Rees's Cyclopædia
19th-century British encyclopædia From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
19th-century British encyclopædia From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Rees's Cyclopædia, in full The Cyclopædia; or, Universal Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, and Literature, was an important 19th-century British encyclopaedia edited by Rev. Abraham Rees (1743–1825), a Presbyterian minister and scholar who had edited previous editions of Chambers's Cyclopædia.
This article needs additional citations for verification. (February 2016) |
Editor | Abraham Rees |
---|---|
Genre | Encyclopaedia |
Publisher | Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme and Brown |
Publication date | 1802–1819 |
Publication place | Great Britain |
When Rees was planning his Cyclopædia, Europe was in the aftermath of the French Revolution, and during serialised publication (1802–1820) the Napoleonic Wars and War of 1812 occurred. Britain absorbed into its empire a number of the former French and Dutch colonies around the world; Romanticism came to the fore; evangelical Christianity flourished with the efforts of William Wilberforce; and factory manufacture burgeoned.
With this background, philosophical radicalism was suspect in Britain, and aspects of the Cyclopædia were thought to be distinctly subversive and attracted the hostility of the Loyalist press.[1] Contributors Jeremiah Joyce and Charles Sylvester had attracted the attention of the government and were tried for their views. The editor and authors went to great pains to emphasise their Englishness, to the extent of anglicising many French words: the French Kings Louis appear under the heading "Lewis".
Scientific theorising about the atomic system, geological succession, and earth origins; natural history (botany, entomology, ornithology and zoology); and developments in technology, particularly in textiles manufacture, are all reflected in the Cyclopædia.[2] Other topics include exploration and foreign travel which provide insights into how the world was viewed at that time. Agriculture and rural life also feature greatly.
The Cyclopædia appeared serially between January 1802 and August 1820, and ran to 39 volumes of text and 6 volumes of plates including an atlas. It contains around 39 million words, and around 500 of the articles are of monograph length. The sheets were produced weekly, and issued as half-volume sets several times a year. The dates of these can be seen on table 4.1 below. Only one set of the work in half-volumes (which also has some of the paper wrappers) is known to survive, in the library of the Natural History Museum, London.
The plates were published in 6 volumes: four covering general articles, one on natural history, and one atlas. They were issued as blocks and so do not appear to have been issued with the texts in the half-volumes.[3] There are 1107 plates, and atlas with 61 folded maps 16" by 10" in size. Bound at the back of Volume 39 are lists of all the plates and an index to them.
The American edition was published by Samuel F. Bradford (see fr:Samuel F. Bradford), of Philadelphia. Bradford was a member of the famous family of American printers. The first volume appeared in May 1806 and the last in December 1820. The work extended to 41 volumes of text and 6 of plates. See section 5 below.
The growth of industrial archaeology led to the reprinting in the 1970s by the British publisher David and Charles of volumes covering manufacturing industry, naval architecture, and horology.
In the 1980s the Swiss publishing house IDC produced a microfiche edition.[4]
The first decades of the 19th century saw many encyclopaediae published in Britain. Examples included:
These sources commonly fed off each other, and writers often contributed to more than one.
The Cyclopædia had comparatively little reception on publication. The Anti-Jacobin Review published hostile reviews of half-volume 1 in 1802, and of volumes 2–4 in 1804-5. These reviews complained about its supposed antireligious aspects and radical standpoints attributed to its editor and contributors, and cited lack of article balance, confusing alphabetisation, and cross-references to then-unpublished volumes. The British Critic less stridently criticised lack of balance and confusion in volume 1. The Panoplist carried a serial review of both editions of Rees by Jedediah Morse in 1807–1810.
The Quarterly Review[5] commented, "Rees is the most extensive cyclopædia in English with many excellent articles it has generally been condemned as on the whole too diffuse and too commonplace."
The exhaustive article on encyclopaediae in the Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th edition (1910)[6] mentions Rees's involvement with the editing of the original Chambers, but ignores completely the later work. The 15th edition of Britannica mentions Rees's Cyclopædia superficially.
Rees's Cyclopædia seems to be in limbo in modern published studies of reference books. Superseded by more modern works and ignored by larger scholarship, the Cyclopædia received modern scholarly attention from students of the history of science and the history of technology, after research into the life and times of Charles Burney and his writings on music. In 1948 Percy Scholes published his biography The Great Dr Burney, 2 vol., and devoted a chapter to Burney's work for Rees. Scholes had his own copy of the work and used it profitably to discuss in some detail the faults of the work, in particular, the way the serial production caused major problems when editors were faced with new knowledge that appeared after the volume containing the appropriate section had been issued. They addressed this partially with an appendix in the last volume, and also by inventing contorted new subject titles in the main work ("Cotton Manufacture", Vol. 10, 1808, and "Manufacture of Cotton", Vol. 21, 1812). Later writers about Burney have investigated further his involvement with Rees. (See list of sources, below).
The Cyclopædia lacks a classified index volume, and alphabetising is on occasion eccentric ("York, New").
The Rees Project was instigated by June Zimmerman Fullmer (1920–2000), a professor at Ohio State University, an authority on Humphry Davy and the chemistry of the early 19th century. Her work drew her to Rees and she indexed it. After tapping the invisible college[7][8] of scholars who knew of Rees, she convened a summer 1986 meeting in London, following which she wrote a proposal[9] to the American Foundation for the Humanities for funding to the project, setting out the object of producing a printed concordance to the contents of the Cyclopædia. This was intended to make Rees much more widely accessible to the modern reader. Funding was not forthcoming, and the matter lapsed.
Rees's Cyclopædia was printed by Andrew Strahan, the King's Printer. It was entirely hand-set (there being no mechanical means of composition at this date) and printed. At the commencement of the work Strahan had nine wooden presses and over 20,000 kg of type. By 1809 this had risen to fifteen wooden presses and 36,000 kg (79,000 lb) of type.[10] Since the Cyclopædia was produced serially, with a few sheets being printed each week, only a small part of Strahan's men and equipment would have ever been used on it at any one time. The work was printed on demy paper and folded to quarto format, with an uncropped size of 11+1⁄4 by 8+3⁄4 inches (290 by 220 mm). A limited number were advertised in the prospectus as being produced on royal paper, which when folded gave a format of 12+1⁄4 by 10 inches (310 by 250 mm). The paper is wove, with no chain lines. One watermark in the paper has been noted,[11] with the legend W BALSTON, 1811. The supplier has not been identified, but it may be significant that a J. Dickinson was a member of the publishing syndicate.
The text matter was set in two columns measuring 221 mm × 80 mm (8.7 in × 3.1 in), with 67 lines per column. Ten lines of text measures 33 mm (1.3 in) deep. According to McKerrow's formula[12] this size of typeface was Long Primer. The typefounder is unknown, but the article on "Printing" in Volume 28 had, bound with the text, specimens of type cast by Fry and Steele of London and Alexander Wilson of Glasgow. Greek and Hebrew faces were sometimes used and occasionally special chemical, pharmaceutical, and other symbols appear.
The work followed the common practice of the time of conflating the entries for I and J and U and V into single lists.
At first a half-volume cost 18 shillings, and a large paper version with proof copies of the plates cost £1 16 shillings (according to the prospectuses). By 1820 the parts sold for £1 and £1 16 respectively. It is not clear if these prices were for the parts in wrappers. At the end of the project the work sold for £85 in the quarto edition and was reputed to have cost Longmans nearly £300,000. Most sets of Rees today are bound in calf, with two parts to the volume, but the quality of the leather used has meant that in many cases the hinges have rotted and the covers loosened, necessitating rebinding.
The publication of Rees followed the common system of a number of booksellers banding together to share the cost and eventual profit: the conger (syndicate). The syndicate comprised Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, & Brown, Paternoster Row; F. C. and J. Rivington, publisher to the SPCK (publishers of the British Critic); A. Strahan, King's Printer; and 24 smaller concerns. The full list is on the work's title page.
No records of the publication survive, since the papers of Longmans were destroyed when their premises in Paternoster Row, London, were burnt out in the Blitz on the night of 29–30 December 1940.[13]
VOLUME | PART | DATE OF PUBLICATION | LAST ARTICLE[3] |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 January 1802 | AGOGE |
2 | 14 May 1802 | AMARANTHOIDES | |
2 | 3 | 18 October 1802 | first part of ANTIMONY |
4 | 7 April 1803 | ARTERIOTOMY | |
3 | 5 | 22 September 1803 | first part of BABEL-MANDEB |
6 | 17 March 1804 | BATTERSEA | |
4 | 7 | 17 August 1804 | BIÖRNSTAHL |
8 | 13 April 1805 | BOOK-BINDING | |
5 | 9 | 1 June 1805 | Pt. BRUNIA |
10 | 26 December 1805 | CALVART | |
6 | 11 | 18 February 1806 | first part of CAPE OF GOOD HOPE |
12 | 17 June 1806 | CASTRA | |
7 | 13 | 1 October 1806 | first part of CHALK |
14 | 9 February 1807 | CHRONOLOGY | |
8 | 15 | 18 May 1807 | first part of CLAVARIA |
16 | 10 August 1807 | COLLISEUM | |
9 | 17 | 27 November 1807 | first part of CONGREGATION |
18 | 8 March 1808 | CORNE | |
10 | 19 | 2 May 1808 | first part of CROISADE |
20 | 2 July 1808 | CZYRCASSY | |
11 | 21 | 23 September 1808 | first part of DELUGE |
22 | 3 December 1808 | DISSIMILITUDE | |
12 | 23 | 14 February 1809 | first part of DYNAMICS |
24 | 22 May 1809 | ELOANX | |
13 | 25 | 18 August 1809 | first part of EQUATION |
26 | 25 November 1809 | EXTREMUM | |
14 | 27 | 3 February 1810 | FIBRO-CARTILAGE |
28 | 13 April 1810 | FOOD | |
15 | 29 | 27 June 1810 | first part of FROBERGER |
30 | 8 October 1810 | GENERATION | |
16 | 31 | 29 November 1810 | GNEISS |
32 | 25 January 1811 | GRETNA GREEN | |
17 | 33 | 8 March 1811 | HATFIELD REGIS |
34 | 22 April 1811 | HIBE | |
18 | 35 | 23 June 1811 | HUYSUM |
36 | 20 August 1811 | INCREMENT | |
19 | 37 | 14 September 1811 | first part of JOSEPHUS |
38 | 16 December 1811 | KILMES | |
20 | 39 | 27 January 1812 | first part of LAUREMBERG |
40 | 19 March 1812 | LIGHT-HORSE | |
21 | 41 | 12 May 1812 | first part of LONGITUDE |
42 | 27 July 1812 | first part of MACHINERY + A. of PLATES | |
22 | 43 | 27 August 1812 | first part of MANGANESE |
44 | 4 November 1812 | MATTHESON | |
23 | 45 | 11 December 1812 | METALS |
46 | 9 February 1813 | MONSOON | |
24 | 47 | 30 March 1813 | first part of MUSCLE |
48 | 26 April 1813 | NEWTON | |
25 | 49 | 15 July 1813 | first part of OLEINÆ |
50 | 15 September 1813 | OZUNICZE + B. of PLATES | |
26 | 51 | 27 November 1813 | first part of PASSIFLORA |
52 | 18 January 1814 | PERTURBATION | |
27 | 53 | 22 March 1814 | first part of PICUS |
54 | 7 May 1814 | POETICS | |
28 | 55 | 14 July 1814 | first part of PREACHING |
56 | 16 September 1814 | PUNJGOOR | |
29 | 57 | 14 December 1814 | first part of RAMISTS + C. of PLATES |
58 | 26 January 1815 | REPTON | |
30 | 59 | 21 March 1815 | first part of ROCK |
60 | 1 June 1815 | RZEMIEN | |
31 | 61 | 11 July 1815 | first part of SARABANDA |
62 | 21 September 1815 | SCOTIUM + D. of PLATES | |
32 | 63 | 22 December 1815 | first part of SHAMMY |
64 | 28 February 1816 | SINDY | |
33 | 65 | 17 May 1816 | first part of SOUND |
66 | 27 July 1816 | STARBOARD | |
34 | 67 | 26 October 1816 | first part of STUART (JAMES) |
68 | 11 December 1816 | SZYDLOW | |
35 | 69 | 19 March 1817 | first part of TESTUDO |
70 | 1 May 1817 | TOLERATION | |
36 | 71 | 13 August 1817 | first part of TUMOURS |
72 | 24 October 1817 | VERMELHO | |
37 | 73 | 20 December 1817 | first part of UNION |
74 | 23 March 1818 | WATERLOO | |
38 | 75 | 29 May 1818 | first part of WHITBY |
76 | 30 July 1818 | WZETIN | |
39 | 77 | 30 December 1818 | ZYTOMIERS; & first part of BALDWIN of Addendum + E. of PLATES |
78 | 27 October 1819 | ZOLLIKIFER of Addendum + F. of PLATES | |
79 | 29 July 1820 | PLATES, THEIR REFERENCES AND TITLES |
Coincident with the appearance of volume 39, all 39 volumes, A through Z, were published as a set in 1819. The primary publishers of this set were the consortium of Longman, Hurst, Rees (who by then apparently held an equity share), Orme, and Brown, of Paternoster Row.
However, correct dating by half-volume or fascicle (1802–1820) can have serious implications for the accuracy of citations by modern writers, especially when discussing scientific priority: a list compiled in 1820 in Philosophical Magazine was designed to give proper priority to scientific discoveries. Volumes of plates were issued in blocks, and not with the texts to which they refer.
Botanical historian Benjamin Daydon Jackson, unaware of this list, attempted to compile a list based on contemporaneous advertisements in the trade press, on dates appearing on the plates (having assumed that the plates were issued at the same time as the accompanying texts), and some guesswork. He published his first list privately in 1877, he issued a corrected version in 1880, and a final version appeared in the Journal of Botany in 1896. Only 3 of Jackson's dates accord with the 1820 dates listed above.[3]
Hundreds of articles in Rees are very long, and the work is unpaginated, so page reference is not easy.[3] The following convention was adopted by the Rees Project, and is based on the method described by R. B. McKerrow.[14] Each gathering has 8 pages, and each page 2 columns. The reference is cited by volume or half-volume details with accurate date between 1802 and 1820, article title, and then the gathering's identifier, the page, and the column, separated by colons. The page containing the gathering identifier (e.g., "B") is page 1 in each gathering (e.g., page "B:1"). Page 3 in each gathering typically contains the gathering identifier plus the figure 2 and should be ignored (e.g., "B2" appears on page "B:3").
The account of the bell-crank steam engine may be referenced as "Farey, John Jr. (December 1816). "Steam Engine". In Rees, Abraham (ed.). Rees's Cyclopædia. Vol. 34. London: Andrew Strahan. O:5:2." ("O" is the 8-page gathering's identifier.)
The gatherings in a typical volume of Rees are identified as follows. In each sequence the letters J and W are omitted and one letter U or V used but not both together.
The David and Charles reprint of some of the manufacturing articles is paged, and many writers cite this pagination, which is useless for consulting the original article from a full set. These reprints are also not comprehensive, as they omit short pieces under about 350 words.
The long encyclopaedic articles in Rees commonly have a note at the end of the articles to the sources used in writing them. In other articles source references are run into the text. These are normally in a short-title form that will need decoding. Frequently these are in the format of surname of the author and a one or two word abbreviation of the book title. Collected works are similarly treated.
Thus, a small example covering biography:
Other sources cited include the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society and similar scientific publications, commentaries relating to biblical scholarship and accounts of travels.
Approximately 500 articles exceed 15 columns (11,000 words). The longest article is "Canal", by John Farey, Sr., 289 columns (210,000 words). John Landseer wrote 4 articles on schools of European engraving totalling over 600 columns (460,000 words).
Rees's Cyclopaedia has 3789 biographical articles half a page (350 words) and longer, as well as numerous briefer ones. They range in time from Antiquity to the eighteenth century. Benjamin Heath Malkin, and Thomas Rees are noted as having written biographical articles, but there is no information about which. The rest of the authors cannot be positively identified except for William Tooke, who wrote about Catherine the Great. Many of the biographical articles are sourced to the biographical reference books noted in 3.3 above. In most cases Christian names are Anglicised – John for Johannes, for example.
These were written by Charles Burney (1726–1814), with additional material by John Farey, sr (1766–1826), and John Farey, Jr (1791–1851), and illustrated by 53 plates as well a numerous examples of music typset within the articles. Charles Burney was well-known as the author of A General History of Music, 4 vol 1776–1789 and two travel diaries recording his Musical Tours collecting information in France and Italy, and later Germany, 1+2 vol, 1771 and 1773, as well as the Commoration of Handel, 1785 and his Musical Memoirs of Metastasio, 1796. John Farey, sr was a polymath, well known today for his work as a geologist and for his investigations of mathematics. He was greatly interested in the mathematics of sound, and the schemes of temperamant used in tuning musical instruments then, and published much about it in contemporary periodicals. His son, John Farey, jr, was also polymathic in his interests. He contributed numerous drawings for the illustrations of mostly technological and scientific topics in Rees, and would have written the descriptions of them. They are always linked by key-letters to the details of the drawings. The procedure would have been for Farey to make the drawing first, after usually inspecting and measuring the object, then write the description of it, with the key letters, which were then engraved on the plate for final printing. The plates for dramatic machinery, the organ and barrel organ are by him.
The Cyclopædia was written by about 100 contributors, most of whom were Nonconformists. They were specialists in their fields, covering science, technology, medicine, manufacturing, agriculture, banking and transportation, as well as the arts and humanities. A number were members of the teaching staffs of the Royal Military Academy, and the Addiscombe Military Seminary of the East India Company. Other contributors were working journalists who wrote for scientific, medical and technical periodicals. Several of the contributors were active in radical politics; one was gaoled for sedition and another indicted for treason.
Amongst the eminent writers engaged by Rees were Lant Carpenter (1780–1870) on education, mental and moral philosophy; Tiberius Cavallo (1799–1809) on electricity and magnetism; John Flaxman (1755–1826) on sculpture; Luke Howard (1772–1867) on meteorology; John Landseer (1769–1852) on engraving; Sir William Lawrence, (1783–1867) on human and comparative anatomy; Sir James Edward Smith (1759–1828) on botany; David Mushet on metallurgy and chemistry; Rev. William Pearson (1767–1847) on astronomy; Sir Thomas Phillips (1770–1875) on painting.
Among the artists and engravers employed were Aaron Arrowsmith (1750–1823) who engraved the maps; William Blake (1757–1827) who made engravings to illustrate some of the sculpture articles; Thomas Milton (1743–1827) who engraved most of the natural history plates; Wilson Lowry (1762–1824) who engraved numerous of the plates especially those relating to architecture, machinery and scientific instruments.
Except for some of the botanical articles by Sir James Edward Smith, none of the articles are signed. Names were recorded in the Prospectus of 1802, the introduction at the start of the first volume, the paper covers of the unbound parts which have survived, and in a paper in the Philosophical Magazine, published in 1820. The alphabetical List of contributors to Rees's Cyclopædia has been compiled from the foregoing sources. The majority appear in the Dictionary of National Biography, and in sources listed in the British Biographical Index, but these accounts rarely record an involvement with the Cyclopædia.
The American edition was published by Samuel F. Bradford, of Philadelphia.(see fr:Samuel F. Bradford). Bradford was a member of the famous family of American printers. The first volume appeared in May 1806 and the last in December 1820. The work extended to 41 volumes of text and 6 of plates. There were 1,851 subscribers recorded. The initial print run was set at 2,500 copies, but Bradford was beset by financial problems, and the project passed to Murray, Draper Fairman and Company[15] who reduced the run to 2,000 copies. The work sold at $4 per half volume or $8 per volume. The full bound set cost $400 in 1820.[16]
The religious content of the first volumes was re-written to reflect American sensibilities by Bishop William White, an Episcopalian, and Ashbel Green a Presbyterian.[17] Additional American material was incorporated into the text.
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.