![cover image](https://wikiwandv2-19431.kxcdn.com/_next/image?url=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f7/Carbon_paper.jpg/640px-Carbon_paper.jpg&w=640&q=50)
Rose & Frank Co v JR Crompton & Bros Ltd
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Rose & Frank Co v JR Crompton & Bros Ltd [1924] is a leading decision on English contract law, regarding the intention to create legal relations in commercial arrangements.[1] In the Court of Appeal, Atkin LJ delivered an important dissenting judgment which was upheld by the House of Lords.
Quick Facts Rose & Frank Co v JR Crompton & Bros Ltd, Court ...
Rose & Frank Co v JR Crompton & Bros Ltd | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Court | House of Lords |
Citation | [1924] UKHL 2, [1925] AC 445 |
Transcript | Full text of judgment |
Case history | |
Prior action | [1923] 2 KB 261 |
Court membership | |
Judges sitting | Earl of Birkenhead, Lord Atkinson, Lord Sumner, Lord Buckmaster and Lord Phillimore |
Close
The case also is an example of the application of the Blue Pencil Rule.