Talk:1942 in rail transport

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains: Timelines Low‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by the Timelines task force. Years This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Rollback to restore "events" in subsection headings

I rolled back the edit to make this page consistent with all of the other YEAR in rail transport articles. When births and deaths related to rail transport are added to this article, they will have their own MONTH births and MONTH deaths subsections. Keeping the "events" in the current subsections provides automatic disambiguation in the TOC. slambo 01:59, July 11, 2005 (UTC)

The trouble is that it looks silly. Why would births and deaths not just go under the relvant month? Also, you've reverted my removal of the (incorrect) hyphens, and a definite article. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 09:53, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

I've been formatting all of the YEAR in rail transport in this manner because that's how other YEAR in TOPIC pages do it. For example, 1942 in aviation uses a hyphen between the date and the event description; that page doesn't list births/deats, but does list first flights split out by months. They get around the ambiguous section headers by not using section headers in the first flights section, just formatting the headers in boldface type. The main 1942 page uses hyphens and splits out the births by month. I have no strong preference, but since the other YEAR in rail transport pages and the majority of other timeline pages are formatted a certain way, that's how I was following here. slambo 10:37, July 11, 2005 (UTC)

I know — I've never been keen on it for the other "Year in Foo" pages either. Use of the hyphen is dealt with in the Style Manual, in that (if anything's needed at all) it can be changed to an em-rule or en-rule, depending on context and use. In this case, an em-rule would be appropriate; it's just that there didn't seem to be any real need for anything. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 17:09, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 1942 in rail transport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.northlouisianatrainshow.org/whats_new_1_files/C%26P.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051217033754/http://www.railways.incanada.net/candate/ottawa.htm to http://www.railways.incanada.net/candate/ottawa.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:51, 14 June 2017 (UTC)