J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro
2011 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro, 564 U.S. 873 (2011), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court holding that a court may not exercise jurisdiction over a defendant that has not purposefully availed itself of doing business in the jurisdiction or placed goods in the stream of commerce in the expectation they would be purchased in the jurisdiction.
This article needs additional citations for verification. (August 2014) |
Quick Facts J. McIntyre Machinery v. Nicastro, Argued January 11, 2011 Decided June 27, 2011 ...
J. McIntyre Machinery v. Nicastro | |
---|---|
Argued January 11, 2011 Decided June 27, 2011 | |
Full case name | J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Robert Nicastro |
Docket no. | 09-1343 |
Citations | 564 U.S. 873 (more) 131 S. Ct. 2780; 180 L. Ed. 2d 765 |
Holding | |
A court may not exercise jurisdiction over a defendant that has not purposefully availed itself of doing business in the jurisdiction or placed goods in the stream of commerce in the expectation they would be purchased in the jurisdiction. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Plurality | Kennedy, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Thomas |
Concurrence | Breyer (in judgment), joined by Alito |
Dissent | Ginsburg, joined by Sotomayor, Kagan |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. XIV |
Close