liability for any damages incurred as a result of these inaccuracies, or for problems arising from the use or transference of this information. The RKD furthermore does not accept liability for any losses, lost profits or any other kind of damage or loss which occur as a result of the use or circulation of the information, or for any technical shortcomings. Users who download data or information do so at their own risk. References or hyperlinks to other websites are only given as information for the users of the RKD website. The RKD offers no guarantee with regard to the content and reliability of these websites, nor does the RKD accept liability in any way for damages incurred either as a direct or indirect result of using the information on these websites. Any statements made by the RKD on art works are a result of art historical examination by the staff member(s) concerned and cannot be seen as expertise. The RKD and/or the staff members(s) who carried out the examination cannot be held liable for any inaccuracies or incomplete information in the given statements, nor for any consequences for third parties due to the results of the examination issued. Pmnedus (talk) 18:34, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.