Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC
2018 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC, 584 U.S. ___ (2018), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the inter partes review process granted by Congress to the United States Patent and Trademark Office for challenging the validity of patents, rather than a jury trial, is constitutional and did not violate either Article III of the Constitution nor the Seventh Amendment.[1]
Quick Facts Oil States Energy Services v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC, Argued November 27, 2017 Decided April 24, 2018 ...
Oil States Energy Services v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC | |
---|---|
Argued November 27, 2017 Decided April 24, 2018 | |
Full case name | Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC |
Docket no. | 16-712 |
Citations | 584 U.S. ___ (more) 138 S. Ct. 1365; 200 L. Ed. 2d 671; 126 U.S.P.Q.2d 1293 |
Case history | |
Prior | 639 F. App'x 639 (Fed. Cir. 2016); cert. granted, 137 S. Ct. 2239 (2017). |
Holding | |
The inter partes review process granted by Congress to the United States Patent and Trademark Office is constitutional. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Thomas, joined by Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan |
Concurrence | Breyer, joined by Ginsburg, Sotomayor |
Dissent | Gorsuch, joined by Roberts |
Close