![cover image](https://wikiwandv2-19431.kxcdn.com/_next/image?url=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7a/Constitutional_court_of_South_Africa.jpeg/640px-Constitutional_court_of_South_Africa.jpeg&w=640&q=50)
Paulsen v Slip Knot
South African legal case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Paulsen and Another v Slip Knot Investments 777 (Pty) Limited is a decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa. In a judgment delivered on 24 March 2015, a majority of the court overturned the Supreme Court of Appeal's decision in Standard Bank v Oneanate, which had established a pendente lite exception to the in duplum rule.
Quick Facts Paulsen v Slip Knot, Court ...
Paulsen v Slip Knot | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Court | Constitutional Court of South Africa |
Full case name | Paulsen and Another v Slip Knot Investments 777 (Pty) Limited |
Decided | 24 March 2015 (2015-03-24) |
Docket nos. | CCT 61/14 |
Citations | [2015] ZACC 5; 2015 (3) SA 479 (CC); 2015 (5) BCLR 509 (CC) |
Case history | |
Prior actions | Supreme Court of Appeal – Paulsen v Slip Knot [2014] ZASCA 16 High Court of South Africa, Western Cape Division – Unreported judgment of 24 February 2012; Paulsen v Slip Knot [2013] ZAWCHC 20 |
Court membership | |
Judges sitting | Mogoeng CJ, Moseneke DCJ, Cameron J, Jafta J Khampepe J, Madlanga J, Nkabinde J, van der Westhuizen J and Leeuw AJ |
Case opinions | |
Decision by | Madlanga J (Jafta and Nkabinde concurring) |
Concurrence | Moseneke DCJ (Mogoeng, Khampepe, Leeuw and Van der Westhuizen concurring) |
Dissent | Cameron J |
Close